These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Walking in stations

First post
Author
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#1101 - 2015-07-31 12:07:48 UTC
Scarlett Anstian wrote:
They are the video game developers and I think we should all start trusting them a bit more with where they want to take EVE.

At the moment, CCP don't appear to want to add anything further to WiS.

I hate it when I remember something CCP Seagull has said, but can't find it immediately. She said something recently that made it clear that WiS is not a current or near future development direction.
Scarlett Anstian
Neverstar
#1102 - 2015-07-31 12:10:17 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:

If CCP were to develop in game pokers rooms, lotteries, slot machines, etc. that would immediately classify Eve as a game that " encourage or teach gambling" under the PEGI system that CCP are already part of and legally, those aspects of the game may not be suitable to play in all countries, requiring CCP to comply with pieces of legislation that they might have no clue even exist.

In relaton to removing that options from the game all together, well that doesn't seem possible. They already operate within the existing game. Adding WiS won't remove them.

It may not say it but EVE Online is a game where gambling is prominent, risk vs reward for any activity in EVE is a gamble. Buying something in Jita is a gamble, fleeting up with that random stranger a gamble, waiting for your drones to return whilst someone is warping in to tackle you is a gamble.

People spend a lot of money in this game and then see it destroyed or stolen. Is this not a game about gambling? Big smile To me it kinda is
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#1103 - 2015-07-31 12:16:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
Scarlett Anstian wrote:
Is this not a game about gambling? Big smile To me it kinda is

To you it kinda might be.

That's different to a legal classification, which does not currently apply to Eve:

http://www.pegi.info/en/index/global_id/505/?searchString=eve+online
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#1104 - 2015-07-31 12:52:04 UTC
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
... Most of the Incarna screeching was from the overly entitled players demanding more from their free expansions and from anger against microtransactions (which amusingly are now in exactly as they wanted them to be, and yet now everyone is fine with them). ...
I have never used the NEX store. I might at some point to sell the free AUR.
My anger was over my 8800 GTX card that Incarna melted along with a lot of other people's cards without so much as a "We are terribly sorry but the TOS means we are not liable and we can not be sure what we actually broke and would need to replace anyway. We do apologise and regret not doing deeper testing."
If you GFX card melted, it was a configuration issue your end. No matter what load it gets put under, a GFX card should never melt (or burn out). At worst your PC should shut off when the temperature reaches critical (way below the temperature that causes physical damage).

Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Then there was the whole thing where WoD developers made 3x Captain's Quarters in a fraction of the time that the EVE developers made one, so that indicates that wrong skill sets were applied to the job.
The first one is going to take longer though, since when that was created there was no framework to build on. The whole engine behind it needs to be built. To build the 3 further ones it's just models and textures. Besides, the WoD team was involved in the whole process. As shown by the quote on a previous page, only 2 of the 9 teams involved in WiS were EVE teams.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Webvan
All Kill No Skill
#1105 - 2015-07-31 12:57:01 UTC
Scarlett Anstian wrote:
Is this not a game about gambling? Big smile To me it kinda is

Nope, it's a game of skill. Lady luck and her RNG is a killer.

I'm in it for the money

Ctrl+Alt+Shift+F12

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#1106 - 2015-07-31 12:57:33 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
But for me, aside from just doing it once, there's no meaningful new gameplay in "Scipio sits down and has a drink" sort of additions. They are fluff with no value to the things I play the game for.
For me there's no meaningful gameplay in "this asteroid belt is surrounded by tiny rocks" or "these ships now look shinier and can have different colours", so perhaps they should just cease all graphical updates too then?

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#1107 - 2015-07-31 13:02:28 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Avvy wrote:
... For me it really comes down to would it be worth the effort required.
Well to start off, it could be a far more immersive way to kill off those 3rd party gambling websites.

I doubt it.

That could occur two ways:

1. In game CCP developed gambling rooms; or
2. Removal of those 3rd party options from the game all together.

If CCP were to develop in game pokers rooms, lotteries, slot machines, etc. that would immediately classify Eve as a game that " encourage or teach gambling" under the PEGI system that CCP are already part of and legally, those aspects of the game may not be suitable to play in all countries, requiring CCP to comply with pieces of legislation that they might have no clue even exist.

In relation to removing that options from the game all together, well that doesn't seem possible. They already operate within the existing game. Adding WiS won't remove them.
Actually, by adding the gambling classification on PEGI, it only means the game can't be lower than a 12, which it already is. It wouldn't require any legislation unless you were able to gamble for real money.

