These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

POSes: I am a small portion of the community

First post First post
Author
Malagar
Hybonashi Industries - Legacy
#221 - 2013-01-17 09:32:19 UTC
Sedilis wrote:
Outrageous u-turn CCP!

Because of the terrible security on POS we w-space corp are forced to exclude large parts of the player base from our recruitment. When we explained this to Greyscale and Masterplan last March they could see this hits your bottom line.

We don't want the whole company for a whole expansion.

We don't even need a whole new pos system.

WE NEED SECURE SHIP STORAGE.

Please give us access control lists on Ship Maintenance Arrays!


Couldn't agree with Sed more here, don't forget about WH's
Evansec
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#222 - 2013-01-17 09:36:02 UTC
New POS is a Jesus Feature, and it would benefit the whole community. Certainly the "instigators and enablers" you, according to the minutes, want to cater to. Open your god damn eyes, CCP.
Illipsys
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#223 - 2013-01-17 09:36:13 UTC
I've spent pretty much my entire eve career inside wh's and whilst my knowledge of how others interact with POS's outside of this admittedly niche playerbase may be limited, industry & production and the nightmare of role allocation and distribution affects low/null/high and ( most especially ) WH.

If CCP wishes to cast us aside as a small portion of the community, could they perhaps publish some statistics to back up this claim?

How many people interacted with a CHA or SMA per month comparatively with stations etc? I realise it will not be of the scale, b ut i question whether we are as 'small' as they represent us being. as I personally know thousands of people log in every day to traverse the space of wormholes from their POS's, run missions or industry from their POS's in null or stage their forward armada in a great conflict from POS's in null/low. They are an integral part of the game the way YOU have designed it.

You made us promises, it's time to keep them. We've been incredibely patient, but you finally said those magic words and you better by god stick to them :)

Regards,

Apathetic Wormhole Denizem.
Forget Myface
Lazerhawks
L A Z E R H A W K S
#224 - 2013-01-17 09:37:28 UTC
Sedilis wrote:
Outrageous u-turn CCP!

Because of the terrible security on POS we w-space corp are forced to exclude large parts of the player base from our recruitment. When we explained this to Greyscale and Masterplan last March they could see this hits your bottom line.

We don't want the whole company for a whole expansion.

We don't even need a whole new pos system.

WE NEED SECURE SHIP STORAGE.

Please give us access control lists on Ship Maintenance Arrays!


THIS!
Joe Widowmaker
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#225 - 2013-01-17 09:37:54 UTC
I'm starting to wonder if they're just testing the community at this point, trying to rustle our jimmies. Yes we'd like a change to poses, no I don't manage one at the moment (because they're so broken).
Mirrodin
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#226 - 2013-01-17 09:41:07 UTC
I do not post to the forums often, but this is something worth posting for. The POSes need fixed. The only reason I packed up and moved into wormholes in the last year, was that I knew (or thought I knew) that POSes were being redone.

Clearly, I'm a part of just a small group of players. :(
Ludwig Frohlich
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#227 - 2013-01-17 09:42:13 UTC
Two step wrote:
If you want CCP to work on the POS system, either by improving the current one or by starting work on the long awaited Modular POS system, post here.

Borlag Crendraven
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#228 - 2013-01-17 09:43:26 UTC
Yugo Reventlov wrote:
So basically they are saying revamping posses would take the full development effort of one expansion and they can't sell that as an expansion. Okay, I get that. .


They've already passed rebalances and bug fixes as "expansions". Literally anything goes when it comes to CCP it seems.
Connall Tara
State War Academy
Caldari State
#229 - 2013-01-17 09:45:32 UTC
as someone who uses invention to make isk I whole heartedly support twostep on this motion.

