These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

POSes: I am a small portion of the community

First post First post
Author
Angry Mustache
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#2421 - 2013-01-22 01:11:28 UTC
IF only for the sake of adding something meaningful to High Sec presence, please Recamp POS's to something that has purpose in High-sec outside of just research. Indeed, they should be something that every player should want and be willing to fight over.

An official Member of the Goonswarm Federation Complaints Department.

Boone Croat
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2422 - 2013-01-22 01:13:22 UTC
Just hopping on to say that I run four POSes personally. I have lived out of one in a wormhole for a couple of years. The inability of POSes to accomplish many of the day to day tasks required by my members (personal item and ship security, competitive refining, jump clones, t3 assembly, market sales, adding plex to game time) tie us to highsec and ultimately Amarr and Jita. We have a variety of workarounds, such as renting password-protected POSes to corp members, but that is ultimately a hassle and drives up cost for new people looking to make a home outside kspace.

Ultimately I would love to have a tiny station in wspace where my members could have secure individual access (except perhaps to a role so that the POS could be emptied and taken down), I could set up a local market for passers-by who did not want to travel to highsec, I could refine my local ABCs at a competitive rate and manufacture goods for my market, etc.
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#2423 - 2013-01-22 01:13:39 UTC
What are the chances of getting CCP to work on a simple thing first: shoeboxes in space as per Jester's blog post?
Landredas
Insectopia
#2424 - 2013-01-22 01:19:35 UTC
As a WH resident i was definitely looking forward to the POS being redone. Count me disappointed.
Curley Rollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#2425 - 2013-01-22 01:22:12 UTC
Sigh... really POS love is good love!
Serptimis
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#2426 - 2013-01-22 01:26:30 UTC
havent progressed to owning or running a POS yet, and from what I've seen , another feature I would want to avoid in its current state. which is a shame as the more content the better.
Marsan
#2427 - 2013-01-22 01:36:52 UTC
CCP Seagull wrote:
Hey all

The result was design work and a prototype, where the prototype and art requirements were centered on stuff that was very cool for the person creating the starbase. This was not the entire ambition of the design, but it was where the prototype and art requirements were focused. Because there were too many open questions around the functionality outside the features for starbase creation, we could not responsibly green light the design to go into production for the summer expansion. When we talk about "the POS system" only affecting a "small portion of the community", we are referring to the focus of the prototype, not to the current starbase system or the concept of the full "modular POS system" - but this does not come across well in the CSM Summit minutes.


As long time software developer I smell revisionist management bullshit. This is not apparent from the CSM notes, and this was no where in your 1st posting. Nor did you or the rest of CCP communicate it to the CSM. So I'm left to ask bullshit or truly inept communication?

Former forum cheerleader CCP, now just a grumpy small portion of the community.

Candy Oshea
Techfree Investment Group
#2428 - 2013-01-22 01:41:58 UTC
Have set-up a pos in 4 different wormholes. from when they came out in apocrypha a C1 to a C3

Have set-up various personal (solo corp) "research" towers in highsec. (works fine for this)

In a wormhole, players have no choice but to share a ship assembly array to store there vessels. it cannot be configured any other way.

To get around that problem, when we had 10+ ppl in 1 wh, we set up 2 ship arrays, and had access to director's only in one, and free for all in another. Now these 10 people we know in RL, so trust isn't the issue. Took me a while to work out thru the "roles" system to find that.

When it came to recruitment, to make our corp bigger, it was tough, most that try to join know the pos mechanics are screwed, and only want to join you to lift your stuff and move out.

You can allocate different people to different hangers, so we had 2 corp hanger arrays, 1 was set up with 7 different players using all the divisions, as there own personal "hanger" some used Lockable containers at safe spots. and the directer array, which no-one could access.

I understand CCP didn't want players to "settle wh's" and wanted them to be more nomadic, and maybe that is the reasoning behind the leaving the underwhelming Corporation roles system & pos system to late.

TL:DR Fix poses.

iCandy  - I have accidently swallowed some Scrabble tiles, my next shit could spell disaster!

Kukkukola
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2429 - 2013-01-22 01:47:57 UTC
I expect some positive news at fanfest, don't let us down.
Laudiur
Rim Worlds Republic
#2430 - 2013-01-22 01:50:43 UTC
I'm one of a few in my corps that use POS's and currently we're having the fun time of living a corp out of 3 ship arrays, one for director, one for "members" and one for recruits. it's a freaking pain.

we've had to resort to the pain in the arse'ness of having directors setup POS with members own passwords for them to be able to get access to a station, and even then they can only do research or manufactoring as it's too much of a pain to be able to get moon mining setup with corp members
Marsan
#2431 - 2013-01-22 01:51:03 UTC
Candy Oshea wrote:

I understand CCP didn't want players to "settle wh's" and wanted them to be more nomadic, and maybe that is the reasoning behind the leaving the underwhelming Corporation roles system & pos system to late.



