These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Walking in stations

First post
Author
Syrilian
Doomheim
#461 - 2015-03-03 19:45:11 UTC
I dont necessarily need WiS, but it would be cool to have some station activities, like gambling and small things like that.
Valkin Mordirc
#462 - 2015-03-03 19:58:15 UTC
WiS isn't anything needed in EVE, Imo.


WiS Keeps people docked. If you give them mini-games that let them earn isk, it mean less time outside.

Keeping people docked, removes risk. Removing one of the core elements in EVE. Even if I could kill someone in station, what's the point? They respawn, no SP loss, no nothing? Oh boy,

Working on WiS Takes time away from actual time that would be beneficial, like reworking Sov, T3 reworking, and add more content that fits in the EvE universe.

EVE is a game about Spaceships, not a gambling hall, not a dance animations, not 'virtual bars'.

I would rather be given a new ship type, then opening the door past the CQ, for these reasons.
#DeleteTheWeak
Serina Cache
Doomheim
#463 - 2015-03-03 21:40:46 UTC
Valkin Mordirc wrote:
WiS isn't anything needed in EVE, Imo.


WiS Keeps people docked. If you give them mini-games that let them earn isk, it mean less time outside.

Keeping people docked, removes risk. Removing one of the core elements in EVE. Even if I could kill someone in station, what's the point? They respawn, no SP loss, no nothing? Oh boy,

Working on WiS Takes time away from actual time that would be beneficial, like reworking Sov, T3 reworking, and add more content that fits in the EvE universe.

EVE is a game about Spaceships, not a gambling hall, not a dance animations, not 'virtual bars'.

I would rather be given a new ship type, then opening the door past the CQ, for these reasons.


A lot of people never undock as it is. I bet half the people in Jita have never left the station. Eve is not a game about spaceships according to CCP. It's an economic simulator that features ships prominently. There are a lot of reasons to not want WIS, but yours are just born from ignorance and small minded thinking. Take a deep breath, turn on your brain, and try again. Or just keep being the sheeple cheerleader that you are posting like. Whatever.
Dersen Lowery
The Scope
#464 - 2015-03-03 21:44:56 UTC
Valkin Mordirc wrote:
Keeping people docked, removes risk.


Currently, yes, it does, because the only station gameplay is trading.

The whole point of avatar gameplay is to increase the amount of gameplay in stations. Why is it so hard to imagine that avatar gameplay in a sandbox MMO would resemble... gameplay in a sandbox MMO?

Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.

I voted in CSM X!

Valkin Mordirc
#465 - 2015-03-03 22:03:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Valkin Mordirc
Quote:
A lot of people never undock as it is. I bet half the people in Jita have never left the station. Eve is not a game about spaceships according to CCP. It's an economic simulator that features ships prominently. There are a lot of reasons to not want WIS, but yours are just born from ignorance and small minded thinking. Take a deep breath, turn on your brain, and try again. Or just keep being the sheeple cheerleader that you are posting like. Whatever.



Just because my opinions don't fall in line with yours doesn't mean I'm the Sheeple Cheerleader, My opinions are from me, and not influenced by anyone else. Sorry to disappoint you in that regard, I am a functioning person with full capabilities.

People are not Sheeple just because they agree with each other. If you think that, you are idiot.

And ignorance? In what? A PvP based Sandbox? What does it a, PvP Sandbox, need when it comes to WiS? Like really, what does Minigames which is majority of thing requested for WiS belong in it?

Your Arrogance is laughable.

Also posting with an alt does nothing but ruin your own reputation for giving a considerable post. Most would just figure you for a troll. Which obviously you probably are.

Also please, EvE is a competitive PvP game. The Free-Market is merely a awesome thing that was apart of the game as a whole. If it was just a Economic Sim. Spaceships wouldn't be needed. It could be MLP Online and still be a Economic sim

To Dersen.


If People can come up with something that makes Avatar based gameplay in station meaningfull to the EVE sandbox, I would support it. But the only thing I see people asking for, either ways to make isk while staying docked. Or silly "Second-Life" crap. Something that I personally would not want in EVE.

If something could be suggested to change WiS into something better then a "Walk around and be social" idea, I would be for it. Until then.

