These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

i am disappointed in null sec people. (TL:DR talking about local chat.) read first post.

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#1141 - 2012-11-18 05:19:47 UTC
Soma Khan wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
He promised to put local into delayed mode, what they've done has been to buff it instead. He also promised to kill blobs, what they've done is to make blobs more and more required.

Your point?

you're saying ccp don't make mistakes?

Where do you see that he said that, at all? They contradicted themselves, so either they made a mistake when they made local blink when it's in focus and a ship enters the system, or they made a mistake when they said 0.0 local should be delayed.

It's obvious to us that the latter part is the mistake, and the former part was merely kind of unnecessary.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#1142 - 2012-11-18 05:20:25 UTC
Soma Khan wrote:
Andski wrote:


hisec is the safe botting haven, not nullsec;
lol


"lol" all you want, I'm still right, mr npc alt

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Shepard Wong Ogeko
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#1143 - 2012-11-18 05:28:26 UTC
Soma Khan wrote:


Andski wrote:


hisec is the safe botting haven, not nullsec;
lol



http://evenews24.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/01.jpg

Read it an weep.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#1144 - 2012-11-18 05:31:46 UTC
Soma Khan wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
He promised to put local into delayed mode, what they've done has been to buff it instead. He also promised to kill blobs, what they've done is to make blobs more and more required.

Your point?

you're saying ccp don't make mistakes?

Actually, no, what I'm saying is that CCP Zulu said he'd like to do that in 0.0, but it's obvious they realized how damaging it would be to nullsec, so what they did was make this happen in WH space instead.

Apparently CCP added some mechanics which failed gankers don't want to deal with anymore, so they're lobbying for CCP to make their lives easier, regardless of whether or not it would be like pissing themselves in -30C weather to keep warm.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat
MasterEnt
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1145 - 2012-11-18 05:37:44 UTC  |  Edited by: MasterEnt
Lord Zim wrote:
Ah, the botter fallacy, haven't seen that for a while.

It's almost as if people are actually pretending to believe that bots would be more vulnerable than humans if local were removed. But surely this is just trolling, surely people can't actually believe that fallacy.


It's obvious by the way you are talking, you are a botter who has never lived in nullsec
It's obviously factual that everyone who agrees with you is your alt... or main.
If you guys had better reading comprehension, you would clearly agree with us.
Circle-jerk jerks in circles.

I can't sleep - Lets go for 60
Jeremy Soikutsu
Kite Co. Space Trucking
#1146 - 2012-11-18 05:39:34 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
heh IRC having pets

I know right.

"Of course you would choose the fun, but you don't lead a relevant entity which has allies." - Colonel Xaven
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#1147 - 2012-11-18 05:39:59 UTC
MasterEnt wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Ah, the botter fallacy, haven't seen that for a while.

It's almost as if people are actually pretending to believe that bots would be more vulnerable than humans if local were removed. But surely this is just trolling, surely people can't actually believe that fallacy.


It's obvious by the way you are talking, you are a botter who has never lived in nullsec
It's obviously factual that everyone who agrees with you is your alt... or main.
If you guys had better reading comprehension, you would clearly agree with us.
Circle-jerk jerks in circles.

Lets go for 60

Why are you still repeating the same refuted arguments? It baffles the hell out of me.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#1148 - 2012-11-18 05:40:00 UTC
MasterEnt wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Ah, the botter fallacy, haven't seen that for a while.

It's almost as if people are actually pretending to believe that bots would be more vulnerable than humans if local were removed. But surely this is just trolling, surely people can't actually believe that fallacy.


It's obvious by the way you are talking, you are a botter who has never lived in nullsec
It's obviously factual that everyone who agrees with you is your alt... or main.
If you guys had better reading comprehension, you would clearly agree with us.
Circle-jerk jerks in circles.

Lets go for 60

Report me, then. Put your money where your mouth is.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat
Shepard Wong Ogeko
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#1149 - 2012-11-18 05:40:08 UTC
MasterEnt wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Ah, the botter fallacy, haven't seen that for a while.

It's almost as if people are actually pretending to believe that bots would be more vulnerable than humans if local were removed. But surely this is just trolling, surely people can't actually believe that fallacy.


