These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

Two Perspectives on Ganking, Will We Find a Common Solution?

Author
Rushdyn Afasi
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#1 - 2012-07-22 12:48:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Rushdyn Afasi
One issue that never fails to provoke passionate responses from capsuleers is Ganking. Opinions are spread between these two poles:

Ganking is PvP, a part of EVE

This side would argue for the association of ganking with what EVE means, and how the game should be played. All activities in EVE are PvP in one way or another, and no pilot is excluded from that reality. Ganking is just a part of it.

Some may even proud of being gankers, dismissing the critics who reject their worldview. Comments range from polite disagreements ("EVE is a PvP game, and ganking is PvP") to veiled insults ("Hello Kitty Online is that way").

Stopping ganking is hurting EVE, because it denies players the right to play as they like.
EVE is a PvP game, and gankers are playing the game as it is meant to be.


Ganking is destroying EVE

On the other side of the fence of course are those who reject that association.

For them, a "PvP", a "fight", offers an image of two trained MMA fighters clashing in a cage, or a dramatic scene of a medieval knight throwing a sword to his opponent to be picked up, because defeating an unarmed man would be an insult his knighthood.

Ganking on the other hand, is akin to a big man sneaking behind a small boy and kill him while he is fishing. The big man later feels good about his win, calling that a "fight". He doesn't even consider that a cowardice, and instead blame the boy for not minding his surroundings.

Ganking is hurting EVE, as it is by definition trespassing the rights of players who prefer non-combat styles of PvP , such as mining.

As it is wrong to force a combat pilot to mine when he is fighting, it is just as unacceptable to force an industrial pilot to fight when he is mining.


EVE is what we make it to be

Of course, like any complex issues that have a whiff of philosophical flavors, there is no simple answer to this. CCP has tried to, and should continue to, remain neutral in this issue.

We, the pilots of EVE, are the ones who will shape what kind of community we are.

If we celebrate ganking as a fascinating PvP, CCP will have to let it spread. If we ostracise gankers as cowards who are hurting EVE, CCP will find a way to stop it.


Finding a resolution: Could we learn from Chess?

The challenge for CCP is to provide a resolution to this philosophical conflict without antagonizing the either the gankers nor the miners.

One idea perhaps is by rewarding balance engagements.

In Chess, players are rated by ELO system. One draw against a Grandmaster worths more to your ranking than beating 10 low-rating amateurs. So players are always looking to win against opponents with similar or higher rating.

If we have a ranking system like ELO, do you think it will encourage players to seek MMA cage encounters instead of killing a boy who fish?

Do you have other suggestions? Or do you think ganking is good for EVE? Why?


P.S.: I love EVE and want the best for the community, so I try to be constructive in this discussion, I apologize if I fall short of that. Thanks in advance for your constructive contributions to this discussion :)


Response to comments is in #25
Ayeshah Volfield
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#2 - 2012-07-22 13:04:33 UTC
All activities in this game that follow the EULA are privileges, not rights.

In highsec, in particular, CONCORD is not there to protect, it's only there to impose highsec rules and punish those that break them.

Finally, both the victim and the ganker are at fault for any ganking that actually succeeds. Those that refuse to adapt are the ones hurting EVE the most.

EVE is what happens when the rule of law does not apply and Darwinism is allowed to run freely.

DrSmegma
Smegma United
#3 - 2012-07-22 13:11:02 UTC  |  Edited by: DrSmegma
Ganking isn't as much of a problem as the security mechanisms of high sec.

I mean wtf, -10 can enter in a pod? Where's even the fun in that?

As for the bolded parts, yes it is pvp, no it is not destroying Eve, it just sucks in a normal way. For you, anyway.

Rushdyn Afasi wrote:

Ganking is hurting EVE, as it is by definition trespassing the rights of players who prefer non-combat styles of PvP , such as mining.

What rights? Wtf are you talking about? P

Rushdyn Afasi wrote:

If we celebrate ganking as a fascinating PvP, CCP will have to let it spread. If we ostracise gankers as cowards who are hurting EVE, CCP will find a way to stop it.

