These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Barge Fairy Tale

First post First post
Author
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#1581 - 2012-07-28 01:29:58 UTC
Matius Toskavich wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
I guess our arguments against this change aren't "easy mode" enough for the hordes of hisec miners who feel entitled to handed out protection without working one iota for it.


Sounds like someone can't adapt to having their "easy mode" ganking made "hard mode".. Roll

That's made even funnier by the fact that I don't gank.
Seriously, check eve-kill.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Smohq Anmirorz
State War Academy
Caldari State
#1582 - 2012-07-28 01:30:06 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Smohq Anmirorz wrote:
baltec1 wrote:

This is the very simple fact of ganking, 99% of the time it is done for profit.


I have seen a number of ganks, now, the wrecks usually sit there. I just watched one two days ago, he ganked, sat in station for 15 minutes, then left the system. The hulk was still sitting there.

So ganking for fun is obviously done more often than your made up statistic would suggest.


Not since the days of M0o. You found one example, my corp has over 700 examples of us looting everything including the wreck.


I found several examples, and I wasn't really connected with any of them so it is far more of a random sample than taking the stats from just your corp. As I said, I've seen a number of ganks, the wrecks usually sit there untouched. 99% is nowhere near an accurate number.
Matius Toskavich
State War Academy
Caldari State
#1583 - 2012-07-28 01:37:14 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Matius Toskavich wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
I guess our arguments against this change aren't "easy mode" enough for the hordes of hisec miners who feel entitled to handed out protection without working one iota for it.


Sounds like someone can't adapt to having their "easy mode" ganking made "hard mode".. Roll

That's made even funnier by the fact that I don't gank.
Seriously, check eve-kill.


Ahh you must be a miner then, otherwise you wouldn't care about this thread and the changes so much? Shocked
Blastcaps Madullier
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
Sedition.
#1584 - 2012-07-28 01:59:35 UTC
Herr Wilkus wrote:
Well played, CCP.
Your DEVs/balancing team apparently have the reasoning ability of small children so I'll put this in terms they will understand.

**********
"Once upon a time there were three little miners. They ventured into the big wide world to earn their fortunes.

The First Little Miner went to Jita and fit his Hulk with Cargo Expanders.
This way, he could AFK mine with a minimum of effort and fuss. It left the miner plenty of freetime to daydream, jerk off, and watch Japanese Anime while earning ISK.

....Then along came the Big Bad Ganker in a Catalyst, saying "Little miner, little miner, I'm going to ******* do you in."
The first miner, predictably, was tabbed out and said nothing.
So the Ganker loaded and overheated and blew the Hulk in, and splattered the pod, too.

The Second Little Miner went to Jita, bought MLU's and a hauler.
This way, he could mine faster than anyone else - and become quite wealthy in no time. It was a bit more work, of course, but he kept himself entertained chatting in local with his neighbors.

...Then along came the Big Bad Ganker, in a Tornado, saying "Little miner, little miner, I'm going to ******* do you in."
The second miner, said "Not by the hair of my chinny, chin chin," aligns, and turned on his Small Booster II.
So the Ganker loaded and overheated and blew the Hulk in. The frightened miner flees in his pod, broke, but alive.

The Third Little Miner went to Jita and fit his Hulk with a DCII, MSE, Invulnerability Fields, and Shield Extender Rigs. Wisely, he sets his Hulk to orbit a nearby asteroid, and always kept an wary eye on his surroundings.

...Then along came the Big Bad Ganker, in a T2 Talos, saying "Little miner, little miner, I'm going to ******* do you in."
The Third miner chuckles to himself, overheats his Invulnerability Fields and aligns to the nearest station.
So the Ganker loaded, and overheated, and simply CANNOT blow the Hulk in.

Defeated, the ganker slinks off in his pod, and the smart little Miner scoops the Talos wreckage and sells it for a tidy profit."

THE END
**********

Cargo Hulk, Yield Hulk, Tank Hulk, those were the choices - all with drawbacks.

