These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Jester Trek Latest Blog

First post First post
Author
Aralyn Cormallen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#2741 - 2014-03-26 13:51:25 UTC
Clara Pond wrote:
Lucretia DeWinter wrote:
If The House had already taken all his money and fed it into the slot machine, and told him the only way he was getting it back would be to win the costume contest dressed as a chicken singing Waltzing Matilda whilst streaming live to the internet, then it would be more accurate.


I loled IRL. Quite so, and were our contestant to willingly suit up and start flapping, we would not say he was being subjected to torture. We would say that he was a consenting adult making a choice, and possibly even having fun doing it.


I think you have both just accurately described reality TV
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#2742 - 2014-03-26 13:52:07 UTC
Upde wrote:
Delt0r Garsk wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:


If the majority of the players and nonplayers think this behavior is unacceptable, your argument is next to worthless.


The majority of eve players have hardly even heard of the forums let along this latest Erotica thing. They just don't care because its just not all that important.


Its not he eve players that we need to worry about. It wasn't the eve players that got Mittani banned, its the way it gets reported out by the gaming media sites / main stream media. It only takes them to do some shitposting that will give CCP heartburn like what happend with the Fanfest incident for them to take what ever action they deem best for the protection of their integrity and reputation in the industry.

Our opinions are worth very little in this case, those of the outside world are what will sway this one. CCP likely don't want to clean shop on this, but I feel they will be manipulated to the point of no return by outside influences and that doesn't mean the CSM or the drivel we all post here.


And after you realize this, you need to ask yourself: "Why did Ripard Teg specifically go to all these lengths to start this up, long after the actual event had occurred?"

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Doomheim
#2743 - 2014-03-26 13:52:45 UTC

When did the world decide to create pansies out of everyone?

With this new term 'cyber bullying' being thrown around, I really am shaking my head here. When I was young(tm), people dealt with 'bullies' as a normal part of coming of age, on their own. People dealt with all life challenges in fact, without having to codify it with a marketing term to convert individual fail into victimization...

You want to know why some young people are killing themselves due to 'bullying'?

It's because they were fricken bubble wrapped since birth and grew up without having to develop any adversity management skills, so when the first 'big' challenge did come their way their brains exploded. ****, Johnny didn't invite me to the dance, I will slit my wrists in the tub...

Now I am not talking about putting all kids in the Agoge of Sparta, but what I am asking is aren't these well-intentioned idiots who coin pansification terms like 'cyber bullying' just making more life-neutered pussies?

tldr;
HTFU
Capt Starfox
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#2744 - 2014-03-26 13:53:54 UTC
Krants wrote:
I hope that CCP comes down hard on this. If not outright banning perpetrators then at least modifying EULA in a way so this would be considered a major offence in the future.

I've got 2 problems with the whole bonus room concept:
1. It uses EvE ecosystem as a honeypot. It filters out the weak and susceptible so that they could be coer... persuaded to join out of game voice comms.
2. They use TS, an out of game, unsupervised and unpoliced solution, to abuse victims for hours and hours. If you recollect two weeks ago CCP contacted a law enforcement to possibly prevent a suicide. Why? Because a player had announced in local chat that he'd blow his brains out. It was all it took for CCP to intervene.
Now with this TS "bonus room" we've got an unsupervised system that consist of a victim and X number of perpetrators who's main goal is to make emotional abuse last as long as possible. And they will do what is necessary to debase the victim psychologically so that he/she would break for the lulz.
Do you believe that "bonus room" perpetrators would contact CCP or law enforcement if a victim would threaten self-harm, like really?

You can scam all you want in EvE sandbox, but the moment you use EvE as a tool for out of game coercion your rights for "emergent gameplay" should end.


Because you can't handle Eve Online and need CCP to hold your hand??

You fail so miserably to see that all participants chose to stay and in no way were forced against their will to continue.

Abandon all hope ye who x up in fleet

Salvos Rhoska
#2745 - 2014-03-26 13:54:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
---

You overlooked several questions in my post.
Please address them.

Have you participated in the Bonus Room?

If so, where is the recording?

Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:
When did the world decide to create pansies out of everyone?

Times change.
Prie Mary
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#2746 - 2014-03-26 13:55:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Prie Mary
Aralyn Cormallen wrote:
I think you have both just accurately described reality TV



The contestants are informed and consent to their actions being recorded and then distributed into the media/public domain. They even have to sign a release form for all data/information recorded.


As far as im aware bonus room makes no attempt to let the victim know they are being recorded at the start. Which infact breaks laws in many country's.

Dont just [u]think[/u] outside the box, [u]Live[/u] outside of it...

Malcolm Shinhwa
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2747 - 2014-03-26 13:56:09 UTC
LordOfDespair wrote:
Delt0r Garsk wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:


If the majority of the players and nonplayers think this behavior is unacceptable, your argument is next to worthless.


