These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev Blog: Exploring The Character Bazaar & Skill Trading

First post First post First post
Author
General Lootit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#6021 - 2015-12-06 19:06:53 UTC
Berrice Silf wrote:
General Lootit wrote:
When I joined Eve(about 25 days ago) most of players had much more SP than me and I have no chance at all to catch them what ever I do.


So your entire eve career spans a few months, What an insightful person you must be to glean your knowledge onto everyone and share your vast experiences Shocked

Berrice Silf wrote:

Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, probably why trolls are drawn to it like moths around light.
Berrice Silf
Academy of the Imperial Guards
#6022 - 2015-12-06 19:09:22 UTC
General Lootit wrote:
Berrice Silf wrote:

Sort of the same theme running through them all me me me me, Its massive multiplayer not massive single player game, ive saved the best one for last but will have to stick it into another post to many quotes.

You could use bold font for quoting to bypass a limit. I foreced to post messages like this becuse some people keep telling that it won't help noobs and I giving them counter example. And as I said
General Lootit wrote:

I have no permit to speaking for all of us(noobs) ... and I'm pretty much sure you too.


So you can take your straw man and stick it where a monkey sticks it's nuts, Your just a nasty little troll as many have pointed out before.
General Lootit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#6023 - 2015-12-06 19:20:04 UTC  |  Edited by: General Lootit
Berrice Silf wrote:
General Lootit wrote:
Berrice Silf wrote:

Sort of the same theme running through them all me me me me, Its massive multiplayer not massive single player game, ive saved the best one for last but will have to stick it into another post to many quotes.

You could use bold font for quoting to bypass a limit. I foreced to post messages like this becuse some people keep telling that it won't help noobs and I giving them counter example. And as I said
General Lootit wrote:

I have no permit to speaking for all of us(noobs) ... and I'm pretty much sure you too.


So you can take your straw man and stick it where a monkey sticks it's nuts, Your just a nasty little troll as many have pointed out before.

I should warn you
Quote:
He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you.
Berrice Silf
Academy of the Imperial Guards
#6024 - 2015-12-06 21:02:52 UTC
General Lootit wrote:
He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you.

Ever heard of locator agents troll, you just might meet that monster your talking about Twisted
Don ZOLA
Omniscient Order
#6025 - 2015-12-06 21:16:57 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:

Sorry but I had to delete your quote to have enough characters for post

To your question, this list. But I guess when dismissiveness and unfounded assumptions are your basis for interpretation it's easy to miss.


a)You are going in semantics again, moving away from the point. My point was that if you have "access" to it as ability to earn it and afford TSP it does not mean everyone has it. Ie it does not matter if you have it in your wallet at the moment or in investments or you just know how to make it. No need to play it dumb. And I have shown you that there is no need for such assumption by providing concrete numbers. Everyone has ability to earn isk, but there are huge differences in efficiency, time being devoted to that etc. And what you are stating is pure elitism, "everyone is given a same chance, who cares why someone cannot do it" and something which was against principles of EVE since start. Ie time managed sp system was there to give everyone same "rights" regardless of how much time they can devote to the game, that is one of the main reasons why eve got it niche. While you are pushing it to favor the more active ones. And I highly doubt you would push it if you were not able to earn it yourself Blink
b) I do not want to ignore them, I just pointed out they are not so big. Plus bazaar will remain as it is and still be more used than TSP. On the "ignorance" comment that troll added which you referred later on, I just gave example and there are thousands same like that and countered your original statement that that is some benefit we will gain with TSP. I just pointed out it is already doable
d) Ok, now I can agree with that when put that way, it will have more visibility than bazaar
e) Again, looking through your own eyes. You were offered T3. Were you new player? I highly doubt it since new players cannot really fly them... So why involve unrelated bs as an argument? I will repeat again, no corp will give hundreds of millions to new players.
f) see d) :)
g) I am saying that budget for plexes is limited. Ie the amount of money people spend on plexes wont increase by adding another use for plexes. People who need to buy plexes with isk will increase in numbers for sure, but it does not mean amount of plexes will be sold unless there is increase in price of it. Which will probably grow faster than supply, as the supply can stretch only a bit up, demand will grow much more which means prices are going to keep going up. And then we will see more and more people quiting.
h) At what point you expect them to purchase them? Since on the start they cannot earn isk to secure sp, they would need to purchase it with money. How many would be willing to do that? It seems that we need to define what we mean by new player. As it seems that our idea is different. For me new players are people who play up to 6 months of playing. Unless heavily guided and instructed, only rare of them will be able to earn enough for their play and sp
i/j) I just feel it is wrong to add something like that to the list as it give impression that you just want bigger list
k) If that is current scenario, I pity such players. There are things to do in eve since day 1, if you choose to be bored you cannot blame the game mechanics for that
l) see k)
m) see g), plex can only go up in prices with this and the TSP price will follow
n) It will be cheaper due to diminishing returns. Simple as that. Regarding my comment on fixing char purchase I just gave shallow random ideas which have crossed my mind, I did not really think of solution for it as this is not topic for that.

