These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

i am disappointed in null sec people. (TL:DR talking about local chat.) read first post.

First post
Author
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#941 - 2012-11-17 03:01:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Honestly, Kenneth, I think you're just finally realising that you are completely wrong and don't know as much as you think you did, and using the "I'm just trolling" excuse to avoid having to admit it.

What a wonderful way to satisfy your real-life cognitive dissonance, inspired by an argument in the internet P

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#942 - 2012-11-17 03:08:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Darth Gustav
Redacted voluntarily by poster.

It has come to my attention that I quoted deleted posts.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#943 - 2012-11-17 03:08:57 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Honestly, Kenneth, I think you're just finally realising that you are completely wrong and don't know as much as you think you did, and using the "I'm just trolling" excuse to avoid having to admit it.

What a wonderful way to satisfy your real-life cognitive dissonance, inspired by an argument in the internet P

I don't know, some of it was so bad I could only justify it by considering it trolling.
Then again, no troll is THAT persistent.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#944 - 2012-11-17 03:11:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Honestly, Kenneth, I think you're just finally realising that you are completely wrong and don't know as much as you think you did, and using the "I'm just trolling" excuse to avoid having to admit it.

What a wonderful way to satisfy your real-life cognitive dissonance, inspired by an argument in the internet P

I don't know, some of it was so bad I could only justify it by considering it trolling.
Then again, no troll is THAT persistent.


His character has been playing since August - it's possible he just doesn't have a full understanding of the game, or it's possible hat Kenneth is just an alt. If it's the former - there's nothing wrong with that, but pretending you know better than people who have been doing it for years is... a little arrogant.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Kenneth O'Hara
Sebiestor Tribe
#945 - 2012-11-17 03:16:22 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Honestly, Kenneth, I think you're just finally realising that you are completely wrong and don't know as much as you think you did, and using the "I'm just trolling" excuse to avoid having to admit it.

What a wonderful way to satisfy your real-life cognitive dissonance, inspired by an argument in the internet P

I don't know, some of it was so bad I could only justify it by considering it trolling.
Then again, no troll is THAT persistent.


His character has been playing since August - it's possible he just doesn't have a full understanding of the game, or it's possible hat Kenneth is just an alt. If it's the former - there's nothing wrong with that, but pretending you know better than people who have been doing it for years is... a little arrogant.

Well i do know what I am talking about. I am a fast learner as well. I ask questions and I gather intel from others that have provide good information on the forums and other websites. When I come across a good thread I post constructive post. nullbears are in denial about local is all. If I am completely wrong about nullsec as everyone says I am then please enlighten me. explain to me where I am wrong in a non-insulting constructive manner.

Bring Saede Riordan back!! Never Forget! _"__Operation Godzilla Smacks Zeus"  ~__Graygor _

Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#946 - 2012-11-17 03:19:16 UTC
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Honestly, Kenneth, I think you're just finally realising that you are completely wrong and don't know as much as you think you did, and using the "I'm just trolling" excuse to avoid having to admit it.

What a wonderful way to satisfy your real-life cognitive dissonance, inspired by an argument in the internet P

I don't know, some of it was so bad I could only justify it by considering it trolling.
Then again, no troll is THAT persistent.


His character has been playing since August - it's possible he just doesn't have a full understanding of the game, or it's possible hat Kenneth is just an alt. If it's the former - there's nothing wrong with that, but pretending you know better than people who have been doing it for years is... a little arrogant.

Well i do know what I am talking about. I am a fast learner as well. I ask questions and I gather intel from others that have provide good information on the forums and other websites. When I come across a good thread I post constructive post. nullbears are in denial about local is all. If I am completely wrong about nullsec as everyone says I am then please enlighten me. explain to me where I am wrong in a non-insulting constructive manner.

Every prior attempt to do so has met with your trolling ridicule. See prior pages for all valid arguments.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

Kenneth O'Hara
Sebiestor Tribe
#947 - 2012-11-17 03:25:17 UTC
Darth Gustav wrote:
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Honestly, Kenneth, I think you're just finally realising that you are completely wrong and don't know as much as you think you did, and using the "I'm just trolling" excuse to avoid having to admit it.

What a wonderful way to satisfy your real-life cognitive dissonance, inspired by an argument in the internet P

I don't know, some of it was so bad I could only justify it by considering it trolling.
Then again, no troll is THAT persistent.


