Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Confirming that the above statement is false about being falsely false

Edit: to those complaining about the low lock range on the Garmur, it is very easy to fit a lock range rig.

I support this. 5s reload times aren't alien to EVE because Hybrids have them- and oh hey Mordu's Legion are Caldari/Gallente, and both factions use hybrids. Something something repurposed hybrid turret ammunition management systems for use with missile launchers?

And if rapid launchers didn't have a reload time that made me want to pry out my eyes with a spork, I might actually consider using them. The ability to swoop out of "you're gonna die" range might also take the edge off and make the extra 7.5 seconds feel not too bad.

I look forward to your analysis. A few of us have proposed increasing the damage on the Barghest from 5% to 7.5%, and I think that with only 50 Mbit drone bandwidth this would balance out the Barghest nicely.

Don't forget: the Barghest is the black Raven we've always wanted.


I believe that is correct, although we're still awaiting official confirmation from CCP Rise.

It's 350...

CCP is showing a severe lack of imagination.

Mordu's Legion is an organized military unit. Their ship classes should synergize with each other (i.e. cover each other weaknesses while amplifying strengths) and not be cookie cutter across ship classes.

Meaning, giving all three ships the same bonus to warp jammer range is unimaginative. It would make more sense (RP sense) to have the smaller faster Mordu ships specialize in getting points on a target, while the heavier ships (i.e. the Barghest) focus solely on delivering damage to that now "trapped" target.

Frigate - long range points (100% range?) and warp speed
Cruiser- 50% range bonus, and/or double points? Or maybe a TP bonus?
Battleship- long range missiles to just pound the bejeezus out of the now slowed or AB'ing target with fast missiles. Preferably with torpedoes, because, dammit, getting hit by a flying frying pan should hurt.

You bring up an interesting point, and there's already a precedent for it with the Nestor (logistics instead of Covert Ops cloak). So let me offer a counter-proposal: Give the frigate and cruiser the web disruption bonus to the Garmur and Orthrus, and give the Barghest an ECM bonus instead.

Omg! Yes!

Non--cookie cutter FTW

to me mordus looks like it will end up like soe,
strong frigate and cruiser but underpowered bs. I might be wrong but thats how i feel about the stats without testing fits and all.

If it was me i would give the bs a 25 to 50% tp bonus instead of scramb range. But i know why it was done that way, i may not like the consequences so.

That's just obnoxious.

I would rather see Gecko style ECM drones. Double size heavies with ~2.5 times the effective ECM of a single heavy. It would be different and add some depth to the Mordu LP store.

The major reason it's not viable to solo in battleships is because their guns don't downsize.

This one and the Rattlesnake are the only ships that bear that distinction. Of the two, the Rattlesnake is almost certainly the more viable solo ship, but this one's doctrine is just fine, honestly.

As a heavy tackle ship, it's much harder to neut out a battleship than a cruiser or frigate. Any battleship heavy doctrine will benefit from the Barghest's point range bonus, so that they aren't required to downsize ships in order to keep a point at mid range.