These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Stop forcing me to wear high heels

First post
Author
Isabel Midnight
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#201 - 2012-09-07 03:11:46 UTC
bump
Elshar Khandar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#202 - 2012-09-07 06:08:51 UTC
Isabel Midnight wrote:
bump


So you've nothing more to say on the subject other than "bump".

And still you have almost no support for your demands.

I bet you were the sort of person who as a child, when told she couldn't have something, screamed and screamed and screamed until daddy gave it to you. And from your obvious misandry I'd say your daddy did give it to you.
L Salander
All Web Investigations
#203 - 2012-09-07 11:02:37 UTC
There's a lot of misogynists in this thread, oh my.
Elshar Khandar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#204 - 2012-09-07 11:41:31 UTC
Misogyny is the hatred of women or girls. That means ALL women or girls. It DOES NOT mean hating one women or one girl because they're a biggoted hate monger demanding ridiculously pointless things (considering the lack of any avatar interaction) simply because she considers herself to be marginalised and therefore have more rights than anyone else.

I and most of the other supposed misogynists here don't hate women or girls. In fact, most of us actively love them as often as we possibly can.

It's a bit like an argument between a black guy and a white guy. If one of them loses his temper and hits the other is he a racist? Well, it entirely depends on whether he's attacked the other chap because of the colour of his skin (or nationality etc.) or because of something completely different. So, the black guy slept with the white guy's sister, took photos and posted them on the internet. The white guy hits the black guy. Is it racist or is it pretty much justified?

Isabel Midnight has shouted demands which either aren't backed up by anyone else (the few positives being alts) or are backed up by such a tiny portion of the forum goers that the validity of the demands should be and have been brought into question.

Isabel Midnight has accused most, if not all, of the people who've replied negatively to her proposal, whether agressively or not, with blanket "You're all misogynists" comments which are as valid as the black guy in my example claiming the white guy is a racist. Her arguments aren't agreed with by most of the people who read and post on this forum. She persists in trying to enforce her demands, not with calm rationality but with baseless accusations casting the natures and ethics of ALL her ctitics into question whilst claiming to be the injured party.

She is not the injured party. She brought a point which is not widely seen as important by the playerbase to the attention of the forum in the form of a demand and then accused any and all neighsayers of being misogynists and worse.

&TLDR Isabel Midnight is a bigot who likes accusing others of her own flaw.
L Salander
All Web Investigations
#205 - 2012-09-07 12:23:51 UTC  |  Edited by: L Salander
Elshar Khandar wrote:
Misogyny is the hatred of women or girls. That means ALL women or girls. It DOES NOT mean hating one women or one girl because they're a biggoted hate monger demanding ridiculously pointless things (considering the lack of any avatar interaction) simply because she considers herself to be marginalised and therefore have more rights than anyone else.

I and most of the other supposed misogynists here don't hate women or girls. In fact, most of us actively love them as often as we possibly can.

It's a bit like an argument between a black guy and a white guy. If one of them loses his temper and hits the other is he a racist? Well, it entirely depends on whether he's attacked the other chap because of the colour of his skin (or nationality etc.) or because of something completely different. So, the black guy slept with the white guy's sister, took photos and posted them on the internet. The white guy hits the black guy. Is it racist or is it pretty much justified?

Isabel Midnight has shouted demands which either aren't backed up by anyone else (the few positives being alts) or are backed up by such a tiny portion of the forum goers that the validity of the demands should be and have been brought into question.

Isabel Midnight has accused most, if not all, of the people who've replied negatively to her proposal, whether agressively or not, with blanket "You're all misogynists" comments which are as valid as the black guy in my example claiming the white guy is a racist. Her arguments aren't agreed with by most of the people who read and post on this forum. She persists in trying to enforce her demands, not with calm rationality but with baseless accusations casting the natures and ethics of ALL her ctitics into question whilst claiming to be the injured party.

She is not the injured party. She brought a point which is not widely seen as important by the playerbase to the attention of the forum in the form of a demand and then accused any and all neighsayers of being misogynists and worse.

&TLDR Isabel Midnight is a bigot who likes accusing others of her own flaw.


