These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Miner Bumping: Discussion & Questions Thread

First post First post
Author
Yuri Wayfare
Suddenly Ninjas
Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
#241 - 2012-11-30 15:00:44 UTC
Ahvram wrote:
Gank the bumper (Which for a miner is near impossible) you lose more money trying to gank them than you would paying there risk free extorsion money. Thats a win for sure... Its not and answer to the issue at all.

The whole point of an extortion is to make it more expensive for you to defend yourself than to simply bend over and pay up. If you think the difference in cost is too great, congratulations: you've just determined the ISK-value of your dignity.

"Suddenly, trash pickers! HUNDREDS of winos going through your recyclables." -Piugattuk

Be careful what you wish for.

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#242 - 2012-11-30 15:03:08 UTC
Ahvram wrote:
Sorry bumpers are War dec proof see NPC corp. As for ganking Ya lets see the option. Gank the bumper (Which for a miner is near impossible) you lose more money trying to gank them than you would paying there risk free extorsion money. Thats a win for sure... Its not and answer to the issue at all.

Our option to deal with you requires us to use the pvp system. Your option is to avoid the pvp system and its rules. See how that works. Now if I could gank you without concord interference we would be on the same level.

And be real Miner bumpers dont run around in frigs/destroyers they use Machs and other large gank proof battleships to push miners around belts. Last time I check it takes about 10+ Tornados/talos to drop a Buffer tank BS. Thats fair right? Only takes one of you completely avoiding all pvp rules to pvp yet it would take nearly 10 pilots all forced to abide by the pvp system to deal with you.


Miners who sit in NPC corps are war dec proof too. Fair is fair, right?

As for what you've said about ganking... it IS an answer, it's just not the one you want to hear. You have ways to deal with them, but you simply refuse to use them because they require ~effort~ or isk. Well that's just tough.

The vast majority of bumpers are in bloody cruisers, not insane buffer tanked battleships. It doesn't take much to gank them at all. Anyway, the comparison is extremely dishonest: It takes ten tornados to gank a mach, but the loss of the mach costs that pilot a huge amount of isk. It takes one cruise to bump a miner off a roid, but the loss to the miner is a few cycles worth of veldspar or whatever. See how that works?
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#243 - 2012-11-30 15:04:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Ahvram wrote:
Sorry bumpers are War dec proof see NPC corp. As for ganking Ya lets see the option. Gank the bumper (Which for a miner is near impossible) you lose more money trying to gank them than you would paying there risk free extorsion money. Thats a win for sure... Its not and answer to the issue at all.


Check again, most of the bumpers are in player corps which are wardeccable, admittedly you'd be a fool to take some of those corps on.

Quote:
And be real Miner bumpers dont run around in frigs/destroyers they use Machs and other large gank proof battleships to push miners around belts. Last time I check it takes about 10+ Tornados/talos to drop a Buffer tank BS. Thats fair right? Only takes one of you completely avoiding all pvp rules to pvp yet it would take nearly 10 pilots all forced to abide by the pvp system to deal with you.


Once again, double check your sources, most of the bumpers are using Stabbers and the like to bump barges, these are cruiser class vessels, not exactly a tough nut to crack, especially when fitted for bumping, the Machs only come out to deal with orcas as they're considerably harder to move.

On a side note it's completely feasible to tank an exhumer to levels rivalling that of a battlecruiser thus allowing time for Concord to turn up and the exhumer to survive a suicide attempt, it's just that most miners don't because it impacts the yield of their ship, hell you can get 16k ehp out of a retriever, just by using 2 low slots and some rigs, you even get to keep the single mid slot free for a survey scanner, and that's a ship made of the really cheap toilet paper schools use.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#244 - 2012-11-30 15:05:06 UTC
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
MTB BR wrote:
Where in EULA is AFK something that needs to be apologized?? you like bump ok some people like to be afk. why what you like is better than the others like. AFK don't bother no body, bump bother. The only reason i think bump needs to be penalized like i sayed in the other post is that this cause some direct trouble to other players. Wile been AFK cause trouble just him self in case of mining cargo gets full and he lost mining time and money.

and just for record i did some AFK some times i got bumped and i do not get angry with that. but once im not AFK and people start pump me cause i dint pay then 10 m, and keep doing it and after no success bumping they Gank me that pist me off!. And Sadly that is what New Order do.