His character has been playing since August - it's possible he just doesn't have a full understanding of the game, or it's possible hat Kenneth is just an alt. If it's the former - there's nothing wrong with that, but pretending you know better than people who have been doing it for years is... a little arrogant.

Well i do know what I am talking about. I am a fast learner as well. I ask questions and I gather intel from others that have provide good information on the forums and other websites. When I come across a good thread I post constructive post. nullbears are in denial about local is all. If I am completely wrong about nullsec as everyone says I am then please enlighten me. explain to me where I am wrong in a non-insulting constructive manner.

Every prior attempt to do so has met with your trolling ridicule. See prior pages for all valid arguments.

True, but that was after I did not receive any constructive post and legitimate reasons to your side of the argument. All I received was insult and bashings left and right. "Oh you don't know what you are talking about." or " ha, he lives in Whs so he has no clue" What insults! If you want to have a legitimate argument then please, show me factual evidence of the game mechanics and how they work in regards to nullsec. I have found several guides and they all support what I already know about the game.

Bring Saede Riordan back!! Never Forget! _"__Operation Godzilla Smacks Zeus"  ~__Graygor _

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#948 - 2012-11-17 03:30:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:

Well i do know what I am talking about. I am a fast learner as well. I ask questions and I gather intel from others that have provide good information on the forums and other websites. When I come across a good thread I post constructive post. nullbears are in denial about local is all. If I am completely wrong about nullsec as everyone says I am then please enlighten me. explain to me where I am wrong in a non-insulting constructive manner.


I don't think you do know what you're talking about, and I think you're relying on poor sources of information that also don't know what they're talking about. You want to learn something? Learn from one of the best:

"For some time, ganking in 0.0 has just not been worth the effort: it's hard as all hell and you usually can't find anyone to gank. As a result there are frequent calls to make ganking easier — generally by nerfing local. That approach is misguided. Predators don’t tend to die off because they’re not good enough at killing their prey. They tend to die off when all the prey has been killed or driven off, starving to death because they are too good. When you’ve fished out the cod in Cape Cod so effectively the nets are coming up dry every summer the solution isn’t to get better nets: it’s to stop devouring every single fish before they can recover their numbers. Likewise, when you introduce an apex predator into a new enviroment and it quickly butchers everything in sight except the mice, the key to keeping it hunting isn't giving it the ability to catch mice."

"The problem with small-gang ganking (small gangs looking for random people to shoot rather than looking for honourable fair fights, i.e. every single player in EVE) and 0.0 ganking — the problem isn’t local. Local is one of the few things actually keeping anyone sitting around in 0.0 waiting to get ganked. It’s that the incentive to sit in a belt mining or ratting is so low that there’s so few people to gank. Take empire, for example: if I pilot my ganking crew into an ice belt and start ganking away, people can — if they’ve got half a brain — keep themselves perfectly safe. But there are so many people that I can easily gorge myself on the idiots. It’s clear this model works: in VFK, there’s always enough idiots packed into the system that someone will fall into your drag bubble between the jump bridge and the station no matter how many times it’s reported in intel channels and no matter how easily you can be seen in local."

You want to read more about why local's not the problem? Read the rest here.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#949 - 2012-11-17 03:33:44 UTC
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:
True, but that was after I did not receive any constructive post and legitimate reasons to your side of the argument. All I received was insult and bashings left and right. "Oh you don't know what you are talking about." or " ha, he lives in Whs so he has no clue" What insults! If you want to have a legitimate argument then please, show me factual evidence of the game mechanics and how they work in regards to nullsec. I have found several guides and they all support what I already know about the game.

You do realize, then, that the asteroid belts and anomalies being the majority of the PVE in null combined with static access routes makes the dynamic totally different than the situation in WH's, right?

And that we use local to find fights as well as to avoid them?

Local is a conflict-driver in null more often than not. It's valuable for fleet intel.

Guides don't necessarily teach you that. Experience does.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#950 - 2012-11-17 03:36:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Darth Gustav wrote:
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:
True, but that was after I did not receive any constructive post and legitimate reasons to your side of the argument. All I received was insult and bashings left and right. "Oh you don't know what you are talking about." or " ha, he lives in Whs so he has no clue" What insults! If you want to have a legitimate argument then please, show me factual evidence of the game mechanics and how they work in regards to nullsec. I have found several guides and they all support what I already know about the game.

You do realize, then, that the asteroid belts and anomalies being the majority of the PVE in null combined with static access routes makes the dynamic totally different than the situation in WH's, right?

