These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Mindless Ganking in high sec - Easy fix

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
CraftyCroc
Fraternity Alliance Please Ignore
#1 - 2012-11-12 01:19:01 UTC  |  Edited by: CraftyCroc
Concord should agress thieves + partake in return delivery work. As they are on-grid once a gank has taken place they could simply arrange for the dropped items to be returned to the poor bear who's dead. Anyone attempting to loot - scram + kill all that jazz - scoop what drops and return to the original bear (now twice as sad but less sad then losing everything).

tldr - High sec gankers are sick and twisted individuals. Why not try and promote being nice? Force the heathens to low sec/null Twisted where ****'s fair game

Also excited by the new changes ... if I am not mistaken those that gank will be targets to all? As will thieves?

Finally a reason to work up security status Pirate

CC


EDIT: This would also add to the pvp within low/null as no longer could ******s sit around jetting can's trying to get noobs to take it (the noob would be concorded for theft which would result in 0.0 chance of pvp).

+ Bears could mine in relative peace (however there would still be those who like to gank regardless of profit involved (sometimes it's nice to just slaughter a bear))


all this = LESS HEADACHE'S FOR CCP + MORE PVP + MORE BEARS
Val'Dore
PlanetCorp InterStellar
#2 - 2012-11-12 01:34:19 UTC
So what you are saying is, your alt can't mine ice in piece.

Star Jump Drive A new way to traverse the galaxy.

I invented Tiericide
Jackal Datapaw
Doomheim
#3 - 2012-11-12 01:36:49 UTC
No to this idea, sorry, but it is bad.

commonly suggest cloaking and local ideas

piecakes's brother
Assasinated Zombies
#4 - 2012-11-12 01:39:45 UTC  |  Edited by: piecakes's brother
CraftyCroc wrote:
Concord should agress thieves + partake in return delivery work. As they are on-grid once a gank has taken place they could simply arrange for the dropped items to be returned to the poor bear who's dead. Anyone attempting to loot - scram + kill all that jazz - scoop what drops and return to the original bear (now twice as sad but less sad then losing everything).

tldr - High sec gankers are sick and twisted individuals. Why not try and promote being nice? Force the heathens to low sec/null Twisted where ****'s fair game

Also excited by the new changes ... if I am not mistaken those that gank will be targets to all? As will thieves?

Finally a reason to work up security status Pirate

CC


EDIT: This would also add to the pvp within low/null as no longer could ******s sit around jetting can's trying to get noobs to take it (the noob would be concorded for theft which would result in 0.0 chance of pvp).

+ Bears could mine in relative peace (however there would still be those who like to gank regardless of profit involved (sometimes it's nice to just slaughter a bear))


all this = LESS HEADACHE'S FOR CCP + MORE PVP + MORE BEARS



Force these people to low sec.... LMAO nope ill just join your corp and corp kill you.... probelm solved stop crying+


Go play WOW you cry baby and leave this game to people that arent so sensitive and dont cry about everything

-simple fix
CraftyCroc
Fraternity Alliance Please Ignore
#5 - 2012-11-12 01:41:00 UTC
Val'Dore wrote:
So what you are saying is, your alt can't mine ice in piece.



Actually thats not what I said


FYI Val'Dore

I am not a bear - neither is my alt

(the third one is but he's a passive bear - like rarely logged on)
CraftyCroc
Fraternity Alliance Please Ignore
#6 - 2012-11-12 01:43:38 UTC
piecakes's brother wrote:
CraftyCroc wrote:
Concord should agress thieves + partake in return delivery work. As they are on-grid once a gank has taken place they could simply arrange for the dropped items to be returned to the poor bear who's dead. Anyone attempting to loot - scram + kill all that jazz - scoop what drops and return to the original bear (now twice as sad but less sad then losing everything).

tldr - High sec gankers are sick and twisted individuals. Why not try and promote being nice? Force the heathens to low sec/null Twisted where ****'s fair game

Also excited by the new changes ... if I am not mistaken those that gank will be targets to all? As will thieves?

Finally a reason to work up security status Pirate

CC


EDIT: This would also add to the pvp within low/null as no longer could ******s sit around jetting can's trying to get noobs to take it (the noob would be concorded for theft which would result in 0.0 chance of pvp).

+ Bears could mine in relative peace (however there would still be those who like to gank regardless of profit involved (sometimes it's nice to just slaughter a bear))


all this = LESS HEADACHE'S FOR CCP + MORE PVP + MORE BEARS



Force these people to low sec.... LMAO nope ill just join your corp and corp kill you.... probelm solved stop crying+


Go play WOW you cry baby and leave this game to people that arent so sensitive and dont cry about everything

-simple fix



Hi... This section of the forum is to have ideas discussed in. Being a tit is reserved for General Chat and the like.

