These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Incarna/WiS Disappointment

First post First post First post
Author
Mars Theran
Foreign Interloper
#1001 - 2012-08-14 06:41:20 UTC
Porto isn't really a troll, just a very opinionated individual who sees things with a biased perspective. His conservative 20K estimate is probably close to the mark, with total numbers being partially the result of players quitting because of the fiasco. A trolled account that quits is an account that quits because of the troll, so it's a victory and counts for the trolls side in their eyes. Never mind the reason the player quit had nothing to do with any agreement with the trolls perspective.

I almost quit myself, but opted to just stop playing instead. I've been getting quite sick of the bs that occurs in MMOs since I introduced myself to them. Let's face it, they aren't really for everybody in the way they are presented or designed. They are designed for a few and try to incorporate many, which is why they generally fail imo.

EVE is the best of them, which is why I still subscribe even though I can't really afford it at this time and haven't played in what seems like a fair bit of time. I haven't seriously played in what seems a very long time, and is in fact quite some time. Still I like the basic premise of the game and the universe it is set in.

Whether or not WiS happens is irrelevent now. It's never going to be fully appreciated and will always be the subject of derision by players who reject it because it's not FiS and doesn't fit in with their idea of the EVE Universe. Most of them cannot adapt to change and think it belongs in another game, and those people certainly will not allow EVE to evolve in any way beyond that which reiterates on the content they play EVE for. It's selfish and inconsiderate, but you really can't expect any less.

Like I said, whatever.
zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub
Pipa Porto
#1002 - 2012-08-14 06:52:10 UTC
Mars Theran wrote:
Porto isn't really a troll, just a very opinionated individual who sees things with a biased perspective. His conservative 20K estimate is probably close to the mark, with total numbers being partially the result of players quitting because of the fiasco. A trolled account that quits is an account that quits because of the troll, so it's a victory and counts for the trolls side in their eyes. Never mind the reason the player quit had nothing to do with any agreement with the trolls perspective.


People quit all the time. They're usually replaced by people joining. The 20k is not "number of people who quit," it's a 20k net decrease in paid Subscriptions.

There's no reason (that I know of) to believe that the normal churn rate of people quitting changed at that time.

So it's pretty safe to say that the 20k lost subs (representing at least $240k a month in lost revenue at $12 USD/sub) were the result of Incarna and the various events surrounding it. Going with 20k, when there's a very strong case for 30k adds to that buffer of safety.

You (and people like you) quitting for reasons unrelated to Incarna would fall under the normal churn rate of unsubs (which, again, there's no reason to believe increased last summer).

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
#1003 - 2012-08-14 07:03:11 UTC
You know, i if you ignore three certain players (and only THREE), this thread becomes quite a statement of how people wants WiS. There's a majoritary sentiment that WiS msut be beefed up NOW and by providing players a way to create emergent content.

It is nice to have theme park rides and dungeon riding and whatever gameplay. But it's only a nice topping, not a mandatory foundation. The ingame chat channels already provide meaningful content with null gameplay. The forums already provide meaningful content and they're not even a part of the game.

That's because PEOPLE ARE MEANINGFUL CONTENT IN THEMSELVES.

Allow people to be people ingame, no matter to what limited extent, and they will create their own content.

And that will be better than just recycle ("iterate") the same old crap forever.

You see, I've been flying a Makinaw these days as It's the new toy in shop and i've been tinkering with it. But then... I already did that for years. Have been mining for years. Yes, it's great how much ISK turns around a single hold of the new Makinaw. But, I ALREADY HAVE BEEN THERE, AND ALREADY HAVE DONE THAT.

And apparently that's all what EVE is going to be about in the next year(s).

That's not a recipe for success, and not even a way to hold on. it's just a way to die at a slower pace and buy some time for Jackpot to happen.

There is no future without WiS. And CCP is losing it as we run out of patience, bitterness wears out our hopes and we reluctantly agree that CCP ****** it all with Incarna and EVE's fate has been written on a wall since then.

