These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

New dev blog: Next Unified Inventory Update

First post First post
Author
Geksz
The Fountain
#181 - 2012-06-05 19:38:42 UTC
LoRDa RaMOs wrote:

Attention 'back' button
Attention No more changing 'folders' with simple item dragging
Attention Compact tree names


Exactly what he says!
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#182 - 2012-06-05 19:44:05 UTC
CCP Goliath wrote:
Guys, the team isn't stopping working on fixes and improvements, they are changing their release cadence. Next release in 2 days, then another one 12 days after that. The 12 days (7 days development time) isn't going to spent doing no work! Please, I understand that you are angry, upset, etc. Your vitriolic hate is doing you no good - we don't listen harder because you call us worse names. To those who are still keeping it constructive, thanks, and we are working!


There are two issues that makes people go "vitriolic".

1) In the past you released many unfinished / buggy features but those were just bugs.

This time is the very fundamental design that is done wrong.
SCRUM allows for quick and decently easy refactoring, but cannot help when the design choices are just wrong.

It's not enough to write the tests, somewhere down the line you have also to think about the design and how it will affect the users.


2) When the beta testers provided feedback you programmers thought to know better than end user.

This is a problem I have seen in 20 years of career many, many times.
You have to step down off the "I am dev" throne and listen to the puny end users.
Some of them could be totally illitterate but you'll see them using the legacy software at blazing speed and could teach you optimized use cases you never thought about.


Both of the above issues are usually caused by junior software engineers, I'd honestly like to know how a senior could give the deploy authorization.
Boneshaker Baybee
Twist The Rusty Knife
#183 - 2012-06-05 19:46:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Boneshaker Baybee
All great features such as walking in stations have an off button, please supply one to the inventory system

I will be constructive and say general usage is fine. The problem I have had which prompted me to the above sentence.
Transfer 600 items from one character to another
Merge items with another stack
Transfer To Hauler
Move Two Jumps
Unload
Stack Items

35 mins...
Capsuler Rhea
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#184 - 2012-06-05 20:20:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Capsuler Rhea
CCP Explorer wrote:
Panhead4411 wrote:
CCP Explorer wrote:
I wanted to expand a bit on CCP Soundwave's comment in his dev blog that "doing frequent updates isn’t really healthy and can’t be maintained for longer periods of time" from a technical perspective. In this particular case then the frequent Inferno 1.0.x releases are starting to press against the staging process of the next main deployment.

We were planning to stage Inferno 1.1.x on 6 June but have pushed that back to 7 June to give the team working on the Unified Inventory all the time possible for updates of Inferno 1.0.x, before we must create the staging branch for Inferno 1.1.x to allow the teams working on that release to finalise their deployment. There are then going to be more updates to Unified Inventory in Inferno 1.1.x as CCP Soundwave detailed in the dev blog.
So is this the real reason the new Inventory was initially PUSHED onto TQ?

I understand and appreciate that you have in house dealines, but you seem to not be understanding that your customers would prefer a fully functional system before you try to work on something new.

Unless i've misread most of the feedback given in all the major threadnaughts thus far.
This is not the reason. We honestly thought we were ready.



Honestly thought you're READY? Despite the feedback on SiSi? you gotta be pulling our leg... can't you really tell Unified Inventory have some issues before you deployed it on TQ, or you're just acting as if nothing is wrong to meet a deadline?

** I want an account freeze, i'm not paying an MMO to be a beta tester, and i don't play to be frustrated, mad, irked, angered, fuming or blood-boiling at something, i play for fun and relaxation, Eve currently is not giving me that!
ISquishWorms
#185 - 2012-06-05 20:31:50 UTC
Capsuler Rhea wrote:

** I want an account freeze, i'm not paying an MMO to be a beta tester, and i don't play to be frustrated, mad, irked, angered, fuming or blood-boiling at something, i play for fun and relaxation, Eve currently is not giving me that!



^^ This

‘No, this isn't it at all. Make it more... psssshhhh’.

