These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Live Events Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Live Event] Invitation to the Arek'Jaalan Project

First post First post
Author
Jowen Datloran
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#41 - 2012-03-28 18:31:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Jowen Datloran
The effort thing... sort of a core issue. The number of potential willing participants to a live event is always great, except when effort from their behalf enters the picture. Most have, after all, enough work to be done in real life already

Headfirst's Sansha events before Incursion were brilliant as they easily included people due to, frankly said, the simple minded goal they laid out; here are the Sansha, destroy them. Some people added spice to the mix by trying to side with the Sansha and the event(s) went pretty well

Arek'Jaalan on the other hand has difficulties explaining the people that want to participate what they should really do. There is nothing to shoot and no immediate rewards to be had. As one who has left real life academia behind I found it as a great opportunity to practice "fictional science", but for somebody with no such experience it seems getting into the topic is hard

Site One was a great event though, again because of the simple and straight forward goal and accessibility. The two w-space incidents were pretty bad as they ended up being effort made for a single person/group only and highly exclusive. To make matters worse, not much was really gained from the project point of view, as in the first instance the involved player was more concerned about killboard whoring and did not find it weird at all to find multiple completely stationary cov-ops frigates. In the second case the player was a w-space alt intended to scan out wormholes in case of access being lost and therefore incapable of engaging a single Sleeper drone and explore a rather tempting spatial rift

The danger CCP Goliath is taking on here, is that of effort; if not careful he might end up having to do a lot of effort to make events with simple goals to draw in a big crowd or he can continue to keep the project more mental demanding with less effort on his behalf, which on one hand encourages a few players to be very productive but has difficulties appealing to the masses

I wonder if doing Live Events count as company work.Straight

Mr. Science & Trade Institute, EVE Online Lorebook 

Jowen Datloran
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#42 - 2012-03-28 19:18:03 UTC
The big question is:

Will you ever finish "The Forlorn Hope" site?

Mr. Science & Trade Institute, EVE Online Lorebook 

Alain Kinsella
#43 - 2012-03-28 20:32:22 UTC
Jowen Datloran wrote:

The danger CCP Goliath is taking on here, is that of effort; if not careful he might end up having to do a lot of effort to make events with simple goals to draw in a big crowd or he can continue to keep the project more mental demanding with less effort on his behalf, which on one hand encourages a few players to be very productive but has difficulties appealing to the masses

I wonder if doing Live Events count as company work.Straight


There's nothing stopping CCP from doing both - Some initial setup will allow them to both manage longer-term, short-time stuff, and still give them the opportunity to 'relax' by staging a real Live Event from time to time.

From a time perspective, I'd suggest that CCP give Mercury a little leeway to help with the general clarifications etc, that could help bring a better foundation to the whole thing.

"The Meta Game does not stop at the game. Ever."

Currently Retired / Semi-Casual (pending changes to RL concerns).

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#44 - 2012-03-28 20:57:41 UTC
As a dude who doesn't generally engage in roleplay, and finds missions and whatnot boring: This is cool. It has piqued my interest.
Ryan Startalker Zhang
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#45 - 2012-03-28 21:44:17 UTC
I know it's a while ago [pre-crucible], but I think I ran into some pdf file report written by the A'J Project members specifically studying the celestial sphere of New Eden and try to determine the span of the current universe, or something like that. And then the nebula are redone in the crucible expansion, and I suppose the celestial sphere has changed a lot in the process. Does that mean A'J Project's effort wasted?

P.S. I'm heading to the live event site right now. Hopefully it's still there to be seen.
Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#46 - 2012-03-29 00:03:56 UTC
CCP Goliath wrote:
Hi, firstly I would like to confirm that CCP Dropbear is no longer with the company. It is not my place to explain the circumstances surrounding this, but I will say that the thread linked above is incorrect.

Some of you may have met me during the Live Events roundtable at Fanfest. I along with other devs (Abraxas, Affinity, Gnauton, Navigator to name a few) have taken up the mantle of live events. We were reponsible for the Dev Caravans that occurred over Christmas as well as the Scavenger Hunt player event at Fanfest. During the roundtable the Arek'Jaalan Project was mentioned by a few players. It is on our list of "cool things we want to get involved in" which is rather extensive following said roundtable. We are currently working on our Next Big Thing and so I will not give specific dates, times or topics at the moment, but rest assured that Live Events are going nowhere and we are committed to making some awesome memories for you all.


Best of luck to you and the rest of the team.

Please stop spawning battleship fleets at optimal range of my ship and then mass primary targeting me at live Sansha events though D:


Seriously, good luck.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Gouzu Kho
Kho Incorporated
The Lone Space Wolves
#47 - 2012-03-29 09:45:00 UTC
Hope to see more live events soon. Always have a lot of fun with those. Big smile
The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#48 - 2012-03-29 10:28:10 UTC
Ryan Startalker Zhang wrote:
I know it's a while ago [pre-crucible], but I think I ran into some pdf file report written by the A'J Project members specifically studying the celestial sphere of New Eden and try to determine the span of the current universe, or something like that. And then the nebula are redone in the crucible expansion, and I suppose the celestial sphere has changed a lot in the process. Does that mean A'J Project's effort wasted?