Invoking the all mighty EULA doesn't help your argument much, because the EULA doesn't prevent players from bothering or attempting to extract isk and tears either. The fact that you think bumping needs to be penalised because it "causes direct trouble to other players" is, quite franky, silly. The entire game is centered on conflict and "causing trouble" to other players.

As for afks and botters not bothering anybody, well this is veering a bit off topic but they do. They have a massive influence on the economy, which every player has to deal with, whether thats because they're buying ships and mods to pew pew with or because they're honest miners and manufacturers trying to sell their goods. Saying AFK miners don't effect others is simply not true.


(This isn't in regards to the posters, just the subject)
I don't think EULA is relevant. It's noone's business.

My EULA is not your EULA. It's a contract "I" agreed to with CCP. In short, stay on topic and mind your business (again, nothing personal to anyone).


_Back to Thread Topic_
Beyond that, it wouldn't even matter anyways as it is not something that's player enforced. You always have the choice to login or not. YOU have the power!

If you take away from Eve what makes Eve special... well, honestly, there ARE better made MMOs. But what makes Eve stand apart is truly what makes Eve awesome and the reason I choose to play it.

Freewill.

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

Ahvram
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#245 - 2012-11-30 15:21:24 UTC
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
Ahvram wrote:
Sorry bumpers are War dec proof see NPC corp. As for ganking Ya lets see the option. Gank the bumper (Which for a miner is near impossible) you lose more money trying to gank them than you would paying there risk free extorsion money. Thats a win for sure... Its not and answer to the issue at all.

Our option to deal with you requires us to use the pvp system. Your option is to avoid the pvp system and its rules. See how that works. Now if I could gank you without concord interference we would be on the same level.

And be real Miner bumpers dont run around in frigs/destroyers they use Machs and other large gank proof battleships to push miners around belts. Last time I check it takes about 10+ Tornados/talos to drop a Buffer tank BS. Thats fair right? Only takes one of you completely avoiding all pvp rules to pvp yet it would take nearly 10 pilots all forced to abide by the pvp system to deal with you.


Miners who sit in NPC corps are war dec proof too. Fair is fair, right?

As for what you've said about ganking... it IS an answer, it's just not the one you want to hear. You have ways to deal with them, but you simply refuse to use them because they require ~effort~ or isk. Well that's just tough.

The vast majority of bumpers are in bloody cruisers, not insane buffer tanked battleships. It doesn't take much to gank them at all. Anyway, the comparison is extremely dishonest: It takes ten tornados to gank a mach, but the loss of the mach costs that pilot a huge amount of isk. It takes one cruise to bump a miner off a roid, but the loss to the miner is a few cycles worth of veldspar or whatever. See how that works?


Its just one bump one time right? Not getting pushed all over a belt and stalked to the station for non payment just to be perma bump again as soon as you undock and hit a belt. I love you you try to claim so much innocents. Griefers always play soft when defending the exploitation tactics.
Almox
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#246 - 2012-11-30 15:26:43 UTC
I believe bumping should still be part of eve, but scale it alot better or offer the players a way to counter it.

May it be a miner or freighter or combat ship (or hitting a station) the 'bumping' doesnt scale right, refering to 'real life' if a Speed Boat bumped a Oil Tanker you wouldnt see the tanker moving much and the speed boat would be toast.

a way to counter as an ACTIVE player over a AFK one would be a great start, again rewarding people for being at the keyboard to see it about to happen.
That way BOTS won't have the option of stopping it.

Maybe even reward people in numbers with a mod that remotely holds the target ship (friendly or fleeted) for Aligning or Standing still? something on a hauling Alt or Freighter Scout?

again i think bumping has its place but i believe the current quo give no counter.



TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#247 - 2012-11-30 15:27:06 UTC
Ahvram wrote:
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
Ahvram wrote:
Sorry bumpers are War dec proof see NPC corp. As for ganking Ya lets see the option. Gank the bumper (Which for a miner is near impossible) you lose more money trying to gank them than you would paying there risk free extorsion money. Thats a win for sure... Its not and answer to the issue at all.