Roses are red / Violets are blue / I am an Alpha / And so it's you

Mars Theran
Foreign Interloper
#1004 - 2012-08-14 07:04:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Mars Theran
I should point out, I don't believe CCP ever intended WiS to become content that developed into what amounted to people standing around fountains dancing and doing various emotes while wearing rediculous carnival gear like you see in other games. Most people with any sense hate that, and I know a number of the players who reject changes to this game are afraid of just such occurences.

It's like a de-evolution of the game environment that would place EVE in the same category of all those other mmos. Nobody wants that, (or at least, I don't think anybody does), and I don't imagine any of the Devs do either. That kind of comic relief that grows stale and old so very quickly isn't really welcome here in my eyes, but I'm fairly certain the Devs made a point of stating "there would be no emotes" a long time ago.

No is a pretty harsh word, but generally I think limited emotes would be a good thing provided they had good animations. Beats the heck out of flying up to a gate camp and seeing some guy doing emote /dance2 on the nose of his Harpy. A wtf moment to be sure, but ultimately game breaking. Really game breaking.

If it were zoned to where specific emotes were available then having some like that would be helpful and even good. A Nighclub in Jita on some station besides 4-4 for example, where players could /dance to their hearts content, and better even if /dance resulted in whatever cultural dance would be expected at that location. i.e: Minmatar Bar definitely isn't going to see the same kind of dances as some nightclub in Jita. More likely it won't see much or any dancing usually.

..never know I guess.

..so much for quick reply..

I'm rambling.

Anyway, just wanted to point out that I don't think WiS was ever intended to take away from the game, but rather to add to it in some small way. Corporate meetings, (maybe a little too Caldari in conception, but so is a corporation), gaming tables, and the like.

Unfortunately, NeX shops and a bunch of other crap got dreamed up along the way and that's not good. Can't remember whether that was players or Devs, but either way, I'm not interested. Whatever might have been done should have been conservative, with respect to all playstyles. It's an addition, not an enitrely new style of gameplay; it shouldn't take away from what is already there, or the seriousness of EVE.

It's an environment, and a setting. Don't bork the hell out of that. Players do enough of that already in some ways; lets not give them more-and more complete-ways to suspend belief for others.

edit: ..just a thought, but it would be nice if emotes were made really simple. Why can't the character just animate out simple emotes that everybody uses and recognizes such as: o/ or :) That would be pretty simple wouldn't it. Just add those animations after they appear in chat when a player is typing in the context of interaction with their avatars.

Like I said, just a thought, but who honestly likes typing /whatever just to get their avatar to do something that is more easily represented in simple text?
zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub
Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#1005 - 2012-08-14 07:08:14 UTC
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
That's because PEOPLE ARE MEANINGFUL CONTENT IN THEMSELVES.


This, so much... actually, I already thought about setting up a forum RP somewhere... one could do SO much with the EVE setting aside from spacehippy-content! Roll

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Scatim Helicon
State War Academy
Caldari State
#1006 - 2012-08-14 07:12:36 UTC
Shalua Rui wrote:
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
That's because PEOPLE ARE MEANINGFUL CONTENT IN THEMSELVES.


This, so much... actually, I already thought about setting up a forum RP somewhere... one could do SO much with the EVE setting aside from spacehippy-content! Roll

You mean the Intergalactic Summit forum?

Every time you post a WiS thread, Hilmar strangles a kitten.

Scatim Helicon
State War Academy
Caldari State
#1007 - 2012-08-14 07:16:17 UTC
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
The ingame chat channels already provide meaningful content with null gameplay. The forums already provide meaningful content and they're not even a part of the game.

That's because PEOPLE ARE MEANINGFUL CONTENT IN THEMSELVES.

Allow people to be people ingame, no matter to what limited extent, and they will create their own content.

Please describe how putting avatars in a featureless room with the ability to do nothing but WASD and chat will generate new 'meaningful content'. Be specific, please.

Every time you post a WiS thread, Hilmar strangles a kitten.

Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#1008 - 2012-08-14 07:22:30 UTC
Goremageddon Box
Guerrilla Flotilla
#1009 - 2012-08-14 07:39:35 UTC
Rek Seven wrote:
Thread lock imminent.

