These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev Blog: Exploring The Character Bazaar & Skill Trading

First post First post First post
Author
Levi Belvar
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#4701 - 2015-10-24 07:02:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Levi Belvar
General Lootit wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
Havenard wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
I think the simpleton is in your mirror, since I was describing an arms race.

"I want to buy skills to compete" is useless when the competitors also can buy them and have the expertise and experience to invest their money better than you.

Yeah, sure, arms race. I'm sure someone will pick you, as individual, and train exclusively things that counter you (there must be a lot). And this guy is a rich veteran, that for some reason doesn't already have skills to fly whatever he wants trained, he needs to buy a lot of SP tokens for that. Yeah, looks like a very realistic scenario to me.


Allegedly, "Noobs" want skills to compete with "vets" but "vets" also could buy them if they need to and nullify the skills bought by "noobs". Who is talking about me?

Lo que la naturaleza no da, Salamanca no lo presta...Roll

noobs have skills for competing, vets have expirence for outcompeting. So it is beneficial for both sides. Anything else?


So if the Vets, and moderatly skilled use there skillpoints to create alts or to boost exisitng, your example is then flipped, Newbro's have no experience, no skills and the vets have more skills on more characters, experience and the newbro's are sitting wondering WTF is happening.

“Stupidity and wisdom meet in the same centre of sentiment and resolution, in the suffering of human accidents.”

AngelFood
#4702 - 2015-10-24 07:07:32 UTC
Doomchinchilla wrote:
ISK for SP, this is what happens when we let people that haven't played EVE for greater than 2 years onto the CSM. How can this even be remotely considered a good idea?

Not once have vets ever seriously thought this was a good idea. This is just bad. Just 100% bad.


Csm? you mean devs right?

Yes this is what happens when you let stream popular players or super alliance popular players become devs.

Niko Lorenzio
United Eve Directorate
#4703 - 2015-10-24 07:30:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Niko Lorenzio
Havenard wrote:
Niko Lorenzio wrote:
They are far from fantasy. I guess you haven't been around in EVE long enough to know just how crazy EVE players can be. This goes beyond those scenarios. I don't understand why simply giving out free SP for certain missions arcs or whatever is not better than this.

You sound just like those guys saying that letting Carriers use gates would ruin nullsec, making clones free would only benefict gankers, and giving 400k SP for new chars would only benefict bots... you just can't let go of your pessimism.

Now while giving SP on missions would be cool, it doesn't address the problems they are trying to solve with this system.


Funny you mention that. I have raised concerns that allowing carriers use gates would be negating the cyno jammers effectiveness, but I didn't think it would ruin nullsec.

Getting rid of clone upgrades completely is one of the worst changes CCP has made in EVE. While I completely understand the rationale and agree that the old mechanic was pretty bad, removing consequences from dying was a big mistake. Yes, the old mechanic did not provide any meaningful choice, it was just a stupid thing you had to do every time you got podded. Still, in a game like EVE (where the CEO himself has stated several times that "Death is a serious matter" was the first line that was written about the game) completely removing consequences from the literal death was a betrayal of everything it stands for. If they didn't bother to spend some time and energy to work on something this fundamental, it begs the question does CCP even know what EVE is about?

I will give you that, I am pretty pessimistic. I guess you could call me a bitter vet. But this pessimism doesn't stem from "I had to warp to gates at 15km, both ways, with rats and pirates on each side." It comes from years of experience and disappointment with CCP's lack of loyalty to its players and it's lack of respect for the core values of EVE. These are the things that got EVE and CCP to where they are today and they have been under constant attack since Incarna.

This proposal caters to instant gratification sort of players. Those players will never work out in EVE anyway. It is not the kind of game for them. At the same time it annoys and demoralizes the core players. Those who play EVE seriously spend days, weeks, months and even years planning, building, destroying, in other words creating content. The very content that brings people in and keeps them in this game. Those players get fatigued by all these changes that don't align with EVE and that in turns leads to them burning out, losing interest and not spending the energy on creating content.

