Ships & Modules

Who says the Tornado will be able to fit a full rack of 1400mm Arties ? If they can only fit 1200mm the alpha is already halfed and it would probably not worth it to use a Tornado instead of a Hurricane.
Seriously wait for the specs of a ship before you cry about it.

And fyi my Freighter feels pretty good today. Its a bit nervous when docking at 4-4 because of those mean Pirates in front of the station but it started a therapy to get over that and I'm sure this will work out well. Its also quite happy to deliver those BCs to fellow Goons that go and blow up Exhumers with it because its always been afraid of small ships.

Nah. Getting rid of it doesn't solve any problems, and adds a few instead.

Keeping it does solve a number of problems.

Thus keeping it trivially solves more problems than the alternative.


…oh, I suppose that there is one problem that removing it would “solve”: people's inability to figure out that game mechanisms are not real. I say “solve” — with quotation marks — because it's not an actual solution to that problem, but rather a way to keep it from occurring quite as often and at best solves mitigates the whining that their collective ignorance creates.

These narrow goals being fixing blasters, supercarrier imbalances, new ships, fixes for old bugs, new technology to fight lag to name but a few.



They wont and they insurance will be as effective as teir 3 battleships.

And of course everything is about Goons

You may try to read the part where it said "it has never made sense in the past, it doesn't make sense now". You are just a current example of a suicide ganker, not the only one ever. Get over yourself.

And thinking about it, the no insurance is another option that might work +1. It might actually bring back that feeling of risk that seems to be missing from a lot of combat. Too much isk, too many bots.

Because you lose less isks reducing the cost of suicide ganking with a certain firepower.

Pretty much.
How many suicide gankers willingly each spend over 150-200m+ on a single gank?
Tier3 BCs are obviously going to be expensive. I wouldn't be surprised if the required manufacturing materials clock these ships over 180m.

Let's see CCP slap on a silly tech book that has you lose a lvl every time you lose a Tier3 BC, similar to the current Tech3 Cruiser.
Now that'd be funny, conservative, and actually tactical... no need to outdate current Tier2 BCs.

Why would anyone bother wasting the isk. You can take a mack down with a thorax and a hulk down with a brutix. If you want industrials you can set up a 1000 scan res rupture.

If you want to do large scale damage then the only option is a tier 1 BS with 8 slots and the grid to support the bombs, lol tank for the lucky cycle and cap injectors.

No man, I got the point, I was just poking fun at your post. I'm not gonna lie, that is kind of cool that the Goonies do that though. Sometimes you guys make me /facepalm but other times I think you hit the nail on the head.

It'd only make sense, right? Just like how mining barges should be paid out less if they're being blown up in high-risk areas.

So long as Concord has it's time to arrival doubled. Back to what it used to be.