Our option to deal with you requires us to use the pvp system. Your option is to avoid the pvp system and its rules. See how that works. Now if I could gank you without concord interference we would be on the same level.

And be real Miner bumpers dont run around in frigs/destroyers they use Machs and other large gank proof battleships to push miners around belts. Last time I check it takes about 10+ Tornados/talos to drop a Buffer tank BS. Thats fair right? Only takes one of you completely avoiding all pvp rules to pvp yet it would take nearly 10 pilots all forced to abide by the pvp system to deal with you.


Miners who sit in NPC corps are war dec proof too. Fair is fair, right?

As for what you've said about ganking... it IS an answer, it's just not the one you want to hear. You have ways to deal with them, but you simply refuse to use them because they require ~effort~ or isk. Well that's just tough.

The vast majority of bumpers are in bloody cruisers, not insane buffer tanked battleships. It doesn't take much to gank them at all. Anyway, the comparison is extremely dishonest: It takes ten tornados to gank a mach, but the loss of the mach costs that pilot a huge amount of isk. It takes one cruise to bump a miner off a roid, but the loss to the miner is a few cycles worth of veldspar or whatever. See how that works?


Its just one bump one time right? Not getting pushed all over a belt and stalked to the station for non payment just to be perma bump again as soon as you undock and hit a belt. I love you you try to claim so much innocents. Griefers always play soft when defending the exploitation tactics.


Have you tried going to a different belt, or a different system entirely? Abudban, Halaima and Tolle are our systems after all.

I think if someone pursues you and bumps you that incessantly then it already counts as the against-the-rules kind of harassment.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#248 - 2012-11-30 15:35:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Ahvram wrote:

Its just one bump one time right? Not getting pushed all over a belt and stalked to the station for non payment just to be perma bump again as soon as you undock and hit a belt. I love you you try to claim so much innocents. Griefers always play soft when defending the exploitation tactics.


I see no claims of innocence at all, the very mechanic of extortion is that you keep pestering until one of 2 things happens, the person being extorted moves to one of the many systems not claimed by the bumpers, where they are not subject to extortion, or they pay up and are left alone, in the case of miners who pay up they also receive Orca support for their mining ops if it's available, which is quite the boost to mining, and get to engage in conversation with people who they would never have otherwise talked to. I don't bump, although I support what they do, I now regularly chat with members of the CFC, HBC, and even people who are blue to -A- Ugh, all nullsec players that I would never even have dreamed of engaging in conversation before.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Gladius Codicis
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#249 - 2012-11-30 15:36:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Gladius Codicis
Azran Zala wrote:
[quote=MTB BR]what New Order is doing is ingenious, and a great display of creativity by a group of players in finding a way to generate an income by creating a whole new profession "Mining permit sales & inspection".


Yes.

Rather than nerf bumping because miners hate paying informal "taxes", I'd suggest that CCP go in the opposite direction. Create formalized methods of tax collection in highsec, extending the quasi-sovereignty/taxation concept not just to ice miners, but to all miners and perhaps all professions. Create "ownership" of grids. Then grids become something worth fighting over. Player versus player conflict is created. Conflict is the soul of Eve. Conflict is good.

---

For example, consider a system in which a new "player owned tax station" (POTS) is created. A POTS is a small anchorable structure, something like a GSC. Perhaps 200m^3. There is a limit of no more than one of them anchored on any given grid at one time. A POCO, POS, gate or station is considered to have one of them by default, so you cannot anchor one there. (Or maybe you can. Hmm.) Similarly a handful of newbie systems are marked "no taxation" at the system level. However, all other grid locations in highsec may have a POTS anchored if players choose to. Because a corporate role is required to anchor, they cannot be used by players in NPC corps.

A POTS stays anchored for no longer than 26 hours. (2 hours more than a day allows for daily maintenance without undue annoyance to the owning players who have real world schedules.) After that time it will automatically unanchor and become free for anyone to take. Thus they require daily interaction to maintain. For lowsec, nullsec, and wspace create permanent POTS akin to POCOs.

