These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

so the hulk WTF CCP?!!?!?

First post
Author
Karim alRashid
Starboard.
#81 - 2012-04-11 09:56:56 UTC
Herr Wilkus wrote:


Generally ships get buffs when they are underutilized. (well, except for Black Ops)
If it was REALLY bad, nobody would fly it.


Correct.

Quote:

I don't think you can honestly say that Hulks are underutilized - its one of the most commonly flown ships in the game.


As a matter of fact, when people start to fly only one ship and fit, which obsoletes all other ships and fits (cf. ECM nerf, nano nerf, NOS nerf, the second nano nerf, the second ECM nerf, supercap nerf), then CCP, well, you guessed it, nerfs it.

Hulk is up for a nerf, methinks. Twisted

Pain is weakness leaving the body http://www.youtube.com/user/AlRashidKarim/videos

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#82 - 2012-04-11 09:59:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Sunviking wrote:
Tippia wrote:
…so how many 1600mm plates do you usually fit your Iterons with?
Difference is that a Iteron is a tech1 ship that costs a few million to buy, The Hulk is a Tech2 specialised mining ship that costs 200million to buy.

So yes, we expect it to be a bit more durable.
…and cost, as always, is not a balancing factor. Again: both are non-combat industrial ships. The hulk is a whole lot more durable than its cousins if you choose to actually tank it (but no-one does, because god forbid that you reduce your yield even a tiny bit to improve on your safety).

The Hulk can fulfil its role just fine while still maintaining a proper tank.

Mara Rinn wrote:
What other ship needs to lose weapons in order to be able to fill mids and lows with tank sufficient for its role? Even Caldari missile boats have sufficient CPU and PG to mount enough tank to do the job without sacrificing high slots.
All of them, pretty much. Notice his wording, and then take a look at things like target painters, tracking computers, tracking enhancers, weapon upgrades…

If you want to max out the tank on any ship, your “gun” part will suffer for it.
ugh zug
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#83 - 2012-04-11 09:59:48 UTC
to ccp. while you envision mining vessels to be like oil rigs, you don't take into consideration that oil rigs are not attacked by combat vessels or kamikazed by zeros inrl.

Bring the tankablity of exhumers up to 75-85% of most tech 2 Battle Cruiser hulls would still be very balanced for the cost of the ship hull and the time required to train for it.

it wont be enough to save you from a gank but it will make them work for it.

Want me to shut up? Remove content from my post,1B. Remove my content from a thread I have started 2B.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#84 - 2012-04-11 10:07:25 UTC
ugh zug wrote:
Bring the tankablity of exhumers up to 75-85% of most tech 2 Battle Cruiser hulls would still be very balanced for the cost of the ship hull and the time required to train for it.
Cost is not a balancing factor.

In what way is a non-combat ship meant for base industry use with 100k+ EHP balanced?
TheBlueMonkey
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#85 - 2012-04-11 10:11:37 UTC
Nick Bison wrote:
Yeah, Hulk is a T2 BC sized ship with a sub-cruiser tank.
Fricken pathetic and should be addressed.

I do not advocate making Exhumers with super-tanks but at least something respectable for their size, cost and tech level.


Everything is ballance,

Less Tank - More DPS
More Speed - Less tank
More mining yield - Less ????

So CCP went with Less tank.

You know, if you went with less yield... you could probably get more tank... at least enough to save you from a thrasher any how.

[Hulk, terrible fit to prove a point]
Micro Auxiliary Power Core II
Micro Auxiliary Power Core II

Medium F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction
Small F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction
Photon Scattering Field II
Invulnerability Field II

Modulated Strip Miner II, Veldspar Mining Crystal I
Modulated Strip Miner II, Veldspar Mining Crystal I
Modulated Strip Miner II, Veldspar Mining Crystal I

Medium Core Defence Field Extender I
Medium Core Defence Field Extender I
Baneken
Arctic Light Inc.
Arctic Light
#86 - 2012-04-11 10:21:07 UTC
Tippia wrote:
ugh zug wrote:
Bring the tankablity of exhumers up to 75-85% of most tech 2 Battle Cruiser hulls would still be very balanced for the cost of the ship hull and the time required to train for it.
Cost is not a balancing factor.

In what way is a capital combat ship meant for base gank use with 100m+ EHP balanced?


RollRollRollRoll

I don't mind hulk having a weak tank but when you have to baby sit your alt in null not because of players but because of belt rats something is wrong.
TheBlueMonkey
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#87 - 2012-04-11 10:23:20 UTC
Baneken wrote:
Tippia wrote:
ugh zug wrote:
Bring the tankablity of exhumers up to 75-85% of most tech 2 Battle Cruiser hulls would still be very balanced for the cost of the ship hull and the time required to train for it.
Cost is not a balancing factor.

In what way is a capital combat ship meant for base gank use with 100m+ EHP balanced?


RollRollRollRoll

I don't mind hulk having a weak tank but when you have to baby sit your alt in null not because of players but because of belt rats something is wrong.


I'd take that as "working as intended" tbh.

If you want to avoid baby sitting, buy some stupidly price x-type shield booster.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#88 - 2012-04-11 10:37:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Baneken wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Cost is not a balancing factor.