There is not a single point on the list which will be beneficial for A LOT of players. What dismisiveness and unfounded assumptions I made, if you do not want to understand something it is really not my fault.

There are 2 rules in a successful life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know

General Lootit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#6026 - 2015-12-06 21:25:09 UTC  |  Edited by: General Lootit
Berrice Silf wrote:
General Lootit wrote:
He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you.

Ever heard of locator agents troll, you just might meet that monster your talking about Twisted

Sorry, didn't notice.
Don ZOLA wrote:

There is not a single point on the list which will be beneficial for A LOT of players.

I could say "Yes, they are" But they coming all together what covering much more players than any single point individually.
Don ZOLA
Omniscient Order
#6027 - 2015-12-06 21:59:52 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
The ones in the very next portion of the quote. For your convenience:

"explain why this would bring about the detriment you claim or more specifically state the reason why inequalities in SP are only not allowable for reasons other than time"

So basically your defense for not posting your points is to point out how easy it would be to do so yet still refuse? Then insult someone else for not doing it for you? Yeah, that's intellectually lazy.


But I have already posted them, they are already in this thread. You are blaming me for being lazy to search them and link them for you, while you are lazy to search them and read them on your own?

Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Yeah, we are living anecdotal lives save when we put forth specific and targeted efforts to gather data relevant and accurate on a larger scale. You've provided nothing that suggests you've done that. Rather, you looked to memories gathered while not going through that effort and are now presenting them as proof despite again, having gone through any effort to make sure it's not.

And yes, you are making a statement for all players, which is that they fall into your observations, on top of the assumptions that your observations are correct. It doesn't matter what % you place above or below the rule because you're still placing them within this logic you've created. So no, it's not placing words in your mouth since yes, you did make a series of statements about the whole of SP vs proficiency.

As for me, I'm fine being honest and saying that while I've seen a fair and good number of people well outpace the proficiency their SP says they should have, it's highly anecdotal and thus not worth much of anything.


So, you do not have any official data presented in tangible way but you blame me for the same? Interesting. And if both yours and mine experience are not worth of anything, then how we can discuss about it? My main point in sp vs proficiency is that is not something which creates big bottleneck as there is always things to do in eve regardless of sp. So even though some players would surely utilize TSP it is not game changer for anyone.

And I am being honest all the time. I have no reason at all to "fight" beside game`s sake and that is only reason why I am posting. I am afraid that current direction is going to make the game worse. And I want CCP to keep taking my money :)

Tyberius Franklin wrote:
I keep giving you the same questions, you either refuse to answer or deflect to 300 pages of thread. I'm not going to oblige you being to lazy to copy/paste.

While still saying it's both worthwhile and not worthwhile in the same post. It either is for addressing the things you see as fallacies, or isn't. Make a choice because we're both wasting words on your self contradictions at this point.

Also, I wasn't saying you were calling me a troll. I was saying it was amusing how trollish you were being while calling others trolls. A trend you seem fine with continuing the former part of.

One other thing that just struck me as funny, you keep saying my viewpoint comes from a myopic way of thinking, but it seems you have a pretty clearly myopic view of me. Most of your posts that do address any point try to default to this "if you personally weren't 'x' you would see this differently" stance. Try separating yourself from that for a sec, first because it increases the quality of your arguments, second because you've been almost completely wrong.