Incoming internet noobs. Oh noez they already here
Pipa Porto
#1010 - 2012-08-14 07:44:06 UTC
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
You know, i if you ignore three certain players (and only THREE), this thread becomes quite a statement of how people wants WiS. There's a majoritary sentiment that WiS msut be beefed up NOW and by providing players a way to create emergent content.


There are like 6 people active in the thread. 3 is a significant percentage of the people active in the thread.

And nowhere have I said I don't want WIS. It's just that CCP really only has one more shot at it, blowing it on another room for WASDing will kill the project.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Ghazu
#1011 - 2012-08-14 07:45:45 UTC
Scatim Helicon wrote:
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
The ingame chat channels already provide meaningful content with null gameplay. The forums already provide meaningful content and they're not even a part of the game.

That's because PEOPLE ARE MEANINGFUL CONTENT IN THEMSELVES.

Allow people to be people ingame, no matter to what limited extent, and they will create their own content.

Please describe how putting avatars in a featureless room with the ability to do nothing but WASD and chat will generate new 'meaningful content'. Be specific, please.


Here's how:
Cemented by the mutual trust gained after many days of frenzied uninterrupted emoting throughout every corner of hisec a coalition that will end all coalitions will be formed and all of low and null will tremble and despair.

If only CCP would just give us the social environments with mandatory avatar loading right I mean how will I ever meet people and make friends forge alliances make deals and get organized and stuff when I am in my lol 3 alt or npc corp.

http://www.minerbumping.com/ lol what the christ https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2299984#post2299984

Mars Theran
Foreign Interloper
#1012 - 2012-08-14 07:45:56 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:
Mars Theran wrote:
Porto isn't really a troll, just a very opinionated individual who sees things with a biased perspective. His conservative 20K estimate is probably close to the mark, with total numbers being partially the result of players quitting because of the fiasco. A trolled account that quits is an account that quits because of the troll, so it's a victory and counts for the trolls side in their eyes. Never mind the reason the player quit had nothing to do with any agreement with the trolls perspective.


People quit all the time. They're usually replaced by people joining. The 20k is not "number of people who quit," it's a 20k net decrease in paid Subscriptions.

There's no reason (that I know of) to believe that the normal churn rate of people quitting changed at that time.

So it's pretty safe to say that the 20k lost subs (representing at least $240k a month in lost revenue at $12 USD/sub) were the result of Incarna and the various events surrounding it. Going with 20k, when there's a very strong case for 30k adds to that buffer of safety.

You (and people like you) quitting for reasons unrelated to Incarna would fall under the normal churn rate of unsubs (which, again, there's no reason to believe increased last summer).


I just made that statement because I remember a number of people who quit not because they agreed with that particular fiasco but because of it. It isn't a fiasco to those who participated and actively 'protested' and then dropped their subs of course; it was a very real event and legitimate protest to them at the time. Not everybody feels the same way about it though, and a lot of people feel it was just a general disruption of gameplay and thus a fiasco.

I never agreed with it then and I don't now. I recognize the reason for the protest and that the players involved were within their rights to be upset at the time, (for various reasons I guess; though I'm still not convinced of the validity of all of them), and certainly within their right to make some protest about it.

I think however, that the way it was carried out and the highly aggressive and defamatory nature of the protest was highly out of context with regard to those rights and they should have managed things in a more civil fashion. Not sure that would have accomplished anything by itself, but the loss of those subscriptions would and did lend weight where the argument itself failed.

The deliberate damage to CCPs reputation was definitely not cool and certainly not conclusively proven, and in fact, was more hearsay and speculation than anything else. None of it can be proven one way or another now and people will believe as they will regardless.

One reason I don't make a lot of personal jokes is because I understand how easy it is for them to be misinterpreted, misunderstood, and/or hurtful or damaging to others or their reputations, and this is only more proof of that in my eyes.