P.S. I'm heading to the live event site right now. Hopefully it's still there to be seen.


Of course not. The know-hows and the system/method of getting to conclusion still resides with the leads, which could be leveraged for the future project. There are at least a dozen of project going under way so the know-hows and the findings from other projects are leverageable for each other.
Qvar Dar'Zanar
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#49 - 2012-03-29 11:03:40 UTC
I'm interested on helping, but knowing how is proving harder than expected... I think I'll just go with the evemail option.
MotherMoon
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#50 - 2012-03-29 11:41:53 UTC  |  Edited by: MotherMoon
Could you just.... give us , the players, the tools to make our own deadspace sites?

And then the tools to roleplay our own live events? Like within the deadspace site, and other approved areas, you have players sign up, like ISD, and they run the live events for you

Why not give ver the majority of live events to the players

Give us tools too....

Change color of text in cha

Fly any ship we deem we want for the live event we are running.

Let us spawn ships at the sites.

Basically let players hired as volunteers, the power to be like a DM in a D&D game.

Heck you want to make it even more hands off? Let the people with the power to play story teller in eve, be elected via, in game voting system. Easier to watch over one player making events then 1000s right


Anyways, you should let us run our own events, and drop our own money into rewards for these sites. You don't need to pump in free ships that we can spawn for free. Like the eve market do it's thing. Let the STs buy buys, set AI for them, and send team off versus a group of players. So it would boost sales of ships no one uses!

anyways, just a thought, curious if it's even going to ever be a possibility.

http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1206/scimi.jpg

CCP Goliath
C C P
C C P Alliance
#51 - 2012-03-29 12:39:56 UTC
MotherMoon wrote:
Could you just.... give us , the players, the tools to make our own deadspace sites?

And then the tools to roleplay our own live events? Like within the deadspace site, and other approved areas, you have players sign up, like ISD, and they run the live events for you

Why not give ver the majority of live events to the players

Give us tools too....

Change color of text in cha

Fly any ship we deem we want for the live event we are running.

Let us spawn ships at the sites.

Basically let players hired as volunteers, the power to be like a DM in a D&D game.

Heck you want to make it even more hands off? Let the people with the power to play story teller in eve, be elected via, in game voting system. Easier to watch over one player making events then 1000s right


Anyways, you should let us run our own events, and drop our own money into rewards for these sites. You don't need to pump in free ships that we can spawn for free. Like the eve market do it's thing. Let the STs buy buys, set AI for them, and send team off versus a group of players. So it would boost sales of ships no one uses!

anyways, just a thought, curious if it's even going to ever be a possibility.


It's not going to be a possibility. Pretty sure I don't need to explain why giving people the tools to create deadspace sites, associate AI with ships, change the colour of their text or remove skills from the ship-flying equation isn't particularly safe Smile

Are you familiar with AURORA? They used to run live events and were volunteer-based. Unfortunately the player base grew too large to leave this duty in the hands of volunteers, and ultimately we are better placed to run events that give a consistent experience to a wider audience.

That all being said, there is nothing that is stopping players from running interesting, engaging events in-game. Marlona Sky for instance has run 2 "Flight of a Thousand Rifters" events now and I believe they were very popular. There are many other examples of this occurring in game and it's amazing to see how creative people can be within the boundaries of the game.

CCP Goliath | QA Director | EVE Illuminati | @CCP_Goliath

Qvar Dar'Zanar
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#52 - 2012-03-29 12:53:50 UTC
MotherMoon wrote:


Change color of text in cha


Sorry but this is a terrible idea.
Jowen Datloran
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#53 - 2012-03-29 12:58:21 UTC
I remember AURORA and to my knowledge there were some other serious issues (misuse of power) that were the main reason for its closure and not that the player base grew too big. Also explains why we should not have it back.

Mr. Science & Trade Institute, EVE Online Lorebook 

Mark726
Project Compass Holdings
#54 - 2012-03-29 21:49:37 UTC
Ryan Startalker Zhang wrote:
I know it's a while ago [pre-crucible], but I think I ran into some pdf file report written by the A'J Project members specifically studying the celestial sphere of New Eden and try to determine the span of the current universe, or something like that. And then the nebula are redone in the crucible expansion, and I suppose the celestial sphere has changed a lot in the process. Does that mean A'J Project's effort wasted?

P.S. I'm heading to the live event site right now. Hopefully it's still there to be seen.


I THINK you're actually referring to the original Project Compass, which is a project I originally ran. The celestial sphere HAS changed, but I think the original analysis could probably still be done. The star pattern I was relying on in that project, Orion, is still present in k-space (and pops up just about everywhere once you know what to look for) as well as in w-space, there's just a bunch of OTHER stars now visible in k-space that makes it slightly less obvious.

Rather than considering the effort truly wasted, however, I believe the original Compass acts as an interesting baseline to the revised Project Compass (which I'm currently in the process of wrapping up, along with my co-lead Faulx). The report (which hopefully will be out soon) actually directly compares the original results to the new results. The only part that is EXPLICITLY disproven by the new Compass project is the conclusions I made regarding the kind of galaxy New Eden is in. We now have distinct galactic banding, which suggests a spiral galaxy, which is something I originally discounted in the first go-around. Still, I can use the bulk of the original research as some tepid support for my findings in the new Project Compass.