Also - posting on an alt... good man.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#7 - 2012-11-12 01:45:04 UTC
CraftyCroc wrote:
Concord should agress thieves + partake in return delivery work.
No, they really shouldn't.
If you have problems with thieves, just shoot them.

Oh, and what's this mindless ganking you mention in the title and why does it need to be fixed?
piecakes's brother
Assasinated Zombies
#8 - 2012-11-12 01:51:47 UTC
CraftyCroc wrote:
piecakes's brother wrote:
CraftyCroc wrote:
Concord should agress thieves + partake in return delivery work. As they are on-grid once a gank has taken place they could simply arrange for the dropped items to be returned to the poor bear who's dead. Anyone attempting to loot - scram + kill all that jazz - scoop what drops and return to the original bear (now twice as sad but less sad then losing everything).

tldr - High sec gankers are sick and twisted individuals. Why not try and promote being nice? Force the heathens to low sec/null Twisted where ****'s fair game

Also excited by the new changes ... if I am not mistaken those that gank will be targets to all? As will thieves?

Finally a reason to work up security status Pirate

CC


EDIT: This would also add to the pvp within low/null as no longer could ******s sit around jetting can's trying to get noobs to take it (the noob would be concorded for theft which would result in 0.0 chance of pvp).

+ Bears could mine in relative peace (however there would still be those who like to gank regardless of profit involved (sometimes it's nice to just slaughter a bear))


all this = LESS HEADACHE'S FOR CCP + MORE PVP + MORE BEARS



Force these people to low sec.... LMAO nope ill just join your corp and corp kill you.... probelm solved stop crying+


Go play WOW you cry baby and leave this game to people that arent so sensitive and dont cry about everything

-simple fix



Hi... This section of the forum is to have ideas discussed in. Being a tit is reserved for General Chat and the like.

Also - posting on an alt... good man.

got a case of the madbros much?
CraftyCroc
Fraternity Alliance Please Ignore
#9 - 2012-11-12 01:52:38 UTC
Tippia wrote:
CraftyCroc wrote:
Concord should agress thieves + partake in return delivery work.
No, they really shouldn't.
If you have problems with thieves, just shoot them.

Oh, and what's this mindless ganking you mention in the title and why does it need to be fixed?



Hi Tippia

I don't have a problem with thieves ... I am one

I refer to the increase in the amount of freighters being taken down travelling through high sec. All joking aside, we all know how this makes bears feel.... being human - it worries me how many people seem to get enjoyment from this

CC
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#10 - 2012-11-12 02:00:21 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
I've removed some off topic posts. Please keep it civil and on topic. Thank you.

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode

Senior Lead

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#11 - 2012-11-12 02:01:50 UTC
CraftyCroc wrote:
I don't have a problem with thieves ... I am one
So no reason to change CONCORD's mandate, then.

Quote:
I refer to the increase in the amount of freighters being taken down travelling through high sec.
…and the problem is?
CraftyCroc
Fraternity Alliance Please Ignore
#12 - 2012-11-12 02:04:22 UTC
Tippia wrote:
CraftyCroc wrote:
I don't have a problem with thieves ... I am one
So no reason to change CONCORD's mandate, then.

Quote:
I refer to the increase in the amount of freighters being taken down travelling through high sec.
…and the problem is?



CraftyCroc wrote:

being human - it worries me how many people seem to get enjoyment from this
Jackal Datapaw
Doomheim
#13 - 2012-11-12 02:06:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Jackal Datapaw
Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#14 - 2012-11-12 02:16:30 UTC
i think new crime watch will have some 'fixes' for mindless ganking.
Wulfy Johnson
NorCorp Security
#15 - 2012-11-12 02:47:05 UTC
To me Hisec seems more lawless than 0.0, I wouldn't know though, since iv'e lived in 0.0 since I started this game.
But looking at killboards/forums I would say concord is loosing the isk war.

I agree that ganks should be there, but I would to argue that they should be targeted ganks to harm corporations and players "secure" operations, not profitable endeavours for everyone to do when bored.

Ganks in highsec is way to cheap, with a way to high profitmargin.
So another "solution" to the "problem" can be that concord fines players they take breaking the law on a percentage of the damage they caused. Just to balance out the 10mill ship killing 300mill ship for lols.
Concord is a policeforce yes?

But this will also cause a problem with new players with little isk having fun and testing and abused by negative wallet pirates unless somebody has a good idea on a workaround for that?

Just thinking out loud and sharing some thoughts
Garviel Tarrant
Beyond Divinity Inc
Shadow Cartel
#16 - 2012-11-12 10:00:59 UTC
A "fix" suggests that its broken

It isn't, its working as intended.

BYDI recruitment closed-ish