Again, you blame me to being lazy while you are lazy on your own to find them and read them. Starts to be funny :)

I am not sure why does it looks like I claim both, must be due to my engrish skills. It is definitely not worthwhile as we are "fighting" for totally different points. I am fighting for the sake of the game, you are fighting for your own interest.

There was only ~5 ppl I called trolls in this thread. And they were obvious trolls not just by the posting but because a lot of their posts got deleted. And if my pointing out that you should read my posts before discussing in order to understand my point in details is trolling, then so be it. It just shows me that your main reason for discussing with me is not to understand each other and then discuss but only to annul my posting by whatever means necessary in order to "win the war" for your personal cause.

And that is one of the reasons why it is not worthwhile to post. Reasoning behind our posting seems to be totally different. Because if you wanted to discuss for the sake of game you would go and read my WOT`s on this subject. Another major reason why it is not worthwhile is that CCP is coming with this change regardless if we agree with all your claims or all my claims. I just wrote side effects which will hit the game after this change no matter if you want to agree or not (would demand to read them first though P).

Please tell me what I am wrong about you:

1. Above average ingame capability
2. Smart
3. Ignorant (looking through his own POV)

There are 2 rules in a successful life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know

Don ZOLA
Omniscient Order
#6028 - 2015-12-06 22:04:35 UTC
General Lootit wrote:


Taking things out of context again, I hoped your trolling skills would improve :/

There are 2 rules in a successful life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know

General Lootit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#6029 - 2015-12-06 22:12:15 UTC
Don ZOLA wrote:

Taking things out of context again, I hoped your trolling skills would improve :/

Teach me, master.
Don ZOLA
Omniscient Order
#6030 - 2015-12-06 22:17:51 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
General Lootit wrote:
Don ZOLA wrote:

I have this character since 2003, I am quite identified with it. Again, ignorant view that if you bought char everyone did

I was wrong... you are not only arrogant, you ignorant too because if you did't bougth any char from bazaar it doesn't mean that others doing things in way you do.
I wanted to do a call out on that one as another example of his character fallacy construction, but post character limit. Beyond that though, what I'm getting from this is he's been around since the beginning. That could well mean he's never had any need of the Bazaar since it could never provide him what he didn't already have in any enticing manner.

As such he's basically saying that since he doesn't have any conflict as a result of his tenure, saying others might makes you "ignorant" and means you bought a character.

Don, you're making up ideal opponents in a pretty obvious fashion here and further actually being myopic. I've never bought a character, but that doesn't mean I can't strive to understand the motivations of those who have or are considering it. You seem unwilling to make that same effort given your post here, and further assume no one else can or will, thus they must have bought a character if the don't agree with you.

You assume that if a person advocates something be bought for isk they have an abundance of it to use for that purpose.

You assume from your anecdote that experience tends to match SP. Edit: And further never actually stated why that would actually matter in a game that gives you room to fail.

To be frank, this is the quality I'm working with and you think this reasoning so sound that I should do the legwork in finding it's foundation. Problem is I find it to be biased and horribly unsound and expect the foundation to be just as poor given what I'm getting now. Given that I'm not willing to expend that effort only to find there's nothing of merit there.


I already explained in previous post. I gave you just one example that you are wrong. There are numerous players who sticked to their original characters.

I have used char bazaar, that can be easily found by search button. For both sales and purchases.

Regarding experience and sp, I can say in average it is quite fine. We would not need 13 years to start pushing for that if that was a mass case. Now baby boomers are coming and they want everything instantly, so the push is here. And I have stated why would it matter and why it is wrong for eve, you just have not read it :)

And the last paragraph just shows me more that I am right, you are fighting for personal cause here by leveraging it in some points which will not be real benefit for majority of players. Just ask yourself "Cui bono?" Since I have enough isk and market knowledge, I am sure I could gain with this thing personally. Since I have enough money to fund myself with plexes I would gain with plex prices going up as well. So why am I against it? Because games sake is above personal gain for me.