Technically speaking they should already have that classification though, as you engage in gambling through third party sites and through the Jita spammers. Sure, those are in almost every case scams, but it's still a promotion of gambling occurring within the game and being specifically allowed by the developers.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Jenshae Chiroptera
#1108 - 2015-07-31 14:10:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenshae Chiroptera
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Avvy wrote:
... For me it really comes down to would it be worth the effort required.
Well to start off, it could be a far more immersive way to kill off those 3rd party gambling websites.
I doubt it.That could occur two ways:
1. In game CCP developed gambling rooms; or ....
CCP can do it via a range of games, Monopoly, Go, Chess, gambling, et cetera. Just have it as a fact that they have more other games than gambling ones and the games are player run.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.

Aralyn Cormallen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#1109 - 2015-07-31 14:20:47 UTC
Scarlett Anstian wrote:
They are the video game developers and I think we should all start trusting them a bit more with where they want to take EVE.

And CCP have decided not to advance WiS beyond what we already have. That being the case perhaps you should follow your own advice.
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#1110 - 2015-07-31 14:27:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
Lucas Kell wrote:
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Avvy wrote:
... For me it really comes down to would it be worth the effort required.
Well to start off, it could be a far more immersive way to kill off those 3rd party gambling websites.

I doubt it.

That could occur two ways:

1. In game CCP developed gambling rooms; or
2. Removal of those 3rd party options from the game all together.

If CCP were to develop in game pokers rooms, lotteries, slot machines, etc. that would immediately classify Eve as a game that " encourage or teach gambling" under the PEGI system that CCP are already part of and legally, those aspects of the game may not be suitable to play in all countries, requiring CCP to comply with pieces of legislation that they might have no clue even exist.

In relation to removing that options from the game all together, well that doesn't seem possible. They already operate within the existing game. Adding WiS won't remove them.
Actually, by adding the gambling classification on PEGI, it only means the game can't be lower than a 12, which it already is. It wouldn't require any legislation unless you were able to gamble for real money.

Technically speaking they should already have that classification though, as you engage in gambling through third party sites and through the Jita spammers. Sure, those are in almost every case scams, but it's still a promotion of gambling occurring within the game and being specifically allowed by the developers.

I didn't write that it required legislation.

I wrote that adding gambling, directly CCP developed means they could be exposed to legislation that they are not even aware of, but must comply with.

If you can 100% say that you understand all gaming legislation in place in every country Eve is played, then fair enough. If you can't though, then it's lucky that CCP have to take into account a whole range of issues when they develop features for the game and that includes considering the legal aspects.

For example, in the Territory I live in, if CCP were to include poker or slot machines or lotteries or other similar features even with ISK inside Eve, the game would be classified for 18+only because of the ability to exchange cash for ISK, even though it can't go the other way. The game would have to be licenced by the gaming commission.

CCP couldn't be expected to know that, yet if a parent or someone else reported it, they would be investigated for a breach of the law.

I don't see why CCP would want to expose themselves to those sorts of risk and restrictions, let alone the do-gooders and perpetual complainers if 12 y/o kids were beIng taught by the game how to gamble. That just doesn't seem worth it to me.
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#1111 - 2015-07-31 14:29:10 UTC
why would ccp want to create gambling when 3rd parties do it for them and ccp dont have to put up with the sh!t that iwantisk deals with

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#1112 - 2015-07-31 14:36:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
Lucas Kell wrote:
... so perhaps they should just cease all graphical updates too then?

If you think they should then great for you.

Not what I think, but each to their own.
Scarlett Anstian
Neverstar
#1113 - 2015-07-31 14:38:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Scarlett Anstian
Aralyn Cormallen wrote:
Scarlett Anstian wrote:
They are the video game developers and I think we should all start trusting them a bit more with where they want to take EVE.

And CCP have decided not to advance WiS beyond what we already have. That being the case perhaps you should follow your own advice.

Actually they wanted to but there was such a **** storm from veteran players that they decided to bow under the pressure and work on more spaceships. Roll

If they didnt want to why did they make it in the first place? >.> durrrr
Jenshae Chiroptera
#1114 - 2015-07-31 14:38:32 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
... For example, in the Territory I live in, if CCP were to include poker or slot machines or lotteries or other similar features even with ISK inside Eve, the game would be classified for 18+only because of the ability to exchange cash for ISK, even though it can't go the other way. The game would have to be licenced by the gaming commission. ....
Not the most difficult bit of code to disable your ability to gamble based on your location.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.

Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#1115 - 2015-07-31 14:46:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Scipio Artelius wrote:
... For example, in the Territory I live in, if CCP were to include poker or slot machines or lotteries or other similar features even with ISK inside Eve, the game would be classified for 18+only because of the ability to exchange cash for ISK, even though it can't go the other way. The game would have to be licenced by the gaming commission. ....
Not the most difficult bit of code to disable your ability to gamble based on your location.

Really?