The CSM XI Election are now open until March 25th, 2016. Consider Niko Lorenzio for CSM XI.

CSM matters, your voice matters, your vote matters!

Tiberius Heth
Doomheim
#4704 - 2015-10-24 07:40:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Tiberius Heth
AngelFood wrote:
Doomchinchilla wrote:
ISK for SP, this is what happens when we let people that haven't played EVE for greater than 2 years onto the CSM. How can this even be remotely considered a good idea?

Not once have vets ever seriously thought this was a good idea. This is just bad. Just 100% bad.


Csm? you mean devs right?

Yes this is what happens when you let stream popular players or super alliance popular players become devs.



All but one CSM were vehemently against this idea so don't pin this on them, per usual CCP is very good at having very bad ideas and the CSM tries to keep them from doing dumb ****, this time however CCP refused to listen to reason.

It's clown devs with either an agenda or simply lacking a solid understanding on the game, that and of course some lunatic making more "no fear" internal memos.
Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
#4705 - 2015-10-24 08:21:47 UTC
I agree with the change. CCP is right with the SP penalty, without it only the rich veterans would use this.

This feature should be aimed towards new players and low SP characters.

The Tears Must Flow

General Lootit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#4706 - 2015-10-24 09:21:33 UTC  |  Edited by: General Lootit
AngelFood wrote:
Doomchinchilla wrote:
ISK for SP, this is what happens when we let people that haven't played EVE for greater than 2 years onto the CSM. How can this even be remotely considered a good idea?

Not once have vets ever seriously thought this was a good idea. This is just bad. Just 100% bad.


Csm? you mean devs right?

Yes this is what happens when you let stream popular players or super alliance popular players become devs.



Thats why CSM had so massive kneejerk reaction
Steve Ronuken wrote:

CCP did talk with the CSM about this, before all of you saw this.

They are become offended and then they wanted to show a power above community to CCP. Some people become victims of that dirty political trick. Politics... Ugh
sero Hita
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#4707 - 2015-10-24 09:50:28 UTC
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
Havenard wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
I think the simpleton is in your mirror, since I was describing an arms race.

"I want to buy skills to compete" is useless when the competitors also can buy them and have the expertise and experience to invest their money better than you.

Yeah, sure, arms race. I'm sure someone will pick you, as individual, and train exclusively things that counter you (there must be a lot). And this guy is a rich veteran, that for some reason doesn't already have skills to fly whatever he wants trained, he needs to buy a lot of SP tokens for that. Yeah, looks like a very realistic scenario to me.


Allegedly, "Noobs" want skills to compete with "vets" but "vets" also could buy them if they need to and nullify the skills bought by "noobs". Who is talking about me?

Lo que la naturaleza no da, Salamanca no lo presta...Roll



Then it is nice that skills are hardcapped in EVE. So when both the newbie and the veteran have all skills affecing one type of ship maxed at V they are on equal grounds(sp wise). So it is indeed not a arms race, as it ends at level V. Arms races keep escalating pr defenition.

"I'm all for pvp, don't get me wrong. I've ganked in Empire, blobed in low sec. Got T-shirts from every which-where.. But to be forced into a pvp confrontation that I didn't want is wrong ccp." RealFlisker

afkalt
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#4708 - 2015-10-24 09:54:29 UTC
sero Hita wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
Havenard wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
I think the simpleton is in your mirror, since I was describing an arms race.

"I want to buy skills to compete" is useless when the competitors also can buy them and have the expertise and experience to invest their money better than you.

Yeah, sure, arms race. I'm sure someone will pick you, as individual, and train exclusively things that counter you (there must be a lot). And this guy is a rich veteran, that for some reason doesn't already have skills to fly whatever he wants trained, he needs to buy a lot of SP tokens for that. Yeah, looks like a very realistic scenario to me.


Allegedly, "Noobs" want skills to compete with "vets" but "vets" also could buy them if they need to and nullify the skills bought by "noobs". Who is talking about me?