The owner of a POTS can set its tax rate, which is a flat fee for 15 minutes present on that grid. By default when the thing is anchored make it be, oh, say, 1m ISK per 15 minutes. The owner can change the tax rate to whatever he wants. Allow different rates to be configured according to corporate relations, like POCOs.

Any player on the grid is taxed. Every 15 minutes, every player on grid gets a dialog demanding tax payment. (The first minute is free. That's plenty of time to look around and decide if you want to use the grid.) You can hit "yes, pay my taxes" to pay them. There's also a "no" button. The dialog stays up for, say, one minute and then automatically is declined. If a player is still on the grid when he declines to pay, he's a thief and he gets an aggression timer just as if he stole from a jetcan owned by the corp owning the POTS. So you can use a grid for up to 2 minutes for free. For longer periods, you have to pay tax or risk legal aggression.

The sovereign over the system in which a POTS is placed can set a taxation rate on POTS taxes, from 0 to 100%. The empire rate is 10%. (Combined with permanent POTS and some sort of logging of declines, this gives nullsec sovereigns a reasonable way to tax mining.)

POTS can be blown up. Attacking one when you are not at war with the owner is Concorded. They should killable even against Concord protection by a medium sized ganker gang, so give them freighter-like EHP (150000 or so). Of course if you are at war with the owner, even solo you should easily kill one in a few minutes. Permanent POTS should have significantly more hitpoints.

Note how this solves the bumping "problem". Each contested belt will now be "owned" by someone, either by a mining corp or by a miner-exploiting corp. If it's a mining corp, then anyone bumping who stays on grid for more than 1 minute out of 15 must pay taxes, and the corp can set these taxes arbitrarily high on non-corp members (or just those with bad relations) to exclude such "undesirables". I.e. they can set the tax rate to 100 million ISK per 15 minutes or whatever. If a bumper declines to pay, and remains on grid, he aggresses and the mining corp can legally terminate him without Concord interference. Alternatively, a corp desiring to exploit miners may take control of a belt; in this case, they have every incentive to want the miners mining, not bumped.

"Farms and fields". Bring them to highsec.
Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#250 - 2012-11-30 15:38:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Murk Paradox
Quote:
So here's a question for you: why doesn't NO attempt extortion via 1:1 chat / PMs? As I see it, that would address a lot of my concerns, as well as provide a potential way for NOA to determine if someone is AFK or not (while simultaneously allowing a player a way to ignore/block if they feel harassed -- and if NOA blows them up and they're angry about it, they can file a petition -- but they'd have evidence that their attacker tried to talk to them first (I think? I forget if this is shown somewhere)). I'd really love to know why PMs aren't being used 100% of the time.


I think you fail to see 2 things in your quest to suit the facts around your theory.

1)Word of mouth. Minerbumping.com has started a movement with a following. This is not one man acting alone, regardless of the roleplay to be used as storyline. Using local gets "the word out". Follow the Code. Pay 10m or risk bump.

2)Besides, you don't dictate how I play, or how I speak/converse with others. It's my game. Not your's. I don't care about you. I don't have to. That's the point. If I want to bump someone, I will. I don't need to justify anything else beyond the fact I warned you I would if you didn't pay your mining indulgence.

And as an addendum, its meta game content. I really don't know you, or hate you, or dislike you. I'm sure you're a stand up guy, hell, you could end up being my best friend, or my worst enemy. But I wouldn't know unless I interacted. Which is what miner bumpers do. It's your choice how to respond.

Keep the perspective it IS just a Game. On many fronts. Not just the program. Eve is just 0s and 1s. There's roleplay, storyline, meta content, and actions with consequences. FOR GOOD OR BAD. Some miners care, some enjoy it, some couldn't be bothered Hope that helps answer your question if it hasn't already been answered to death =)

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#251 - 2012-11-30 15:50:20 UTC
Anslo wrote:
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
Ollivir Witt wrote:
Bumping in this case is being used as a no-risk version of PVP.


Didn't bother reading the rest of your huge post after this line because this line is so wrong why waste my time with the rest.

Bumpers can be war decced or suicide ganked just like anyone else. Bam. Risk.

Also there's a considerable risk of drowning in all the tears


And then they dock up or avoid ti by dropping corp.



