These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

EVE Online: Inferno - Feedback thread

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
DazedOne
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#321 - 2012-05-22 19:57:02 UTC
I have an idea CCP, make your crappy unified inventory optional. It is beyond horrid!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Thanks for making my corp hangers in that crappy interface, now I have to do more work to find items. Make this optional like you did with that crappy ass captains quarters like most of us aren't using. I would think you would of learned your lesson from that debacle. apparently not. Only positive thing I can say is I like the missilie effects. You guys need to pull your heads out of your collective you know what and start listening to your damn players. How many of them told you that inventory crap you slapped together sucks nuts???????? MOST OF THEM!!!!!!!!!
5n4keyes
Sacred Templars
Fraternity.
#322 - 2012-05-22 19:57:32 UTC
Everything is fantastic, except the UI.

Whilst in station its not too bad, admittedly I would like member hangers to be organised Alphabetically, simple fix, but other than that UI works okish, things take longer, but thats normal.

Now, I decided to go out to a POS, minerals are stored in a corp hanger, and they need to go into an assembly array, problem, the POS has multiple arrays, guns, silos, etc. which makes one fecking huge list. So insted of having 2 reasonably small boxes, I now need to full screen the menu in order to do what I was doing before, note that now I cant have my browser open with a google doc, which I need for working out what to build, etc.

UI really isnt an improvement, its now more annoying, and slow to do things.
Arra Lith
Infinite Point
Pandemic Horde
#323 - 2012-05-22 19:58:28 UTC
FFS why CCP you need to break everything that was working fine ??? You really hate your players so much or something ?

New hangar and inventory IS TERIBBLE. Completly non functional and useless.

PLEASE GIVE US OLD HANGAR WINDOW.
Zleon Leigh
#324 - 2012-05-22 19:59:24 UTC
Well torp effects are nerfed. So much for the Jita New Year's display....

Incarna - Newest business example of mismanaged capital. CCP - Continuing to gank independent PI producers every day

PvP's latest  incentive program ** Unified Inventory **  'Cause you gotta kill something after trying to use it
Sythin Chure
Doomheim
#325 - 2012-05-22 20:02:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Sythin Chure
To be honest, Its pretty fine, Although I think that it needs a better filter.
The only other thing I would like for this is that split windows so transferring items would be a bit easier.

Softcore PvPer
Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#326 - 2012-05-22 20:04:03 UTC
Grath Telkin wrote:
Adriel Malakai wrote:
This has probably been mentioned, but is there a way to make it so that the inventory window auto-opens when you dock, if it was open when you undocked?


There are certain things they've said they're working on fixes for, this is one of them, window retention, the corp member hangar list, what you're reading here is basically 5 posters bitching up a storm that they've had to adapt to something new.


Yet not a one of them opened their mouth when we were force fed Dominion sov rules and changes, nobody complained when Titan changes or supercarrier changes went through, nobody stood up for the nano ships when they got nuked from orbit.


This change like all others, people will learn to live with, or wont, and the game will ramble on.
Eh? This inventory system has flaws / bugs, but let's talk about your assumption that people didn't speak up about the Dominion Sovereignty mechanisms or super cap modifications... There's only so many times a space pilot can ask for follow-up and follow-through from their MMO vendor [on Dominion loose ends] before it is time to throw the hands up in the air [like you just don't care.]

It has been, what, 2.5 years with little-to-no work done on the Sov and Null-sec stuff with only CCP Greyscale's occasional tweak to exploration and sanctums?

And now we see FW gets some pretty tasty Sovereignty upgrades (50% off the cost of medical clones!?!?!) with Null-sec continuing to stagnate as far as game assets go.

For example, whatever happened to the proposed treaty functionality that was put onto the table just prior to Dominion's release? That sounded like one of the most amazing things to hit Null-sec standings -- ever.

+++++++ I have never shed a tear for a fellow EVE player until now. Mark “Seleene” Heard's Blog Honoring Sean "Vile Rat" Smith.
Di Mulle
#327 - 2012-05-22 20:04:30 UTC
Grath Telkin wrote:
Captain Praxis wrote:


The main reason trees are bad? They don't let you view the contents of two locations at the same time.


Shift click the other window you want open, it'll pop right off for you.

Now you can see two windows at once.


And the Moon orbits the Earth.

Equally widely known and equally irrelevant.
<<Insert some waste of screen space here>>
Tanaka Sekigahara
United Space Marine Corp
#328 - 2012-05-22 20:05:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Tanaka Sekigahara
I'll say very simply this. It does not feel so much like I am playing a game anymore, as much as it feels like I am using a computer.

More and more it feels like work, and less like leisure.

Sure, It's usable, just takes some getting used to. It's still more clicks, and less situational awareness of my inventory in any particular place, and more time getting at it.It's just annoying.

I play to be diverted from annoyances, not to be annoyed.
Clayton Dozer
#329 - 2012-05-22 20:05:24 UTC
Bridgette d'Iberville wrote:
At work and have yet to login today. Can someone please report how these changes have impacted ship spinning?


todays game update fixed my laggy client and Its horrible how the ship spinning was effected



it spins 2x faster and makes me DIZZZZY....... Oops

i think im trolling this forum post correctly if im not then please shut up..
Angeliq
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#330 - 2012-05-22 20:15:35 UTC
CCP pls answer this ONE QUESTION!

Why did you "stayed the course" with the crappy Inventory Feature after all the negative feedback from Sisi?

wow much space very ship such pvp many pew
Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
#331 - 2012-05-22 20:16:47 UTC
Angeliq wrote:
CCP pls answer this ONE QUESTION!

