These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CSM The Mittani's Misconduct Calls for Resignation - We Did It!

First post First post
Author
Livini Naship
Eve Ryuken
#541 - 2012-03-26 18:59:16 UTC
Helicity Boson wrote:
I see no evidence that this person is actually suicidal, and not just another dumbass trying to sympathy himself out of a hole.

If you're a pirate, over the years, you will receive several "OMG im suicidally depressed because you blew up my bantam" evemails.

To my knowledge, none of them has ever killed themselves.

poor taste maybe, but it's not like he stabbed a man.

Use some perspective please people...


The guy himself that claimed that he is suicidal is not of interest here. But the publicly performance of the guys at the alliance panel is, because they represented themselves on a by CCP sponsored livestream. The only damage they have done is to CCP and themselves with these few sentences. (sry for bad english)
My Neutral Toon
Doomheim
#542 - 2012-03-26 19:00:11 UTC  |  Edited by: My Neutral Toon
Helicity Boson wrote:
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:

In fact, if the Goon-vermin go after this guy full force, he might become suicidal as a result of the very very public attack

The appropriate response was to ignore it or attack him in a less public way.

NOTE:
Goon-vermin refusal to "talk with" people they can't threaten makes them thugs.


It's not the goons' responsibility to determine if the guy is suicidal, or just a whiner playing the sympathy card.

It's a real suicidal person's task to remove themselves from situations that cause anxiety and seek professional help.

By your definitions no PVP game should exist because you might make a suicidal person kill themselves.


I don't think the display was very tasteful, but I also think nobody here is actually using their heads and using logic to analyse the situation.



I disagree, I think this is actually a not-so-well-though-out NCdot/PL/Raiden plot to try and remove Mittens from CSM because they are butt-hurt the CFC can generate more votes than their hypocritical anti-coalition coalition...

And they are butt-hurt about the 3 titans they got blapped.

FOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO

...Can't. Tell. If ...Troll? Or Serious....

Butt Hurt about Harrasment? Read first GM post: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=88362&find=unread

Jim Luc
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#543 - 2012-03-26 19:00:20 UTC
Boring thread.
Heimdallofasgard
Ministry of Furious Retribution
Fraternity.
#544 - 2012-03-26 19:00:24 UTC
"It's not about the guy... it's about the character"

it is an mmo-"RPG"!!!! after all
ILikeMarkets
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#545 - 2012-03-26 19:00:58 UTC  |  Edited by: ILikeMarkets
Yumi Sagara wrote:
Wow, if this is true then Mittani is one seriously messed up individual. Far beyond whatever he role plays as in the game. This isn't douchebaggery, this is flat out insanity. No normal person would ever consider doing something like that.

This dude has some serious issues... I wonder what he would do with himself if he didn't have EVE to keep him stable and give him an outlet? Kill the neighborhood cats, I guess.

Crap, you know what? Let him have CSM. Maybe that's the secret the goons all have that makes them support him unanimously. They know he's a ticking timebomb that might go on a shooting spree at his workplace one day if he doesn't have some outlet for craziness. >_> Having him muck up some video game is a small price to pay to keep that from happening.


Edit: Another media coverage post! http://massively.joystiq.com/2012/03/26/ccp-investigates-player-panel-that-encouraged-cyber-bullying/


If this is legit, then this guy has a screw loose, and obviously doesn't understand social and moral boundaries. Being drunk doesn't excuse this level of behavior, and the fact that he had that information prepared meant he thought of it beforehand. To preplan something that messed up? Takes a special level of psycho.

But I wonder if its real. I wonder if he or a friend didn't just make the toon and make that whole story up just to get the publicity. Of course, CCP would be able to see that when they investigated so he wouldn't have to worry about being removed from CSM, banned and having the authorities get involves.

So basically, if nothing happens to him you'll know he just staged all this.

Proof that capital ships are rare in EVE: http://imgur.com/gallery/jJJE1

Pasen Haas
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#546 - 2012-03-26 19:01:26 UTC
Heimdallofasgard wrote:
"It's not about the guy... it's about the character"

it is an mmo-"RPG"!!!! after all


wanna join WI?
Gossamer DT
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#547 - 2012-03-26 19:01:42 UTC
Amity Lane wrote:
Why are people still babbling on about Psychology? It's irrelevant.

The issue is that The Mittani, as a CSM, suggested to people that they break the rules by harassing someone. That's it. It's been said before (self-quoting for the win):


Why do you people always blur the line between the mittani the Goon Alliance leader (note the pannel name in question here); eve pilot and the mittani the CSM chair?

just becase you are on the CSM doesn't mean your eve play is dead and no longer allowed. get over your selves all ready TIA.

who is your main, and what does he do?