Lo que la naturaleza no da, Salamanca no lo presta...Roll



Then it is nice that skills are hardcapped in EVE. So when both the newbie and the veteran have all skills affecing one type of ship maxed at V they are on equal grounds(sp wise). So it is indeed not a arms race, as it ends at level V. Arms races keep escalating pr defenition.




Not empty quoting.
General Lootit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#4709 - 2015-10-24 10:18:51 UTC  |  Edited by: General Lootit
Levi Belvar wrote:
So if the Vets, and moderatly skilled use there skillpoints to create alts or to boost exisitng, your example is then flipped, Newbro's have no experience, no skills and the vets have more skills on more characters, experience and the newbro's are sitting wondering WTF is happening.

Below is my answer to you.
Levi Belvar wrote:

you either need to goto bed or shut your yammering you have no clue about what im talking about here obviously.
Dave Stark
#4710 - 2015-10-24 10:42:14 UTC
Levi Belvar wrote:
So if the Vets, and moderatly skilled use there skillpoints to create alts or to boost exisitng, your example is then flipped, Newbro's have no experience, no skills and the vets have more skills on more characters, experience and the newbro's are sitting wondering WTF is happening.


that's no different to the situation we're in now. most vets already have a myriad of characters with a range of skills.
Levi Belvar
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#4711 - 2015-10-24 10:56:49 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
Levi Belvar wrote:
So if the Vets, and moderatly skilled use there skillpoints to create alts or to boost exisitng, your example is then flipped, Newbro's have no experience, no skills and the vets have more skills on more characters, experience and the newbro's are sitting wondering WTF is happening.


that's no different to the situation we're in now. most vets already have a myriad of characters with a range of skills.


Dave, that proposal i put forward of CCP doing it instead of it being player governed still retains its diminishing returns. It then benefits those who need it more than older characters. Its not something i want at all, but if something has to be implimented then shouldnt it be for the specific groups and not all who could exploit it.

“Stupidity and wisdom meet in the same centre of sentiment and resolution, in the suffering of human accidents.”

Vahligmarr
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#4712 - 2015-10-24 11:01:06 UTC
Octoven wrote:


...

The other side to this is money, many may think, why should a player buy SPs with real cash? I should remind you that you are already doing that right now as we speak. Yes, subscription cost comes with many perks like playing the game, accessing the forums, and such. However, the real value in the $15/month is in the skill training. How many have left their accounts subbed whilst they took a break from EvE to simply keep skills being trained? SPs already = money, this option is just allowing you to advance it in incremental burst.


.... + CCP gets paid twice and more per SP in the future, by making it a commodity and thats where the idea comes from in the first place....again, its not about helping beginners or something, its a cash move and if the bait works this time, I am absolutely sure, it pushes the door more open, to even more microtransactions in the future.

... You want to participate in FW. Here is an FW license for AUR, you want to be immune against wardec, here is a Peace Decree, it only costs x AUR....

Where does it end.....?

I don't want this to happen with my favorite game....
Dave Stark
#4713 - 2015-10-24 11:07:14 UTC
Levi Belvar wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
Levi Belvar wrote:
So if the Vets, and moderatly skilled use there skillpoints to create alts or to boost exisitng, your example is then flipped, Newbro's have no experience, no skills and the vets have more skills on more characters, experience and the newbro's are sitting wondering WTF is happening.


that's no different to the situation we're in now. most vets already have a myriad of characters with a range of skills.


Dave, that proposal i put forward of CCP doing it instead of it being player governed still retains its diminishing returns. It then benefits those who need it more than older characters. Its not something i want at all, but if something has to be implimented then shouldnt it be for the specific groups and not all who could exploit it.


can you please stop pretending that big alliances don't already have every type of pilot they need. it's honestly getting boring listening to you and the other people bleating "exploited by veterans".

people like goonswarm, the older veterans in PL, the long time players in what used to be the n3 coalition (wherever they ended up) all have all the pilots they need with all the skills they need.

the game has been out 12 years. between 12 years of skill training and however long the char bazaar has been operating more SP for these people is basically a total irrelevance. they already have a character with perfect skills for every activity they need.

the character bazaar is one of the best things eve has for new players - i'll paraphrase the mittani "a new player can level up to the level of their intelligence as soon as they start the game" ~ that is from the meta show at the end of September when he had sort dragon on as a guest and they were discussing the new SP boost for new characters.
why are we hiding such a feature away from the people who benefit from it most?
General Lootit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#4714 - 2015-10-24 11:09:47 UTC
Levi Belvar wrote:
who could exploit it.