Why did you "stayed the course" with the crappy Inventory Feature after all the negative feedback from Sisi?


Negative from some people, not everyone dislikes the new inventory.

The Tears Must Flow
Callidus Dux
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#332 - 2012-05-22 20:17:55 UTC
Vaju Enki wrote:
Angeliq wrote:
CCP pls answer this ONE QUESTION!

Why did you "stayed the course" with the crappy Inventory Feature after all the negative feedback from Sisi?


Negative from some people, not everyone dislikes the new inventory.


But MORE people liked the OLD version and HATE the new crap.
Tanaka Sekigahara
United Space Marine Corp
#333 - 2012-05-22 20:18:19 UTC
Angeliq wrote:
CCP pls answer this ONE QUESTION!

Why did you "stayed the course" with the crappy Inventory Feature after all the negative feedback from Sisi?


You will have to address that one to CCP Hubris, who seems to be running game design these days.....
Rrama Ratamnim
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#334 - 2012-05-22 20:19:47 UTC
Hakaru Ishiwara wrote:
[quote=Grath Telkin]
It has been, what, 2.5 years with little-to-no work done on the Sov and Null-sec stuff with only CCP Greyscale's occasional tweak to exploration and sanctums?

And now we see FW gets some pretty tasty Sovereignty upgrades (50% off the cost of medical clones!?!?!) with Null-sec continuing to stagnate as far as game assets go.

For example, whatever happened to the proposed treaty functionality that was put onto the table just prior to Dominion's release? That sounded like one of the most amazing things to hit Null-sec standings -- ever.


Like'd and +1'd for truthly awesomeness
Rrama Ratamnim
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#335 - 2012-05-22 20:23:55 UTC
Callidus Dux wrote:
Vaju Enki wrote:
Angeliq wrote:
CCP pls answer this ONE QUESTION!

Why did you "stayed the course" with the crappy Inventory Feature after all the negative feedback from Sisi?


Negative from some people, not everyone dislikes the new inventory.


But MORE people liked the OLD version and HATE the new crap.


Come on no one f*cking "liked" the old system, we tolerated it because there were no options...

The new system is broken due to bugs and unfinished polish left and right that have been pointed out that CCP promises to look at and resolve...

But saying we liked the old system is histerical, i suppose you "loved windows 3.1" as well right?
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#336 - 2012-05-22 20:24:36 UTC
The "All wars" tab on the wars panel doesn't actually show all wars. It shows the 50 most recently declared wars.

Can you name things based on what they actually do?
Ad'Hakim Tahous
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#337 - 2012-05-22 20:25:38 UTC
Anyone else having issues with chat windows? My main toon is connected to several corp/alliance chat windows all showing similar problems:
- people who have logged off hours ago still shown in some but not all chat windows
- oeople who log on shown as active in some but not all chat windows
What?
Agrikaan
Absolute Order XVIII
Absolute Will
#338 - 2012-05-22 20:27:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Agrikaan
Bloodpetal wrote:

@ Unified Inventory -

I LOVE IT, Thank you.



@ Those who Do not like Unified Inventory.

ON THE TOP LEFT, there are a set of LEFT POINTING CHEVRONS. Click on this, Unified Inventory Index goes away, and you never have to use it again.


GREAT solution! I pressed it! Now I have my ship cargo bay where I want it, small, to the side. But I can't find my Corp Hangar now. Guess I never have to use it again. So of course you have to use it.

- Bookmarks are STILL not sorted. Closing in on the third major updated for a 1 hour fix that can save lives.

- And yes, the new "inventory" system. Choosing between a small tiny window perfect for a ships cargo and then have the Corp hangar stuff in the same tiny window, or having the few items you have in cargo open up to the size you want the Corp hangar window to be. Not a good solution. This was not an issue at all before, no "fix" or improvement was needed. It could only get worse, and it did.

Otherwise, all good.
Angeliq
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#339 - 2012-05-22 20:27:56 UTC
Rrama Ratamnim wrote:
Callidus Dux wrote:
Vaju Enki wrote:
Angeliq wrote:
CCP pls answer this ONE QUESTION!

Why did you "stayed the course" with the crappy Inventory Feature after all the negative feedback from Sisi?


Negative from some people, not everyone dislikes the new inventory.


But MORE people liked the OLD version and HATE the new crap.


Come on no one f*cking "liked" the old system, we tolerated it because there were no options...

The new system is broken due to bugs and unfinished polish left and right that have been pointed out that CCP promises to look at and resolve...

But saying we liked the old system is histerical, i suppose you "loved windows 3.1" as well right?


The old Items and Ships functions + window settings had more functionality! It was more intuitive and easy to use, not to mention FASTER loading. If windows 3.1 would be faster and more useful than windows 7, I'd stick with it! I don't like shiny new crap only cos it's shiny and new.

wow much space very ship such pvp many pew
D'Kelle
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#340 - 2012-05-22 20:33:16 UTC
As I have mentioned in other posts why can we not add our own short ID/Name to any POS stucture up to a max of say, five/six chars, we dont need you to remove your ingame names etc: especially as you offer the option but it dosn't work , not that that is any real surprise here, still we now have INVENTORY! now if you use it and look at your Multiple corp hanger arrays WOW surprise! they all appear the same with no way to differentiate them, DO YOU GUYS really ever play EVE AT NORMAL PLAYER LEVEL TO SEE WHAT IS GOING ON? result more click fest to see which one is which and what is in it, from that point of view your standard name is now pointless. Might suggest you change your bedfellows and see what an normal average player wants / needs in EVE.