These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Jester Trek Latest Blog

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Ssieth
Celestial Inc
Dracarys.
#6361 - 2014-03-27 21:21:04 UTC
Kristalll wrote:
Ssieth wrote:
Cheap scams preying on newbies not so much.


Don't lie. You and I both know these scams are targeted at bored bittervets.


Hey! I resemble that remark!

Not much use though. Bittervet I may be but I keep myself poor to avoid losing isk in scams. See.. the smart folks realises that if they only have 0 isk they can only lose 0 isk ;p

W-Spacer.  Bittervet. 75% PvP, 25% assorted other stuff.
LUMINOUS SPIRIT
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#6362 - 2014-03-27 21:22:13 UTC
Batelle wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Look what Microsoft is doing in cases like this:

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-26766098

EVE should do similar.


Use your brain for two seconds and you'll understand why this is not possible. (its not because of "false reports")


Nothing is impossible.

A reworked system that colors a player's name in local based on a number and type of accumulated feedback reports is a solid improvement on the current security status mechanic.
Dave stark
#6363 - 2014-03-27 21:22:31 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Kristalll wrote:
Don't lie. You and I both know these scams are targeted at bored bittervets.


You still get all his assets though, if they are stupid/dumb enough to comply.
And I applaud you for that. Gf.

But why the whole Bonus Room thing thereafter?


because if they're not going to get a bonus room, why would they give you their stuff?
Dave stark
#6364 - 2014-03-27 21:23:17 UTC
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Batelle wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Look what Microsoft is doing in cases like this:

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-26766098

EVE should do similar.


Use your brain for two seconds and you'll understand why this is not possible. (its not because of "false reports")


Nothing is impossible.

A reworked system that colors a player's name in local based on a number and type of accumulated feedback reports is a solid improvement on the current security status mechanic.


have you ever tried slamming a revolving door?

there are things that are impossible, that is one of them.
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#6365 - 2014-03-27 21:23:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Look what Microsoft is doing in cases like this:

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-26766098

EVE should do similar.

Are you suggesting that anyone who is anti-social should be punished?

I think that's harsh on people who made the choice to play on their own and not interact with anyone.

Cheats I can totally understand and CCP has a similar policy.

But I personally think everyone should be free to make whatever decision they like about how they want to play, whether it is social or not.

EDIT:

Looking at in in more depth, the concept of "reporting" someone would become the new bounty system. If people are flagged on the basis of how often they are reported, every single new player, carebear and rager in the game would be red within a couple of days.
LUMINOUS SPIRIT
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#6366 - 2014-03-27 21:24:24 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Batelle wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Look what Microsoft is doing in cases like this:

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-26766098

EVE should do similar.


Use your brain for two seconds and you'll understand why this is not possible. (its not because of "false reports")


Nothing is impossible.

A reworked system that colors a player's name in local based on a number and type of accumulated feedback reports is a solid improvement on the current security status mechanic.


have you ever tried slamming a revolving door?

there are things that are impossible, that is one of them.


OK. whatever you say Mr. Troll.
Dave stark
#6367 - 2014-03-27 21:25:11 UTC
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Batelle wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Look what Microsoft is doing in cases like this:

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-26766098

EVE should do similar.


Use your brain for two seconds and you'll understand why this is not possible. (its not because of "false reports")


Nothing is impossible.

A reworked system that colors a player's name in local based on a number and type of accumulated feedback reports is a solid improvement on the current security status mechanic.


have you ever tried slamming a revolving door?

there are things that are impossible, that is one of them.


OK. whatever you say Mr. Troll.


you submitted that nothing is impossible.

it is impossible to slam a revolving door.

explain to me how that's trolling.

thinking before you speak is a great way not to embarrass yourself, just for future reference.
Ssieth
Celestial Inc
Dracarys.
#6368 - 2014-03-27 21:25:44 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Batelle wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Look what Microsoft is doing in cases like this:

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-26766098

EVE should do similar.


Use your brain for two seconds and you'll understand why this is not possible. (its not because of "false reports")


Nothing is impossible.

A reworked system that colors a player's name in local based on a number and type of accumulated feedback reports is a solid improvement on the current security status mechanic.


have you ever tried slamming a revolving door?

there are things that are impossible, that is one of them.


Clearly you're not slamming hard enough.

W-Spacer.  Bittervet. 75% PvP, 25% assorted other stuff.
Kristalll
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#6369 - 2014-03-27 21:26:18 UTC
Vilar Diin wrote:


Has nothing to do with pixels. Has everything to do with a mayonnaise and humiliation fetishist. Blink


Which has nothing to do with the bonus room.

“Die trying” is the proudest human thing.
Desivo Delta Visseroff
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#6370 - 2014-03-27 21:26:58 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Batelle wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Look what Microsoft is doing in cases like this:

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-26766098

EVE should do similar.


Use your brain for two seconds and you'll understand why this is not possible. (its not because of "false reports")


Nothing is impossible.

A reworked system that colors a player's name in local based on a number and type of accumulated feedback reports is a solid improvement on the current security status mechanic.


have you ever tried slamming a revolving door?

there are things that are impossible, that is one of them.