Callidus Dux
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#186 - 2012-06-05 20:41:19 UTC
CCP Goliath wrote:
Guys, the team isn't stopping working on fixes and improvements, they are changing their release cadence. Next release in 2 days, then another one 12 days after that. The 12 days (7 days development time) isn't going to spent doing no work! Please, I understand that you are angry, upset, etc. Your vitriolic hate is doing you no good - we don't listen harder because you call us worse names. To those who are still keeping it constructive, thanks, and we are working!


CCP Goliath:
You want that we calm down. Understandable! But to calm down; WE ALL need something from you.. a clear word WHAT fantastic improvements CCP will re implement or new invent.
You have to understand that a simple phrase like "We listen to you.." or "We will improve the UI a little bit more.." is just not enough. Give us something .. something more than a empty cliché. Give us a clear direction where we can see which way CCP is going.
The best would be the current list of the planned improvements. NOT a hightech masterplan with all details; just some REAL functions what you are planning to implement in this, at present, terrible unified UI.
MOST of us want just the 100% copy of the old UI. Perhaps 100% is not possible. But give us a hint how near you want to come to the old UI.

- Will it be possible to have hundreds of seperate windows again? Seperate windows with seperate informations leads to a massive reduces calculation work and therefore less lag.
- Can we have ALL our former options in the right click menue back? An easy to install functionality; but important for the community.
- Will it be possible again to open cargo containers; wrecks and ships within a several window per simple double click at this container? And please abandon every try to implement a further mysterious shortcut with 'SHIFT + X'

If you have a closer look to ALL of the former statements from CCP, you will clearly see that not one of them will explain what will be CCP's next steps. A little bit less lag here; some mysterious improvements there.. Nothing substantial just empty words.

Come on CCP. You can do it better (I think). Bring more facts into this discussion. WHAT functions can we await with the next main patch? If you just say "Improvements" and "Some great stuff" you can bet that a lot of people have another view of Improvements and greats stuff.. and might be very disappointed about your (hard) work. The next rage would be pre-programmed. We should calm down? Than you must deliver facts. Its just as simple.
Rommiee
Mercury Inc.
#187 - 2012-06-05 20:43:02 UTC
Chokichi Ozuwara wrote:
CCP Goliath wrote:
Your vitriolic hate is doing you no good - we don't listen harder because you call us worse names.

When you guys release stuff that doesn't work, and you ignore tester feedback, this is what happens.

We didn't originate this issue, CCP did.

People are pissed because you guys made a series of compound mistakes (bad enough) and you ignored your most passionate users (much worse). You might not like how people are expressing it, but these tough words from people still subscribed are better for you and CCP than mass unsubscribes.

It's not about people motivating you to work. You're missing an essential part of understanding relationships. People are venting. We have very low expectations for you guys. We are simply expressing our frustration with that state of affairs the only way we can, short of unsubscribing.

The way you make this stop, is to fix the problem, not to lecture us on our tone. Our tone isn't the problem with the inventory.

What I think CCP misses, is that people like Tippia represent us much better than the CSM does, and we (the players) know it. So when you ignore her, you ignore us. And no one likes being in a relationship where they feel (right or wrong) that they are being ignored.


This.

The arrogance that you are now starting to show, REALLY is not helping.
Callidus Dux
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#188 - 2012-06-05 20:55:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Callidus Dux
Chokichi Ozuwara wrote:

What I think CCP misses, is that people like Tippia represent us much better than the CSM does, and we (the players) know it. So when you ignore her, you ignore us. And no one likes being in a relationship where they feel (right or wrong) that they are being ignored.


Hm.. Chokichi Ozuwara. Now that you said this I think you are right. I have to ask; what was the statement from the CSM (at whole or in parts) concerning this UI again? Was there any? Do they have a own opinion concerning this unified UI issue?

Sadly but truth. It is irrelevant for me, who does NOT represent my interests. THIS 'CSM' does not speak in my name! It is NOT my substitute and I must ask whats their function in EvE?

Unnecessary ballast! Sad
Lemming Alpha1dash1
Lemmings Online
#189 - 2012-06-05 20:59:44 UTC
will this mean showing your corpse trophy (with its former owner's name on it) in (local) chat is finally fixed ? Bear

Information is Ammunition,

War does not tolerate Ambiguities.