In what way is a capital combat ship meant for base gank use with 100m+ EHP balanced?
RollRollRollRoll
Nice strawman. So you agree, then that the hulk is fine since you have to resort to fallacies like this to maintain something that might be mistaken for an argument. Goodie.

Oh, and people using the “safe against null rats” fits in highsec, rather than a fit that would protect them against highsec dangers, is one of the primary reasons hulk ganking caught on, so not only can it be done — it's the genesis.
Kreeia Dgore
24th Imperial Crusade
Amarr Empire
#89 - 2012-04-11 10:56:42 UTC
Agree with OP, hulk can be fitted for reasonable tank, but then it is useless for mining. It can mine well, but then it won't be able to tank a destroyer. Of course you may spend 700m on modules, but when you but so much money into the ship you generally get an extra edge to be used somewhere. The fitting above is a great example. Expensive and useless, since the mining yield sucks. It is a common misconception about miners, being a miner isn't about having a strip miner, it is all about modules and implants. You increase your yield = you loose your high, low, some med slots and rigs. With the rest, there is no reliable way to tank.
I'm ok with that, as long as the ship has lower material costs. Also, i would like to see some boost to structural HP, which i consider a reasonabe way to express how sluggish the vessel but still it shows somehow.
Jojo Jackson
Dead Red Eye
#90 - 2012-04-11 11:07:04 UTC
Karim alRashid wrote:
Herr Wilkus wrote:


Generally ships get buffs when they are underutilized. (well, except for Black Ops)
If it was REALLY bad, nobody would fly it.


Correct.

WRONG

If the Abaddon would be bad you could still chose Geddon or Apoc. If all 3 would be bad you can switch to Minmatar, Caldari or Galente Battleships.

Now ... there is ONE high end mining ship. The Hulk.
You can NOT simply switch to an other ship like combat pilots can.

If there is just ONE ... you use it even if it has real and hardcore problems as there are no alternatives.

It's like the VW Beatle after WW2 or Trabant from DDR.
If there is no alternative people use it even if this cars have ******* bad breaks, ~34 PS only, no airbags, no radio or whatever.

Why the hell can't I fitt capital repairs or shield booster on an Orca ... it's an CAPITAL ship!

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#91 - 2012-04-11 11:09:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
Herr Wilkus wrote:
Haha. Miners just never stop complaining and crying. They aren't even getting CCPwnd like Incursion runners and gankers - they just crying because they aren't getting the buffs they want.

Let me clue you in.

Generally ships get buffs when they are underutilized. (well, except for Black Ops)
If it was REALLY bad, nobody would fly it.



Yeah when a PvP ship sucks people dump it and go for a similar worth and role another ship.

When a mining ship sucks people dump it and go for .... oh wait, that's it.

I will spell it easy for the tards who can't get it.

You can buy a fully insurable covetor, have somewhat less yield. Cost approximates zero, yield is o(Hulk), tank is o(Hulk), that is covetor WILL die but at zero cost.

Hulk has an huge jump in cost, while the yield is a bit better but the tank is still worthless.

If the tanked T2 ship yields less than the zero cost, disposable untanked T1 ship, then the T2 ship is worthless.
BellaDonna Nyghtshade
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#92 - 2012-04-11 11:10:51 UTC
Someone said a Hulk is no good at PvP?

Oreally?

http://youtu.be/ndWUlntJ58U

Lol

You can PvP with ANYTHING in this game.........well, anything that can fit an offence.

Stop being so narrow minded....................


Cool
Jojo Jackson
Dead Red Eye
#93 - 2012-04-11 11:14:37 UTC
BellaDonna Nyghtshade wrote:
Someone said a Hulk is no good at PvP?

Oreally?

BAD KEYLOGGER LINK

Lol

You can PvP with ANYTHING in this game.........well, anything that can fit an offence.

Stop being so narrow minded....................


Cool

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndWUlntJ58U

If you mean this video he is attacked by t1 friggats only PRE destroyer and PRE arti buff.

Why the hell can't I fitt capital repairs or shield booster on an Orca ... it's an CAPITAL ship!

Prince Kobol
#94 - 2012-04-11 11:17:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Prince Kobol
Personally I think this is a pointless discussion for the simple reason EVERY SHIP (yeah yeah a Titan can't be ganked.. funny) can be ganked and it has been covered god knows how many times.

Even IF CCP increased the base hulk EHP by a few k, that just translates into 1 more destroyer.

The best way to avoid getting ganked is to spend a couple of hours scouting the system and surrounding system where you want to mine, see who is flying about, talk to other miners.. (yes I know.. talking to other people in a MMO. I must be some crazy nut Roll) to find out if ganks happen, if they do how often and who are the main culprits.

Use the many on-line tools available to check to see how many kills there has been in the systems and who is doing the killing.

Once you find somewhere you are happy with and have laid the ground work for the intel you need, talk to other miners in local and look out for each other.

Also.. FIT SOME DAMN TANK.

Nothing worse then listening to people ***** and complain that they have been ganked and then you find out they had zero tank and were mining in a system that has a history of ganks.