The majority of eve players have hardly even heard of the forums let along this latest Erotica thing. They just don't care because its just not all that important.


This 137 page thread and multiple news articles disagree.


288. Thats the number of people participating in this thread last I looked at the stats. That's not even a majority of the Eve players logged into Eve right now.

[i]"The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental[/i]."

Katkon Darnok
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2748 - 2014-03-26 13:56:15 UTC
LordOfDespair wrote:
Just because something isn't illegal doesn't mean it is okay.


This man speaks the truth! I don't know whether cyber bullying is illegal, but it is certainly morally reprehensible. CCP needs to take decisive, aggressive and swift action to avoid creating the perception of supporting the scammer's actions through inaction. Time to stop hiding behind the "it's just like real life" banner and protect the community from itself, and boost the game's reputation. Sure, it won't please everyone, BUT it will please many. Moreover, it's the right thing to do - and CCP and every individual on the face of the earth with a decent moral compass knows it.

Let's put it this way: imagine, for a second, if this was brought up on mainstream media and discussed on the BBC, NBC etc. What do you think would happen? CCP would RUSH to take action to save the game's reputation, as the negative PR effect would otherwise be traumatic for the game - and new subscriptions. The right course of action is so incredibly obvious - from both a reputational and economic perspective - that I'm agitated at having to write this comment.

C'mon CCP. Do the right thing, and stop hiding behind inaction.
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#2749 - 2014-03-26 13:56:24 UTC
This thread is definitely proof highsec needs to be nerfed.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#2750 - 2014-03-26 13:56:35 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
---

You overlooked several questions in my post.
Please address them.

Have you participated in the Bonus Room?

If so, where is the recording?


You said something along the lines of "The entire scam is just there to select victims".

And my response is to tell you that the isk doubling service is not a scam. I know full well it's not, because I have had my isk doubled successfully, because I can actually read.

In order to even get offered a bonus room event, you have to specifically seek out E1 and engage the isk doubling service.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Salvos Rhoska
#2751 - 2014-03-26 13:57:05 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
And after you realize this, you need to ask yourself: "Why did Ripard Teg specifically go to all these lengths to start this up, long after the actual event had occurred?"


Why not?

Would you like to buy a nice shiny tinfoil hat?
Speedkermit Damo
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#2752 - 2014-03-26 13:57:19 UTC
Kaivar Lancer wrote:
YZertim wrote:
CCP should think about the impact on the game if this sort of thing was covered by mainstream media.


This would be awesome. More players to Eve. :)


More wankers to eve

Protect me from knowing what I don't need to know. Protect me from even knowing that there are things to know that I don't know. Protect me from knowing that I decided not to know about the things that I decided not to know about. Amen.

Bjurn Akely
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2753 - 2014-03-26 13:57:52 UTC
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:

When did the world decide to create pansies out of everyone?

With this new term 'cyber bullying' being thrown around, I really am shaking my head here. When I was young(tm), people dealt with 'bullies' as a normal part of coming of age, on their own. People dealt with all life challenges in fact, without having to codify it with a marketing term to convert individual fail into victimization...

You want to know why some young people are killing themselves due to 'bullying'?

It's because they were fricken bubble wrapped since birth and grew up without having to develop any adversity management skills, so when the first 'big' challenge did come their way their brains exploded. ****, Johnny didn't invite me to the dance, I will slit my wrists in the tub...

Now I am not talking about putting all kids in the Agoge of Sparta, but what I am asking is aren't these well-intentioned idiots who coin pansification terms like 'cyber bullying' just making more life-neutered pussies?

tldr;
HTFU


I agree that some of the words regarding this subject is a little misplaces. 'Torture' is one of them, IMO. That said the actions of Ero and friends is reprehensible and I would like CCP to take a long hard look at it all and publicly inform us what they think of this. I'm fine with any ruling, really. I might not agree with it, but I will be fine with it as long as it is publicly explained.

And no, there is no 'or else'.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#2754 - 2014-03-26 13:58:26 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
And after you realize this, you need to ask yourself: "Why did Ripard Teg specifically go to all these lengths to start this up, long after the actual event had occurred?"


Why not?

Would you like to buy a nice shiny tinfoil hat?


No, but it would be nice to get an answer from our wonderful CSM representative, if he has the intestinal fortitude to do something besides sling things at people from behind his blog.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Clara Pond
Never Not Snazzy
#2755 - 2014-03-26 13:58:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Clara Pond
LordOfDespair wrote:
You have no idea who that person is, or what their life is right now.
He could be impaired someway mentally or not in the right state of mind. Does that make it right to abuse them for personal pleasure?