May you live in an interesting Empyrean age !

http://eve-radio.com/

Varg Krugar
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#190 - 2012-06-05 21:25:18 UTC
one minor improvement request: please make item selections persist across window resizing. sorry if this came up before.

what happens to me all the time is that i dock up with loot, doubleclick to get my ships cargobay open, select all the loot i want to drop off, unselect my ammo and whatever i want to keep, and then notice that the tree view isnt open... i think you can guess what happens next ;)

i know i can work around it with alt-g, its would just be more convenient if you could resize a window or open/close the tree view and have the selection in the open folder carry over.
Dennie Fleetfoot
DUST University
#191 - 2012-06-05 21:52:47 UTC
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
All this bad feeling on both sides could have been avoided if the issues identifed by Tippia and others had been fixed before release.


This is exactly the problem.

People are justifiably upset. We spend a lot of time and our money to play this game so we're going to get a bit narky with you when the proverbial hits the fan. Is some of the vitriol being flung at you acceptable, probably not (and I've been guilty of some serious flinging over this). Is it understandable? Absolutely.

A lot of us gave up the time to test this on Sisi and the overwhelming opinion was that is was a shoddy and ill conceived notion and shouldn't go anywhere near TQ.

You've all said you listened to the feedback and I've no reason to doubt you. But you didn't act upon it. Thats the important distinction to be made here. The proof of you not acting on it is the fact it appeared on TQ, when it wasn't even close to ready.

Is anyone going to come out and admit that in hindsight releasing this to TQ when it didn't work was very, very bad call and should never have happened till it did work?

CEO Dust University

CPM 1&2 Member

www.twitter.com/DennieFleetfoot

Sturmwolke
#192 - 2012-06-05 21:56:45 UTC
CCP Goliath wrote:
Your vitriolic hate is doing you no good - we don't listen harder because you call us worse names.


Actually it does. It shows the measure of negativity associated with Inferno's UI feature. The more vitriol you get from the users, the more it points to faulty decision making or process - from both the low level and high level stakeholders. Infact, if you get more than enough of it, the issue gets the attention of the higher levels. It's the standard escalation path for nearly all companies.

Now, you or CCP at this point in time is in no position to bemoan the heavy flak from players. They wasted a lot of their time wrestling with the broken UI, you'd think many would be happy to write constructively? This thing was clearly broken from inception and you don't need me to tell you that as a professional in your work - because you're already aware it was broken. Many of us is/were professionals in their own right, it's not exactly rocket science to deduce/see where it went wrong.

Stop antagonizing the players because it makes you look very bad. Years from now, a dev who posted moronically will be remembered.
E man Industries
SeaChell Productions
#193 - 2012-06-05 22:00:56 UTC
Small thing.

When I have an inventory window open and I click my items button....I don't want the window to move there I want a new window....
Can clicking or opening the inventory system open a new widow by default rather than just moving the current window to that location.

Eg) I have corp hanger open and want to look into my inventory to see if I have 100mn thingy before I grab one from the corp...I click my inventory butoon and *&%&$* I lost my corp hanger window.

Please Please Please.
Par'Gellen
#194 - 2012-06-05 22:10:19 UTC
CCP Goliath wrote:
Customers demanding a quality product is fine, customers demanding hard working peoples' jobs, or calling their personal integrity, skill and commitment into question, isn't in my book.

So the inability of the current staff to provide a quality product to paying customers should go unchallenged by those customers? Of course not.

Believe it or not customers are SUPPOSED to complain like this when disasters like this happen. Failure to do so leaves you lot thinking we are content with the current staff's management abilities and descision making. WE ARE NOT! Obviously.

I see by your sig that you are in QA. How did even one tenth of this UI disaster make it past you? Yes you personally CCP Goliath! How? With all the feedback from the test server and your own personal experiences (I'm assuming you actually fired up the client and tried it out), how did you, CCP Goliath, not send it back to the designers and declare it not acceptable?

Running a company is about much much more than drinking coffee and laughing at customers that complain (this is how most of us see the current managment of CCP). This especially applies to the higher-ups who ultimately own the responsibility of the screw ups under them. This is how it works in a corporate environment. Don't believe me? Look it up.