Kara Roideater
#548 - 2012-03-26 19:02:08 UTC
Helicity Boson wrote:


It's not the goons' responsibility to determine if the guy is suicidal, or just a whiner playing the sympathy card.

It's a real suicidal person's task to remove themselves from situations that cause anxiety and seek professional help.

By your definitions no PVP game should exist because you might make a suicidal person kill themselves.



Because real suicidal people are frequently noted for their powers of discrimination in not putting themselves in harm's way? Oh, wait ...

The argument about PvP games in general is total crap. We're not talking about the consequences of someone losing their ship. we're talking about the consequences of a public call to harass a person. If you look closely you may be able to discern a minor difference.
JamesCLK
#549 - 2012-03-26 19:02:14 UTC  |  Edited by: JamesCLK
Welp, cross posting from a different but similar thread:

JamesCLK wrote:
This is starting to get really old really fast. It's as if people are trying to smear literally anything they can get their hands on, on Mittens.
How desperate can you get? This must be a new level of internet lawyer-dom.

Suicide is not a bargaining chip people; if you have issues -- and even the slightest intention of doing something about it -- you would be seeking professional help, not ~threatening~ people over the internet (of all mediums Straight) with suicide.

Now, I know people aren't angry about this because someone claimed to be suicidal; you're angry because Mittens pulled a 'name and shame' out of his hat and essentially said "go find this guy". It is also debatable which party is responsible; is it Mittens, or is it 'The Wis'? This actually isn't really important in the big picture because both are subject to human nature and chaos (if it can be done, some(one) will eventually do it). Hence we can't blame Mittens for talking about it, and we can't blame The Wis for typing it in the first place.

But here's where the victimization element comes into play:
Of the following, who is easier to feel sympathy and/or empathy for?
Goonswarm CEO "douche bag extraordinaire" The Mittani, or Random-person "poor sod" The Wis?

Your personal choice is probably going to differ from mine, but I'm personally leaning towards Mittens, if only because The Wis used suicide as a bargaining chip. That and I don't have a bad opinion of Goonswar- ah; see...
Right there is the real problem. The people making the biggest fuss about this really just don't like Goonswarm or The Mittani regardless (this is a generalization, apply reason). The real tragedy is that they are using The Wis as a straw man (whether they realise it or not is irrelevant); an excuse for attacks on someone whom they don't like.

I could also be wrong and people genuinely care about and want to defend someone they've never met, talked to, or even cared about before Mittens brought it up. Excuse me if I find that a little hard to believe until someone shows me a documentary about The Wis being a person with actual issues IRL and being unable to deal with them.
If you really care about this person, I challenge you to run a charity to get him professional help and counselling.

Take that as you will; but you should probably just do as the ex-attorney said and
The Mittani wrote:
deal with it~


This is a terrible thread, with an even worse topic, inevitably posted by people who just can't let anything slip.
Or maybe it's all a trap taken just a bit too far; nobody knows but Mittens (I'll be waiting for his official statement).


Brought to you by 'not-an-internet-lawyer'.

-- -.-- / -.-. .-.. --- -. . / .. ... / - --- --- / . -..- .--. . -. ... .. ...- . / - --- / ..- -. -.. --- -.-. -.- / ... - --- .--. / .--. .-.. . .- ... . / ... . -. -.. / .... . .-.. .--. / ... - --- .--.

ILikeMarkets
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#550 - 2012-03-26 19:03:47 UTC
Gossamer DT wrote:
Amity Lane wrote:
Why are people still babbling on about Psychology? It's irrelevant.

The issue is that The Mittani, as a CSM, suggested to people that they break the rules by harassing someone. That's it. It's been said before (self-quoting for the win):


Why do you people always blur the line between the mittani the Goon Alliance leader (note the pannel name in question here); eve pilot and the mittani the CSM chair?

just becase you are on the CSM doesn't mean your eve play is dead and no longer allowed. get over your selves all ready TIA.


This is far past eve play. This is trying to basically lead to a real death of a real human being for his own personal amusement. What he did would be considered a serious crime in many countries if that person really did take their life after this.

He best pray to whatever gods he does or does not believe in that this person doesn't die any time soon, or he will have serious legal problems on his hands.