O7 to it
#DeleteTheWeak
Jenshae Chiroptera
#466 - 2015-03-03 22:23:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenshae Chiroptera
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
There are three simple reasons allow us to invite each other into our Captain's Quarters:
1) Role-Players Bear
2) Weirdos that don't find rubbing ships together good enough. P
3) $$$ - think people want to buy clothes to show to no one? ( I bet trousers and shoes are flying off the shelves! Roll )
Actually, CCP can you comment out the code that stops us taking our shoes and pants off?

Then all the people who find WiS silly can take them off, have great profile pictures and show how useless the rest is as it stands, now.

This should make for an interesting graph and a fair bit of publicity, "CCP asks EVE players to vote by taking their pants off" Twisted

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.

Sibyyl
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#467 - 2015-03-03 22:37:05 UTC

Portraits and WIS are not the same. Portraits are under active development and CCP is "happy" with the side income the accessories provide. WIS development was halted, CCP has no compelling ideas that would justify resources to be assigned, and the company has no plans to develop it.

Don't mix the two. They are very different.

Joffy Aulx-Gao for CSM. Fix links and OGB. Ban stabs from plexes. Fulfill karmic justice.

Marsha Mallow
#468 - 2015-03-03 22:47:19 UTC
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Then all the people who find WiS silly can take them off, have great profile pictures and show how useless the rest is as it stands, now.

Funnily enough if they allowed older players to discard the new avatars and use the pre-Incarna alts, I reckon there would be a stampede.

Possibly to signal a rejection of Incarna, but more likely out of nostalgia for their old pic. We loved our old backgrounds and hats. Chribba just doesn't look the same anymore. If he pops up and shouts "HELLO" in response to that, don't blame me.

Ripard Teg > For the morons in the room:

Sweets > U can dd my face any day

The Golden Serpent
A Drunken Squirrels' Conspiracy for Revenge
#469 - 2015-03-03 23:15:27 UTC  |  Edited by: The Golden Serpent
I can tell things got weird in this game in the past.

I like the captain's quarters it's pretty cool, but yeah it would be nice if you could walk around with everyone else inside of just the captain's quarters.

My PC wouldn't break a sweat.


Isn't CCP based in Iceland? Must be hard to get talent there in large numbers or to get people to move there. Blizzard in located in Cali for a reason yknow.

-:¦:-•:'":•.-:¦:-•* K H A N I D •-:¦:-•:''''*:•-:¦:-

Indahmawar Fazmarai
#470 - 2015-03-03 23:23:05 UTC
Sibyyl wrote:

Portraits and WIS are not the same. Portraits are under active development and CCP is "happy" with the side income the accessories provide. WIS development was halted, CCP has no compelling ideas that would justify resources to be assigned, and the company has no plans to develop it.

Don't mix the two. They are very different.



Both are avatar content. Maybe you're happy with a logotype, but we didn't needed any legs to walk into this situation...

We didn't needed to have permanently high-heeled feet. Didn't needed to be everybody of the same height (well, there's two heights: male height and female height).

I wonder until when we, not CCP, but WE, will bear with the schizoid situation of buying shoes nobody can see because a piece of code was not finished four years ago. Or seeing how CCP invites us to cosplay at Fanfest but keeps our avatars alone in our CQs.

I smirk at thinking that, thanks to CCP, the only place we can see other player's "Outlaw" boots is in RL. If *that* is not the definition of nonsense...
Marsha Mallow
#471 - 2015-03-03 23:32:09 UTC
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
We didn't needed to have permanently high-heeled feet. Didn't needed to be everybody of the same height (well, there's two heights: male height and female height).

I smirk at thinking that, thanks to CCP, the only place we can see other player's "Outlaw" boots is in RL. If *that* is not the definition of nonsense...

I tried Second Life in the months leading upto Incarna to check their player made economy (the Linden side looked interesting). Funnily enough the only female characters I spoke to told me off because I'd rez'd the shoes wrong and my heels were sticking out. Then they went on a massive lecture on how to fix this. Luckily I'd bought a sword by then (and a waggle sword emote) before they invited me to an orgy. Only had to chase them about for a bit until they ran off. They still mailed me later to join a cyber orgy. Me and my mum watched and howled in the most undignified way.

Ripard Teg > For the morons in the room:

Sweets > U can dd my face any day

Sibyyl
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#472 - 2015-03-03 23:33:56 UTC

The primary reason why I match my shoes to my dress is for my own sanity. If someone else looks at them, then fine.. but it is not the reason for me. I choose the same thing for Barbies I've had or for Sibs in the game. Somewhere in the back of my head I know that this behavior must be some sort of evolutionary social imperative.. is it?