I usually have 24K EHP before Orca boosts on all my hulks and that is with 3 Modulated Strips miners and a Mining Laser Upgrade II.

You know how many hulks I have lost to ganks.... ZERO
Pak Narhoo
Splinter Foundation
#95 - 2012-04-11 11:19:48 UTC
Some people here clearly never have mined and I cannot blame them.
But if you had you'd know its so (fork in eye) boring even if you do it for like maintaining your own POS or getting minerals to build stuff, the last thing you want is compromise your yield or cycle for that tiny little bit of tank.
Its feels like forced labour.

The Hulk was designed with the gameplay of 2006 in mind. We're 5+ years further now.
The Hulk in these days needs a buff to be able, even tough oh so slightly, to cope (just a little bit), with the challenges of today.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#96 - 2012-04-11 11:20:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Yeah when a PvP ship sucks people dump it and go for a similar worth and role another ship.

When a mining ship sucks people dump it and go for .... oh wait, that's it.

[…]

You can buy a fully insurable covetor, have somewhat less yield. Cost approximates zero, yield is o(Hulk), tank is o(Hulk), that is covetor WILL die but at zero cost.
…so in other words, there is no real need to buff the Hulk since there is a viable alternative, and yet the Hulk is the ship everyone uses. In fact, it's one of the most used ships in the game, so it can't be nearly as bad as people make it out to be.

Pak Narhoo wrote:
The Hulk was designed with the gameplay of 2006 in mind. We're 5+ years further now.
The Hulk in these days needs a buff to be able, even tough oh so slightly, to cope (just a little bit), with the challenges of today.
What challenges are those and what buffs would that be? It rather sounds like people are stuck in the gameplay of 2006 and refuse to adapt it to the realities of 2012 (viz. by fitting a tank).
Prince Kobol
#97 - 2012-04-11 11:22:11 UTC
Pak Narhoo wrote:
Some people here clearly never have mined and I cannot blame them.
But if you had you'd know its so (fork in eye) boring even if you do it for like maintaining your own POS or getting minerals to build stuff, the last thing you want is compromise your yield or cycle for that tiny little bit of tank.
Its feels like forced labour.

The Hulk was designed with the gameplay of 2006 in mind. We're 5+ years further now.
The Hulk in these days needs a buff to be able, even tough oh so slightly, to cope (just a little bit), with the challenges of today.



The problem is not with the ship but with mining as a whole.

Buffing the hulk to allow people to afk mine is not the solution.
Jojo Jackson
Dead Red Eye
#98 - 2012-04-11 11:23:36 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
Personally I think this is a pointless discussion for the simple reason EVERY SHIP an be ganked and it has been covered god knows how many times.

True ..

BUT PvP guys like to whine like sissys "risk v reward".

Using a T1 Destroyer which cost about 15m with guns and w-ups to eazy mode gank a 300m (WITHOUT mods) T2 ship ..

not enough risk for the reward!

It is YOU (wannabe PvPler) who over abuse this "risk v reward"! Not the miners.

After CCP buffed the Destroyer, Projectil and Hybrid guns ... they destroyed any balance for Mining+Industrial ships.

Now they MUST fix this balance problem again (nerf Destroyer+Hybrid+Projectil OR .. better for both sides buff mining+industrial ships).

Why the hell can't I fitt capital repairs or shield booster on an Orca ... it's an CAPITAL ship!

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#99 - 2012-04-11 11:23:42 UTC
Mara Rinn wrote:

What other ship needs to lose weapons in order to be able to fill mids and lows with tank sufficient for its role?


Just about every single cruiser.

Quote:

As has been said in this thread already: a miner is actually better off flying a Covetor than a Hulk, because the Covetor can be flown with a maximum yield fitting, platinum insurance, and the inevitable loss will be more than compensated for by the difference in income between that Covetor and the max-tanked Hulk it replaced.


So fly the covetor then. I'll stick with a supertank hulk which does not need replacing whenever a destroyer turns up.
BellaDonna Nyghtshade
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#100 - 2012-04-11 11:23:44 UTC
Jojo Jackson wrote:
BellaDonna Nyghtshade wrote:
Someone said a Hulk is no good at PvP?

Oreally?

BAD KEYLOGGER LINK

Lol

You can PvP with ANYTHING in this game.........well, anything that can fit an offence.

Stop being so narrow minded....................


Cool

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndWUlntJ58U

If you mean this video he is attacked by t1 friggats only PRE destroyer and PRE arti buff.


First off, "bad keylogger link" my ass. Sort your A/V and stop being a tard.

Second, sure, that was pre-alotofthings

Doesn't change a damned thing.

A Hulk, properly skilled with drone and tank skills is perfectly capable of doing low end PvP, just like in that video.

The only things that have changed are the exact fitouts.

Now, that being said, of course any asshat can manage to cobble together an alpha strike ship or team, but I hardly call that PvP.

No sport in it, mate.

Like shooting ducks with nuclear weapons.

Alas, "fair fights" and "1v1" have gone the way of the Albatross, it seems.

Killmail whores only think about the gank, not the actual fun from battle tactics.

What a miserable way to exist, IMHO.