Cargo - for a Hybrid Exhumer/Hauler, with a risky AFK 'cruise control' option.
Yield - to maximize returns with friends providing transport.
Tank - 30-40K EHP to discourage/thwart gankers.
(and really, one could still put up a reasonable tank on either Cargo or Yield fit Hulks, if they used the mid-slots....Roll)

But choices are dangerous things. Given the choice, miners will take cargo/yield every time - and then throw a tantrum when they are ganked. The rare, clever miner who tanked his Hulk; well, he weathered the storm - and reaped the benefits as mineral prices rose.

But throw that out the window, just give the whining miners all three. Notice how CCP put quite a bit of care into saving miners from their own bad choices.

This is more than a buff - this is CCP acknowledging that miners, as a group, are too stupid to make the correct fitting choices.

Step 1: Idiot miners don't even use the slots they have - so slap stupid amounts of EHP directly to the hull, rather than give them additional slots/PG or CPU. Frigate-size Skiff, Orca EHP. Really?

Step 2: Idiot miners keep sacking their EHP with Cargo Expanders - so make Cargo Expanders pointless with the Ore Bay.
(And I doubt the DEVs will get around to fixing the 'special cargo bays don't drop loot' bug, either - simply because fixing THAT bug would benefit the wrong kinds of players, I suppose.....)

So, good game, CCP.
Good to know we are still steaming, full speed ahead! - towards Hello-Kitty highsec, a paradise for bots and stupidass gameplay. Hard to hear myself say it, but I'm now officially nostalgic for the days of Incarna and WiS development. At least back then, the DEVs were merely wasting their own time. Roll



And your missing completely the WHOLE POINT of the changes suggest that you go back and REREAD the dev blog, atm T1 mining barges cant tank for s**t, the covetor is frequently skipped along with the procurer, skiffs are ONLY useful for meckoxit mining and macks which also cant tank for s**t are only useful for ICE MINING, leaving lets see, hulk for ice and ore mining, tanked hulk to survive gankers, and well hulk, hulk, hulk, hulk....
THE whole point of the ship rebalance is give ALL barges and exhumers a reason and purpose and to do away with the current tier system, also read the part about "ONGOING SHIP REBALANCES FOR ALL SHIPS" then start QQing, end of period ALL ships are being reworked.
now kindly go pick your pacifier off the floor and stick it back it.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#1585 - 2012-07-28 02:42:32 UTC
Exhumers HAD a role... Skiff was for mercoxit, Mackinaw for ice, and Hulk for general purpose mining.
The Hulk can also be tanked sufficiently to discourage ganking as is on Tranquility. They can also do any number of other things to mitigate their risk.

With this change these techniques are pointless and miners are simply safe by default.
How you people manage to believe this isn't dumbing down the game I will never understand.
This change also doesn't make anything more difficult for gankers (merely more expensive) but significantly easier for miners.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#1586 - 2012-07-28 02:54:35 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Exhumers HAD a role... Skiff was for mercoxit, Mackinaw for ice, and Hulk for general purpose mining.
The Hulk can also be tanked sufficiently to discourage ganking as is on Tranquility. They can also do any number of other things to mitigate their risk.

With this change these techniques are pointless and miners are simply safe by default.
How you people manage to believe this isn't dumbing down the game I will never understand.
This change also doesn't make anything more difficult for gankers (merely more expensive) but significantly easier for miners.


you mention miners are becoming dumber since its easier now. But then you say its easy to gank other ships, and they will stay easy. So you as a ganker are dumb then? and as well as staying dumb? It will just cost more money, to support your dumbness?

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#1587 - 2012-07-28 02:55:11 UTC
Matius Toskavich wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Matius Toskavich wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
I guess our arguments against this change aren't "easy mode" enough for the hordes of hisec miners who feel entitled to handed out protection without working one iota for it.


Sounds like someone can't adapt to having their "easy mode" ganking made "hard mode".. Roll

That's made even funnier by the fact that I don't gank.
Seriously, check eve-kill.