And my points on side effects are mostly not even related to the points you wrote and we "discussed". Will you read them or not is not important, but as long as you blame me for not providing some arguments I have to point you to read them first :)

There are 2 rules in a successful life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know

Sgt Ocker
What Corp is it
#6031 - 2015-12-06 22:41:46 UTC
Don ZOLA wrote:
Tyberius Franklin wrote:

Both wrote a lot of stuff
Prices of around 300 to 500 mil per packet have been bandied around for SP packets - How many new players have 2 bil in their in game wallet to pay for a plex and an SP packet?
Instant gratification is the norm for many (especially when it comes to "leisure time"). Is there enough rich benefactors in Eve to hand out isk by the bucket load to new players to use sp packets or will this new class of players need to have a large amount of excess income to spend on their leisure activity.

The biggest single concern I hear from new players (aside from "why do players in lowsec always kill me") is, how do I make enough isk to play for "free".
The "need" to buy SP packets, "so you don't get left behind" "so you can be useful in fleet" etc, can only add to the frustration many new players suffer now.

Benefit to the game - Is hard really but *could* lead to a lot more targets for those who learned the game as they trained up, rather than paid to buy SP. Anyone who has played eve for more than 5 mins knows, having the skills to fly a ship does not make you a good pilot (unless you join an F1 group where your just one in the blob).

IMO; The best way to allow new players to advance more quickly (if that is the goal); Reduce the transfer cost to a single plex and make the extra by adding options to buying a new character from the the character bazaar. Offer the option (at a cost) to change the name of a purchased character, offer the option (at a cost) to remove existing corp history.
Once a character is sold on the bazaar it has lost any link, symbolic or otherwise with its creator (or at least should). So why not allow the purchaser to start out fresh, new character, new name, start your own (corp) history.

My opinions are mine.

  If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - - Just don't bother Hating - I don't care

It really is getting harder and harder to justify $23 a month for each sub.

General Lootit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#6032 - 2015-12-06 23:21:47 UTC  |  Edited by: General Lootit
Don ZOLA wrote:

There are numerous players who sticked to their original characters.

Sasha Sen wrote:

Sasha was my first character, first choice. The skill packets would allow me to stay with my choice and get the skills I feel I "need" to move forward. So Sasha would live on, as my first choice for character, with all the consequences attached to her.

Sorry, Sasha, but someone thinking that we are minority so we don't derserve it.
Sgt Ocker wrote:

IMO; The best way to allow new players to advance more quickly (if that is the goal); Reduce the transfer cost to a single plex and make the extra by adding options to buying a new character from the the character bazaar. Offer the option (at a cost) to change the name of a purchased character, offer the option (at a cost) to remove existing corp history.
Once a character is sold on the bazaar it has lost any link, symbolic or otherwise with its creator (or at least should). So why not allow the purchaser to start out fresh, new character, new name, start your own (corp) history.

TSP not only allowing to keep indentity. It also allowing to spend isk in more gradual way than it happening on bazaar.
Sgt Ocker wrote:

Prices of around 300 to 500 mil per packet have been bandied around for SP packets - How many new players have 2 bil in their in game wallet to pay for a plex and an SP packet?

They might pay for sub with RL. Anyway more than users of bazaar.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#6033 - 2015-12-07 02:03:39 UTC
Don ZOLA wrote:
a)You are going in semantics again, moving away from the point. My point was that if you have "access" to it as ability to earn it and afford TSP it does not mean everyone has it. Ie it does not matter if you have it in your wallet at the moment or in investments or you just know how to make it. No need to play it dumb. And I have shown you that there is no need for such assumption by providing concrete numbers. Everyone has ability to earn isk, but there are huge differences in efficiency, time being devoted to that etc. And what you are stating is pure elitism, "everyone is given a same chance, who cares why someone cannot do it" and something which was against principles of EVE since start. Ie time managed sp system was there to give everyone same "rights" regardless of how much time they can devote to the game, that is one of the main reasons why eve got it niche. While you are pushing it to favor the more active ones. And I highly doubt you would push it if you were not able to earn it yourself Blink
b) I do not want to ignore them, I just pointed out they are not so big. Plus bazaar will remain as it is and still be more used than TSP. On the "ignorance" comment that troll added which you referred later on, I just gave example and there are thousands same like that and countered your original statement that that is some benefit we will gain with TSP. I just pointed out it is already doable
d) Ok, now I can agree with that when put that way, it will have more visibility than bazaar
e) Again, looking through your own eyes. You were offered T3. Were you new player? I highly doubt it since new players cannot really fly them... So why involve unrelated bs as an argument? I will repeat again, no corp will give hundreds of millions to new players.
f) see d) :)
g) I am saying that budget for plexes is limited. Ie the amount of money people spend on plexes wont increase by adding another use for plexes. People who need to buy plexes with isk will increase in numbers for sure, but it does not mean amount of plexes will be sold unless there is increase in price of it. Which will probably grow faster than supply, as the supply can stretch only a bit up, demand will grow much more which means prices are going to keep going up. And then we will see more and more people quiting.
h) At what point you expect them to purchase them? Since on the start they cannot earn isk to secure sp, they would need to purchase it with money. How many would be willing to do that? It seems that we need to define what we mean by new player. As it seems that our idea is different. For me new players are people who play up to 6 months of playing. Unless heavily guided and instructed, only rare of them will be able to earn enough for their play and sp
i/j) I just feel it is wrong to add something like that to the list as it give impression that you just want bigger list
k) If that is current scenario, I pity such players. There are things to do in eve since day 1, if you choose to be bored you cannot blame the game mechanics for that
l) see k)
m) see g), plex can only go up in prices with this and the TSP price will follow
n) It will be cheaper due to diminishing returns. Simple as that. Regarding my comment on fixing char purchase I just gave shallow random ideas which have crossed my mind, I did not really think of solution for it as this is not topic for that.