Which is a little weird, because that's how science works in the real world as well: building off of previous research.
The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#55 - 2012-03-30 11:33:36 UTC
Mark726 wrote:
Ryan Startalker Zhang wrote:
I know it's a while ago [pre-crucible], but I think I ran into some pdf file report written by the A'J Project members specifically studying the celestial sphere of New Eden and try to determine the span of the current universe, or something like that. And then the nebula are redone in the crucible expansion, and I suppose the celestial sphere has changed a lot in the process. Does that mean A'J Project's effort wasted?

P.S. I'm heading to the live event site right now. Hopefully it's still there to be seen.


I THINK you're actually referring to the original Project Compass, which is a project I originally ran. The celestial sphere HAS changed, but I think the original analysis could probably still be done. The star pattern I was relying on in that project, Orion, is still present in k-space (and pops up just about everywhere once you know what to look for) as well as in w-space, there's just a bunch of OTHER stars now visible in k-space that makes it slightly less obvious.

Rather than considering the effort truly wasted, however, I believe the original Compass acts as an interesting baseline to the revised Project Compass (which I'm currently in the process of wrapping up, along with my co-lead Faulx). The report (which hopefully will be out soon) actually directly compares the original results to the new results. The only part that is EXPLICITLY disproven by the new Compass project is the conclusions I made regarding the kind of galaxy New Eden is in. We now have distinct galactic banding, which suggests a spiral galaxy, which is something I originally discounted in the first go-around. Still, I can use the bulk of the original research as some tepid support for my findings in the new Project Compass.

Which is a little weird, because that's how science works in the real world as well: building off of previous research.


And all our hard work are compiled in EVELOPEDIA. The new EVELOPEDIA is streamlined and easy to navigate. Please type in "Arek'Jaalan" to get caught up on all the work!
Morwen Lagann
Tyrathlion Interstellar
#56 - 2012-03-30 14:24:58 UTC
Dropbear just poked his head in on Backstage (one of the forums hosted by the RP community) to say hello.

You can read his post here.

Morwen Lagann

CEO, Tyrathlion Interstellar

Coordinator, Arataka Research Consortium

Owner, The Golden Masque

Saul Caris
#57 - 2012-03-30 19:20:20 UTC
Just adding a supportive +1 to more on this project & the WH story in general, some good ideas in this thread. Please don't let this die off CCP, its the most interesting bit of the lore!
Wyke Mossari
Staner Industries
#58 - 2012-03-30 20:28:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Wyke Mossari
The back story of Eve is very deep, the latest revelations in Templar One for example only just scratch it's surface.

If you are interested, this thread indexes some of the detailed and deep exploration of the Mystery of New Eden.

I think the depth of the back story will surprise many players.
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#59 - 2012-03-30 21:17:15 UTC
CCP Goliath wrote:

(snip)...
We are currently working on our Next Big Thing and so I will not give specific dates, times or topics at the moment, but rest assured that Live Events are going nowhere... ( snip)


That the problem they are going NOWHERE!!!
WHERE IS THIS BLACK HOLE THAT SWALLOWS PAST IDEAS AND LEADS THEM TO NOWHERE? Kill the BH with fire!!!
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Ryan Startalker Zhang
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#60 - 2012-04-01 15:37:43 UTC
Mark726 wrote:
Ryan Startalker Zhang wrote:
I know it's a while ago [pre-crucible], but I think I ran into some pdf file report written by the A'J Project members specifically studying the celestial sphere of New Eden and try to determine the span of the current universe, or something like that. And then the nebula are redone in the crucible expansion, and I suppose the celestial sphere has changed a lot in the process. Does that mean A'J Project's effort wasted?

P.S. I'm heading to the live event site right now. Hopefully it's still there to be seen.


I THINK you're actually referring to the original Project Compass, which is a project I originally ran. The celestial sphere HAS changed, but I think the original analysis could probably still be done. The star pattern I was relying on in that project, Orion, is still present in k-space (and pops up just about everywhere once you know what to look for) as well as in w-space, there's just a bunch of OTHER stars now visible in k-space that makes it slightly less obvious.

Rather than considering the effort truly wasted, however, I believe the original Compass acts as an interesting baseline to the revised Project Compass (which I'm currently in the process of wrapping up, along with my co-lead Faulx). The report (which hopefully will be out soon) actually directly compares the original results to the new results. The only part that is EXPLICITLY disproven by the new Compass project is the conclusions I made regarding the kind of galaxy New Eden is in. We now have distinct galactic banding, which suggests a spiral galaxy, which is something I originally discounted in the first go-around. Still, I can use the bulk of the original research as some tepid support for my findings in the new Project Compass.

Which is a little weird, because that's how science works in the real world as well: building off of previous research.


Thank you very much for taking the time to explain the changes to me; it is indeed the report I came across before, the Original Project Compass. I'll keep track of progress on the new link of course. Thank you again for your efforts in the project.