Quite right, you have no idea of these things in an MMO. They are a capsuleer name, an alliance ticker, a shiptype. They are a mark, a target. The person you undercut with your market trade may have been on their last ISK and suffering manic depression. Who knows what your callous undercut could trigger? You argue that people are responsible for the jilted lover screaming "if you don't take me back I'll kill myself". People are not responsible for the reactions of others.

If you want to argue for compassion, I'm right behind you. But that is a different thing. Some people just don't have the intellectual or emotional maturity to interact with other humans in a competitive environment and the rest of us are not responsible for their reactions.

Look at the login screen: Online Interactions Not Rated By The ESRB.
Salvos Rhoska
#2756 - 2014-03-26 13:58:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
---

Just because it seems you are stupid or labile enough to fall victim to the scams selection process, and not realise it, does not mean it is still not a selection process.

Let me repeat what I said earlier, so you can re-read it perhaps more attentivelly:

The entire scam, from beginning to end, which escalates to outside the game, is a selection process for victims.

Only those stupid or otherwise impaired enough to participate in the Bonus Round, ever approach Erotica1's doubling service in the first place. These stupid or labile victims are then exploited for purposes of enjoying their suffering in the out of game Bonus Room event by Erotica1 and his associated escrow functionaries, and other people inclined to enjoying the sound of another persons distress and suffering over the voice channel. This, ofc, after they have already been (legitimately) parted from ALL their assets.

It is predatory on the community of EVE, and its entire scam structure is designed to attract and entrap those who are stupid or labile enough to A) not be likely to overcome the ridiculous and asinine hurdles and demands placed on them in the Bonus Room process (for the enjoyment of all persons listening in) B) for some reason incapable of understanding that they are being exploited and taken advantage of in a malicious manner with harmful intent. C) Are most likely to become emotionally compromised under the duress and distress deliberately caused by the perpetrators, which aborts the Round and further feeds the sadistic joy of the listening participants.

Have you participated in the Bonus Round?
If so, where is the recording?
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
#2757 - 2014-03-26 13:59:41 UTC
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:

When did the world decide to create pansies out of everyone?

With this new term 'cyber bullying' being thrown around, I really am shaking my head here. When I was young(tm), people dealt with 'bullies' as a normal part of coming of age, on their own. People dealt with all life challenges in fact, without having to codify it with a marketing term to convert individual fail into victimization...

You want to know why some young people are killing themselves due to 'bullying'?

It's because they were fricken bubble wrapped since birth and grew up without having to develop any adversity management skills, so when the first 'big' challenge did come their way their brains exploded. ****, Johnny didn't invite me to the dance, I will slit my wrists in the tub...

Now I am not talking about putting all kids in the Agoge of Sparta, but what I am asking is aren't these well-intentioned idiots who coin pansification terms like 'cyber bullying' just making more life-neutered pussies?

tldr;
HTFU

One difference between your young(tm) type bullying and current online(tm) type bullying, is that it's way way way harder to actually do something about it. Classic face to face bullying, you could try fight back by punching some sense into someone. It's much harder to smack someone in the face when they're anonymous behind a screen in a different country and can keep on doing stuff. So I wouldn't call it fair to compare the two types as if they were equal. But I fully understand your point.

/c

★★★ Secure 3rd party service ★★★

Visit my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar'

Twitter @ChribbaVeldspar

Crumplecorn
Eve Cluster Explorations
#2758 - 2014-03-26 14:00:06 UTC
Prie Mary wrote:
As far as im aware bonus room makes no attempt to let the victim know they are being recorded at the start.
Literally the first thing said in the recording is that it is being recorded.

Witty Image - Stream

Not Liking this post hurts my RL feelings and will be considered harassment

Upde
Upde Harris Industries
#2759 - 2014-03-26 14:00:19 UTC
Capt Starfox wrote:
[quote=Krants]

Because you can't handle Eve Online and need CCP to hold your hand??

You fail so miserably to see that all participants chose to stay and in no way were forced against their will to continue.


That is irrelevant now. This whole situation will get eaten up by media channels and they will farm CCP tears and feast upon them. Eve hasn't exactly got the greatest rep in the gaming media circles and shitstorms like this are what shitposting journo's love. They will selectively publish the bits that support their "EVE is full of sociopaths" and push it out into the public domain. Then we all get reamed if CCP are then forced into a position where they have to make a public statement and effect change to game mechanics.

As a community we should probably do a better job of self policing so this kind of media tear harvesting doesn't happen and ensure we clean our own house up rather than it being a forced issue. Surely that would be better for us as gamers and the health of EVE ?
Salvos Rhoska
#2760 - 2014-03-26 14:00:28 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
No, but it would be nice to get an answer from our wonderful CSM representative, if he has the intestinal fortitude to do something besides sling things at people from behind his blog.


I suppose he just finally got around to writing it.

Would that not suffice as a reason?