There is not a single point on the list which will be beneficial for A LOT of players. What dismisiveness and unfounded assumptions I made, if you do not want to understand something it is really not my fault.

a) No, you're simply refusing to acknowledge the point by trying to say any specific example you can find of a poor player invalidates the idea that players can chose to learn to make more isk. There is plenty of info out there on how to do so. Those who are good at it learned from somewhere obviously. Why you assume so many permanently incapable I'm not sure. At some point you're going to have to justify this limitation you assume other players have.
b) No, you pointed out you were not one of them, that was it. And dismissing the size of the group still doesn't argue against it being a benefit for them.
e) Relatively yes, They offered it, but when you can barely board a drake, as was my case, you couldn't really take advantage of it. But pointing out such orgs exist is not looking at things through one's own eyes because the existence of those orgs and their programs doesn't change with personal perspective. What they have done is objective fact. That's why your ignorance argument is BS.
g) That reasoning goes completely against the P2P/P2Progress arguments being made. If this becomes a non-driver for PLEX purchase from CCP then no one is actually exchanging cash for SP and we get an increase only in so much as farmers of SP actually need to establish their capacity, which in some cases is 0. I'm just not prepared to believe that no one will take the at least one time cost out in real currency for a quick training boost.
h) Contradicts your previous point. If the amount of PLEX flowing into the game won't increase due to what you seem to think are capped RL budgets, then that's it. There can be no cash purchases by new players. But to answer the question of targets, I expect the 10-50mill range to see the most use. I'm not expecting brand new players to use it, as the shouldn't really be engaging in steep purchases for skill systems they likely won't fully understand. This is a feature for those who have been here to the point of understanding game and training fundaments.
i/j) We'll have to agree to disagree.
k) No, but you can provide carrots to discourage it through mechanics.
m) Yeah, but you contradicted the method with your very prior point.
n) A solution which didn't address the chief issue with the sale of dirty characters, consequence avoidance. Rather it just potentially builds it in to xfers.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#6034 - 2015-12-07 02:24:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Tyberius Franklin
Don ZOLA wrote:
But I have already posted them, they are already in this thread. You are blaming me for being lazy to search them and link them for you, while you are lazy to search them and read them on your own?
I've already told you why I'm not doing that. Your logic is shortsighted and self centric. I'm not wasting my time to seek that out. You are the one who wants me to answer those so do me the same level of courtesy I'm doing you and post them. If you think you can obligate me to more effort than you while not responding to my own efforts, you're mistaken about how far you can play me into your manipulations.

Edit: Also nice dodge on answering the represented questions complete with deflection into you appeal to waste my time.

Reporting then to give you another chance:
"explain why this would bring about the detriment you claim or more specifically state the reason why inequalities in SP are only not allowable for reasons other than time"

Quote:
So, you do not have any official data presented in tangible way but you blame me for the same? Interesting. And if both yours and mine experience are not worth of anything, then how we can discuss about it? My main point in sp vs proficiency is that is not something which creates big bottleneck as there is always things to do in eve regardless of sp. So even though some players would surely utilize TSP it is not game changer for anyone.