Why do I even have to explain this stuff to a company as big as CCP?

We need someone in charge of the whole operation that is concerned with the final product. Teams of employees (be it devs, QA people, testers, or even an entire company) are only as good as their leaders who direct their efforts.

As far as I'm concerned Hilmar is still fired and I'd LOVE the job. I'm not kidding. You'll never find another person who cares more about Eve. Send me the paperwork and I'll be on the next plane. I'm THAT serious!

"To err is human", but it shouldn't be the company motto...

nardaq
Orion Expeditions
#195 - 2012-06-05 22:11:54 UTC  |  Edited by: nardaq
CCP Goliath wrote:



I don't have an issue with complaints, I have an issue with the manner of complaining.

hm.. yes.. how come.....


/edit

Par'Gellen (post above me) took the words out of my mouth.


Par'Gellen wrote:


I see by your sig that you are in QA. How did even one tenth of this UI disaster make it past you? Yes you personally CCP Goliath! How? With all the feedback from the test server and your own personal experiences (I'm assuming you actually fired up the client and tried it out), how did you, CCP Goliath, not send it back to the designers and declare it not acceptable?


I'd like know thins one....
nardaq
Orion Expeditions
#196 - 2012-06-05 22:19:12 UTC
gd damn, quote instead edit :/
Arclite Ortegana
Renegade Republic
#197 - 2012-06-05 22:31:55 UTC
I'm trying to be optimistic about this but it is extremely difficult. Personally I feel the hate for this unified inventory as much as everybody else but I also know that throwing a hissyfit isn't going to work. You're trying. A lot of us get that but your fixing the things we don't even care about.

All I want is to be able to have a seperate window for my hangars open and pinned so that the only person who can move it is me, not the game. It's a similar situation with salvaging, I want wrecks to open in a seperate window, and after hitting loot all, i want them to close, not revert back to the cargohold which i already have opened on the other side of the screen. Anything else that comes is a bonus.

If you can do this you will have my respect again. If you can't then I have 1 billion isk in assets ready for my 2 accounts to go inactive for a few months which I really don't want to have to do.
BlackTalon
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#198 - 2012-06-05 22:41:43 UTC
ccp quote :We’ve been hogging a lot of releases for the Unified Inventory recently and at some point we’ll need to go back to our regular release calendar.

yup you didnt listen to test servers and didnt listen to us who told yous its was crap system :even after all the patches and fixes its still way slow and crap .who every thought off the inventory in an tree form must be blind .why have to keep scrolling threw them i dont know corp hanger with tabs and there names an ship icon on the left. And bring back the corp hanger tab on the right side be nice to once again click open up can see all corp hangers and there names and at bottom tab members hangers .also open containers easy by double clicking them and allowing multi windows open up with out no problems argh the good old days sadly eve at the moment is very slow and hard to move stuff around fast if your got an few toons that you use at once . 8yr player not playing as much at the mo to much off an pain in arse

Daiki Ryuu
Black Knights Inc.
#199 - 2012-06-05 23:04:46 UTC
Just a quick post here. What I belief will be most helpful for a mission runner like me is:

1) The ability to select a whole bunch of salvaged items from the inventory, right click it, and select "Sell Selected Items:

2) From "Sell Selected Items" menu, the ability to check the :
"Sell if xxx% more then market value",
"Do not sell if xxx% below market value"

3) A review menu (like the contract menu) to do a final look see if all the items selected are what I want to sell.

This will definitely make selling a whole bunch of salvage easier, especially when the haul is 300 items and above... :)
Challu
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#200 - 2012-06-05 23:42:25 UTC
CCP Soundwave wrote:


Yeah, we'll make it easier to use. Added to what you're talking about, we're looking at adding bays to the neocom, so if you drag the drone bay to the neocom, you can access it from there when it's available, it's kind of cool. Anyway, on it Big smile


Nice!

Honestly, if you add the ship hanger and item hanger back, it will go a long way to making this system as easily usable as the last one. You'd probably want different icons for them though and not the generic one we get now cause if you have hanger bay, drone bay and cargo bay all open at the same time, having to hover/click and figure out which is which will add another source of frustration.