These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Jester Trek Latest Blog

First post First post
Author
Brusanan
Free State Project
#5841 - 2014-03-27 18:04:46 UTC
For anyone who thinks the US government should be running bonus rounds in Guantanamo Bay, Erotica 1 himself will be finishing up his own bonus round tonight at 9:30 PM EST. It will be live streamed. He will read The Code. He will sing. We will take his stuff and then pod him repeatedly.

It will be horrible. I don't think Erotica will be able to live with himself afterwards, but I'm a psychopath so who cares?
Kara Vix
Perkone
Caldari State
#5842 - 2014-03-27 18:04:49 UTC
Amazing this is still going on, you realize you are just arguing with the same people over and over. No one is going to change their opinion so why waste your energy on this? I for one am walking away from the forum for awhile until this is gone.
Salvos Rhoska
#5843 - 2014-03-27 18:05:10 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
This is Dinsdale you're talking to dude, EVE's version of Alex Jones. Don't even try to get rational discourse out of him.

Whereas you are EVEs version of a self-professed autist who once deliberately drove a two-ton truck at a guy stopping just short of killing him by pressing him against a garage-door.

Glasshouse. Pot and kettle.
KnowUsByTheDead
Sunlight...Through The Blight.
#5844 - 2014-03-27 18:05:37 UTC
You have won, ladies and gentlemen, you are getting your witch to burn at the stake.

Against the wishes of his friends, Ero has decided to use his own game to remove himself from EvE Online. But as his friends tried to tell him no, it dawned on many of us that this is the only way people will be satisfied.

Erotica's Bonus Round was never meant to be more than a test of whether people could lose inhibition, show faith in a total stranger, and have fun in a game that breeds the worst kind of paranoia.

Whether Ripard and the community believe it was a scam is irrelevant. Those who did win, would not always win liquid isk. Other times they would win the chance at being an Escrow. One Bonus Round "victim" played the round, and due to his sheer power of determination, though losing the round itself, ended up "grab-bagging" 10b or so in assets, including a Thanatos, a Rorqual, and other multi-billion isk assets. And the best part? He did it all with good spirits, and a smile on his face. His EO name? Vicious Rage.

10 billion isk, in two days. Some "victim" of "torture," huh? Roll

But that is now irrelevant as well.

Erotica has relinquished control of both channels, the Escrow Lounge, and The Glory Hole to myself and a few other trusted escrow's. He no longer has a say in what happens in either channel.

To serve the community, he will be doing every single component of the Bonus Round. Only he is going to do it 5x what any other person has done. He will be doing it every day for a "business week." 5 days, 5 bonus rounds. The final bonus rounds.

He will sing songs, a long-time EvE tradition.

He will read the Code. Every single round.

He will contract all of his assets. All active accounts.

He will then be alpha-podded, not on one character, as was the case when podfleet still operated. He will lose all of his SP, until each character is sitting at 900k.

And the ironic thing? We will all walk out from this "test of faith" with a smug smile on our faces. Do you know why?

Because those who support the Bonus Room didn't have to resort to threatening CCP with media backlash in order to serve their own personal agenda.

Bonus Round supporters did not have to use veiled threats of violence to scare a man's innocent wife and child, as so many have had to do in just this one thread.

Bonus Round supporters did not have to resort to doxxing someone to retain their seats on the CSM, to fuel their never-ending crusade of self-righteousness and hubris-driven rabble rousing.

And most importantly, and at the very core of the Bound Round, supporters know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that at the end of the day it is only space pixels. That a game, by it's very definition, is a form of play or sport, a competitive one played according to rules and decided by skill, strength, or luck.

The Bonus Round had a very specific set of rules. It is not the fault of this individual that others could not follow those rules. That tantrums served them better. That instead of playing, they scammed themselves out of what could potentially be a good thing. Emergent. Real. After all, that is the axiom, is it not? EvE is real?

"But-but-but, it's just a scam like every other Erotica stunt!!!!"