Repeat after me:
who could use it... use ....it .... use it. Big smile
Dror
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#4715 - 2015-10-24 11:10:41 UTC
Saelyth wrote:
Dror wrote:

Honestly, though, that could be said about any game where paying real money for an advantage. It may not effect you, but there's the whole law of large numbers. Enough purchases equals an abundance of advantages.


What are these advantages that presumably don't already exist in another fashion (character bazaar)?

Specific mains of any type. It honestly undermines the whole of SP -- not that it's a great deterrent now, nor a great progression system.

"SP is helpful for the game?" Here's all of the research on motivation -- it says the opposite! What purpose does it serve, then? Starter corps are non-competitive. Sov is unchallenged. "Fix sov!" you say? Remove SP.

Tristan Agion
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#4716 - 2015-10-24 11:13:17 UTC
Niko Lorenzio wrote:
This proposal caters to instant gratification sort of players. Those players will never work out in EVE anyway. It is not the kind of game for them. At the same time it annoys and demoralizes the core players.

Why would this "annoy and demoralise" core players? If "instant gratification" players flood into EVE, boost their characters with SP packets, fly around cluelessly in bling ships, and get blown to pieces over and over again until they leave - just what exactly is the problem?

Is it that you cannot handle the entertainment? Is it that you cannot stand CCP making money? Are you opposed to having large numbers of logins showing in your launcher window?

If there are players who cannot deal with EVE in the long run, but who through this feature will spend tons of cash on this game in the ultimately mistaken idea that they can pay to win - then how please is that not great for everybody but them?

As you say, they will be gone sooner or later anyway. But this will make them leave later, and in the meantime they pay CCP's server bills and provide you with endless hours of pew-pew entertainment (and a source for ISK, those skill packets and bling ships have to come from somewhere).

The supposed influx of EVE-incompatible players is at worst irrelevant, at best highly beneficial to everybody else. There is only one thing that is worth discussing here as far as core play goes:

This feature would ultimately increase the number of "up to about 30M SP" players and alts in game, and I mean players and alts that are EVE-compatible enough to be around for quite some time. Furthermore, these players and alts would have their SP "better tuned" to specific aims. So basically, you will get an increase in low to medium, but properly, SP-trained players in EVE.

Now, are you for that or against that, as far as "core play" goes? I have a hard time seeing how this can negatively affect vets, unless perhaps if they have grown accustomed to shooting low SP fish in a space barrel.
Vahligmarr
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#4717 - 2015-10-24 11:16:35 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:


the character bazaar is one of the best things eve has for new players - i'll paraphrase the mittani "a new player can level up to the level of their intelligence as soon as they start the game" ~ that is from the meta show at the end of September when he had sort dragon on as a guest and they were discussing the new SP boost for new characters.
why are we hiding such a feature away from the people who benefit from it most?


If you really think, one of the best things for Beginners in EvE, is the ability to buy a high level character on the bazaar, then something with the game is completely wrong.
Dror
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#4718 - 2015-10-24 11:18:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Dror
Niko Lorenzio wrote:
This proposal caters to instant gratification sort of players.

This statement always shows a complete lack of a clue.

Please show us the game design or psychology research where this type of demographic is even stated.. much less than studied or implemented.

Motivation is pretty unbiased. Every game demographic enjoys feeling great. If paying a bunch of money does or doesn't do that for them probably has more to do with their disposable income and how much of the game they can experience before getting bored of a supposed sandbox MMO that limits its gameplay for microtransactions.