Then again I have a fondness for yellow, which might not be socially acceptable at all, but I don't consider that to be discouraging at all.

Joffy Aulx-Gao for CSM. Fix links and OGB. Ban stabs from plexes. Fulfill karmic justice.

Vincent Athena
Photosynth
#473 - 2015-03-04 00:09:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Vincent Athena
One odd thing is CCP has not removed what little we have of WiS. We know they are willing to remove parts of the game that see little use. A recent example is industry teams.

So why do we still have any form of Incarna, unless it is, at some level, doing something for the game? Every patch CCP has to do regression tests on CQ, just to make sure something did not get broken. That's extra work they could avoid if they just dropped the entire thing. It must be relevant in some way. If it is doing something for the game, would completing the feature do more for the game?

Know a Frozen fan? Check this out

Frozen fanfiction

Minas' Morgul
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#474 - 2015-03-04 00:17:44 UTC
I know I'm always hanging out in the quaters when I'm not in space. I'd like the opportuity to mingle with players on a station, it would cool to be in a bar while having the station services up so I can interact and work at the same time. But, thats just me. I thought think it would hurt much to add on to whats alredy there
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#475 - 2015-03-04 00:28:23 UTC
Minas' Morgul wrote:
I know I'm always hanging out in the quaters when I'm not in space. I'd like the opportuity to mingle with players on a station, it would cool to be in a bar while having the station services up so I can interact and work at the same time. But, thats just me. I thought think it would hurt much to add on to whats alredy there


Thing is, CCP would have to lease an engine that actually allowed more then one character on the screen without melting your graphics card. Meaning scrapping what they've done to date and starting over.

While I'm fine with that since I'm not going anywhere in the near future and I still have secret dreams of teabagging some fool in a player run bar, most FISers would have a total meltdown over it. Ships or nothing, right guys? Though reading the front page today (or any day, for that matter) all I'm seeing is whining over ships. So I guess since y'all are going to cry anyway, CCP might just as well finish what they started and give us a fully interactive Science Fiction simulator.

Mr Epeen Cool
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
#476 - 2015-03-04 06:59:49 UTC
Marsha Mallow wrote:
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Then all the people who find WiS silly can take them off, have great profile pictures and show how useless the rest is as it stands, now.

Funnily enough if they allowed older players to discard the new avatars and use the pre-Incarna alts, I reckon there would be a stampede.

Possibly to signal a rejection of Incarna, but more likely out of nostalgia for their old pic. We loved our old backgrounds and hats. Chribba just doesn't look the same anymore. If he pops up and shouts "HELLO" in response to that, don't blame me.

Hello.

I totally would walk around with my old avatar if I could - even if I was a 2D face.

/c

★★★ Secure 3rd party service ★★★

Visit my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar'

Twitter @ChribbaVeldspar

Indahmawar Fazmarai
#477 - 2015-03-04 07:51:52 UTC
Vincent Athena wrote:
One odd thing is CCP has not removed what little we have of WiS. We know they are willing to remove parts of the game that see little use. A recent example is industry teams.

So why do we still have any form of Incarna, unless it is, at some level, doing something for the game? Every patch CCP has to do regression tests on CQ, just to make sure something did not get broken. That's extra work they could avoid if they just dropped the entire thing. It must be relevant in some way. If it is doing something for the game, would completing the feature do more for the game?


Well, I would be shocked if we still had the CQ next year. Once CCP finishes the new NPE, the CQ will be just a useless piece of legacy code.

CCP says "no to avatars". And tha'ts what they've been doing. Some time ago, they started spawning new players randomly at the CQ an the hangar, to check -literally- whether the CQ had an effect on player retention. Back then I figured they were considering to remove the CQ, and now that the NPE starts again in space, and it's been improved with the opportunities system, the CQ has already run its course.

Maybe CCP feels a bit uneasy about removing it and fear some kind of backlash, but the fact is that CCP shall not fear such backlash. By neglecting avatars, they've reached their purpose of removing most WiS players (another of my prediction). Without avatar content, avatar lovers are mostly gone and only a few nuts still want them, and most of us are pre-Incarna players. Post-Incarna players never experienced the WiS fiasco and to them the avatars are, literally, the CQ and the character creator. They're in it for the pew pew spaceships, and that's what matters to CCP.

