These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation

First post First post First post
Author
El Space Mariachi
Zero Fun Allowed
xqtywiznalamywmodxfhhopawzpqyjdwrpeptuaenabjawdzku
#21 - 2014-11-25 16:23:32 UTC
thank god

thank you falcon

eve is saved

gay gamers for jesus

eiedu
Wildly Inappropriate
Wildly Inappropriate.
#22 - 2014-11-25 16:24:51 UTC
RIP incursions
RIP Ratting
RIP bombing

Time to go back to wow, where it makes no sense to have multiple accounts

How are you even going to "catch" people who are input-multiplexing hardware-wise
Fonac
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#23 - 2014-11-25 16:25:59 UTC
Steve Ronuken wrote:
Fonac wrote:
So is-boxer is banned?

edit: I Honestly dont care about is-boxer or what it can do, since i've never used it, or met anyone who uses it. But the OP is not very clear on it.



isboxer isn't banned. Some of the things isboxer can do are banned.



I'm seriously lacking faith in the eve population, that they can understand such a policy... All it takes is a few clicks, and bam you're doing something illegal.
Anonymous Forumposter
State War Academy
Caldari State
#24 - 2014-11-25 16:26:07 UTC
eiedu wrote:
RIP incursions
RIP Ratting
RIP bombing

Time to go back to wow, where it makes no sense to have multiple accounts

How are you even going to "catch" people who are input-multiplexing hardware-wise


Bye :)
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
#25 - 2014-11-25 16:26:13 UTC
DragonHelm III wrote:
CCP FoxFour wrote:
Ama Scelesta wrote:
RIP ISBoxer?


ISBoxer has some great uses outside of it's broadcasting functions. So maybe, but probably not.

For god's sake CCP stop all the bluster and give a straight answer

ISBOXER banned or not? It just needs a yes or no

All this crap about terms like Input Broadcasting and Input Multiplexing mean squat to me as I have no idea what they are.


For these things, yes it is banned.

Quote:

This includes, but isn’t limited to:

• Activation and control of ships and modules
• Navigation and movement within the EVE universe
• Movement of assets and items within the EVE universe
• Interaction with other characters


It seemed pretty clear to me.

I don't judge people by their race, religion, color, size, age, gender, or ethnicity. I judge them by their grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, clarity of expression, and logical consistency.

Mierin Arthie
Enlightened Industries
Goonswarm Federation
#26 - 2014-11-25 16:26:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Mierin Arthie
CCP Falcon wrote:
We would like to clarify that it does not matter how Input Broadcasting and Input Multiplexing are being done, whether through use of software or modified hardware. Our only concern is regarding how it is being used in the EVE universe.

How does this policy update regard the usage of KVM switches to control multiple computers from one mouse/keyboard?

for those that dont know what a kvm switch is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KVM_switch
Robert Harris
Blackwater USA Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#27 - 2014-11-25 16:26:29 UTC
About time, dont know why this took so long.... finally CCP, well done.
Anthar Thebess
#28 - 2014-11-25 16:26:34 UTC
Thank you CCP.
We where waiting for this.
When we will get list of sov changes ... and those changes.
Chingy Chonga
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#29 - 2014-11-25 16:26:36 UTC
Thank you for finally straightening this out!

o7 CCP
Lyron-Baktos
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2014-11-25 16:26:38 UTC
Jesus, can you be any more vague Falcon?
Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia
Pandemic Legion
#31 - 2014-11-25 16:26:49 UTC
So, does this mean no more Mac support?
Kono Lotus
Sneaked In
The Initiative.
#32 - 2014-11-25 16:27:11 UTC
so this means using keyboard macro's will be prohibited?

regards
Nimrod vanHall
Van Mij Belastingvrij
#33 - 2014-11-25 16:28:07 UTC
Corey Lean wrote:
This is a good change and can only lead to a healthier game. Much courage, much respect Smile


Amen!

•Fake edit: dafuq i'm agreeing with a Goon!•
Nick Moretti
Celestial Exports
#34 - 2014-11-25 16:28:13 UTC
Goodbye ISBoxer (for the most part), you won't be missed.
Tarsas Phage
Sniggerdly
#35 - 2014-11-25 16:28:18 UTC
The poor 1-account pubbies who would rather complain to mom about rules instead of upping their game win again.
Frozen Hairdresser
Doomheim
#36 - 2014-11-25 16:28:30 UTC
Just to be clear, are we still allowed to bind all our hardeners to the same key?
Seandals
Coalition of Fancy Sirs
#37 - 2014-11-25 16:28:40 UTC
Warr Akini
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#38 - 2014-11-25 16:28:59 UTC
I've had a good suicide ganking run, but the wave of nerfs against it don't seem to be stopping anytime soon.

Thanks. It's been fun.
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
#39 - 2014-11-25 16:29:09 UTC
Mierin Arthie wrote:
How does this policy update regard the usage of KVM switches to control multiple computers from one mouse/keyboard?

for those that dont know what a kvm switch is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KVM_switch


That doesn't broadcast, it just changes where input goes - it should be fine.

I don't judge people by their race, religion, color, size, age, gender, or ethnicity. I judge them by their grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, clarity of expression, and logical consistency.

Nick Starkey
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#40 - 2014-11-25 16:29:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Nick Starkey
I am impressed by CCP's decisions that might hurt their wallet in the short term, but are of positive effect to the game in long term. This is a very welcome change and this comes from someone that has actually used and seen what that tool can do. well done. I'm curious how you're going to find out/enforce for sure if people are broadcasting commands, though.

I've made a signature. I hope you're enjoying it. www.evetrademaster.com - web based asset manager & profit tracker