What THEY choose to do is not in question for what YOU choose to do. You fail before you even try at that point. Why bother undocking then at all?

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

Bing Bangboom
DAMAG Safety Commission
#252 - 2012-11-30 15:50:53 UTC
I am quoting nobody and trying to not be too funny on this post as some of my best stuff has been too offensive to survive.

While this is a big world full of all kinds of people I am astonished that people who self-select to be Eve players can consider the following things to be harassment and therefore a reason to eliminate bumping (I put this part in because I want to stay on topic):

1) Talking to someone in local.
2) Speaking English to a non-english speaker.
3) Not stopping your "attack" when someone asks you to.
4) Blogging.
5) Not doing exactly what you say you are doing.
6) Not being in a player corp.
7) Surviving gank attempts.
8) Not congregating in one corporation.
9) Flying Battleships.
10) Not being in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities act.


Before the censor takes this message apart please note that these are all arguments given in this thread for why the New Order of Highsec has to be stopped by CCP action.

As many people have already pointed out , who do you want in Eve? People like James 315 and the Agents of the New Order of Highsec or people who not only believe the things above but are willing to come out in public and actually present them as valid arguments?

I was going to wind up with something inspiring like "Give me bumpage or give me .... you know" but it might be too funny and WHAM! I'm reduced to my first line.

www.minerbumping.com

Bing Bangboom
Agent of the New Order of Highsec
Beligerent Undesirable

Highsec is worth fighting for.

By choosing to mine in New Order systems, highsec miners have agreed to follow the New Halaima Code of Conduct.  www.minerbumping.com

Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
Goonswarm Federation
#253 - 2012-11-30 15:55:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Eugene Kerner
My two cents:

I have not bumped miners so far nor do I intend to bump miners in the future. If I ever pass by a miner, which happens very rarely- be it in a catalyst - I will start shooting and will lose my ship over it.

Having that said I think miner-bumping as an idea to create content is a good initiative.

I do not know to what degree the agents of the NO(new Order) are linked and organized but as far as I understand it they demand a mining fee and as soon as it is paid a one year allowence is issued and the miner in question is set to blue...hell they even get orca boost as far as I know.

I guess by now miner bumping is not only done by NO affiliates exclusivly anymore and so there will be enough random douchebags bumping players out of range of their rocks no matter if they pay them or not. (I am pretty sure even some miners have made alts to do that to their fellow colleagues...).
That is not the finest way to treat other people but...life is not fair .

In the real world one could say:
Quote:
"The right to swing my fist ends where the other man's nose begins."

To my knowledge Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. does not play Eve...

In Eve they say:
Quote:
"Progress... ...what is it?
Out here progress is numbers
Millimetres, kilometres,
Head counts, death tolls
This is progress.

Colonies burned
Ships destroyed
People killed
Money earned

It all comes at a price
and if the price is right
I'll set the universe on fire."


So for the sake of the game we all play and love:
Not another lex miner
No to bumping changes.

Bumping is not a crime...botting is.

TunDraGon is recruiting! "Also, your boobs [:o] "   CCP Eterne, 2012 "When in doubt...make a diȼk joke." Robin Williams - RIP

Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#254 - 2012-11-30 16:04:51 UTC
R0me0 Charl1e wrote:
Anslo wrote:
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
So do miners, missioners, etc. I don't see your point.


Miners, Missioners etc don't harass players. They engage NPCs (risk of dying to NPC) and mine roids (risk rats, ganks, or other mienrs taking roids)

I would like to point out that Miners can "harass" other Miners by stripping clean a system (or more) of roids. That's the PVP of mining, the fight over extracting the limited resources in systems.



Exhumers can also bump exhumers. I've done it. A few times.

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#255 - 2012-11-30 16:23:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Murk Paradox
Ahvram wrote:
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
Ahvram wrote:
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
Anslo wrote:
Except it does. They're in highsec doing that because they don't want to PvP. They don't force missioning et al on you, why should you force PvP on them?


You have a fundamental misunderstanding of what highsec is. Highsec does not mean, has never meant, and ideally never will mean pvp-free. It's considerably safer than other areas, but it is not 100% safe. So you're simply wrong - them being in highsec does not mean they are not valid targets for any form of PVP, including bumping.