Oh yea? Here is Erotica's api key, posted with his permission to the forums. Feel free to peruse it for your enjoyment during this momentous occasion. His mail is not included, as he has personal information contained within, and we often encourage "clients" to either delete their mails or leave mail unchecked in the API, especially when personal information comes to play, and also when large alliance intel comes into play. His contacts are also left out, as we do not want others to become "victims" of the witch hunt that Ripard started.

ID: 3226972

Code: rkk4RiGb0BYlNSKBGO9CtDz6imPSagxSxeyVGvovQ2poUZmO78oTmAkEJw2A8GrW


"Damage Control, you say?"

You mistake us, lol. Most of the Escrow's are so intrinsically lazy, that we could care less about damage control. No, this is walking out, on our terms, with our heads held high. Because we know that we were simply playing the game. Perhaps too meta. But we certainly never held a gun to someone's head, and told them they had to verbally berate us, or even play the Bonus Room, for that matter.

"But you will take it easy on Ero, because you are his friend!!!!!!!!"

I can assure you that Ero chose the most trollish people to give the best possible blowout. Last night he was trolled as he read the Code, as he contracted over several of his over 700 stations, and as I took control of Krypteia Operations for a corp audit. He gets no special treatment, outside of the treatment he needs to protect himself from the violent sadists who have wished death upon him, over a video game, in this very thread.

To those that have spoke out in defense of the sandbox...good for you. You remain true to the tenets this game was based and created on. Harsh, cold, unforgiving, emergent. I am happy that some still believe what this game could and can be.

To those who have thrown death threats, defamation, and everything else at an emergent aspect of the sandbox....

Take a long hard look in the mirror. Are your threats so much better? Your wishes of death? You chose to irrationally follow the words of one man, based on one fringe case. Look up Nikul Naath on Minerbumping. You will see a vastly different performance than the one sohkar gave. In fact, Nikul even used another EvE axiom when he understood he had lost in a PvP game, as I audited and took control of his corp. "Good Fight."

So now, with emergence on trial, the only thing left to do is walk into one last midnight, hand in hand, brothers and sisters, opting not for the "sandbox," but for the Trammelization of EvE.

Well done, Ripard, well done indeed.

Good fight.

Big smile

Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense.

lollerwaffle
Perkone
Caldari State
#5845 - 2014-03-27 18:05:53 UTC
Graabeerd Khagah wrote:
I been following this since the other evening when it broke out and I seriously believe the time has come to lay the subject to rest. 287 pages worth of reading is a lot for some, other a speed reading course. However tho' the issue here is whether or not if the victim in this case was being subjected to "torture" to which I think he was as far as mental torture was concerned, no physical torture. However on the other hand this to me is the most unethical use of a scam and then turn right around and go outside of eve to using TS3 for two hours or so to subject the victim to mental torture on this scale is wrong.

In my opinion however the victim had every right to refuse to continue which he didn't, Erotica1 and his cohorts kept edgeing the victim onwards to past the point of no return, Erotica1 DID in fact commit a crime of cyber bullying, and there fore has opened himself and others with him to possible charges.

IF that were the case being then, the community at large should petition on the behalf of the victim to have his entire inventory, isk and what ever else he lost returned to him notwithstanding, AND to let CCP know that this is unacceptable to the community at large. The use of Teamspeak outside the game is a matter of record for a court of law to decide on the consequences and maybe a jail term as called for earlier in this thread.

Eve is a game of course, but sometimes some people just go to the extremes sometimes and push the limits as to what is and what isn't acceptable behavior and this is a classic case of pushing beyond an acceptable boundary to which Erotica1 and his cohorts have shown in a public manner.

I know CCP has been rather silent about this matter and as one said they will release some kind of statement in the coming days ahead.

New internet lawyer comes in on his high horse. Welcome!
Xuixien
Solar Winds Security Solutions
#5846 - 2014-03-27 18:06:19 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Xuixien wrote:
So, you gonna answer, or dodge?

