These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev Blog: Exploring The Character Bazaar & Skill Trading

First post First post First post
Author
Veraca Darmazaf
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#5841 - 2015-11-21 02:51:30 UTC
Niko Lorenzio wrote:

Not as silly as implying that making a game free to play will automatically make it flooded with activity and players. My point was dismissing that notion as ridiculous. I'm not sure why I'm even explaining this, should be obvious.

Sarcasm on the internet is tricky. I interpreted your post to mean you thought f2p would massively slash the population - the exact opposite of what you were replying to - rather than merely have a lesser effect as you apparently meant.
Niko Lorenzio
United Eve Directorate
#5842 - 2015-11-21 07:22:24 UTC
Veraca Darmazaf wrote:
Niko Lorenzio wrote:

Not as silly as implying that making a game free to play will automatically make it flooded with activity and players. My point was dismissing that notion as ridiculous. I'm not sure why I'm even explaining this, should be obvious.

Sarcasm on the internet is tricky. I interpreted your post to mean you thought f2p would massively slash the population - the exact opposite of what you were replying to - rather than merely have a lesser effect as you apparently meant.


Yes. That being said, I do think going F2P is actually going to harm EVE's population. This whole direction EVE is heading in is either going to slowly bleed the game to death or change it into a themepark MMO.

The CSM XI Election are now open until March 25th, 2016. Consider Niko Lorenzio for CSM XI.

CSM matters, your voice matters, your vote matters!

DeepHole Trild
The Men Who Sold Worlds
#5843 - 2015-11-21 20:12:58 UTC
ehm alright ...

This idea came up after years of discussing how to bring more new players to eve and have them stick longer than the 2-3 weeks trial, right?

The first question which pops up:

- Is it going to attract more new people to Eve and have them stick longer?
- If new players don`t stick because of the idea they can never catch up on older players than what is this idea to which they think never can live up to? It seems to be new players think 'big = more guns = better'. And, will this trading skills system going to change that idea?

Everything about Eve if you first join radiates: Big = more guns = better. Also on the killboards there is no other differentiation but DPS. You either got lots of DPS or you have got a fleet with lots of DPS so you can get on top of the killboard. The single role which is celebrated is the role of DPS.

Reward different roles equally and this idea new players have might change so they can live up to the idea they too can be part of something within a reasonable amount of time. Change the killboards for example to also show the fleet who did the most reps so they could deiliver the most DPS. In stead of DPS rules all.

New players can live up to some of these roles in short notice and feel they are doing something which adds up to each individual taking part in a fleet.

Finally, there is no example in real life where you can get skilled in something from one day into the other. It feels counter intuitive. And, for those games who actually have these trade offs, skills for money and vice versa, are the games built on hypes. Where new players come and go rapidly anyway.

Either way, I do love the idea but I don`t think it will have new players stay longer then the 2-3 weeks trial.

Celebrate every role equally. Tell the story of EVE both in numbers and in roles on a daily basis. Killboards should go more in depth, unraveling the story of teamwork.

o7
General Lootit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#5844 - 2015-11-21 21:27:16 UTC  |  Edited by: General Lootit
DeepHole Trild wrote:

- Is it going to attract more new people to Eve and have them stick longer?

I think(as noob) it will helps me but it isn't the main reason why I'm sticking with the game. Main reason is friendly community of players Blink
Indahmawar Fazmarai
#5845 - 2015-11-21 21:39:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Indahmawar Fazmarai
Just some additional thoughts.

If a player doesn't likes the game enough when he haves low skills, he's unlikely to like it further just with more skills. Having more skills doesn't makes the game better, or more enjoyable.

What a faster skilling does for sure, is to shorten up the tenure of those disatisfied players, who rather than sit on the fence for months can find out sooner that their issue is not with skills, but with the game.

So, players who enjoy the game and would become long term players will become it the same (just faster or for a higher price), and EVE will just burn out and churn faster those who don't like the game enough to play it for a decade but currently need a couple of years to notice that EVE is not made for them.

I can understand how CCP may be a bit more worried than CCP Quant implies with the PCU numbers, but I can't sympathize with their misled efforts to revert that situation.

EVE has stopped growing in the worst way possible: first, it has given up new players by adding "Level 80" content only, and second it has compounded that by neglecting (out of unawareness or poor decission making) the core of its population, the silent but dependable highsec solo PvE cash cows.

Selling them that Raven faster is not going to change anything. It's just a feast today, famine tomorrow situation.
General Lootit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#5846 - 2015-11-21 22:10:00 UTC  |  Edited by: General Lootit
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
Just some additional thoughts.

If a player doesn't likes the game enough when he haves low skills, he's unlikely to like it further just with more skills. Having more skills doesn't makes the game better, or more enjoyable.

It was a radical thought. If having more skills doesn't makes the game better, or more enjoyable for you
a) Stop traning skills
b) Vote for Dror(with his idea to get rid of SP system)
c) Transfer your high SP toon to me or someone else who can enjoy it. There is no difference between playing low SP toon and high one. Right?