Last time a checked every action in eve related to PVP there are some cause and effect. You gank concord pops you, You can/wreck flip you get and agression timer. You harass miners/freighters by pushing them around belts/gates you get? You take no risk for full reward.


I think miners should stop inhaling veldspar dust, as it's given them a curious blindness related to the words "suicide", "gank", "war" and "dec"



Sorry bumpers are War dec proof see NPC corp. As for ganking Ya lets see the option. Gank the bumper (Which for a miner is near impossible) you lose more money trying to gank them than you would paying there risk free extorsion money. Thats a win for sure... Its not and answer to the issue at all.

Our option to deal with you requires us to use the pvp system. Your option is to avoid the pvp system and its rules. See how that works. Now if I could gank you without concord interference we would be on the same level.

And be real Miner bumpers dont run around in frigs/destroyers they use Machs and other large gank proof battleships to push miners around belts. Last time I check it takes about 10+ Tornados/talos to gank a buffer tank BS. Thats fair right? Only takes one of you completely avoiding all pvp rules to pvp yet it would take nearly 10 pilots all forced to abide by the pvp system to deal with you.



Just because someone can do something better doesn't mean it's broken.

Also, take a look at how impressive the Stabber is. Fleet issue even more so. Truly an overpowered hull. Even though there's no enforcement of using 1 hull, the Stabber is the bread and butter of Code enforcers.(I personally use an omen because well, I like the ship. Although I might use the maller since I like those too). Thank you for the loaded question however, as passive aggressiveness definitely contributes to the thread. (See what I did there?)

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#256 - 2012-11-30 16:47:29 UTC
Gladius Codicis wrote:
Azran Zala wrote:
[quote=MTB BR]what New Order is doing is ingenious, and a great display of creativity by a group of players in finding a way to generate an income by creating a whole new profession "Mining permit sales & inspection".


Yes.

Rather than nerf bumping because miners hate paying informal "taxes", I'd suggest that CCP go in the opposite direction. Create formalized methods of tax collection in highsec, extending the quasi-sovereignty/taxation concept not just to ice miners, but to all miners and perhaps all professions. Create "ownership" of grids. Then grids become something worth fighting over. Player versus player conflict is created. Conflict is the soul of Eve. Conflict is good.

---

For example, consider a system in which a new "player owned tax station" (POTS) is created. A POTS is a small anchorable structure, something like a GSC. Perhaps 200m^3. There is a limit of no more than one of them anchored on any given grid at one time. A POCO, POS, gate or station is considered to have one of them by default, so you cannot anchor one there. (Or maybe you can. Hmm.) Similarly a handful of newbie systems are marked "no taxation" at the system level. However, all other grid locations in highsec may have a POTS anchored if players choose to. Because a corporate role is required to anchor, they cannot be used by players in NPC corps.

A POTS stays anchored for no longer than 26 hours. (2 hours more than a day allows for daily maintenance without undue annoyance to the owning players who have real world schedules.) After that time it will automatically unanchor and become free for anyone to take. Thus they require daily interaction to maintain. For lowsec, nullsec, and wspace create permanent POTS akin to POCOs.

The owner of a POTS can set its tax rate, which is a flat fee for 15 minutes present on that grid. By default when the thing is anchored make it be, oh, say, 1m ISK per 15 minutes. The owner can change the tax rate to whatever he wants. Allow different rates to be configured according to corporate relations, like POCOs.

Any player on the grid is taxed. Every 15 minutes, every player on grid gets a dialog demanding tax payment. (The first minute is free. That's plenty of time to look around and decide if you want to use the grid.) You can hit "yes, pay my taxes" to pay them. There's also a "no" button. The dialog stays up for, say, one minute and then automatically is declined. If a player is still on the grid when he declines to pay, he's a thief and he gets an aggression timer just as if he stole from a jetcan owned by the corp owning the POTS. So you can use a grid for up to 2 minutes for free. For longer periods, you have to pay tax or risk legal aggression.

The sovereign over the system in which a POTS is placed can set a taxation rate on POTS taxes, from 0 to 100%. The empire rate is 10%. (Combined with permanent POTS and some sort of logging of declines, this gives nullsec sovereigns a reasonable way to tax mining.)