Proof that capital ships are rare in EVE: http://imgur.com/gallery/jJJE1

Heimdallofasgard
Ministry of Furious Retribution
Fraternity.
#551 - 2012-03-26 19:03:48 UTC
Pasen Haas wrote:
Heimdallofasgard wrote:
"It's not about the guy... it's about the character"

it is an mmo-"RPG"!!!! after all


wanna join WI?


haha YES!, Is this redeemable at a later date when I have more time in my life for null sec and not just forum trolling?
Amity Lane
Hek Mining Association
#552 - 2012-03-26 19:04:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Amity Lane
Helicity Boson wrote:
I also think nobody here is actually using their heads and using logic to analyse the situation.

I've tried a couple times now, but it seems to repeatedly get buried in forum-scroll by non sequitur posts announcing sexual orientation and people just regurgitating the same flawed, irrelevant arguments that started on Page 2 with no real progress in the discussion short of "if I shout it loud enough, it will become fact" attitudes. Eh, I gave it a shot.

I'd held out hope for a more refined discussion on a forum for a game that supposedly has a more mature user base. I guess as a new EVE player, I'm still pretty naive. Hey, could be worse...at least I'm not falling for that guy selling 1 piece of Tritanium for 600+ million ISK.
Jonathan Malcom
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#553 - 2012-03-26 19:04:53 UTC
PinkKnife wrote:



Oh man, you're so cool, can I be just like you?


Yes, you can. But it will require some perspective. Good luck.
Grey Stormshadow
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#554 - 2012-03-26 19:05:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Grey Stormshadow
The presentation was maybe distasteful, but who knows, maybe the troubled person was just trolling goons after handing them some ISK.

If this can be counted as harassment, players involved should get a warning. If the harassment continues, they should receive a short term ban.

This is space ships game with serious business. Players make the content and CCP is not responsible about the mental health of individual players. There is warning about unmoderated in-game communication and if some players are not up for the challenge, they should not log in to the game.

If some player thinks that he is being harassed and stalked by some individuals he should contact CCP and file a petition. It is not our work to decide how he feels. If such complaint has not been made, there won't be even grounds to give anyone warnings about the discussion what has taken place.

Maybe this all has been just nice politics again. You never know.

Get classic forum style - custom videos to captains quarters screen

Play with the best - die like the rest

Helicity Boson
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
#555 - 2012-03-26 19:05:24 UTC
Kara Roideater wrote:


Because real suicidal people are frequently noted for their powers of discrimination in not putting themselves in harm's way? Oh, wait ...

The argument about PvP games in general is total crap. We're not talking about the consequences of someone losing their ship. we're talking about the consequences of a public call to harass a person. If you look closely you may be able to discern a minor difference.


it's 100% NOT YOUR PROBLEM OR RESPOSIBILITY if someone is suicidal. Not one smidgen, because YOU are not a psychologist, and YOU have no way to determine the veracity of their claims, AT ALL. EVER.

However, posting the player's credentials publically and invoking a request to hassle them, THAT is against the EULA, 100%.

does that help you?

Now get off your moral high horse and apply logic.
Bienator II
madmen of the skies
#556 - 2012-03-26 19:06:25 UTC
what i don't understand is why the people in the room just ignored that idiot. The simplest and with fewest effort connected what you can do is to leave the room.

how to fix eve: 1) remove ECM 2) rename dampeners to ECM 3) add new anti-drone ewar for caldari 4) give offgrid boosters ongrid combat value

Pasen Haas
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#557 - 2012-03-26 19:06:45 UTC
Heimdallofasgard wrote:
Pasen Haas wrote:
Heimdallofasgard wrote:
"It's not about the guy... it's about the character"

it is an mmo-"RPG"!!!! after all


wanna join WI?


haha YES!, Is this redeemable at a later date when I have more time in my life for null sec and not just forum trolling?


I was serious ^.^ recruiting from a hate threat about the glorious mittens is something I'll get moaned at for, but it will be worth it <3
Kattshiro
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#558 - 2012-03-26 19:07:01 UTC
Isn't mittens a lawyer IRL? The case about the kid offing himself, and those helping provoke (Found guilty fyi) perhaps uh... I dunno at least think to make an apology?

Is it really that difficult to acknowledge that you said something ****** up when drunk, and apologize for it? I understand saying stupid ****/doing stupid **** when drunk, but it doesn't make it less asinine or right.

Those defending him I also get sticking up for a friend...however my friends do dumb **** drunk as well. Doesn't mean I dont call them on it, and tell them they ****** up... So why the over whelming support for something probably not the most kosher?
Javier McPoopbeard
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#559 - 2012-03-26 19:07:42 UTC
lol
Steelshine
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#560 - 2012-03-26 19:08:14 UTC
Well I guess if you guys don't like the Mittani you should probably just get 11,000 people to vote for someone you agree with