Intergalactic Summit

I would like to express gratitude to CONCORD for their operation and closure of disturbing thread.

A reminder to those who complain about biased CRC moderation:



Those that have been reported have been actioned as is appropriate.

I'm a little confused by this. Do you mean to say that if someone reports a person who repeatedly breaches the CRC communications policy is effectively shielded from being reported on over and over?

I find this a little troubling as you are discouraging people from reporting offences for fear that their reporting could be considered an offence in-and-of itself.

Could you possibly clarify this rule a little more. Would a person who report a person for multiple similar offences risk punishment themselves? This seems wildly nonconstructive to what you are trying to achieve with this new initiative.

Regard,

K. Amsel

Due in no small part to their proclivity for pushing the boundaries, Gallente artistry has become so elaborate that, to many members of New Eden's other nations, it seems virtually unintelligible.
As an example, in many Gallente narratives, the story is embedded withing layers of satire-upon-meaning-upon-satire and predicated upon subtle movement and form. As a result, the whole endeavor of the audience becomes less about following the plot and more about how to interpret the piece based on the nuances of its presentation. For this reason, whereas a typical Gallente may sit rapt over the latest Gallente holoreel, a non-Gallente might watch the same thing and perceive little to have happened at all. Furthermore, in many Gallente works these convolutions will turn in on themselves several times, creating meta layers of meaning that Gallente love to mull over, but which seem like vacuous pretension to those less interested in the intricacies of analysis.

Hmm, Aux Aliette sounds Gallente...looks Gallente...but seemingly he either has become so cosmopolitan that he's lost some touch with Gallente artistry, or he is so busy that he did not have time to do a proper analysis. Funny to see Tuulinen having a better grasp on that.

That because when I created him I forgot to add any depth of personality, humor, and the ability to make or understand emotionally based decisions. So he's effectively a bot designed to lock threads and ban people.... I did leave the ability to develop those things, but it seems it didn't take. My apologies, it's to late to fix now though.

Do you have any idea how difficult it is to make one of those?

That only works if the thing you've broke is mass produced. Unique snowflakes are harder to replace.

What wonderful news, civility will once again reign on the IGS.

Ideas can have their day in the court of public opinion without every thinker being personally flamed.

This is very good news, I hope they enforce it, and I hope it needs little enforcement because we all try to do better on our own as well.

I am formally protesting the fact that any killmail linked is treated as a derailment of topic. Kills are the catalyst and result of much of new eden's activity and the fact I cannot use them in argument is ridiculous.

This rule panders to the safe high-sec pilot and ignores how relevant they are to the daily life of every other pilot. Being able to use empirical data in an argument to demonstrate a point is crucial. Instead I just get posts removed.

This is just a means for those alliances seeking investors who cannot defend their assets and those terrorists who cannot construct a reliable detonator to act unimpeded regardless of facts of the events. CONCORD's information about ship losses should not be restricted on the IGS.

I Claudia Amelia Testarossa Wingate Lillithella Osyn MDCXXXIV, Goddess of the IGS, hear your protest and will take it into consideration.