These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Remember When I Said Alts Were The New Wardec Shield?

First post
Author
Kelduum Revaan
The Ebon Hawk
#41 - 2012-04-26 10:04:57 UTC
Patient, I will indulge you, as you have a couple of good questions in that post, however your opinion may differ on my answering these honestly. Nevertheless...

Quote:
Did you ever have contingency plans to alliance hop should the ability to defend yourself ingame from wardeccers prove to not be feasible/desirable for E-Uni?
We currently have and previously had no plans to alliance hop, otherwise we would have formed another alliance as a standby. However there are plans for a 'disaster' situation which can be enacted if needed which would ensure E-UNI's continuity of operation with little interruption.

Quote:
What is the maximum amount of corp members you can have in your alt corporation?
Currently, off the top of my head, the limit is something like 550 members. It's run by my own alt as he wasnt doing much else, and I may add more SP to Corporation Management in the future. By comparison, E-UNI can hold 6500 members, and we're using a little under a third of that capacity at present, with none inactive more than 31 days outside of a few honorary members and emeriti.
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#42 - 2012-04-26 12:23:49 UTC
Patient 2428190 wrote:
Okay, so the NDA thing is misinformation by an idiot blogger making a pathetic reach attempt.
I never made any claim or suggestion that Kelduum was breaching the NDA for in-game advantage.
Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse
The Curatores Veritatis Auxiliary
#43 - 2012-04-26 12:52:28 UTC
Simetraz wrote:
This whole post just made me laugh.

Lets see if I got this right.
A bunch of players who have no interest in PvPing decided to band together to so that they don't have to PvP.
And the supposed PvP'rs are whining cause they can't get free kills without paying more for a war dec Big smileBig smileBig smile

Too funny, just find someone who actually wants to fight.

Or take a hint from how many gankers there are out there who figured out that you don't need a war dec to kill someone in high-sec

RollRollRoll


haha!! Excellent and well said!

Imagine that, Carebears extracting Fearbear tears. Nothing new there.

(some slight modifications where made to the original quote).
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#44 - 2012-04-26 12:55:51 UTC
ShipToaster wrote:
Did you hear the question asked about why declaring war for a month should cost up to 320 times more than the default operating costs for an alliance per month? Still no answer on that.
Kind of.

The answer was that they think we're willing to pay for the number of targets: more targets = easier to find fights = higher cost. Also, there are apparently “drawbacks” (left undefined) with having a ratio or size-difference based formula for the cost.

The problem is, of course, that it's complete nonsense. Finding targets is easy; you want a manageable amount of them, not just ”more”; and if they just give us the formula, it can be as complicated as all hell — we'll just plug it into excel, as with everything else, and plan from there.
Qvar Dar'Zanar
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#45 - 2012-04-26 13:47:53 UTC
Wow you're a genius, who could have thought about this?
Previous page123