Just kidding. If you were right than there wouldn't be exist such thing as bazaar.

Post with opposite opinion
Lan Wang wrote:
I bought my first character when i was at 4mil sp, jumped to 42mil sp, was always my intention to buy a character as soon as i heard about the bazaar, but only once i would buy a main character, buying that character made me relevant in fleets and i had much more fun with 42mil sp than i did with 4mil sp, it didnt make me that much better at the game but it certainly made one hell of a difference.

I really dont see much of an issue with this as my now highish sp doesnt really matter to me anymore, i dont really even bother looking at my skills unless the fc's decide on a new doctrine which i cant already fly but i feel much better about having to invest little to no time training skills to get that ship.

Sometimes a small boost in skills really makes the game so much more enjoyable

Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
What a faster skilling does for sure, is to shorten up the tenure of those disastisfied player, who rather than sit on the fence for months can find out sooner that their issue is not with skills, but with the game.

Do you want to tie them up and torture them more?
Will Howard
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#5847 - 2015-11-21 22:46:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Will Howard
I don't see that much of a difference in the outcome that you get when someone with too much money buys a character from the character bazaar.

As I sit in a bait venture on a gas site waiting for the stupid proteus pilot who obviously has no clue try to scan me down with combat probes, I knew he bought his pilot and I was pondering the whole "if you're bad no amount of skill points will fix that" line of thinking. Couldn't scan down the venture and apparently didn't realize he could just warp to the gas site to get me (and disregarding that everything we were doing smelled like a complete trap to anyone who has played eve for more than a couple of weeks) so I warped into his probes for him with an industrial.

This skill pack idea will probably yeild the same effect. More shiny kills from dumbasses who don't know what they are doing.

There's probably many ways to exploit this I'm sure. The prices involved would be an important factor in determining how I guess but other than the fact that it's a small step in the direction of pay to win I don't really see how this will hurt anyone but the people who use it.
Tia Tzu
G.E.A.R.
#5848 - 2015-11-21 23:11:34 UTC
I must say returning back to the game last week after a couple of years away it looked like CCP had learned some lessons from the past and I was reasonably optimistic, but I see it must have been a lucid period that I missed out on and now they are ready to bring out the same old crazy that I got used to over the last ten years. I dont argue that many including myself would not find this useful, but the usual suspects are surely going to exploit it like they do everything else.. I hope CCP will decide to take this brain fart back to the drawing board like WIS never to be heard about again..
General Lootit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#5849 - 2015-11-21 23:30:36 UTC  |  Edited by: General Lootit
CCP I will really appreciate if you public anonymous statistic of this thread. Especially
I want to know how often same person used different characters to post.
Don ZOLA
Omniscient Order
#5850 - 2015-11-21 23:39:05 UTC
General Lootit wrote:
CCP I will really appreciate if you public anonymous statistic of this thread. Especially
I want to know how often same person using different characters to post.


Alts are definitely more use for "pro" posts, so I doubt that would work in your favor. Btw, good luck getting CCP to communicate with you/us here :D

There are 2 rules in a successful life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know

General Lootit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#5851 - 2015-11-22 00:04:55 UTC  |  Edited by: General Lootit
Don ZOLA wrote:
General Lootit wrote:
CCP I will really appreciate if you public anonymous statistic of this thread. Especially
I want to know how often same person using different characters to post.


Alts are definitely more use for "pro" posts, so I doubt that would work in your favor. Btw, good luck getting CCP to communicate with you/us here :D

A Ingus wrote:

I used to have 4 accounts.

I can't afford as many as vet can and my terrible russian accent should already gave me up but I have no alt. "con" mans could be real con-mans.
Don ZOLA
Omniscient Order
#5852 - 2015-11-22 16:42:47 UTC
General Lootit wrote:
Don ZOLA wrote:
General Lootit wrote:
CCP I will really appreciate if you public anonymous statistic of this thread. Especially
I want to know how often same person using different characters to post.


Alts are definitely more use for "pro" posts, so I doubt that would work in your favor. Btw, good luck getting CCP to communicate with you/us here :D

A Ingus wrote:

I used to have 4 accounts.

I can't afford as many as vet can and my terrible russian accent should already gave me up but I have no alt. "con" mans could be real con-mans.


I never said you used them. Just that majority of pro posts are done by chars which look like alts Smile But even if it was truth, it still does not matter obviously as CCP does not care about anything that was discussed here Sad

There are 2 rules in a successful life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know

General Lootit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#5853 - 2015-11-22 17:36:48 UTC  |  Edited by: General Lootit
Don ZOLA wrote:

I never said you used them.

Thanks god. I thought you blame me again as several previous times.

Don ZOLA wrote:
Just that majority of pro posts are done by chars which look like alts

Which ones? Just interesting.