You accused me of not having answered a question from a previous post.

Where is that previous post?


There you have it folks.

I've presented hard questions to him twice:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4400852#post4400852

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4400990#post4400990

And instead of answering it, he's trying to pretend he didn't see it and completely avoid the questions by asking me where the posts are located, instead.

Come to your own conclusions guys. :)

Epic Space Cat, Horsegirl, Philanthropist

Bizzaro Stormy MurphDog
B.L.U.E L.A.S.E.R.
#5847 - 2014-03-27 18:06:35 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Batelle wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:

False.

Being able to walk away from a situation in which you are being subjected to torture, does not stop the actions being taken against you from being torture.

Being restrained from leaving the situation is furthermore not a pre-condition to something fulfilling the definition of torture.

Voluntarily entering into a situation in which you are then subjected to torture, is also not a pre-condition to it fulfilling the definition of torture.


Cite one example where a court (ANYWHERE) agreed with this nonsense, when discussing TORTURE.


Cite one example where a court (ANYWHERE) requires that in order for actions taken against someone to constitute torture they must:

-Be restrained or otherwise incapable of leaving the circumstances in which their are being tortured.
-Where if they voluntarily entered a situation where it later culminates into torture, that that initial act negates the subsequent actions taken against the victim from being classifiable as torture.

The definition of torture, does not require the victim to be restrained, nor that they have been brought involuntarily into the circumstances where torture occurs.

Thats just how it is.


Uh, not to burst your internet lawyer bubble, but when someone freely and voluntarily agrees to comply with a situation . . . they are not being tortured.

When someone freely and voluntarily agrees to comply with a situation because they anticipate financial gain from doing so . . .they are not being tortured.

When someone is free to up and terminate a situation, at any time, on less than a moment's notice . . . they are not being tortured.

The absolutely broadest definition of torture is 1) physically or mentally 2) harming someone 3) against their will.

This was not physical. It was not against their will, and because the guy was a willing participant, I wouldn't even classify it as mental harm (unless you think a toddler throwing a tantrum is a sign of mental torture, and if you do, you are wrong).

If you offer to pay my mortgage dues for a year, on the condition that you get to waterboard me, 1) I'm an idiot, and 2) you are not torturing me. I got greedy and stupid. Change that from a real life mortgage to a video game, and waterboarding to what went on here . . . and holy crap, you need to stop being a terrible person.

Because torture really does exist; it happens every day. You just need to get a grip, because your world view is both stupidly sheltered and outright dangerous.

I am not an alt of Chribba.

Salvos Rhoska
#5848 - 2014-03-27 18:07:30 UTC
KnowUsByTheDead wrote:
Damage control and avoiding assets and accounts being seized for EULA violations, as well as potentially IRL legal prosecution


Sorry, can you repeat that?
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#5849 - 2014-03-27 18:07:42 UTC
Big Lynx wrote:
For instance:

some statistics on this threatan:

Threadnaught


Top 25 alliance posters in thread
Gallente Federation 393 (6,8%)

Erotica1 has pissed off the Space-French. No Baguettes for you now E1.
Xuixien
Solar Winds Security Solutions
#5850 - 2014-03-27 18:09:13 UTC
Bizzaro Stormy MurphDog wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Batelle wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:

False.

Being able to walk away from a situation in which you are being subjected to torture, does not stop the actions being taken against you from being torture.

Being restrained from leaving the situation is furthermore not a pre-condition to something fulfilling the definition of torture.

Voluntarily entering into a situation in which you are then subjected to torture, is also not a pre-condition to it fulfilling the definition of torture.


Cite one example where a court (ANYWHERE) agreed with this nonsense, when discussing TORTURE.


Cite one example where a court (ANYWHERE) requires that in order for actions taken against someone to constitute torture they must:

-Be restrained or otherwise incapable of leaving the circumstances in which their are being tortured.
-Where if they voluntarily entered a situation where it later culminates into torture, that that initial act negates the subsequent actions taken against the victim from being classifiable as torture.

