Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center

These are explained in another post further back, but basically they are new EWAR Fighters.

Siren is the Warp Disruptor Support Fighter
Cenobite is the Energy Neutralizer Support Fighter
Scarab is the ECM Support Fighter
Dromi is the Stasis Webifier Support Fighter

There is another new set of anti-fighter fighters as well that you may see mentioned in the thread.

Same issue as the super level, albeit not as bad. 12.5% damage is not as strong as 20% resists. EANM II is 20% all resists (25% with 4 skills maxed), DDA II is 20.5% damage bonus. Both take a low slot, comparable CPU (DDA2 actually uses less), and are passive modules. How did damage suddenly become so much more valuable on carriers?


Change damage bonus to 4%/level as well.


Also while you're making adjustments, please consider adjusting the building materials for the Thanatos so that it's not consistently more expensive than the others to build, by a decent margin.

So the fighter damage is still as low as it was before, and there still is this huge imbalance between fighters, meaning firbolgs are the best and everything else is crap if you do not rely on a certain damage type.

Look at Navigation Computer vs Damage Amplfier for example. 30% velocity Bonus and 20.5 % damage increase for the TII variant. And usually you fit more DDA than navs.
So why should it be fair if for example Firbolgs do 22% more damage then Einhejri and Einherji are 22% faster? Or that Firbolgs have 16% more damage than Templar, and Templar are 16% faster? Damage is more valueable, you should cut the difference in damage in half.


And as already mentioned in the last thread, fighters do significantly less damage than on tranq. Now carriers lost the support ability and also get a dps nerf? That still doesnt make much sense.

the nid has become an amazing tackle capital and you wont understand just how valuable that speed bnonuse to fighters is untill you see how limited fighter range really is

also why can you only launch two combat squads all carriers can launch 3

why would you give a bonus to range and not a bonus to strength? unless this takes you out of smartbomb range, which im pretty sure none of these orbit in smart bomb range to begin with, this bonus is worthless?

the only worthwhile one is MAYBE the point range from the thannatos.
25% extra range on jams or webs or neuts really means nothing. a bonus to strength would actually give you a reason to fly these particular support fighters with their racial carrier, as it stands now, this range bonus does nothing to encourage you to use your races support fighter.

I don't think that 3 fighters will withstand a lot of pressure.

Take a second to look at stats past bonuses before giving your 2 cents


The nid and the than have much larger done bays and can each get well over 1mill ehp

These ships are no longer built to contend in capital fights so the extra tank on the archon and chimera don't mean much as they don't need to tank capital dps and you can kill all of their fighters b4 you kill them. That 2.5 damage bonus is also a 2.5speed/tank making your fighters much harder to kill



As it is Archons ate almost useless and chimera ate not much better when it comes to filling the anti sub cap role (Tbh they all suck) but at least the than and nid have a chance to get some semblance of dps

I mean that i don't think that some small **** with 15k EHP will last long if it's far away from the safety of a hangar.
Your tackle squadrons will get shot down in no-time.

O.o go try it the web drones are only out there long enough for the 2km/s nid to get there and swap them out for combat fighters

Except you have 2 dedicated DPS fighter tubes and 1 dedicated support fighter tube.

You can't use 3 DPS wings at the same time.