"SP is helpful for the game?" Here's all of the research on motivation -- it says the opposite! What purpose does it serve, then? Starter corps are non-competitive. Sov is unchallenged. "Fix sov!" you say? Remove SP.

Levi Belvar
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#4719 - 2015-10-24 11:32:33 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
Levi Belvar wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
Levi Belvar wrote:
So if the Vets, and moderatly skilled use there skillpoints to create alts or to boost exisitng, your example is then flipped, Newbro's have no experience, no skills and the vets have more skills on more characters, experience and the newbro's are sitting wondering WTF is happening.


that's no different to the situation we're in now. most vets already have a myriad of characters with a range of skills.


Dave, that proposal i put forward of CCP doing it instead of it being player governed still retains its diminishing returns. It then benefits those who need it more than older characters. Its not something i want at all, but if something has to be implimented then shouldnt it be for the specific groups and not all who could exploit it.


can you please stop pretending that big alliances don't already have every type of pilot they need. it's honestly getting boring listening to you and the other people bleating "exploited by veterans".

people like goonswarm, the older veterans in PL, the long time players in what used to be the n3 coalition (wherever they ended up) all have all the pilots they need with all the skills they need.

the game has been out 12 years. between 12 years of skill training and however long the char bazaar has been operating more SP for these people is basically a total irrelevance. they already have a character with perfect skills for every activity they need.

the character bazaar is one of the best things eve has for new players - i'll paraphrase the mittani "a new player can level up to the level of their intelligence as soon as they start the game" ~ that is from the meta show at the end of September when he had sort dragon on as a guest and they were discussing the new SP boost for new characters.
why are we hiding such a feature away from the people who benefit from it most?


I said all who could exploit it, i dont need lists of corps nor alliances or quotes.Why does it need to be player orientated over CCP, If it was for customization purposes only then they would just give us the ability to remap our skills once a year same with looks / race.

“Stupidity and wisdom meet in the same centre of sentiment and resolution, in the suffering of human accidents.”

Dror
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#4720 - 2015-10-24 11:36:22 UTC
Levi Belvar wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
Levi Belvar wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
Levi Belvar wrote:
So if the Vets, and moderatly skilled use there skillpoints to create alts or to boost exisitng, your example is then flipped, Newbro's have no experience, no skills and the vets have more skills on more characters, experience and the newbro's are sitting wondering WTF is happening.


that's no different to the situation we're in now. most vets already have a myriad of characters with a range of skills.


Dave, that proposal i put forward of CCP doing it instead of it being player governed still retains its diminishing returns. It then benefits those who need it more than older characters. Its not something i want at all, but if something has to be implimented then shouldnt it be for the specific groups and not all who could exploit it.


can you please stop pretending that big alliances don't already have every type of pilot they need. it's honestly getting boring listening to you and the other people bleating "exploited by veterans".

people like goonswarm, the older veterans in PL, the long time players in what used to be the n3 coalition (wherever they ended up) all have all the pilots they need with all the skills they need.

the game has been out 12 years. between 12 years of skill training and however long the char bazaar has been operating more SP for these people is basically a total irrelevance. they already have a character with perfect skills for every activity they need.

the character bazaar is one of the best things eve has for new players - i'll paraphrase the mittani "a new player can level up to the level of their intelligence as soon as they start the game" ~ that is from the meta show at the end of September when he had sort dragon on as a guest and they were discussing the new SP boost for new characters.
why are we hiding such a feature away from the people who benefit from it most?


I said all who could exploit it, i dont need lists of corps nor alliances or quotes.Why does it need to be player orientated over CCP, If it was for customization purposes only then they would just give us the ability to remap our skills once a year same with looks / race.

You overestimate the ability of SP to keep subs interested. The trend is that they're trying to increase sub retention, through the starter SP increase.. and now the idea of purchasing SP on the market.

"SP is helpful for the game?" Here's all of the research on motivation -- it says the opposite! What purpose does it serve, then? Starter corps are non-competitive. Sov is unchallenged. "Fix sov!" you say? Remove SP.