The definition of torture, does not require the victim to be restrained, nor that they have been brought involuntarily into the circumstances where torture occurs.

Thats just how it is.


Uh, not to burst your internet lawyer bubble, but when someone freely and voluntarily agrees to comply with a situation . . . they are not being tortured.

When someone freely and voluntarily agrees to comply with a situation because they anticipate financial gain from doing so . . .they are not being tortured.

When someone is free to up and terminate a situation, at any time, on less than a moment's notice . . . they are not being tortured.

The absolutely broadest definition of torture is 1) physically or mentally 2) harming someone 3) against their will.

This was not physical. It was not against their will, and because the guy was a willing participant, I wouldn't even classify it as mental harm (unless you think a toddler throwing a tantrum is a sign of mental torture, and if you do, you are wrong).

If you offer to pay my mortgage dues for a year, on the condition that you get to waterboard me, 1) I'm an idiot, and 2) you are not torturing me. I got greedy and stupid. Change that from a real life mortgage to a video game, and waterboarding to what went on here . . . and holy crap, you need to stop being a terrible person.

Because torture really does exist; it happens every day. You just need to get a grip, because your world view is both stupidly sheltered and outright dangerous.


I'm pretty sure this is why torture victims need to be physically restrained.

Just sayin'.

Epic Space Cat, Horsegirl, Philanthropist

OUTLAW RIOT P0LICE
Doomheim
#5851 - 2014-03-27 18:09:40 UTC
PEOPLE SAYING THIS IS BAD PRESS FOR EVE ONLINE I THINK IT IS GOOD PRESS THIS GAME IS DARK AND TWISTED AND I HAVE HAD FRIENDS COME TO ME AFTER HEARING ABOUT THIS 'INCIDENT' AND PEOPLE WAVING THEIR BITCHFORKS ABOUT SAYING MATE MATE PLEASE GET ME A TRAIL FOR THIS GAME THIS SOUNDS IMMENSE AND THEY PUT DOWN THEIR XBOX TO COME CHECK.

NOT GONNA LIE THEY ARE PLAYING THIS GAME NOW THROUGH A BUDDY INVITE SYSTEM BECAUSE I GAVE THEM A TRAIL.

YOU SEE THE GOOD THAT HAS PERHAPS COME FROM THIS I HAVE GIVEN BIRTH TO SOME NEW PLAYERS. THESE NEW PLAYERS WANT TO BECOME THE NEXT EROTICAL 1 OR THE NEXT JAMES375 BECAUSE THEY ARE WANTING TO PLAY A GAME THAT THEY DIDN'T PREVIOUSLY.

ALL THE PEOPLE WAVING THEIR BITCHFORKS SAYING BAN THIS GUY BECAUSE HE IS BAD. THINK ABOUT IT THAT THIS JUST GOES ON AT ALL TIMES SAID BEHIND CLOSED DOORS. THIS IS NOT ANY DIFFERENT TO THE TIME I FOUND A GUY WHO WARDECCED ME WHO LIVED IN SAME CITY AND TIED HIM TO MY RADIATOR AS PUNISHMENT AND HE DROPED THE WARDEC. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE PERHAPS YOU SAY THAT HE DIDN'T GET HIS STORY PUBLISHED ON A BLOG THAT WANTS AN AUDIENCE FOR A PROPER GANDER CAMPAIGN.

THE EVIL HERE IS RIPARD TEGS AND HIS BRAINWASHING FOLLOWERS. MOST OF THE PEOPLE DIDN'T EVEN LISTEN TO THE RANTING RACIST FOUL MOUTHED GUY WHO GOT MAD AND INSTEAD JUST TOOK TO THE FORUMS TO PEN ANGRY POSTS. I AM NOT AN ANGRY MAN. I WOULD HAVE WALKED AWAY. PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW THIS BECAUSE I AM NOT MAD ABOUT THIS INCIDENE TI AM HAPPY THAT IT GOT MY TWO MATES TO COME PLAY WITH ME AND PUT DOWN THEIR CRACK PIPES AND XBOXES.