Ahh you must be a miner then, otherwise you wouldn't care about this thread and the changes so much? Shocked

I care about this game and the implications going forward of CCP's intentions.
However, Mara Rinn is a miner who has expressed misgivings about this patch for the same reasons as me.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#1588 - 2012-07-28 02:56:54 UTC
rodyas wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Exhumers HAD a role... Skiff was for mercoxit, Mackinaw for ice, and Hulk for general purpose mining.
The Hulk can also be tanked sufficiently to discourage ganking as is on Tranquility. They can also do any number of other things to mitigate their risk.

With this change these techniques are pointless and miners are simply safe by default.
How you people manage to believe this isn't dumbing down the game I will never understand.
This change also doesn't make anything more difficult for gankers (merely more expensive) but significantly easier for miners.


you mention miners are becoming dumber since its easier now. But then you say its easy to gank other ships, and they will stay easy. So you as a ganker are dumb then? and as well as staying dumb? It will just cost more money, to support your dumbness?

Your opinion on who is dumb is irrelevant since you clearly can't read.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#1589 - 2012-07-28 03:00:47 UTC
^ Sorry to hurt your feelings, I mostly experienced you as annoying, and wanted to troll you, my apologies.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#1590 - 2012-07-28 03:02:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Tyberius Franklin
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Exhumers HAD a role... Skiff was for mercoxit, Mackinaw for ice, and Hulk for general purpose mining.
The Hulk can also be tanked sufficiently to discourage ganking as is on Tranquility. They can also do any number of other things to mitigate their risk.

With this change these techniques are pointless and miners are simply safe by default.
How you people manage to believe this isn't dumbing down the game I will never understand.
This change also doesn't make anything more difficult for gankers (merely more expensive) but significantly easier for miners.

Barges didn't, but it should be clear that CCP wasn't happy with the idea of 2 of 3 ships dedicated only to limited cases. And considering the primary difficulty of mining is securing your ship from being destroyed, by active piloting or profit prohibitive EHP, if it isn't any harder for gankers, it isn't any easier for miners.
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1591 - 2012-07-28 03:12:08 UTC
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:

No need to be an expert to realise a simple buff to some "pixels" will not and suddenly make bots be smarter.
Thinking or pretending the other way around is just being idiot, paranoid, lacking totally of software knowledge (this is harder than be able to count up to 3) and talking out of an hairy pubbie arse.


Since you're such a smart hairy assed pubbie does buffing the most easily botted profession make botting easier or harder? You haven't explained why the bot argument is a bad one yet either internet security expert who graduated from MIT magna *** laude.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

Corina Jarr
en Welle Shipping Inc.
#1592 - 2012-07-28 03:15:21 UTC
The problem is with the current Sisi stats, the Proc/Skiff will still be useless because the Mack and Hulk (and T1 equivalents) will tank more than enough to discourage the for profit gankers while still getting decent yields.

And the only reason to use a Mack will be for afk ice mining.


So the new ship usage will be-
Mack: afk or solo Ice miner
Hulk: general ore and active group ice miner
Everything else: I'm too poor/lacking skills to afford the other two.

This is not how it should be. There should be a reason to fly the other miners. But with this change, nothing will change except less Hulk deaths.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#1593 - 2012-07-28 03:16:33 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:

No need to be an expert to realise a simple buff to some "pixels" will not and suddenly make bots be smarter.
Thinking or pretending the other way around is just being idiot, paranoid, lacking totally of software knowledge (this is harder than be able to count up to 3) and talking out of an hairy pubbie arse.


Since you're such a smart hairy assed pubbie does buffing the most easily botted profession make botting easier or harder? You haven't explained why the bot argument is a bad one yet either internet security expert who graduated from MIT magna *** laude.

Penalizing bots should not be prioritized over giving non-botting players (AFK or otherwise) wider and more relevant choices.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#1594 - 2012-07-28 03:16:38 UTC
Then CCP clearly doesn't follow their own stated intent as exhumers are T2 ships and are therefore supposed to be specialized.
I agree insofar as T1 barges are concerned.

The ganker places an unwritten value on what they're willing to spend, regardless of if they gank for the profit or for the lulz.
This is the trade off and it's different for each person. The fact remains that the higher total cost of a gank, the less gankers there will be. Miners could do this themselves, but they've whined and cried and now CCP is caving and has decided to coddle the hisec carebear masses.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Boxless
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#1595 - 2012-07-28 03:17:24 UTC
http://i.imgur.com/x7d0o.jpg

77k+ EHP Cyno Procurer. These values are insane.