And that we use local to find fights as well as to avoid them?

Local is a conflict-driver in null more often than not. It's valuable for fleet intel.

Guides don't necessarily teach you that. Experience does.


I've never read a game guide that hasn't left something out, or missed the point completely. Guides are no way to learn a game, and I never touch them anymore. Guides are for referencing game info, such as what sort of resists to tank for against what npc faction, or what kind of mins a certain kind of ore will yield, but never for learning how to play the game.

As soon as you start playing a game by a guide, you'll lose yourself in a rut so deep that you'll never be able to adapt to difficult situations that the guide may simply not cover. And in a game like EVE, you'll get a lot of those.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Kenneth O'Hara
Sebiestor Tribe
#951 - 2012-11-17 03:37:32 UTC
Darth Gustav wrote:
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:
True, but that was after I did not receive any constructive post and legitimate reasons to your side of the argument. All I received was insult and bashings left and right. "Oh you don't know what you are talking about." or " ha, he lives in Whs so he has no clue" What insults! If you want to have a legitimate argument then please, show me factual evidence of the game mechanics and how they work in regards to nullsec. I have found several guides and they all support what I already know about the game.

You do realize, then, that the asteroid belts and anomalies being the majority of the PVE in null combined with static access routes makes the dynamic totally different than the situation in WH's, right?

And that we use local to find fights as well as to avoid them?

Local is a conflict-driver in null more often than not. It's valuable for fleet intel.

Guides don't necessarily teach you that. Experience does.

But local revels your plans to the enemy. I thought local should never be used for intel?

Bring Saede Riordan back!! Never Forget! _"__Operation Godzilla Smacks Zeus"  ~__Graygor _

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#952 - 2012-11-17 03:39:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:
Darth Gustav wrote:
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:
True, but that was after I did not receive any constructive post and legitimate reasons to your side of the argument. All I received was insult and bashings left and right. "Oh you don't know what you are talking about." or " ha, he lives in Whs so he has no clue" What insults! If you want to have a legitimate argument then please, show me factual evidence of the game mechanics and how they work in regards to nullsec. I have found several guides and they all support what I already know about the game.

You do realize, then, that the asteroid belts and anomalies being the majority of the PVE in null combined with static access routes makes the dynamic totally different than the situation in WH's, right?

And that we use local to find fights as well as to avoid them?

Local is a conflict-driver in null more often than not. It's valuable for fleet intel.

Guides don't necessarily teach you that. Experience does.

But local revels your plans to the enemy. I thought local should never be used for intel?

Local doesn't reveal any plans, it only shows who's in the system. What it should or should not be used for is irrelevant - the bottom line is it's there, it's part of the mechanics, therefore it's not an exploit. Everyone in the system has access to it, therefore they know you're around just the same moment as you know they're around - it's only afkers and the inexperienced that won't know what to do with it, and the inexperienced will learn the hard way. The afkers can just burn.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#953 - 2012-11-17 03:40:00 UTC
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:
Darth Gustav wrote:
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:
True, but that was after I did not receive any constructive post and legitimate reasons to your side of the argument. All I received was insult and bashings left and right. "Oh you don't know what you are talking about." or " ha, he lives in Whs so he has no clue" What insults! If you want to have a legitimate argument then please, show me factual evidence of the game mechanics and how they work in regards to nullsec. I have found several guides and they all support what I already know about the game.

You do realize, then, that the asteroid belts and anomalies being the majority of the PVE in null combined with static access routes makes the dynamic totally different than the situation in WH's, right?

And that we use local to find fights as well as to avoid them?

Local is a conflict-driver in null more often than not. It's valuable for fleet intel.

Guides don't necessarily teach you that. Experience does.

But local revels your plans to the enemy. I thought local should never be used for intel?

Local is used for intel all the time.

If you thought it shouldn't be used for that, then you were mistaken.

That's not an insult, either. It's just a fact. Local drives conflict in fleet fights where the enemy fleet might otherwise escape the range of your jump bridge network.

It's really quite vital to inflicting massive damage.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

Kenneth O'Hara
Sebiestor Tribe
#954 - 2012-11-17 03:40:34 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Darth Gustav wrote:
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:
True, but that was after I did not receive any constructive post and legitimate reasons to your side of the argument. All I received was insult and bashings left and right. "Oh you don't know what you are talking about." or " ha, he lives in Whs so he has no clue" What insults! If you want to have a legitimate argument then please, show me factual evidence of the game mechanics and how they work in regards to nullsec. I have found several guides and they all support what I already know about the game.