Except what they're "demanding" isn't ridiculous or pointless at all, forcing all female characters to dress a certain way is very misogynistic. The fact that the vast majority of players (aka men) are ok with it doesn't mean it's ok. Argumentum ad populum doesn't stand, mate.
Elshar Khandar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#206 - 2012-09-07 12:57:30 UTC
L Salander wrote:

Except what they're "demanding" isn't ridiculous or pointless at all, forcing all female characters to dress a certain way is very misogynistic. The fact that the vast majority of players (aka men) are ok with it doesn't mean it's ok. Argumentum ad populum doesn't stand, mate.


Please acquaint yourself with the definition of misogyny.

IF there was any misogyny involved in women in the game having to wear high heals it would mean that CCP intentionally made it that way specifically because they hate women.

Anyone with half a brain can tell that simply isn't the case.

Therefore, the only logical assumption that can be made is that the reason women all wear high heals is because of a mix of pragmatic design decisions, cost/benefit analysis (technical and/or financial) and simplification of complicated interaction mechanics. There may be others but I think that covers the most obvious.

Argumentum ad populum does actually stand. Someone who believes themselves to be in the minority and/or marginalised doesn't get more than one vote to make up for it in any country, as far as I can tell.

People really need to get to grips with a bit of common sense. When and only when we have avatar interactions does this demand transition from pointless to having some (albeit very little) merit.
Nikk Narrel
Moonlit Bonsai
#207 - 2012-09-07 13:25:55 UTC
Elshar's arguments possess the all too rare quality of logic.

Despite her thought provoking bumps, I fear Isabel's arguments are here beaten.
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#208 - 2012-09-07 15:29:15 UTC
L Salander wrote:
forcing all female characters to dress a certain way is very misogynistic.


No, it's not. I've already made a post where I clearly state several other possible reasons for it, including market research among female players. It's entirely possible that the feedback they got from women favored high heels, and technical limitations only allowed for one type of shoe.

You accuse people of acting on hate while never considering they might have other motives.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#209 - 2012-09-07 15:31:27 UTC
Nikk Narrel wrote:
Isabel's arguments

So far, I don't think she's presented any. Just baseless accusations of hate, intermixed with some hypocritical hate of her own.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Ellariona
B52 Bombers
#210 - 2012-09-07 16:05:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Ellariona
double-post, sry
Ellariona
B52 Bombers
#211 - 2012-09-07 16:25:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Ellariona
Isabel Midnight wrote:
Every single boot or shoe in NEX or available through the character creation thing has a massive heel on it. It's a joke and insanely misogynistic to have not even considered this massive oversight. I hate wearing high heels in real life as they are painful and extremely awkward to walk in and mostly only for pleasing dumb ass men.

CCP art team needs to pull their head out their ass and introduce some non high heels for female characters to wear. I'm supposed to be a spaceship captain. I need actual practical shoes. Male character's get them.

You could also fix this by removing the 'gender' requirement on clothing but I guess that's another post.

STOP FORCING WOMEN TO WEAR HIGH HEELS IN VIDEO GAMES


For anyone who is unclear this isn't a joke post or a troll. I legitimately think a game that offers character customization that forces me to wear high heels in 2012 is disgusting.


The fact that OP thinks that high heels are linked to misogyny baffles me. I treat women like objects in real life, but I really dislike heels.

No, just kidding. Here comes my real reply:

If you think a heel (although, I must agree IRL they are mostly being defined as either "tough bi-atch" or "sl-ut" type shoes) is a symbol for misogyny, then I could say the same about all the "tough guy" clothing being misandrous. If you hate wearing them in real life because you either can't walk in them or are overweight, leave your problems at the door. Do you think all of us men wear either tight leather-looking pants or baggy pants? Do you think all of us men are that skinny or muscular? Do you think WE like to see the contrast between RL and our eve avatars? No, we don't. And I don't think most of us care, even. Fact is, this is EVE. Not to be confused with reality. In New Eden, especially for Gallente women I would think, for all you know high heel shoes are a symbol of stature, divinity and freedom. And about the weight issue, I assume to be a capsuleer (wether female or not), you need to have a certain limit in weight, as more fat would mean more tissue moving around by the g-forces affecting you.

I say -1 to this superfeminist (I have nothing against equal gender rights, but I do have a problem with crybabies), overly subjective and pointless thread.
Paikis
Vapour Holdings
#212 - 2012-09-07 16:37:07 UTC
mi·sog·y·nist   [mih-soj-uh-nist, mahy‐]
noun
a person who hates, dislikes, mistrusts, or mistreats women

I guess I'm a misogynist then, because I don't trust them as far as I can kick them. Up hill and against the wind. Irony of ironies, feminism has done more to create a generation of ACTUAL misogynists than anything else possibly could. To top it off, women are the most unhappy they've ever been (as a group) and are painted as perpetual victims unable to do anything for themselves. Feminists do an absolutely MARVELOUS job of treating women as children. Feminism is misogynistic?