And I am being honest all the time. I have no reason at all to "fight" beside game`s sake and that is only reason why I am posting. I am afraid that current direction is going to make the game worse. And I want CCP to keep taking my money :)
Who's making the claim as refutationm to potential benefits of the idea? It was you. So the stance you're now taking is that neither of us have proof therefore you get a win based purely on making the claim? That's pretty dishonest.

Quote:
Again, you blame me to being lazy while you are lazy on your own to find them and read them. Starts to be funny :)

I am not sure why does it looks like I claim both, must be due to my engrish skills. It is definitely not worthwhile as we are "fighting" for totally different points. I am fighting for the sake of the game, you are fighting for your own interest.

There was only ~5 ppl I called trolls in this thread. And they were obvious trolls not just by the posting but because a lot of their posts got deleted. And if my pointing out that you should read my posts before discussing in order to understand my point in details is trolling, then so be it. It just shows me that your main reason for discussing with me is not to understand each other and then discuss but only to annul my posting by whatever means necessary in order to "win the war" for your personal cause.

And that is one of the reasons why it is not worthwhile to post. Reasoning behind our posting seems to be totally different. Because if you wanted to discuss for the sake of game you would go and read my WOT`s on this subject. Another major reason why it is not worthwhile is that CCP is coming with this change regardless if we agree with all your claims or all my claims. I just wrote side effects which will hit the game after this change no matter if you want to agree or not (would demand to read them first though P).

Please tell me what I am wrong about you:

1. Above average ingame capability
2. Smart
3. Ignorant (looking through his own POV)
Well yes, you are lazy for not matching my efforts in posing you questions for you to respond to. A fact I'll gladly repeat as often as you do it lest you think it's gone unnoticed or found acceptable.

Yes, you are being the lazy one. You can't copy paste but want someone else to review a thread over 300 pages long to find something that you've pretty poorly defined in the first place when you could end this whole part of the conversation by posting it again. I've done that much. You are doing in that specific way less. That makes you the lazy one.

To the idea of my own interest, if a classic ad hominem is the best you have to present as an argument, and has been for a while no less, I think we can all see your pretty much out of anything resembling rational arguments. While the accusation is wholly unture, this is a mechanic I have no intention to use from any standpoint, I'll not but forth any effort trying to convince you because you came to this conclusion based on your own misconceptions about the sides in this debate. I can't fix that.

To your ascertions:
1) No, not in the least bit player skill wise
2) Enough to see through your BS
3) Not in the least bit, rather I'm the one not labeling people based on their stance and arguing against self constructed opponents, but rather the (sometimes rather poor) quality of their reasoning
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#6035 - 2015-12-07 02:42:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Tyberius Franklin
Don ZOLA wrote:
I already explained in previous post. I gave you just one example that you are wrong. There are numerous players who sticked to their original characters.

I have used char bazaar, that can be easily found by search button. For both sales and purchases.

Regarding experience and sp, I can say in average it is quite fine. We would not need 13 years to start pushing for that if that was a mass case. Now baby boomers are coming and they want everything instantly, so the push is here. And I have stated why would it matter and why it is wrong for eve, you just have not read it :)

And the last paragraph just shows me more that I am right, you are fighting for personal cause here by leveraging it in some points which will not be real benefit for majority of players. Just ask yourself "Cui bono?" Since I have enough isk and market knowledge, I am sure I could gain with this thing personally. Since I have enough money to fund myself with plexes I would gain with plex prices going up as well. So why am I against it? Because games sake is above personal gain for me.

And my points on side effects are mostly not even related to the points you wrote and we "discussed". Will you read them or not is not important, but as long as you blame me for not providing some arguments I have to point you to read them first :)
No, you never told me I was wrong, you just said it didn't apply to you then suggested that's the same as being wrong. Further now you seem to be suggesting that the people who feel differently than you don't count because a number of people agree with you. In both cases you're doing exactly what you accuse me of doing. Taking your own myopic view as a norm to minimize conflicting viewpoints while further ignoring the context of the issue. No one would expect a 2003 player to have this conflict. Your personal experience and the experience of your tenured peers is the last and least useful place to draw that measure.