Sidetrack is that the pew pew spacships crowd is dwindling and there's not enough new players born each year to cope with the burnout of the niche, but CCP likely are in a better position to expand the game with more spaceships content, than with avatar content. Or just expand their business leaving EVE behind and trying their luck with new games.

So, weather forecast for avatars is: expect to see the CQ gone, more microtransactions for your portraits and maybe some way to show up your FBA (Full Body Avatar) by other means than the client preview.

WiS, as has been said, is dead. IMHO CCP killed the future of EVE along with it, but, who am I? I stay subscribed hoping that some day CCP would do for hisec and PvE what they're doing for nullsec and Sov. Most of what I do in EVE is forum stuff. And as long as my bitterness stays at acceptable levels, I will keep playing EVE.

Aside of that, CCP can pretty much burn in hell.
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#478 - 2015-03-04 08:17:51 UTC
Serina Cache wrote:
Eve is not a game about spaceships according to CCP.

if this is true, ccp is wrong

Quote:
Then again I have a fondness for yellow, which might not be socially acceptable at all

saw someone ejected from the pub for the colour of their socks
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#479 - 2015-03-04 08:21:57 UTC
they spent the next ten minutes trying to convince the bouncer the socks were actually light goldenrod. as if anyone was going to believe that
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#480 - 2015-03-04 13:39:04 UTC
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
Vincent Athena wrote:
One odd thing is CCP has not removed what little we have of WiS. We know they are willing to remove parts of the game that see little use. A recent example is industry teams.

So why do we still have any form of Incarna, unless it is, at some level, doing something for the game? Every patch CCP has to do regression tests on CQ, just to make sure something did not get broken. That's extra work they could avoid if they just dropped the entire thing. It must be relevant in some way. If it is doing something for the game, would completing the feature do more for the game?


Well, I would be shocked if we still had the CQ next year. Once CCP finishes the new NPE, the CQ will be just a useless piece of legacy code.

CCP says "no to avatars". And tha'ts what they've been doing. Some time ago, they started spawning new players randomly at the CQ an the hangar, to check -literally- whether the CQ had an effect on player retention. Back then I figured they were considering to remove the CQ, and now that the NPE starts again in space, and it's been improved with the opportunities system, the CQ has already run its course.

Maybe CCP feels a bit uneasy about removing it and fear some kind of backlash, but the fact is that CCP shall not fear such backlash. By neglecting avatars, they've reached their purpose of removing most WiS players (another of my prediction). Without avatar content, avatar lovers are mostly gone and only a few nuts still want them, and most of us are pre-Incarna players. Post-Incarna players never experienced the WiS fiasco and to them the avatars are, literally, the CQ and the character creator. They're in it for the pew pew spaceships, and that's what matters to CCP.

Sidetrack is that the pew pew spacships crowd is dwindling and there's not enough new players born each year to cope with the burnout of the niche, but CCP likely are in a better position to expand the game with more spaceships content, than with avatar content. Or just expand their business leaving EVE behind and trying their luck with new games.

So, weather forecast for avatars is: expect to see the CQ gone, more microtransactions for your portraits and maybe some way to show up your FBA (Full Body Avatar) by other means than the client preview.

WiS, as has been said, is dead. IMHO CCP killed the future of EVE along with it, but, who am I? I stay subscribed hoping that some day CCP would do for hisec and PvE what they're doing for nullsec and Sov. Most of what I do in EVE is forum stuff. And as long as my bitterness stays at acceptable levels, I will keep playing EVE.

Aside of that, CCP can pretty much burn in hell.


In one nonsensical sentence (where you would condemn to 'hell' the actual human beings of CCP because they didn't deliver the space barbie only a few fringe types wanted), you summed up the entire reason I dislike the "WiS community" and thus WiS itself. WiS would attract MORE HATEFUL/ENTITLED PEOPLE LIKE THIS, no WiS in the foreseeable future is a pure blessing.

The last piece of Irony is the fact that if CCP ticks you off to the point where they need to burn in hell, why are you still paying them in some form (either cash or plex). and you ARE paying them, as evidenced by your posting privileges You are actually paying people you don't like to make a game you are disappointed with.. WTF is wrong with you?