Break it down for me so that Eve is compliant and remains compliant with changing legislation Workdwide associated with gambling.

If it's so easy, how do you achieve Worldwide compliance continuously?
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#1116 - 2015-07-31 14:49:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Lucas Kell
Scipio Artelius wrote:
If you can 100% say that you understand all gaming legislation in place in every country Eve is played, then fair enough. If you can't though, then it's lucky that CCP have to take into account a whole range of issues when they develop features for the game and that includes considering the legal aspects.
Obviously I can't say that, but I can say that I know of no game that has had to deal with legislation over purely in-game gambling systems with no real money gambling. As PEGI is an opt-in classification system, there's no reason to believe they would have to do anything more based on that classification changing, doubly so because the game already has significant elements of gambling within it.

Scipio Artelius wrote:
For example, in the Territory I live in, if CCP were to include poker or slot machines or lotteries or other similar features even with ISK inside Eve, the game would be classified for 18+only because of the ability to exchange cash for ISK, even though it can't go the other way. The game would have to be licenced by the gaming commission.
What territory would that be? The game should already be 18+ then because you can buy PLEX, trade it for ISK and pay it straight into the BIG lottery. I don't believe you are understanding that legislation correctly as it would make a huge number of games require 18+ certification and licensing. Generally that's only required if you can gamble cash for cash (or transfer them both ways through tokens to gamble with).

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#1117 - 2015-07-31 14:59:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
Lucas Kell wrote:
Scipio Artelius wrote:
If you can 100% say that you understand all gaming legislation in place in every country Eve is played, then fair enough. If you can't though, then it's lucky that CCP have to take into account a whole range of issues when they develop features for the game and that includes considering the legal aspects.
Obviously I can't say that, but I can say that I know of no game that has had to deal with legislation over purely in-game gambling systems with no real money gambling. As PEGI is an opt-in classification system, there's no reason to believe they would have to do anything more based on that classification changing, doubly so because the game already has significant elements of gambling within it.

Scipio Artelius wrote:
For example, in the Territory I live in, if CCP were to include poker or slot machines or lotteries or other similar features even with ISK inside Eve, the game would be classified for 18+only because of the ability to exchange cash for ISK, even though it can't go the other way. The game would have to be licenced by the gaming commission.
What territory would that be? The game should already be 18+ then because you can buy PLEX, trade it for ISK and pay it straight into the BIG lottery. I don't believe you are understanding that legislation correctly as it would make a huge number of games require 18+ certification and licensing. Generally that's only required if you can gamble cash for cash (or transfer them both ways through tokens to gamble with).

Australian Capital Territory and yes I'm understanding the legislation correctly. Whether you want to believe that or not.

CCP don't directly offer gambling in the game, nor do they offer it outside the game. 3rd parties do. So the risk isn't with CCP unless they directly offer it as mentioned as a possibility for WiS by Jenshae above. But the moment CCP decide to develop gambling options as features of Eve, then they would be accepting the responsibility to comply.

While we can both see that it is all in game currency, so might seem just the same as any other free online games and apps, the law isn't always so straight forward. The ability to purchase PLEX for cash, sell that for ISK and then gamble exposes problem gamblers to the potential of substantial real cash loss in game. Problem gambling has had a significant focus from the community in Australia over the last few years and being the nanny State we are, legislation to protect people from themselves has been implemented in recent years.


Edit: checking the legislation, they could operate poker (because not all eve players are based in Australia - go figure) but could not offer sports betting. The legislation is fairly complex in games that can be played online and those that can't and how and when. So CCP could not easily replace eve-bet for example. When I search for non-Australian based sports betting sites, they either don't accept registration from Australian addresses, they redirect automatically to an Australian licensed site or just provide a message similar to this: http://puu.sh/jkeqF/786f7bb15a.jpg the whole PLEX aspect of dong it in Eve muddies the water.
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#1118 - 2015-07-31 15:02:26 UTC
thing that bother me is everyone wants something which is already available but they seem to want it to a slow and more inconvenient way Ugh

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#1119 - 2015-07-31 15:16:27 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
thing that bother me is everyone wants something which is already available but they seem to want it to a slow and more inconvenient way Ugh


But but but,....."Immersion"! Who needs a spaceship with a warp drive when you can use LEGS!

It works in real life too, instead of driving my car for 10 minutes to go the 8 miles to work, I immerse myself by getting out the old horse and buggy and taking 14 days to make the same trip lol. Can't wait till CCP gives us real WiS so I can watch people walk to talk to their agent while I click a single button to accomplish the same goal and make more isk per hour Twisted
Jenshae Chiroptera
#1120 - 2015-07-31 15:17:49 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
... If it's so easy, how do you achieve Worldwide compliance continuously?
Back bone IP addresses are static.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.