Heads make great door-stops for revolving doors.......not saying anything....Just saying.Blink

I was hunting for sick loot, but all I could get my hands on were 50 corpses[:|]..............[:=d]
Xuixien
Solar Winds Security Solutions
#6371 - 2014-03-27 21:26:58 UTC
Ssieth wrote:
Kristalll wrote:
Ssieth wrote:
Cheap scams preying on newbies not so much.


Don't lie. You and I both know these scams are targeted at bored bittervets.


Hey! I resemble that remark!

Not much use though. Bittervet I may be but I keep myself poor to avoid losing isk in scams. See.. the smart folks realises that if they only have 0 isk they can only lose 0 isk ;p


I just keep my billions on an alt.

I only keep enough for day to day living on Xuixien.

Epic Space Cat, Horsegirl, Philanthropist
H aVo K
Tycheon Industries
#6372 - 2014-03-27 21:27:05 UTC
Kristalll wrote:

Really, once you've lost a jump freighter because you were too stupid to dock up you get over really caring much about the space pixels.



ahahahaha.... I feel like you could be writing about me, specifically, there.

So true, though ^_^
Kristalll
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#6373 - 2014-03-27 21:28:18 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Kristalll wrote:
Don't lie. You and I both know these scams are targeted at bored bittervets.


You still get all his assets though, if they are stupid/dumb enough to comply.
And I applaud you for that. Gf.

But why the whole Bonus Room thing thereafter?


Assuming it isn't a scam: It's to let you play a game for your chance of winnings.

Assuming it is a scam: It's to let you play and have some fun and see when you notice what happened.

Similar to a Carnival game. Or a claw game.

“Die trying” is the proudest human thing.
Vance Armistice
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#6374 - 2014-03-27 21:28:52 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Look what Microsoft is doing in cases like this:

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-26766098

EVE should do similar.

Are you suggesting that anyone who is anti-social should be punished?

I think that's harsh on people who made the choice to play on their own and not interact with anyone.

Cheats I can totally understand and CCP has a similar policy.

But I personally think everyone should be free to make whatever decision they like about how they want to play, whether it is social or not.


It's true, we need the "scumbags" in this game, they make the game edgy and dangerous. Admittedly, from the looks of it, we have assembled more than our fair share but the game is set up to attract them.

What we don't need is the freaks who are so warped in their out of game lives that even GS kicks them for extreme behavior.

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
#6375 - 2014-03-27 21:28:55 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
I think that's harsh on people who made the choice to play on their own and not interact with anyone.

That's not really what antisocial means. Antisocial behaviour is when someone goes out of their way to create problems for other people.

Oh god.
Kristalll
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#6376 - 2014-03-27 21:29:24 UTC
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Batelle wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Look what Microsoft is doing in cases like this:

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-26766098

EVE should do similar.


Use your brain for two seconds and you'll understand why this is not possible. (its not because of "false reports")


Nothing is impossible.

A reworked system that colors a player's name in local based on a number and type of accumulated feedback reports is a solid improvement on the current security status mechanic.



So bounties?

“Die trying” is the proudest human thing.
Xuixien
Solar Winds Security Solutions
#6377 - 2014-03-27 21:30:14 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Look what Microsoft is doing in cases like this:

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-26766098

EVE should do similar.

Are you suggesting that anyone who is anti-social should be punished?

I think that's harsh on people who made the choice to play on their own and not interact with anyone.

Cheats I can totally understand and CCP has a similar policy.

But I personally think everyone should be free to make whatever decision they like about how they want to play, whether it is social or not.

EDIT:

Looking at in in more depth, the concept of "reporting" someone would become the new bounty system. If people are flagged on the basis of how often they are reported, every single new player, carebear and rager in the game would be red within a couple of days.


Just to nitpick.

"Antisocial" refers to behaviors which are antisocial... lying stealing cheating physical violence **** vandalism etcetc.

What you're thinking of, ie loners, are just asocial.

Epic Space Cat, Horsegirl, Philanthropist
Salvos Rhoska
#6378 - 2014-03-27 21:31:19 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
because if they're not going to get a bonus room, why would they give you their stuff?


Why go to a bonus room after they give you their stuff?

PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent
Xuixien
Solar Winds Security Solutions
#6379 - 2014-03-27 21:31:52 UTC
Kristalll wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Batelle wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
Look what Microsoft is doing in cases like this:

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-26766098

EVE should do similar.


Use your brain for two seconds and you'll understand why this is not possible. (its not because of "false reports")


Nothing is impossible.

A reworked system that colors a player's name in local based on a number and type of accumulated feedback reports is a solid improvement on the current security status mechanic.



So bounties?


omg

Have you ever bountied a carebear? They get so mad!

I finally figured out why, too: 3 people I put excessive bounties on get kicked out of their corps and a few others were denied entries into corps because they had bounties. lol

How long do you think it'd take a miner who only mines in Retrievers to remove a 1 billion ISK bounty via suicide ganks?

Epic Space Cat, Horsegirl, Philanthropist
Kristalll
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#6380 - 2014-03-27 21:32:32 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
because if they're not going to get a bonus room, why would they give you their stuff?


Why go to a bonus room after they give you their stuff?


Good sir!

Certainly you are not suggesting someone would pay for a Bonus Room and we would not oblige them by giving them a Bonus Room! What kind of thieves do you think we are?!!?

That's like saying I'd **** a guy in the ass and not have the courtesy to give him a reach-around!

“Die trying” is the proudest human thing.