My guess is that every programmer who has looked at the role code has said they will need to rewrite the entire corp, and alliance code base to just make roles work in a sane manner in POS. Then the QA guys start twitching and throwing around huge man hour numbers for a corp role rewrite. Someone asks what they do if there is a major bug that lets people rob their corp/alliance blind. Things go downhill from there....

Former forum cheerleader CCP, now just a grumpy small portion of the community.

Marsan
#2432 - 2013-01-22 02:00:07 UTC
CCP Seagull wrote:

You will see the first results of our new way of planning expansions towards the end of February, and you can follow the process through the CSM participation and also some updates I'll be giving. I can't and won't promise that specific features or fixes will be part of the summer expansion until we have gone through our pre-production phase.


Note how Seagull promises we'll see something about the "new way of planning expansions towards the end of February". Not that anything will happen with reguards to POSes.

PS- Also forgive if I'm under whelmed by promises of CSM participation. The CSM didn't even know the last major update was about bounty hunting until the feature was set in stone. Never mind that I can't remember the CSM commenting about the content of the last several expansions until they were nearly out.

Former forum cheerleader CCP, now just a grumpy small portion of the community.

Nickolas Protege
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2433 - 2013-01-22 02:00:48 UTC
I want to run a cool POS one day!

Not the current system though...Cry
ROCK MELTER
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2434 - 2013-01-22 02:06:32 UTC
I would like to see POS's worked on. Being the CEO of my corp I am also an enabler. This would help me doing things for my corp and for the Alliance. They need to be a higher priority then they currently are.
Mad B0mber
Novaku Inc
#2435 - 2013-01-22 02:10:36 UTC
Please make POS's less of a uber pain in the ass..

Broken for so long.. WHY U NO FIX CCP???
Wrathraker
Wife Is Sleeping
Snuffed Out
#2436 - 2013-01-22 02:19:07 UTC
I would also like to see POS's wprked on. I read Jesters blog today and I think he summed it up real good.

"Know what I want first? I want a POS I can dock at. One office slot, a space-limited set of corporate hangars, a space-limited personal hangar for everyone in the corp, and that's it. I think that alone would make the wormholers happy... and I think the rest of us can wait. It'd be relatively straight-forward to do, I'll bet, and wormholers can leave their existing POSes in place for everything else. Just a little dockable POS that's just as hard to kill as the current ones to start, maybe with the sentry gun code. Wormholers would use it, null-sec players would use it, a few low-sec players here and there would use it, and it would start us down the road to a new way of looking at POSes. And then CCP could build from there for the next few expansions until we can finally delete the current POS code."

My experience with POS's?

I research and invention right now...
I have in the past done moon mining...
I am one of the POS managers right now
When WH's first cam out we tried to live in a Class 1 in ours. What a pain in the ass.

Am I an Expert? No

Do I have experience? Yes

Please CCP make it a priority.
Kantrel
GETCO
#2437 - 2013-01-22 02:21:04 UTC
Count my vote for POS rework.
Besides the Fuel blocks, when was the last time something was done for them?
Marquette Altier
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#2438 - 2013-01-22 02:32:04 UTC
I manage 11 POSes in nullsec, mostly moon miners. Under the current system they are painful to set up, annoying to maintain, and difficult to delegate. I wish CCP would improve them.
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#2439 - 2013-01-22 02:41:56 UTC
Marsan wrote:
As long time software developer I smell revisionist management bullshit. This is not apparent from the CSM notes, and this was no where in your 1st posting. Nor did you or the rest of CCP communicate it to the CSM. So I'm left to ask bullshit or truly inept communication?


As a lifetime software engineer, I apologise for Marsan's bullshit attitude.

Marsan, you catch more flies with honey than vinegar.

Rather than vomiting your bile all over CCP Seagull, why not try expressing what it is that you are actually concerned about: for example maybe you are a current POS user and find that you are hamstrung (or "working with two hands tied behind your back") due to difficulties managing access controls and privileges. Perhaps you are a miner and are continually stymied by the lack of decent refining and storage capacity at a POS, forcing you to be reliant on NPC refineries or the one outpost allowed per system in nullsec.

We are all cynical of CCP Seagull's fluff piece. There is no need to be so belligerent about it.

Sure, label me a "white knight". All I'm trying to suggest is that you will make more progress describing why this sequence of events is troubling you, rather than how much this sequence of events is troubling you.
Bo Kantrel
GETCO
#2440 - 2013-01-22 02:47:53 UTC
Having done research, invention and lived in a WH under the current mechanics, you have to do something, and soon.

After reading Jester's blog (Angry retort to the QOTW ) Well put.

Kirith Kodachi ( Forget POSes, Make POPs ) A good alternative.