THINK ABOUT THIS FOR A MOMENT. WHY IS THIS HOLE THING BAD? I ASK YOU?

ORP.
Salvos Rhoska
#5852 - 2014-03-27 18:10:52 UTC
Bizzaro Stormy MurphDog wrote:

When someone is free to up and terminate a situation, at any time, on less than a moment's notice . . . they are not being tortured


That is a commonly held false belief.

"Torture is the systematic and deliberate infliction of acute pain by one person on another, or on a third person, in order to accomplish the purpose of the former against the will of the latter." - Amnesty International.

There is no requirement of being constrained from leaving the situation, or for being subjected to torture involuntarily, in the above.

At law, according to this definition, it is a question of the "purpose of the former against the will of the latter."

In the specific case of Erotica1's activities in the Bonus Room, torture is the mechanism whereby they force the victim to abort the Bonus Room participation, thereby granting a win to Erotica1.

It is exactly by a person LEAVING the torture he is subjected to within the Bonus Room, that facilitates Erotica1 wins.
Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#5853 - 2014-03-27 18:12:16 UTC
lollerwaffle wrote:

Thank you for taking an objective view on this.
Also, no one, not even CCP can stop people from choosing to make fools of themselves. That was a trick question.


You're welcome! There are enough people just spewing inane and biased crap. Staying objective is the only way we will see a reasonable conclusion to this mess.

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#5854 - 2014-03-27 18:12:53 UTC
OUTLAW RIOT P0LICE wrote:
PEOPLE SAYING THIS IS BAD PRESS FOR EVE ONLINE I THINK IT IS GOOD PRESS THIS GAME IS DARK AND TWISTED AND I HAVE HAD FRIENDS COME TO ME AFTER HEARING ABOUT THIS 'INCIDENT' AND PEOPLE WAVING THEIR BITCHFORKS ABOUT SAYING MATE MATE PLEASE GET ME A TRAIL FOR THIS GAME THIS SOUNDS IMMENSE AND THEY PUT DOWN THEIR XBOX TO COME CHECK.

NOT GONNA LIE THEY ARE PLAYING THIS GAME NOW THROUGH A BUDDY INVITE SYSTEM BECAUSE I GAVE THEM A TRAIL.

YOU SEE THE GOOD THAT HAS PERHAPS COME FROM THIS I HAVE GIVEN BIRTH TO SOME NEW PLAYERS. THESE NEW PLAYERS WANT TO BECOME THE NEXT EROTICAL 1 OR THE NEXT JAMES375 BECAUSE THEY ARE WANTING TO PLAY A GAME THAT THEY DIDN'T PREVIOUSLY.

ALL THE PEOPLE WAVING THEIR BITCHFORKS SAYING BAN THIS GUY BECAUSE HE IS BAD. THINK ABOUT IT THAT THIS JUST GOES ON AT ALL TIMES SAID BEHIND CLOSED DOORS. THIS IS NOT ANY DIFFERENT TO THE TIME I FOUND A GUY WHO WARDECCED ME WHO LIVED IN SAME CITY AND TIED HIM TO MY RADIATOR AS PUNISHMENT AND HE DROPED THE WARDEC. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE PERHAPS YOU SAY THAT HE DIDN'T GET HIS STORY PUBLISHED ON A BLOG THAT WANTS AN AUDIENCE FOR A PROPER GANDER CAMPAIGN.

THE EVIL HERE IS RIPARD TEGS AND HIS BRAINWASHING FOLLOWERS. MOST OF THE PEOPLE DIDN'T EVEN LISTEN TO THE RANTING RACIST FOUL MOUTHED GUY WHO GOT MAD AND INSTEAD JUST TOOK TO THE FORUMS TO PEN ANGRY POSTS. I AM NOT AN ANGRY MAN. I WOULD HAVE WALKED AWAY. PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW THIS BECAUSE I AM NOT MAD ABOUT THIS INCIDENE TI AM HAPPY THAT IT GOT MY TWO MATES TO COME PLAY WITH ME AND PUT DOWN THEIR CRACK PIPES AND XBOXES.