Having said that, why are we having a political discussion in my internet spaceships forum!?
Nikk Narrel
Moonlit Bonsai
#213 - 2012-09-07 16:42:36 UTC
Paikis wrote:
mi·sog·y·nist   [mih-soj-uh-nist, mahy‐]
noun
a person who hates, dislikes, mistrusts, or mistreats women

I guess I'm a misogynist then, because I don't trust them as far as I can kick them. Up hill and against the wind. Irony of ironies, feminism has done more to create a generation of ACTUAL misogynists than anything else possibly could. To top it off, women are the most unhappy they've ever been (as a group) and are painted as perpetual victims unable to do anything for themselves. Feminists do an absolutely MARVELOUS job of treating women as children. Feminism is misogynistic?

Having said that, why are we having a political discussion in my internet spaceships forum!?

I noticed this strange event as well...

Thank goodness I am not the only one baffled by this contrast with appropriate topic content.

Now, If you wanted shoes that launched missiles, THAT I could get behind you with.

Especially if they are high heels.
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#214 - 2012-09-07 18:23:25 UTC
Uhh...dudes? Characterizing the feminist movement as bad for women just feeds their delusions.

I'm just waiting for the OP to make a thread about being forced to wear a bra.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Elshar Khandar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#215 - 2012-09-07 18:42:29 UTC
Paikis wrote:

Having said that, why are we having a political discussion in my internet spaceships forum!?


I think it's because the OP started it and needed to have some realities explaining to her.

Mind you, you and Nik both make the fair point, albeit obliquely, that this is a forum for features and ideas for the online multi-player game EvE. I don't believe this includes delusional whining on the scale seen in this thread.

Just my twopence worth, mind. I really want to make it clear at this point that this is merely my opinion and not "truth" in any sense of the word.

@Nik - Hell yeah! I can so get behind high heal boots with missile launchers built in. I might have to start another thread.....

mu-hahahaha!
GTN
BALKAN EXPRESS
Shadow Cartel
#216 - 2012-09-08 09:22:26 UTC
What you guys fail to understand is that CCP will give this woman what she wants.
Because the world is heading in a female-dominant direction, and CCP isn't an exception to this.
This makes me both angry and happy at the same time Twisted
Isabel Midnight
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#217 - 2012-09-08 12:27:00 UTC
At the moment I don't really need to do anything to argue against you because you are making your own argument. There are some really scummy people coming forth to defend this stuff.

Also FYI , intent has nothing to do with whether it is misogynistic or not.
Nikk Narrel
Moonlit Bonsai
#218 - 2012-09-08 16:15:47 UTC
Isabel Midnight wrote:
Also FYI , intent has nothing to do with whether it is misogynistic or not.

Ah, so you admit the possibility that no intent to demean or marginalize women has taken place.

Without the intent to cause harm, the perception of such harm could be defined as being limited to only those choosing to see it.

This raises the question, why do you choose to see harm?

Will winning this battle fill some hole in your heart? I do hope for you to find inner peace, but to do so upon changes to our game is unfair to those of us simply wanting to play with space ships.

Perhaps you should stop trying to walk all over us with your shoes.
Corina Jarr
en Welle Shipping Inc.
#219 - 2012-09-08 17:04:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Corina Jarr
Isabel Midnight wrote:
At the moment I don't really need to do anything to argue against you because you are making your own argument. There are some really scummy people coming forth to defend this stuff.

Also FYI , intent has nothing to do with whether it is misogynistic or not.

Yes it does. Intent is the entire definition of the term.


Misogyny is an active state of mind. It requires the intended hatred, otherwise it is not misogynistic.
You can't accidentally hate women.

Just like racism must be intentional, so must sexism.



I still would like some non heeled shoes, just for some variety. But, you're taking it too far. There is nothing wrong about how it is now... just lacking variety.
Isabel Midnight
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#220 - 2012-09-08 17:29:12 UTC
Intent is not part of the term. People have even posted wikipedia definitions and such in here and intent has never been mentioned.

If you step on my foot it hurts me regardless of your intent. If someone stood on your foot and you started wailing about how you didn't mean to step on it so how dare they feel pain....