And no, the last paragraph in no way validates you. Rather you're now just saying minority benefits aren't worth counting, again continuing your trend of marginalizing if not outright denying anything that's not in your majority. You're refusing to consider anything not in the majority use case when it suits you.

I'm just not one to believe that because a group is a minority, an advantage top them isn't an advantage to them.

And no, I'm terrible at maximizing market usage. Another thing you got wrong.

On top of that, you're still being intellectually lazy and not providing the points, so calling you out for it is entirely accurate.
General Lootit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#6036 - 2015-12-07 04:16:29 UTC  |  Edited by: General Lootit
Don ZOLA wrote:

[context]
And what you are stating is pure elitism, "everyone is given a same chance, who cares why someone cannot do it" and something which was against principles of EVE since start. Ie time managed sp system was there to give everyone same "rights" regardless of how much time they can devote to the game
[/context]

O rly? I thought principle of EVE "Lets give additional advantage(SP) to palyers who subed longer so they could do more thing than others". I just can't believe that you wrote this - char who have ~244m SP and who subed since 2003.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#6037 - 2015-12-07 04:45:27 UTC
General Lootit wrote:
Don ZOLA wrote:

[context]
And what you are stating is pure elitism, "everyone is given a same chance, who cares why someone cannot do it" and something which was against principles of EVE since start. Ie time managed sp system was there to give everyone same "rights" regardless of how much time they can devote to the game
[/context]

O rly? I thought principle of EVE "Lets give additional advantage(SP) to palyers who subed longer so they could do more thing than others". I just can't believe that you wrote this - char who have ~244m SP and who was subed since 2003.
Not to mention it's fundamentally wrong. Since when was Eve not a sandbox that allowed and in some ways mandated taking something where others may not have the ability to do so?

The only thing the game has ever done is give access to the same basic tool, their character and then has you determine the rest from there. If that process is elitist because it doesn't ensure parity and allows some to gain more than others then the game itself is fundamentally and inescapably elitist.

Which means if that's a problem for someone that other can use their knowledge and skill to do more than they can in a competitive environment, the issue is that player, not the game.
Sgt Ocker
What Corp is it
#6038 - 2015-12-07 09:27:53 UTC
General Lootit wrote:
Don ZOLA wrote:

There are numerous players who sticked to their original characters.

Sasha Sen wrote:

Sasha was my first character, first choice. The skill packets would allow me to stay with my choice and get the skills I feel I "need" to move forward. So Sasha would live on, as my first choice for character, with all the consequences attached to her.

Sorry, Sasha, but someone thinking that we are minority so we don't derserve it.
Sgt Ocker wrote:

IMO; The best way to allow new players to advance more quickly (if that is the goal); Reduce the transfer cost to a single plex and make the extra by adding options to buying a new character from the the character bazaar. Offer the option (at a cost) to change the name of a purchased character, offer the option (at a cost) to remove existing corp history.
Once a character is sold on the bazaar it has lost any link, symbolic or otherwise with its creator (or at least should). So why not allow the purchaser to start out fresh, new character, new name, start your own (corp) history.

TSP not only allowing to keep indentity. It also allowing to spend isk in more gradual way than it happening on bazaar.
Sgt Ocker wrote:

Prices of around 300 to 500 mil per packet have been bandied around for SP packets - How many new players have 2 bil in their in game wallet to pay for a plex and an SP packet?

They might pay for sub with RL. Anyway more than users of bazaar.

Sorry Sasha - It would live on but would no longer be the same character, once you pay to alter a characters attributes it is no longer "Sasha" but something you decided to turn Sasha into. My 1st character (8 years old now) is still a bit of a mess due to early mistakes, I don't have the option to buy SP to fix him though without huge cost due to diminishing returns.

TSP only works IF players are prepared to sell SP and enough of it to keep prices cheap. Once TSP's hit the market, there may be an initial rush of cheap SP available as older players with mining skills (2 or 3 mil a piece) decide to sell them just because they can.
Problem is, this is Eve, few players will do something if it is not fun or profitable. SP packets will not be cheap, so you need to ask yourself - Are you prepared to grind isk X days a month so you can add some SP and play the game for the remainder of the month.