THINK ABOUT THIS FOR A MOMENT. WHY IS THIS HOLE THING BAD? I ASK YOU?

ORP.


Can someone paypal this guy some cash for a new keyboard? The one he has now seems to have a stuck caps lock key.
Salvos Rhoska
#5855 - 2014-03-27 18:13:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Xuixien wrote:
I'm pretty sure this is why torture victims need to be physically restrained.

Just sayin'.


False.

Show me a legal definition that requires the victim be physically restrained for acts taken against them to constitute torture.

Also, you still have not linked the post you claim I did not answer a question from.
Evasion?
H aVo K
Tycheon Industries
#5856 - 2014-03-27 18:13:08 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:




Yeah, way to make us all look bad E1. GTFO.


Those people say the same thing about every scam they see. Also most ganks. And all the fights. Plus that time we deadzoned that station. Also anything goons do.

In short these people will never play a game like EVE anyway.


Speculation.


Also:
Ganking, fighting, scamming =/= Harrassment and Public Embarrassment




You are arguing doing this is harassment.


It is.

... and it's ******* hilarious XD
Graabeerd Khagah
MoonFyre BattleGroup Holdings
#5857 - 2014-03-27 18:13:28 UTC
OUTLAW RIOT P0LICE wrote:
PEOPLE SAYING THIS IS BAD PRESS FOR EVE ONLINE I THINK IT IS GOOD PRESS THIS GAME IS DARK AND TWISTED AND I HAVE HAD FRIENDS COME TO ME AFTER HEARING ABOUT THIS 'INCIDENT' AND PEOPLE WAVING THEIR BITCHFORKS ABOUT SAYING MATE MATE PLEASE GET ME A TRAIL FOR THIS GAME THIS SOUNDS IMMENSE AND THEY PUT DOWN THEIR XBOX TO COME CHECK.

NOT GONNA LIE THEY ARE PLAYING THIS GAME NOW THROUGH A BUDDY INVITE SYSTEM BECAUSE I GAVE THEM A TRAIL.

YOU SEE THE GOOD THAT HAS PERHAPS COME FROM THIS I HAVE GIVEN BIRTH TO SOME NEW PLAYERS. THESE NEW PLAYERS WANT TO BECOME THE NEXT EROTICAL 1 OR THE NEXT JAMES375 BECAUSE THEY ARE WANTING TO PLAY A GAME THAT THEY DIDN'T PREVIOUSLY.

ALL THE PEOPLE WAVING THEIR BITCHFORKS SAYING BAN THIS GUY BECAUSE HE IS BAD. THINK ABOUT IT THAT THIS JUST GOES ON AT ALL TIMES SAID BEHIND CLOSED DOORS. THIS IS NOT ANY DIFFERENT TO THE TIME I FOUND A GUY WHO WARDECCED ME WHO LIVED IN SAME CITY AND TIED HIM TO MY RADIATOR AS PUNISHMENT AND HE DROPED THE WARDEC. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE PERHAPS YOU SAY THAT HE DIDN'T GET HIS STORY PUBLISHED ON A BLOG THAT WANTS AN AUDIENCE FOR A PROPER GANDER CAMPAIGN.

THE EVIL HERE IS RIPARD TEGS AND HIS BRAINWASHING FOLLOWERS. MOST OF THE PEOPLE DIDN'T EVEN LISTEN TO THE RANTING RACIST FOUL MOUTHED GUY WHO GOT MAD AND INSTEAD JUST TOOK TO THE FORUMS TO PEN ANGRY POSTS. I AM NOT AN ANGRY MAN. I WOULD HAVE WALKED AWAY. PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW THIS BECAUSE I AM NOT MAD ABOUT THIS INCIDENE TI AM HAPPY THAT IT GOT MY TWO MATES TO COME PLAY WITH ME AND PUT DOWN THEIR CRACK PIPES AND XBOXES.