It's obvious by the way you are talking, you are a botter who has never lived in nullsec
It's obviously factual that everyone who agrees with you is your alt... or main.
If you guys had better reading comprehension, you would clearly agree with us.
Circle-jerk jerks in circles.

Lets go for 60



Well, if you had the best reading comprehension, you would agree with us... time infinity.
MasterEnt
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1150 - 2012-11-18 05:40:15 UTC
MasterEnt wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Ah, the botter fallacy, haven't seen that for a while.

It's almost as if people are actually pretending to believe that bots would be more vulnerable than humans if local were removed. But surely this is just trolling, surely people can't actually believe that fallacy.


It's obvious by the way you are talking, you are a botter who has never lived in nullsec
It's obviously factual that everyone who agrees with you is your alt... or main.
If you guys had better reading comprehension, you would clearly agree with us.
Circle-jerk jerks in circles.

I can't sleep - Lets go for 60
MasterEnt
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1151 - 2012-11-18 05:40:21 UTC
MasterEnt wrote:
MasterEnt wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Ah, the botter fallacy, haven't seen that for a while.

It's almost as if people are actually pretending to believe that bots would be more vulnerable than humans if local were removed. But surely this is just trolling, surely people can't actually believe that fallacy.


It's obvious by the way you are talking, you are a botter who has never lived in nullsec
It's obviously factual that everyone who agrees with you is your alt... or main.
If you guys had better reading comprehension, you would clearly agree with us.
Circle-jerk jerks in circles.

I can't sleep - Lets go for 60



Just for good measure, this makes it factual
MasterEnt
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1152 - 2012-11-18 05:41:06 UTC
Shepard Wong Ogeko wrote:
MasterEnt wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Ah, the botter fallacy, haven't seen that for a while.

It's almost as if people are actually pretending to believe that bots would be more vulnerable than humans if local were removed. But surely this is just trolling, surely people can't actually believe that fallacy.


It's obvious by the way you are talking, you are a botter who has never lived in nullsec
It's obviously factual that everyone who agrees with you is your alt... or main.
If you guys had better reading comprehension, you would clearly agree with us.
Circle-jerk jerks in circles.

Lets go for 60



Well, if you had the best reading comprehension, you would agree with us... time infinity.


LOL I like you
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#1153 - 2012-11-18 05:42:22 UTC
why do pubbies seem to love empty-quoting their own posts?

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
MasterEnt
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1154 - 2012-11-18 05:44:57 UTC
Andski wrote:
why do pubbies seem to love empty-quoting their own posts?


1, 2 or 3?
MasterEnt
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1155 - 2012-11-18 05:45:28 UTC
Andski wrote:
why do pubbies seem to love empty-quoting their own posts?


1, 2 or 3?
MasterEnt
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1156 - 2012-11-18 05:47:06 UTC
SNL Sucks these days.
Shepard Wong Ogeko
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#1157 - 2012-11-18 05:50:08 UTC
BTW; this thread is all about me now.

<--- Deal with it.
EI Digin
irc.zulusquad.org
#1158 - 2012-11-18 06:09:27 UTC
Shepard Wong Ogeko wrote:
http://evenews24.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/01.jpg


This is a good jpg and more people should see it.

MasterEnt wrote:
What does his corp/alliance have anything to do with his ability, or lack there of, to formulate an argument.


If you can't read your own posts, why should anyone bother responding to you?
Jeremy Soikutsu
Kite Co. Space Trucking
#1159 - 2012-11-18 06:18:42 UTC
Oh earlier that newb WHer was mouthing off about how WHers could come in and just bust Nullsecers up. That was quite the laugh I'll tell ya. Frankly I'm not uncomfortable saying that almost any WH group would be curb stomped by any Null alliance, even CVA. This isn't to say that you cats suck or nothing, just that **** is different out here.

"Of course you would choose the fun, but you don't lead a relevant entity which has allies." - Colonel Xaven
MasterEnt
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1160 - 2012-11-18 06:27:51 UTC
You got - me, ive never been outside hisec
Never guessed you were a goon

You sir... you sir are a sharp sharp individual.
Way too much for me.

Nanny Nanny boo boo stick your head in doo doo.
rubber and glue and such

Well, I accomplished my troll goal of 60 pages.
Have a good evening gents