Oh so you want as to cry as loud as possible. Nope, not participating. Also CCP doesn't "have to" do anything. They can remove ganking if they want, even though you aren't crying, or they can keep the mechanics in place like they are, even with your crying.

What you mean is: "I can't afk mine anymore while watching MLP:FiM on youtube!! (good series, granted) CCP please change the game mechanics cause I suck at playing Eve!!"

You could always, you know, pay attention to your environment, put hardeners on, do something else than mine in high sec, etc..

One more thing: There aren't just two perspectives on ganking. There are many. Not as many as there are Eve players, but many. You just picked "two" to make your tears-essay easier for yourself (suits you, high sec miner mentality) and to prevent yourself from actually putting any kind of thought into the subject.

PS: No I'm not a ganker, and I have nothing against afk miners. But the flaw in your gameplay routine should be obvious to you. Don't act so surprised. I don't make a Q.Q topic every time someone undercuts me either. This is a game of social darwinism. Someone with a plan like yours will fall short and rightly so.

PPS: I have considered to pick up ganking just for the epic tears. That idea would never occure to me without postings like yours.

Eve too complicated? Try Astrum Regatta.

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
#4 - 2012-07-22 13:24:02 UTC
"suicide gankers" don't have a problem with pve'ing from time-to-time.

"whiners" have a problem with pvp'ing from time-to-time.

The argument is not equal. One side embraces all of EVE while the other only tries to embrace half of EVE.

Everyone else ("regular PVPers" and "competent carebears") just sits back and /popcorn's.
Dave stark
#5 - 2012-07-22 13:27:48 UTC
miners need to stop complaining because they let themselves get ganked. simple as.
Dirk Magnum
Spearhead Endeavors
#6 - 2012-07-22 13:29:38 UTC
The common solution has been here since launch: all ship-on-ship combat is legitimate, even if CONCORD has to come in and blast someone.

There is literally no debate to be had unless we've accepted that Eve is no longer fit to be Eve.

                      "LIVE FAST DIE." - traditional Minmatar ethos [citation needed]

Sugar Kyle
Middle Ground
#7 - 2012-07-22 13:43:20 UTC
There is no need for a formal CCP backed ranking system to encourage 'better' PvP. People have their own reasons to do what they do for whatever reason they do it. To create ranks is to fix the entire situation into a very narrow set of concepts and trap it there.

As long as spaceships violence other spaceships all is as it should be. Someone's desire not to be violenced is irrelevant. Sometimes others can't find targets. If they cried out for ccp to force people to be around for them to shoot they would be told tough luck. Avoid being shot. It is an active excercise and one will not always be sucessful.

No one is locked out of a playing style. Being ganked is as much a decision made as what ore to mine.

Not liking something that is valid and nonexploit gameplay does not make it wrong.

Stop asking CCP to fix something that one can fix oneself.

Member of CSM9 and CSM10.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#8 - 2012-07-22 14:09:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Rushdyn Afasi wrote:
Ganking is hurting EVE, as it is by definition trespassing the rights of players who prefer non-combat styles of PvP , such as mining.
Unfortunately (for them), no such right exist. No rights are being trespassed on, by definition or otherwise. All that's happening is that their incorrect assumptions are being proven wrong.

Ganks must be possible for the game to work — unless miners want to be completely cut off from the rest of the game (i.e. there is no longer any reason for them to mine since they cannot do anything with the ore) others need to have the same ability to affect them as they have in affecting others. And due to the multiplayer sandbox nature of the game, they do affect others, no matter how much they prefer not to think about it.
Mag's
Azn Empire
#9 - 2012-07-22 15:49:49 UTC
Rushdyn Afasi wrote:
Ganking is hurting EVE, as it is by definition trespassing the rights of players who prefer non-combat styles of PvP , such as mining.
What rights?

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Tor Gungnir
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#10 - 2012-07-22 16:13:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Tor Gungnir
There are more than those two opinions on it.

Here's mine:

It is a part of EVE and you have to deal with it as a gankee, however I believe it is incredibly cowardly of the ganker and you should go look for real targets who can and will fight back.

But just because I believe it is cowardly, why would I call for it to be banned or somehow removed?

lol

Space. It seems to go on and on forever. But then you get to the end and a gorilla starts throwing barrels at you.

Andoria Thara
Fallen Avatars
#11 - 2012-07-22 16:51:51 UTC
Miners mining non-stop with no risk is bad for eve. I think if a miner hasn't been ganked after 30 days they should self destruct a buy a new ship to contribute to the economy.
Tres Farmer
Gallente Federation Intelligence Service
#12 - 2012-07-22 16:55:17 UTC
Rushdyn Afasi wrote:
*snip*
One idea perhaps is by rewarding balance engagements.

In Chess, players are rated by ELO system. One draw against a Grandmaster worths more to your ranking than beating 10 low-rating amateurs. So players are always looking to win against opponents with similar or higher rating.

If we have a ranking system like ELO, do you think it will encourage players to seek MMA cage encounters instead of killing a boy who fish?

Do you have other suggestions? Or do you think ganking is good for EVE? Why?
*snap*

that with the flawed 'right' has been pointed out already, so..

About that ELO system though.. some people just like to grief and nothing will deter them, what do you do?
And others already measure their success per isk for 'economically' worthwhile targets.
Corina Jarr
en Welle Shipping Inc.
#13 - 2012-07-22 17:03:16 UTC
I think a ranking system would be very interesting.

Since KMs are here to stay, CCP could add in a ranking system that would allow people to stroke their epeen even more.

Each ship would be given a rank type, with things like miners, pods, shuttles and noobships being the lowest. Add in a modifier for beating a higher ranked player and you could create motivation to go after the bigger guys.


To make blobbing less attractive (though it will always be the choice when something matters) make the points divide by the number of attackers on a KM.


Won't stop ganking of course, but it would be a nice addition to KM whoring.
Mystic Lore Arcanium
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#14 - 2012-07-22 17:15:59 UTC
What I see as a common underlying current in threads on this subject is the expectation of "ethics and morality" from all involved.
I find that EvE (spelled EvE not Eve for it's not a girls name it's Everybody against Everybody) human nature and group interactions play out and often mimic real life history. There is a presumption that Highsec living mandates a certain Code of Ethical Conduct, and those who violate this Code earn the ire and disdain of those who live by the Code. I have breaking news for you... there is no such "Code" in EvE, if you desire such things there are game mechanics available for you to organize, implement, and ENFORCE such Codes if you can. Such issues were faced time and time again throughout Human History.

All that it takes is to figure out what needs to be done, recruit others of similar circumstance and sell them on your plan, and then implement it. If that fails try something else.

This advice goes for both sides here...
Josef Djugashvilis
#15 - 2012-07-22 17:21:53 UTC
One can 'play as one likes' insofar as it does not stop any other player 'playing as they like' with the proviso that neither party is breaking any of CCP's rules.

This is not a signature.

Gaellia Bonaventure
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#16 - 2012-07-22 17:49:06 UTC
Eve is red in tooth and claw. Some people get that, others don't.

Bring your possibles.

Bootleg Jack
ACME Mineral and Gas
#17 - 2012-07-22 17:56:10 UTC
Everyone
Versus
Everyone

Stop making **** up.

I'm an American, English is my second language...

Evei Shard
Shard Industries
#18 - 2012-07-22 18:25:02 UTC
Rushdyn Afasi wrote:
Two Perspectives on Ganking, Will We Find a Common Solution


No.

Profit favors the prepared

Sharise Dragonstar
Big Strong
Hisec Miners
#19 - 2012-07-22 20:12:25 UTC
Ganking is part and parcel of eve but there is no punishment out there that deters gankers. Unfortunately the punishment of losing your ship is negated by the ISK from the salvage and loot from the gankers victim. Until the isk cost is greater than the rewards from ganking it will continue.
Red Teufel
Calamitous-Intent
#20 - 2012-07-22 20:14:24 UTC
to gank or not to gank, that is the question.
123Next page