 FREE Iamien !!!!!

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#1596 - 2012-07-28 03:20:17 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:

No need to be an expert to realise a simple buff to some "pixels" will not and suddenly make bots be smarter.
Thinking or pretending the other way around is just being idiot, paranoid, lacking totally of software knowledge (this is harder than be able to count up to 3) and talking out of an hairy pubbie arse.


Since you're such a smart hairy assed pubbie does buffing the most easily botted profession make botting easier or harder? You haven't explained why the bot argument is a bad one yet either internet security expert who graduated from MIT magna *** laude.


Its mostly, cause we don't care about the bots. We want to mine, not worry about bots. You should pick up mining, would close off some of that free time you have to worry about bots so much.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Shizuken
Venerated Stars
#1597 - 2012-07-28 03:20:51 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:
Marconus Orion wrote:
Oh he mad.


But is he wrong?

Nope.

Fitted properly, a Hulk cannot be profitably ganked.



This is great, dont take any responsibility for your own actions. NO ONE FORCES YOU TO GANK MINERS. You CHOOSE to gank miners and then justify it by repeating the same BS (risk v reward, dont undock if you cant afford it, eve was made for pvp... etc...). Just because you can be a **** on the playground does not mean you have to.

This is getting to be rediculous with you people. You are constutuionally incapable of admitting you are dicks, despite all of the evidence. You can keep ganking, by all means. EvE was designed to allow many forms of gameplay. But, if you highsec gank you MUST admit that you are an antisocial, you take pleasure in causing frustration to others, and only YOU are responsible for YOUR actions.
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#1598 - 2012-07-28 03:23:02 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Then CCP clearly doesn't follow their own stated intent as exhumers are T2 ships and are therefore supposed to be specialized.
I agree insofar as T1 barges are concerned.

The ganker places an unwritten value on what they're willing to spend, regardless of if they gank for the profit or for the lulz.
This is the trade off and it's different for each person. The fact remains that the higher total cost of a gank, the less gankers there will be. Miners could do this themselves, but they've whined and cried and now CCP is caving and has decided to coddle the hisec carebear masses.


I kind of think you are asking too much. This is mostly a band aid, or one of their paper cuts. Not a full drawn out rebalance. CCP is currently doing a full out rebalancing. But they are starting with frigs and moving to BS, then starting on the T2 line. With exhumers being T2 they are far back in line, for a rebalance. You are just gonna have to wait with Black ops and other ships for more specialization and worthyness.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Unit757
North Point
#1599 - 2012-07-28 03:26:57 UTC
Shizuken wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
Marconus Orion wrote:
Oh he mad.


But is he wrong?

Nope.

Fitted properly, a Hulk cannot be profitably ganked.



This is great, dont take any responsibility for your own actions. NO ONE FORCES YOU TO GANK MINERS. You CHOOSE to gank miners and then justify it by repeating the same BS (risk v reward, dont undock if you cant afford it, eve was made for pvp... etc...). Just because you can be a **** on the playground does not mean you have to.

This is getting to be rediculous with you people. You are constutuionally incapable of admitting you are dicks, despite all of the evidence. You can keep ganking, by all means. EvE was designed to allow many forms of gameplay. But, if you highsec gank you MUST admit that you are an antisocial, you take pleasure in causing frustration to others, and only YOU are responsible for YOUR actions.



Fit a tank on a hulk, suddenly, you get ganked less??! Imagine that. I don't think its that gankers are "dicks", its that miners don't learn and think they should not have to worry about being attacked in their ships, which, btw most of them have less tank then a shuttle. This kind of mentality doesn't belong in EvE, which is why you have individuals, such as James 315, who speak out against it so much. And, I don't blame them.
Boxless
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#1600 - 2012-07-28 03:27:13 UTC
http://i.imgur.com/x7d0o.jpg Just look at that tank. for the tier 1 mining barge.

 FREE Iamien !!!!!