Will Howard looks like Dror. They have similar avatars(style), same month of birth and Will Howard poped up after I mentioned Dror. I could mistaken as you know and all of this is just coincidence.
Don ZOLA wrote:
But even if it was truth, it still does not matter obviously as CCP does not care about anything that was discussed here

Yeap, this is sad.
Anyway only CCP could say it for sure. Script is needed to group up charachters with same account than accounts with same owner and finally some monotone work(read several posts of each owner to determine his position "con" or "pro") Result must show how many alts were used on each side.
Don ZOLA
Omniscient Order
#5854 - 2015-11-22 19:10:37 UTC
General Lootit wrote:
Don ZOLA wrote:

I never said you used them.

Thanks god. I thought you blame me again as several previous times.

Don ZOLA wrote:
Just that majority of pro posts are done by chars which look like alts

Which ones? Just interesting.

Will Howard looks like Dror. They have similar avatars(style), same month of birth and Will Howard poped up after I mentioned Dror. I could mistaken as you know and all of this is just coincidence.
Don ZOLA wrote:
But even if it was truth, it still does not matter obviously as CCP does not care about anything that was discussed here

Yeap, this is sad.
Anyway only CCP could say it for sure. Script is needed to group up charachters with same account than accounts with same owner and finally some monotone work(read several posts of each owner to determine his position "con" or "pro") Result must show how many alts were used on each side.


1. I blamed you for trolling, not posting with alts
2. I doubt Dror is using alts, he has quite unique POV and specific way of posting
3. There is much more ways these forums could be improved, but I guess it is easier for CCP employees to go to some third side forums, we are aware they do not care about subscribed players anyway :D

There are 2 rules in a successful life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know

General Lootit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#5855 - 2015-11-22 19:48:11 UTC  |  Edited by: General Lootit
Now you become a nice guy. Stay this way.
Don ZOLA wrote:

1. I blamed you for trolling, not posting with alts

First you blamed me in trolling then in spamming so I used inductive logic because you didn't specify whom you talked about. And this kind of logic has problem.
Don ZOLA wrote:

2. I doubt Dror is using alts, he has quite unique POV and specific way of posting

Maybe they have same photographer Smile You will be surprised how different alts could be in way of posting.
Don ZOLA wrote:

3. There is much more ways these forums could be improved, but I guess it is easier for CCP employees to go to some third side forums, we are aware they do not care about subscribed players anyway :D

Menthioning miscommunication third time in the row I think it's too much.
Don ZOLA
Omniscient Order
#5856 - 2015-11-22 21:34:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Don ZOLA
[Conspiracy theory] Seems some are already preparing for this - Rent in TSP? [/conspiracy theory] Blink

Edit: I guess they will not wanted to be involved with the market games and price control at all :D

There are 2 rules in a successful life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know

Rocker Will
Rockstar federation
#5857 - 2015-11-22 21:45:03 UTC
Rocker Will wrote:
I heard people talking about this in Amar, I thought It was a bad idea but after reading the blog it actually sounds pretty good,

adding to that I think new players should start with something near to mastery level 3 with frigs

I'm Batman

Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#5858 - 2015-11-23 05:23:21 UTC
Don ZOLA wrote:
[Conspiracy theory] Seems some are already preparing for this - Rent in TSP? [/conspiracy theory] Blink

Edit: I guess they will not wanted to be involved with the market games and price control at all :D


Sounds like someone leaked info to the group who will benefit the most, who'd have guessed. So which of the Goon CSM was it.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#5859 - 2015-11-23 07:44:08 UTC
Sounds like an even less hassle version of renting.

Are we exploring the renting bazaar and region trading?

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#5860 - 2015-11-24 08:37:56 UTC
Levi Belvar wrote:
I don't think your understanding what some are trying to say either, I have a character i could quite easily remove 26 or so million sp's from. Of those 26m i would like to reassign 7m into something else on the same character but can't because on removing them to me they only become 50k packets. I don't need isk i don't need to strip any toon down for money, so if i can't reallocate my 7 million i sure as hell ain't gonna part with all the rest to give someone else the benefit of them - Your on about bitter vet's all the time but screwing them over for a sub 50m player sure ain't going to help this. This Personalization is flawed to anyone above 50m skill points, like i've said before once you turn the backbone of the game into a pay2 access system where is there any prestige and uniqueness ??

EDIT
Say they had 2 models of extractors 1 the standard tradeable TSP with it's depreciation scale, then one that was purely for use on the character that it pulled the skill points from with zero loss. A skill realignment model - your still paying extra in some way to do it but without feeling CCP have kicked you in the nuts for being so loyal.
We've had this conversation. There is no gap in understanding, there or here. Just the disagreement regarding whether the use of extractors/TSP for remapping purposes should incur loss or not. I still hold to what I stated prior, that I should not be able to losslessly remove any training "mistakes" to put me even with those that more effectively used their training time.

The "screwing the vets" argument doesn't fly with me as one of those vets. Being paid for doesn't bypass the principle of 1st time training choices sticking or having some level of consequence. Even if TSP allows one to speed up other trains, it doesn't bypass what you already have and the consequence of having it.