These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Gambling/Boosters/Contraband instead of Rocks bouncing off Ships please
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Shepard Book
Underground Stargate
#21 - 2012-03-27 19:24:56 UTC
Gevlin wrote:
WIS is making a plan I will let them follow it.

but I would like to see the POS dead horse delt with first. then we can start having graphixs fun

But it looks like there is an over whelming Positive response to the eye candy enough to warrent its inclusion.

this is the thread you should be voicing you opinions at:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=85762&find=unread


I'd like to see walking in POSes too! I am sure wormhole people would love it as well.
Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#22 - 2012-03-27 19:26:23 UTC
Nirnias Stirrum wrote:
+1 for rocks bouncing off of ships!

+2 for said rocks damaging ships!

Signatures should be used responsibly...
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#23 - 2012-03-27 19:27:07 UTC  |  Edited by: DarthNefarius
Nova Fox wrote:
+1 for ships breaking apart when they collide.


+1 for realistic ship bouncing off of shields ( or damaging them would be better )

+1 for WiS like this http://www.youtuberepeat.com/watch/?v=Y5XOOpjyC5w

edit: fixed as a 10 second sample allowed by copyright laws
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
#24 - 2012-03-27 19:29:35 UTC
+4 for revolving planets and stations and stars and things in geo sync orbit.

Dust 514's CPM 1 Iron Wolf Saber Eve mail me about Dust 514 issues.
Altimo
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#25 - 2012-03-27 19:34:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Altimo
I honestly think that this graphics feature the art team is thinking of would bring more immersion into the game, It doesn't matter whether I'm pvping or pveing, Right now I have most of my sound turned down and the effects themselves are less than convincing.

I'm not so immersed in the events taking place, in the moment as much as I am just focused on getting tasks done.

The Art/sound team should definitely continue bringing us more immersed into the game environment. I been playing eve for a damn long time, and I say its about time they step it up a notch, bumping asteroids into my ship and having them bounce/shatter, at the same time hearing the crackling/seeing your shields light up as it happens. It's convincing.

EVE needs more of that. I am well aware of the other issues, such as ship balancing which should always come first, but remember this is the art teams job. Improving the look and feel is just as important imo.
Glockshna Quant
Versatility Production Corporation' LLC
#26 - 2012-03-27 19:35:29 UTC
Liang Nuren wrote:
Shepard Book wrote:
I believe we were told it could take up to a year for the graphics upgrade for Tessellation Tech. I would much rather see those features and Establishments than rocks bouncing off a ship. Please put resources there instead. I looked for the Tessellation Tech post asking for feedback to no avail.


I hear that artists are supremely equipped to write server code?

C/D

-Liang

Yes because it takes NO coding to upgrade the entire engine to support dx11 from the current dx9 platform :rollseyes:
Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#27 - 2012-03-27 19:37:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Gogela
Nova Fox wrote:
+4 for revolving planets and stations and stars and things in geo sync orbit.

I'll +5 on that G. Hellz yah.

...and it's feasible. It really is. I wouldn't have guessed we would see the day where space looked so good, the stars were in their respective and correct positions in space, and the gates pointed to their destination system. The game has come so far... I think anything is doable.

Signatures should be used responsibly...
Altimo
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#28 - 2012-03-27 19:41:30 UTC
Gogela wrote:
Nova Fox wrote:
+4 for revolving planets and stations and stars and things in geo sync orbit.

I'll +5 on that G. Hellz yah.

...and it's feasible. It really is. I wouldn't have guessed we would see the day where space looked so good, the stars were in their respective and correct positions in space, and the gates pointed to their destination system. The game has come so far... I think anything is doable.



+6
Shepard Book
Underground Stargate
#29 - 2012-03-27 19:57:41 UTC
Maybe they could add a hijacking element to WIS too Lol Seriously though, I believe establishments and the ideas around it (monocles aside) were solid as goals.

I think it is really needed for growth of membership for the long term future and big picture. It could have been rolled out better I think we all agree on. Too many people are used to having an avatar in other games and it is a hurdle for most our new players IMO.
Danfen Fenix
#30 - 2012-03-27 20:41:30 UTC
Nova Fox wrote:
+1 for ships breaking apart when they collide.


Ship ramming, greek style Cool

Heck, even new modules, geared towards ramming other ships without damaging your own ? P
Adunh Slavy
#31 - 2012-03-27 20:54:48 UTC
Liang Nuren wrote:

I hear that artists are supremely equipped to write server code?


Custom, tailored track suits for hamsters.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt
Previous page12