You do realize, then, that the asteroid belts and anomalies being the majority of the PVE in null combined with static access routes makes the dynamic totally different than the situation in WH's, right?

And that we use local to find fights as well as to avoid them?

Local is a conflict-driver in null more often than not. It's valuable for fleet intel.

Guides don't necessarily teach you that. Experience does.


I've never read a game guide that hasn't left something out, or missed the point completely. Guides are no way to learn a game, and I never touch them anymore. Guides are for referencing game info, such as what sort of resists to tank for against what npc faction, or what kind of mins a certain kind of ore will yield, but never for learning how to play the game.

As soon as you start playing a game by a guide, you'll lose yourself in a rut so deep that you'll never be able to adapt to difficult situations that the guide may simply not cover. And in a game like EVE, you'll get a lot of those.

That's not a guide. That's reference resources... spreadsheets. Guides break everything down and explains why you do certain things and how to do them. I'm seriously not trying to be rude here so forgive me if it comes off as such.

Bring Saede Riordan back!! Never Forget! _"__Operation Godzilla Smacks Zeus"  ~__Graygor _

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#955 - 2012-11-17 03:43:39 UTC
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:
Darth Gustav wrote:
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:
True, but that was after I did not receive any constructive post and legitimate reasons to your side of the argument. All I received was insult and bashings left and right. "Oh you don't know what you are talking about." or " ha, he lives in Whs so he has no clue" What insults! If you want to have a legitimate argument then please, show me factual evidence of the game mechanics and how they work in regards to nullsec. I have found several guides and they all support what I already know about the game.

You do realize, then, that the asteroid belts and anomalies being the majority of the PVE in null combined with static access routes makes the dynamic totally different than the situation in WH's, right?

And that we use local to find fights as well as to avoid them?

Local is a conflict-driver in null more often than not. It's valuable for fleet intel.

Guides don't necessarily teach you that. Experience does.

But local revels your plans to the enemy. I thought local should never be used for intel?

Says who?
Local doesn't reveal your plans to the enemy. The ONLY thing that's revealed is who is in the system. It doesn't say what ships they're in, the name of their ships, their distance to you, how they entered the system, how long they've been there, if they're in a fleet, what they're doing, etc. The only thing you know is their name (and by extension, their corporation, alliance, and standings).

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Kenneth O'Hara
Sebiestor Tribe
#956 - 2012-11-17 03:44:47 UTC
Darth Gustav wrote:
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:
Darth Gustav wrote:
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:
True, but that was after I did not receive any constructive post and legitimate reasons to your side of the argument. All I received was insult and bashings left and right. "Oh you don't know what you are talking about." or " ha, he lives in Whs so he has no clue" What insults! If you want to have a legitimate argument then please, show me factual evidence of the game mechanics and how they work in regards to nullsec. I have found several guides and they all support what I already know about the game.

You do realize, then, that the asteroid belts and anomalies being the majority of the PVE in null combined with static access routes makes the dynamic totally different than the situation in WH's, right?

And that we use local to find fights as well as to avoid them?

Local is a conflict-driver in null more often than not. It's valuable for fleet intel.

Guides don't necessarily teach you that. Experience does.

But local revels your plans to the enemy. I thought local should never be used for intel?

Local is used for intel all the time.

If you thought it shouldn't be used for that, then you were mistaken.

That's not an insult, either. It's just a fact. Local drives conflict in fleet fights where the enemy fleet might otherwise escape the range of your jump bridge network.

It's really quite vital to inflicting massive damage.

How does it drive conflict? Wouldn't it be best to use a separate channel for intel? Sorry, if I'm still hung up on this. I'm not getting the idea of spreading intel in local... unless it's bad intel. Like disinformation for the enemy. That would make sense to me.

Bring Saede Riordan back!! Never Forget! _"__Operation Godzilla Smacks Zeus"  ~__Graygor _

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#957 - 2012-11-17 03:45:15 UTC
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:

That's not a guide. That's reference resources... spreadsheets. Guides break everything down and explains why you do certain things and how to do them. I'm seriously not trying to be rude here so forgive me if it comes off as such.