POTS can be blown up. Attacking one when you are not at war with the owner is Concorded. They should killable even against Concord protection by a medium sized ganker gang, so give them freighter-like EHP (150000 or so). Of course if you are at war with the owner, even solo you should easily kill one in a few minutes. Permanent POTS should have significantly more hitpoints.

Note how this solves the bumping "problem". Each contested belt will now be "owned" by someone, either by a mining corp or by a miner-exploiting corp. If it's a mining corp, then anyone bumping who stays on grid for more than 1 minute out of 15 must pay taxes, and the corp can set these taxes arbitrarily high on non-corp members (or just those with bad relations) to exclude such "undesirables". I.e. they can set the tax rate to 100 million ISK per 15 minutes or whatever. If a bumper declines to pay, and remains on grid, he aggresses and the mining corp can legally terminate him without Concord interference. Alternatively, a corp desiring to exploit miners may take control of a belt; in this case, they have every incentive to want the miners mining, not bumped.

"Farms and fields". Bring them to highsec.



And within 2 months you'll have miners crying for the freewill to have open belts. Because this is empire space. IE; npc enforced.

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#257 - 2012-11-30 17:17:24 UTC
Last post on minerbumping.com is a mini guide what to train and how to fit a nice ganking catalyst. But you know, miners can train for those too. Can you imagine how much propaganda you could spin after suicide ganking bumping crew? But to do it you would need that thing, how is it called? Oh, I know: BALLS!

Invalid signature format

Ahvram
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#258 - 2012-11-30 17:19:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Ahvram
Would take about 2/3 BC to gank a stabber (if the stabber pilot is worth anything). So 2/3 pilots at around 100 mill EA + sec status loss is = to A stabber and you right back at bumping with all reward no risk and free kill rights. Ya thats balanced.

It always comes back to the victims has to risk much and the bumpers risk nothing. Its nothing but a form of pvp that allows you to dodge pvp mechanics to force other pilots to your will.
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#259 - 2012-11-30 17:21:45 UTC
Anslo wrote:
Goody, I've been targeted.

Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
Wardecs should allow miners to fight back (and they do, in the case of every single bumper other than James). They're broken at the moment. Any bumper will tell you that. That's the whole point of James' antics with decshield and corp switching.

The issue still lies with wardecs, not bumping or whether it constitutes harassment.


Yes it does lie in harassment. Miners can't give you risk for your behavior, thus its harassment, as there is no way to stop you.

TheGunslinger42 wrote:
Oh I get it now: You want one set of rules for yourself, and another set of rules for everyone else. LMAO, get real.


You people always run around with risk vs reward decries. Where is your risk in this behavior? I want rules to give you risk.

SaKoil wrote:
See, this is a problem. You want one set of rules for yourself and another ruleset for others.

Miners participate in mining/market PVP all the time when they fire their lasers. Refusing to understand this point does not make it less true.

In my opinion we should not go around changing the basic philosophy of whole Eve based on what you want.


See above. I want your behavior put at risk. There is no risk. Just harassment, targeted harassment. And stop using semantics saying they "pvp" when they mine, it's very unbecoming.

Also, it is not what I want, it's what the miners want. Otherwise this thread would not exist. And situations need to change to adapt to harassment and abuse of things.


We're at risk of missing, being ignored & being suicide ganked. People choose not to do these things & by default, choose to be a victim.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#260 - 2012-11-30 17:27:20 UTC
Ahvram wrote:
Would take about 2/3 BC to gank a stabber (if the stabber pilot is worth anything). So 2/3 pilots at around 100 mill EA + sec status loss is = to A stabber and you right back at bumping with all reward no risk and free kill rights. Ya thats balanced.

It always comes back to the victims has to risk much and the bumpers risk nothing. Its nothing but a form of pvp that allows you to dodge pvp mechanics to force other pilots to your will.


You do know that a bumping fit stabber has minimal defensive and offensive capabilities?, you have to nerf the hell out of it to get the oversized MWD on, and if it's taking you 2 or 3 BCs to gank a cruiser, you're doing it wrong, I've seen a single destroyer take down a stabber in the past before concord turned up.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack