These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

Since ISD Dorrim Barstorlode asked,
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#1 - 2012-06-26 00:20:08 UTC  |  Edited by: RubyPorto
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode wrote:

Post constructively.

Negative feedback can be very useful, provided that it is presented in a civil, factual manner. Tell us what you don't like and why and how you feel it could be improved. Posts that are not constructive, insulting or rude may be deleted, no matter how valid the ideas behind them may be.

Thank you.


We tried that (or at least I did) at the beginning of this game of whack-a-mole. Those civil, factual posts were -----Edit-----
Whack-a-mole it is.

My Edit:
http://eve-search.com/thread/125865-1

-----Edit-----.

Post edited.
No attacks of CCP staff.

ISD Tyrozan
Ensign
Community Communications Liaisons
Interstellar Services Department

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2012-06-26 00:20:38 UTC
IBTS. You can take our posts but you can never take our desire to look smart.

Dodixie > Hek
Suqq Madiq
#3 - 2012-06-26 00:20:57 UTC
A thread discussing prior moderation? Surely this won't be locked.
CARB0N FIBER
Derailleurs
#4 - 2012-06-26 00:21:29 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode wrote:

Post constructively.

Negative feedback can be very useful, provided that it is presented in a civil, factual manner. Tell us what you don't like and why and how you feel it could be improved. Posts that are not constructive, insulting or rude may be deleted, no matter how valid the ideas behind them may be.

Thank you.


We tried that (or at least I did) at the beginning of this game of whack-a-mole. Those civil, factual posts were Stenssoned for 'discussing moderation" even when they weren't (the flashpoint was a thread discussing Shirts of all things).

So, since any form of public communication about the fact that Volunteer moderation (esp with an evident lack of training/history lesson) is a poor idea for the EvE-O forums is useless;

Whack-a-mole it is.

IB4TStensson.


Agreed!
Malacath Azaria
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2012-06-26 00:21:40 UTC
Stenssoned; When a constructive thread is locked for spam, trolling or personal attacks.

We should apply for this to be added to the dictionary.
Graic Gabtar
The Lemon Party
#6 - 2012-06-26 00:21:56 UTC
Stenssored?
ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2012-06-26 00:22:39 UTC
Malacath Azaria wrote:
Stenssoned; When a constructive thread is locked for spam, trolling or personal attacks.

We should apply for this to be added to the dictionary.


IBTS has already become a forum "thing".

Dodixie > Hek
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#8 - 2012-06-26 00:23:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
RubyPorto wrote:
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode wrote:

Post constructively.

Negative feedback can be very useful, provided that it is presented in a civil, factual manner. Tell us what you don't like and why and how you feel it could be improved. Posts that are not constructive, insulting or rude may be deleted, no matter how valid the ideas behind them may be.

Thank you.


We tried that (or at least I did) at the beginning of this game of whack-a-mole. Those civil, factual posts were Stenssoned for 'discussing moderation" even when they weren't (the flashpoint was a thread discussing Shirts of all things).

So, since any form of public communication about the fact that Volunteer moderation (esp with an evident lack of training/history lesson) is a poor idea for the EvE-O forums is useless;

Whack-a-mole it is.

IB4TStensson.


I'm not sure why the shirt tucking thread was nuked, although I can see an argument made that the OP could not possibly be that stupid and was blatantly trolling.

I'm well past under estimating that particular capability of the EVE community.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.
ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2012-06-26 00:23:06 UTC
Graic Gabtar wrote:
Stenssored?


This is when a post is modified by stensson to hide content.

Dodixie > Hek
Cutter Isaacson
DEDSEC SAN FRANCISCO
#10 - 2012-06-26 00:23:17 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode wrote:

Post constructively.

Negative feedback can be very useful, provided that it is presented in a civil, factual manner. Tell us what you don't like and why and how you feel it could be improved. Posts that are not constructive, insulting or rude may be deleted, no matter how valid the ideas behind them may be.

Thank you.


We tried that (or at least I did) at the beginning of this game of whack-a-mole. Those civil, factual posts were Stenssoned for 'discussing moderation" even when they weren't (the flashpoint was a thread discussing Shirts of all things).

So, since any form of public communication about the fact that Volunteer moderation (esp with an evident lack of training/history lesson) is a poor idea for the EvE-O forums is useless;

Whack-a-mole it is.

IB4TStensson.



The thread that was locked was inflammatory and clearly lacked any real content and/or basis for continued constructive discourse, hence it was locked. Continued posting of threads consisting of little to no content and/or personal attacks on CCP staff are not the sign of people wishing to conduct rational conversation, and thus they were also locked.

"The truth is usually just an excuse for a lack of imagination." Elim Garak.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#11 - 2012-06-26 00:24:51 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode wrote:

Post constructively.

Negative feedback can be very useful, provided that it is presented in a civil, factual manner. Tell us what you don't like and why and how you feel it could be improved. Posts that are not constructive, insulting or rude may be deleted, no matter how valid the ideas behind them may be.

Thank you.


We tried that (or at least I did) at the beginning of this game of whack-a-mole. Those civil, factual posts were Stenssoned for 'discussing moderation" even when they weren't (the flashpoint was a thread discussing Shirts of all things).

So, since any form of public communication about the fact that Volunteer moderation (esp with an evident lack of training/history lesson) is a poor idea for the EvE-O forums is useless;

Whack-a-mole it is.

IB4TStensson.


I'm not sure why the shirt tucking thread was nuked, although I can see an argument made that the OP could not possibly be that stupid and was blatantly trolling.

I'm well past under estimating the that particular segment of the EVE community.


The shirt tucker was a random newbie who hadn't been able to find the tuck button. The thread got stenssoned before anyone could answer the newbie's question.

(Question got answered on like the third ressurected thread off that)

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
CARB0N FIBER
Derailleurs
#12 - 2012-06-26 00:25:39 UTC
1 account cancelled! Wanna go for another iSD?
ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#13 - 2012-06-26 00:26:50 UTC
Tin can alley of account at this point.

Dodixie > Hek
Mons Pubis Giganticus
Doomheim
#14 - 2012-06-26 00:27:15 UTC
I expect more from Snigg than mod wars.

Booooorrrrring.
Malacath Azaria
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#15 - 2012-06-26 00:27:28 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode wrote:

Post constructively.

Negative feedback can be very useful, provided that it is presented in a civil, factual manner. Tell us what you don't like and why and how you feel it could be improved. Posts that are not constructive, insulting or rude may be deleted, no matter how valid the ideas behind them may be.

Thank you.


We tried that (or at least I did) at the beginning of this game of whack-a-mole. Those civil, factual posts were Stenssoned for 'discussing moderation" even when they weren't (the flashpoint was a thread discussing Shirts of all things).

So, since any form of public communication about the fact that Volunteer moderation (esp with an evident lack of training/history lesson) is a poor idea for the EvE-O forums is useless;

Whack-a-mole it is.

IB4TStensson.


I'm not sure why the shirt tucking thread was nuked, although I can see an argument made that the OP could not possibly be that stupid and was blatantly trolling.

I'm well past under estimating the that particular segment of the EVE community.


The shirt tucker was a random newbie who hadn't been able to find the tuck button. The thread got stenssoned before anyone could answer the newbie's question.

(Question got answered on like the third ressurected thread off that)


Didn't the Devs deem picking on newbies to be a bannable offence?

The real question here is; Will Stensson be banned for such a terrible act that wil no doubt affect CCP's income & that of the NPE?
ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#16 - 2012-06-26 00:28:37 UTC
Malacath Azaria wrote:
Didn't the Devs deem picking on newbies to be a bannable offence?

The real question here is; Will Stensson be banned for such a terrible act that wil no doubt affect CCP's income & that of the NPE?


I want to see what happens when the first forum ban is handed out.

Dodixie > Hek
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#17 - 2012-06-26 00:29:55 UTC
Mons Pubis Giganticus wrote:
I expect more from Snigg than mod wars.

Booooorrrrring.


I've been Forum warring for a lot longer than I've been in Waffles.

Mod warring is just a new fun trick.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#18 - 2012-06-26 00:30:21 UTC
ElQuirko wrote:
Malacath Azaria wrote:
Didn't the Devs deem picking on newbies to be a bannable offence?

The real question here is; Will Stensson be banned for such a terrible act that wil no doubt affect CCP's income & that of the NPE?


I want to see what happens when the first forum ban is handed out.


Boom goes the dynamite.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
Malacath Azaria
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2012-06-26 00:34:20 UTC
ElQuirko wrote:
Malacath Azaria wrote:
Didn't the Devs deem picking on newbies to be a bannable offence?

The real question here is; Will Stensson be banned for such a terrible act that wil no doubt affect CCP's income & that of the NPE?


I want to see what happens when the first forum ban is handed out.


It's already happened.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#20 - 2012-06-26 00:36:01 UTC
Malacath Azaria wrote:
ElQuirko wrote:
Malacath Azaria wrote:
Didn't the Devs deem picking on newbies to be a bannable offence?

The real question here is; Will Stensson be banned for such a terrible act that wil no doubt affect CCP's income & that of the NPE?


I want to see what happens when the first forum ban is handed out.


It's already happened.


Who lost at Russian Roulette?

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
123Next page