I know, I made that distinction quite clearly. Guides are only as useful as the player is unable to learn for themselves, and as I previously stated, if you use guides, you're going to get stuck doing what the guide tells you to do, and never learning for yourself.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#958 - 2012-11-17 03:46:02 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
So... you're just trolling? I don't take sides, mate, I just make assertions based on what makes sense. I'm not on anybody's side, but I'll happily call out immaturity when I see it - I'm not here to make friends so I don't really care what you think of me after the fact.

Maturity is only a thing of real life. Not on cyberspace.


Ah yes, never forget this little gem! You see, the internet isn't "real life" and therefore nothing that happens on the internet could ever have an actual impact on real people.

OH no, anything that happens on the internet is, by virtue of simply happening on the internet:

"A Joke!"

Never mind that real people are really behind the really real words they're typing "on the Internet" and that those words actually do reflect real world opinions, beliefs, prejudices and discriminations that really do affect really real people from Marginalised Groups™ and they already have to deal with that stuff on a daily basis - so what! It's "the Internet". Nothing is "real" on "the Internet". You can simply say to them: If you take anything on "the Internet" to heart, you're taking it "too seriously" and probably just need to log off for awhile...

... and go out into the "real world" where they will... experience the exact same type of discrimination and prejudice.

You see, this tactic conveniently ignores that there is no genuine respite for Marginalised People™ when it comes to encountering bigotry characteristic to their group, not even through a supposed entertainment medium, like "the Internet".

Since nothing on "the Internet" happens face to face, you as a Privileged Person® can easily persuade yourself nothing that happens on "the Internet" really matters. You can then communicate your contempt for the Marginalised Person™'s experience by dismissing and trivialising any hurtful or outright hateful things either you or other Privileged People® have said, simply because it was on "the Internet" and since they can't see you and you can't see them, how can they even prove the words even mean anything, nyah nyah neh nyah nyah!

Using this tactic, you're also subtly characterising 'the Internet" as an autonomous being - it's not people being offensive, it's "the Internet", thus allowing you to further shirk responsibility.

You forgot to say all goons and hbcs should be banned for the forums.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#959 - 2012-11-17 03:48:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Darth Gustav
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:
Darth Gustav wrote:
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:
Darth Gustav wrote:
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:
True, but that was after I did not receive any constructive post and legitimate reasons to your side of the argument. All I received was insult and bashings left and right. "Oh you don't know what you are talking about." or " ha, he lives in Whs so he has no clue" What insults! If you want to have a legitimate argument then please, show me factual evidence of the game mechanics and how they work in regards to nullsec. I have found several guides and they all support what I already know about the game.

You do realize, then, that the asteroid belts and anomalies being the majority of the PVE in null combined with static access routes makes the dynamic totally different than the situation in WH's, right?

And that we use local to find fights as well as to avoid them?

Local is a conflict-driver in null more often than not. It's valuable for fleet intel.

Guides don't necessarily teach you that. Experience does.

But local revels your plans to the enemy. I thought local should never be used for intel?

Local is used for intel all the time.

If you thought it shouldn't be used for that, then you were mistaken.

That's not an insult, either. It's just a fact. Local drives conflict in fleet fights where the enemy fleet might otherwise escape the range of your jump bridge network.

It's really quite vital to inflicting massive damage.

How does it drive conflict? Wouldn't it be best to use a separate channel for intel? Sorry, if I'm still hung up on this. I'm not getting the idea of spreading intel in local... unless it's bad intel. Like disinformation for the enemy. That would make sense to me.

I see the problem now dude.

We use the local list for intel.

There may be a lone pilot in-system for our side and a whole fleet of enemies.

He can give us numbers and position (from local.) Then we know where to go to head them off on their way out.

Jump bridges activate.

Good FC's get kills. Bad FC's still don't get kills, even with the instant intel available from seeing who's in local.

We're not using local to chat.

That's not how it works at all.

[Edit: What guides have you been reading, anyway?]

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#960 - 2012-11-17 03:50:05 UTC
Kenneth O'Hara wrote:

How does it drive conflict? Wouldn't it be best to use a separate channel for intel? Sorry, if I'm still hung up on this. I'm not getting the idea of spreading intel in local... unless it's bad intel. Like disinformation for the enemy. That would make sense to me.


Scroll back up the page to this post. Read the article I linked there for you - if you read it, it will answer these questions.

Local doesn't provide intel via its chat function, it provides intel via the fact that it shows you who is in chat, and therefore who is in system. If I'm mining Jaspet solo in the Seyllin system, for example, and I see someone appear in local, I'll check their sec status and leave if it's below 1, but if it's above I'll align to the nearest gate just in case.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104