These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

New Dev Blog: Alliance Panel at Fanfest 2012: The Conclusion

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Lenrir Andven
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#161 - 2012-03-28 23:03:00 UTC
MeBiatch wrote:
Lenrir Andven wrote:
MeBiatch wrote:
School Nickname Worldmonkey wrote:
CCP, you literally better give me my assfucking vote back. I'm Irish and can legitimately live with the illusion of democracy where my elected representative makes no decisions, but deposing the people's King of Space goes too far.

I propose that you give all those who voted for Mittani their votes back, which will now become STV votes.



why not every player voted... only 15% of the player base voted remember...

and you voted for a person who broke eula/tos... thats not ccps fault... you voted for a idiot... thats your fault... not mine...

two step is now the logical chioce... and the next person inline who did not get voted in should now be the 14th csm... plain and simple...

your brosefs....

deal wit it!


Yet that isn't how a electoral system works.

Cripes, can't believe how many pubbies have little to no brain cells to comprehend how an election works.


care the cite the president in internet spaceship democracy that supports a re election clause when a csm breaks eula?


I would contest you, but your poor grasp of grammar and spelling just ruins it for me.
Raivi
State War Academy
Caldari State
#162 - 2012-03-28 23:03:04 UTC
I strongly disagree with this choice.

Mittens made a very poor choice and crossed the line with that comment, but enforcing the TOS that strictly in an out of game context is overkill.

Accept his apology and resignation of chairmanship, make it clear that fanfest is covered by the TOS from now on and stop broadcasting the parts of fanfest that traditionally come close to the line (alliance/csm panels and quiz show). This decision makes me a sad Raivi.
Heathkit
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#163 - 2012-03-28 23:03:05 UTC
~ 10,058 ~
SolusLunes
LEGITIMATE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
#164 - 2012-03-28 23:03:10 UTC
DIAF CCP, kthxbai
Acwron
Meet The Fockers
#165 - 2012-03-28 23:03:13 UTC
You gotta be kidding me...30 days? Perma ban is the right decision. Being friend with CCP employees is priceless, lets you go free. 30 is nothing for what damage he's done to the game. I'm really disappointed.
Twistator
Slow Match
#166 - 2012-03-28 23:03:31 UTC
Way to invalidate the entire CSM. How are we supposed to take the representation seriously now.

Where will this lead, will you ban people for talking **** on other sites? In RL?


Whats the point of the election if the losing part of the election (and lets face it thats all these ($%&/ here complaining) whine about some stupid thing later to because they despicse him so much, not because of what he did just because they hate him in game and his giant Ego. Thats all this is about and not about the miner dude ...


anyway ... its what we "do" right? Ill sacrifice my sec status in Jita soon .... it will burn. You have given this a whole new meaning!
Blawrf McTaggart
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#167 - 2012-03-28 23:03:35 UTC
just started 10 more 10 hour hero accounts with my scam winnings

isboxer timeeeeee
Serena Hennessy
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#168 - 2012-03-28 23:03:46 UTC
It is quite a shame to see that despite our giving Alex over 20% of the votes cast he won't be sitting on the CSM at all.

I'd suggest some serious work needs to be done to revise the architechture and electoral process of the CSM if it is possible to simply discard the will of 10,058 paying customers in this manner.

In a true Democracy, an action such as this would likely force the entire election to be set aside and a new election called.

I'd imagine there's just over 10000 people who would like another opportunity to decide what our next CSM will look like; to call this "The Conclusion" is a gross misnomer.

A solution that discards the will of 20% of the voting customers is no solution at all.
Koby Botick
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#169 - 2012-03-28 23:03:52 UTC
Infinimo wrote:
it's cool that you can break the eula of a videogame while not even playing that game
Bill Banner
State War Academy
Caldari State
#170 - 2012-03-28 23:04:05 UTC
RDevz wrote:
You've disenfranchised 10,058 voters. Good job.


I voted for Nixon too.
Sernum
Infinite Point
Pandemic Horde
#171 - 2012-03-28 23:04:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Sernum
(INSERTS DRAMA)

On serious note glad to see CCP makes rules apply to ALL the players.
Steamgrind Meatroller
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#172 - 2012-03-28 23:04:24 UTC
Acwron wrote:
You gotta be kidding me...30 days? Perma ban is the right decision. Being friend with CCP employees is priceless, lets you go free. 30 is nothing for what damage he's done to the game. I'm really disappointed.


What damage is that exactly? Oh right, the vein sticking out on your forehead.
MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#173 - 2012-03-28 23:04:25 UTC
Sara Sue wrote:
CCP disregarding the voices of 10058 Players and loosing one of the best csm members all over some drunken ramblings.
CCP really likes to screw over its player base by removing one of their voices from the csm.



or how about how stupid that only 15% voted for csm! thats 85% disregarded by a stupid policy! thats like 300 000 disregarded players every time they do csm...

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.
Leykan
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#174 - 2012-03-28 23:04:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Leykan
MeBiatch wrote:


care the cite the president in internet spaceship democracy that supports a re election clause when a csm breaks eula?

as i remember when akcnabobited broke tos there was no reelection....


Care to cite where in a EULA/TOS applies out of the game client/world?
Kitfox Mikakka
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#175 - 2012-03-28 23:04:34 UTC
Every cfc member in this thread whining about canceling their accounts is badposting like all hell, stop it you guys. :colbert:
bestposteringoonfleet
Perkone
Caldari State
#176 - 2012-03-28 23:04:35 UTC
This is definitely not due process!

I thought EVE Online: A Spaceship Game was not a pure dicktatorship!
Josef Djugashvilis
#177 - 2012-03-28 23:04:43 UTC
ButterNut wrote:
Oh well I was looking for a good reason to quit this game anyway.



Why?

This is not a signature.
Adrenalinemax
Lap Dancers
Brothers of Tangra
#178 - 2012-03-28 23:04:43 UTC
So, EXACTLY where do TOS/EULA end?

I want my votes back....

Re-election
Radelix Cisko
JUMP DRIVE ACTIVE
#179 - 2012-03-28 23:04:46 UTC
Looks like Eve found its Nixon.

Apparently assisted in making game better, gets fired for bad decision. Such is life

Despite my posting prowess I really am terrible at this game
Koby Botick
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#180 - 2012-03-28 23:04:46 UTC
Infinimo wrote:
it's cool that you can break the eula of a videogame while not even playing that game


Anyone have me a book about weird abominations in Icelandic law speaking? Inquiring minds want to know.