Anyway, it's a moot point and the damage-such as it is-has been done, and to some extent, undone. We are where we are, and only current and future development really matter now. We'll see what we'll see.
zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub
Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#1013 - 2012-08-14 08:03:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Shalua Rui
@Scatim: No, the IS forum is more of a fluff/news channel, really...

I was thinking more along the lines of a virtual environment, including a bar or two, a promenade... rooms like that... where poeple can play out their characters... chatting, banter, etc. It was done for other games/movies/pen&paper RPGs before.

Aside from that and on topic: I think the biggest problem is that there are those that are convinced that "face to face" avatar interaction would be benefitial to EVEs overall gaming experiance... and those that don't give a... you know.

But as much as the latter people wanna ignore it... it seems like it at times... there are those of us that think of the chats in game merely as a galaxy wide com system, with no possibility of "actual interaction"... and because of that, seeing our (wonderfully rendered) avatars locked inside those "golden cages" that are the CQs is kinda... meh.

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Flamespar
WarRavens
#1014 - 2012-08-14 10:11:42 UTC
A good step forward would be for CCP to enable a basic multi avatar environment as an optional opt in Beta feature.

This could start as simple as being able to invite other characters into your CQ.

This way they could continue to work on it at a slow burn, whilst satisfying Pro-Wis players that something is happening.

Just a suggestion.
Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#1015 - 2012-08-14 10:12:59 UTC
Agreed... we got other "test features" on Tranq before. Blink

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
#1016 - 2012-08-14 12:54:18 UTC
Shalua Rui wrote:
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
That's because PEOPLE ARE MEANINGFUL CONTENT IN THEMSELVES.


This, so much... actually, I already thought about setting up a forum RP somewhere... one could do SO much with the EVE setting aside from spacehippy-content! Roll


Well, the Intergalactic Summit is supposed to be about that, but it's quite uninteresting; I haven't seen a good thread in there in ages... and certainly nothing that could pose for "RP".

Roses are red / Violets are blue / I am an Alpha / And so it's you

Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#1017 - 2012-08-14 12:56:37 UTC
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
Well, the Intergalactic Summit is supposed to be about that, but it's quite uninteresting; I haven't seen a good thread in there in ages... and certainly nothing that could pose for "RP".


That's what I meant... it's more like a news channel... not badly written, though.

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Soulpirate
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#1018 - 2012-08-14 15:08:44 UTC
Perhaps it would be interesting to use Second Life to set up an EVE avatar
area. I have never tried SL, but my understanding is you can pretty much
create any enviroment that you like. So, somethig set up to look and feel
like EVE for a social spot for those interested in human avatar interaction.

I mean, if CCP isn't going to do it, someone else may as well.

Seleia O'Sinnor
Drop of Honey
#1019 - 2012-08-14 15:24:33 UTC
If CCP would have followed the path of WiS we wouldn't have gotten all the small things, all the sweet things since the change of direction. Maybe we would just have gotten another cake door.

Odyssey: Repacking in POS hangars for modules +1,  but please for other stuff too, especially containers. Make containers openable in POS hangars.

oldbutfeelingyoung
Perkone
Caldari State
#1020 - 2012-08-14 15:24:40 UTC
Ghazu wrote:
Flamespar wrote:
Dear CCP. Can you please remove large fleet fights from EVE? They make my graphics card heat up.

Also how dare you force PVP content on me, can you please give me a check box so I can disable it. Ganking should be impossible.

Also please stop updating graphics - new missile and explosion effects do not add meaningful gameplay and should therefore be removed completely.

Blah blah blah ....

It's funny but we literally only have one or two people posting consistently in this thread saying they don't want WiS.


I'll give you that, oldbutfeelingyoung's incessant whining and his weird keyboard made me do it.



i am so honored Lol
But you stil are not original ,AntiWis people keep coming back with the same words every time.

Besides that ,you seem to think that, i want WIS yesterday
The only thing i want now at this moment , is that Team Avatar is allowed to show of their work

We can troll each other like idiots,but no one here knows what TA was doing
And no one knows if he likes the ideas,TA implemented in that demo

and about my weird keyboard ,English is not my native language ,but you complaining about whining,makes me clear you understand.

R.S.I2014