THINK ABOUT THIS FOR A MOMENT. WHY IS THIS HOLE THING BAD? I ASK YOU?

ORP.


Wut, caps??
Jerome Gouillot
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#5858 - 2014-03-27 18:13:30 UTC
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:
What would happen to the world if 'free speech' laws only applied to polite speech, and not the intolerant or vile speech?
Who would then decide what is hateful speech, and not protected?
Who would then protect your speech, on that day years later when someone determines your words are hateful to them?

EvE the 'sandbox' must be based on the same principles. It is a sandbox, or not. There is no middle ground between food and poison, just poisoned food. tldr; CCP must be very careful about coming between two players in any scenario, at risk of crushing what the sandbox stands for.

Harassment or 'bullying' as previously defined by CCP, is when a player continuously or on an ongoing basis messes with another player, without asset acquisition being their core driver.

If we look to that precedent, Erotica1 neither continuously nor on an ongoing basis messed with Sohkar, for it was a single time event with Sohkar, and Erotica1's goals were clearly asset acquisition at their core. By CCP's own precedent this was thus not harassment nor bullying, it was the sandbox, working as intended.

Now while you may denounce the way Erotica1 did what he did, you however can NOT denounce his right to do it, or you might as well denounce the sandbox, freedom of speech and the notion of freedom itself.

Why is It always liberal pansies that have to silence or jail those they disagree with in the real world, rather than win their arguments by engaging directly with the person they wish to neuter, and instead convince them? That is evil. That is Stalinism. That is today's liberal pansification in real life injecting itself into a GAME with cries to 'ban Erotica1!'...

What's missing from this thread is that Sohkar was a DUNCE. He allowed himself to be scammed, then doubled down on stupid by allowing himself to be made a fool of, driven by his personal greed and attempts to acquire quick money (ISK). Sohkar should be THANKING Erotica1 for the valuable real-life lesson he was just taught! Surely the first time he goes to nagotiate a car loan, mortgage or cellphone contract -- he will be more likely to look at the fine print and not get screwed thanks to Erotica1?

THAT is the lesson of HTFU you pansies never seem to get, that HTFU is GOOD FOR YOU. Bubble wrap a dunce or carebear, and you neuter him in real life I say. Want to know why kids are leaving their parents homes at older and older ages? Just look in the f#$king mirror you fail-enabling PANSIES!

F#)($#!



+1 - I would recommend to use this post for the next CCP marketing campaign.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#5859 - 2014-03-27 18:13:37 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
This is Dinsdale you're talking to dude, EVE's version of Alex Jones. Don't even try to get rational discourse out of him.

Whereas you are EVEs version of a self-professed autist who once deliberately drove a two-ton truck at a guy stopping just short of killing him by pressing him against a garage-door.

Glasshouse. Pot and kettle.


And you are repeatedly demonstrating your inability to put things in perspective. I don't care what you think of me, I don't care what anyone thinks of me. You have ignored most if not all the points of made and resorted to strawman arguments repeatedly. The point of that story was that emotion is no excuse for not taking personal responsibility. You've decided to try to use that against me to make me look like a bad person. But it's irrelevant what kind of person I am, or even whether I'm actually autistic or not, if you don't address the actual points I've made, and you haven't.

Are you trying to achieve an emotional reaction out of me yourself? Are you trying to 'torture' me the way you claim Ero 'tortured' Sokhar? You should probably be banned for that by your own definition.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#5860 - 2014-03-27 18:14:15 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:


"Torture is the systematic and deliberate infliction of acute pain by one person on another, or on a third person, in order to accomplish the purpose of the former against the will of the latter." - Amnesty International.


This is the definition of PVP.