Creating characters for SP farming has a very small chance of happening but the SP from them on a monthly basis is not going to be cheap - Around 400 mil isk per 500k SP +TSP + profit = Not cheap SP to the consumer. I'd expect prices to be in the 550 to 600 mil isk range, until people work out - grinding to sub an account for 150 mil profit p/m is not worth it and prices go up.




In some selfish way, I hope CCP do start this program. I hope it brings 10's of thousands of new players in. I want all those new players flying ships they purchased SP for in the game, the more the merrier. Having SP does not give you pilot skill, only learning the mechanics of how ships work will do that.
Bottom line - The more noobs in shiny ships the more killmails (and buckets of tears) for the rest of us.


NB; My FW character with <10 mil SP is currently my favorite. I get more kills with it and have more fun than I do in any of my other characters.
SP is only a limiting factor if the individual player allows it to become so.



My opinions are mine.

  If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - - Just don't bother Hating - I don't care

It really is getting harder and harder to justify $23 a month for each sub.

Berrice Silf
Academy of the Imperial Guards
#6039 - 2015-12-07 12:20:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Berrice Silf
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
General Lootit wrote:
Don ZOLA wrote:

[context]
And what you are stating is pure elitism, "everyone is given a same chance, who cares why someone cannot do it" and something which was against principles of EVE since start. Ie time managed sp system was there to give everyone same "rights" regardless of how much time they can devote to the game
[/context]

O rly? I thought principle of EVE "Lets give additional advantage(SP) to palyers who subed longer so they could do more thing than others". I just can't believe that you wrote this - char who have ~244m SP and who was subed since 2003.
Not to mention it's fundamentally wrong. Since when was Eve not a sandbox that allowed and in some ways mandated taking something where others may not have the ability to do so?

The only thing the game has ever done is give access to the same basic tool, their character and then has you determine the rest from there. If that process is elitist because it doesn't ensure parity and allows some to gain more than others then the game itself is fundamentally and inescapably elitist.

Which means if that's a problem for someone that other can use their knowledge and skill to do more than they can in a competitive environment, the issue is that player, not the game.

Eve is a sandbox in every sense of the word. In this open world there is no place a one day old character cannot go to that someone who has played for 13 years. There are no level entry requirements to access any area, there are no instanced area's that are off limits to anyone.

What are you trying to infer that eve should be ?, All its characters are created equal from day one none better than the next. It's up to you what direction you choose to progress and how quickly too. Every one has the ability to train for implants to speed up there training and with the plex you are now on a level field with the ability to gain isk without any grind. If a pilot decides to go cyber/ssc/gunnery to work towards fleet and then you have someone who is semi clueless and just wants to chase the idea of playing the game for free grinding at almost anything for the plex, That is not the games fault but they're the first to whine about falling behind and they cannot access the latest FoTM shinies.

Tenure and length of, Has always been an integral part of eve. Even the CEO states:
The investment of money in EVE should not give you an unfair advantage over the investment of time.

Sandbox / Openworld does not mean instance access to every item in game, Just that everyone is given the opportunity to gain access to them. I can see there is a need to help the new now and part of the new system maybe leading to this, The 5 million cut off for an extraction maybe because somewhere down the line new players could be given 5 million as a start point but the figures for 5 / 50 are nothing short of a reskill mechanic as they stand.

The only way this would work without intended / unexpected exploitation would be for CCP to market them directly, It may not be a perfect solution but far less interruption to the game as it now stands.

Edit: A lot of people think they would prefer sandbox games, then when presented with a true sandbox game they either don't like it / wont play it. Truth being that the majority of casual players who hop on for a hour or two expecting to be rewarded are disappointed. A sandbox game like eve represents a time commitment which you should treat like hobby and expect to play for 6 month's minimum but more like 2 years.
Rat Scout
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#6040 - 2015-12-07 17:11:56 UTC
Berrice Silf wrote:


Tenure and length of, Has always been an integral part of eve. Even the CEO states:
The investment of money in EVE should not give you an unfair advantage over the investment of time.




Well, if we are talking about current problems with the bazaar this makes sense, but you can't apply this a s an issue for TSP if it already exists