Naomi Knight - "You must be CCP Rise alt , that would explain everything"

Khanh'rhh
Sparkle Motion.
#230 - 2013-01-17 09:46:33 UTC
POSes are only used by a minority, because the system is so utterly terrible that only a small amount of people can be **trusted with any access at all** For instance, a WH corp of 50 people might have 5 people with full access, so you see this as 10% of people using them. However, 100% of that corp actually suffer from that terrible system.

It's a barrier to small groups living in lowsec.
It's a barrier to small groups living in nullsec.
It's a barrier to small groups living in WHs
It's a giant pain in the ass for large groups living in nullsec.

CCP, how are you this blind?

"Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual,

Heimdallofasgard
Ministry of Furious Retribution
Fraternity.
#231 - 2013-01-17 09:46:39 UTC
Joe Widowmaker wrote:
I'm starting to wonder if they're just testing the community at this point, trying to rustle our jimmies. Yes we'd like a change to poses, no I don't manage one at the moment (because they're so broken).


It is very strange that CCP would ignore and decide against implementing a feature that 99% of the entire eve community unilaterally support.

For a change, this isn't raging about something being badly implemented... like monocle gate, or unified inventory, or walking in stations, or factionwarfareLPgate, or mining barge buff etc...

This is the community getting together and saying that WE WANT something in our game.
Evelgrivion
State War Academy
Caldari State
#232 - 2013-01-17 09:46:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Evelgrivion
It really burns to have that sense of vindication, after all these years, of an old and long popular idea, be suddenly snatched away on the grounds of dissatisfied starbase users being seen as an insignificant minority in the grand space opera by the man calling the shots.

"Surprise! We're not doing modular starbases in the foreseeable future because the number of people affected is too small. New shiny is more important than making bad features that work into good features that work well."

I am not a happy man.
Ya Huei
Imperial Collective
#233 - 2013-01-17 09:46:53 UTC
This is so very disappointing. W-space has not gotten any love since release. now CCP backs down on the POS revamp we've all been looking forward to since CSM 5 brought it up?

Want me to list some other niche features a large portion of the EVE populace doesn't give no fucks about ?

bollocks.


LF9000
Neurotoxin Control
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
#234 - 2013-01-17 09:49:24 UTC
POS need to be reworked to make WH life less of a hassle. (Read: Not easier, just less convoluted)
psycho freak
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#235 - 2013-01-17 09:50:21 UTC
Pos's only effect a small portion of players?

Damn that weed in iceland must be good

hmm maybe ccp should take a look at they sever and see just how many active pos are ingame in all areas

pos effects ppl from every area and need a major overhall from the managment side as well as things like refine rate that null baers been crying years for


for a group of ppl who made what gota be one of the best online games around they seem a bit clueless at times

my spelling sux brb find phone number for someone who gives a fu*k

nop cant find it

Jev North
Doomheim
#236 - 2013-01-17 09:52:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Jev North
"A small portion of the community."

It might have been a larger portion of the community f the majority of people who end up dealing with POSs wouldn't end up in padded cells afterwards.

Complete redesign of the system into this modular POS thing may in fact be be overreaching, but some kind of revamp is sorely needed. The fuel block change was nice; more of that sort, please.

Even though our love is cruel; even though our stars are crossed.

Z1gy
Vindicator Corporation
#237 - 2013-01-17 09:52:06 UTC
one of the main reason i voted for selene was that about the pos revamp/re iteration . pls CSM push for POS revamp or improvement! the roles system are PITA and for you to do a invention and building stuff you need a bunch of roles and access to corp wallet division and some of the roles are not intuitive.

so either you revamp post or make more slot available in station for copying and invention and manufacturing
Mad Mobius
VICE.
#238 - 2013-01-17 09:54:08 UTC
http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/July_2011_Prioritization_Crowdsourcing

Please pay special attention to Item #75 in the results lists.

Fly Safe o7o7o7o7o7o7
Tas Nok
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#239 - 2013-01-17 09:54:13 UTC
Having had to work with POSes in HS, LS and WH space I confirm they are a pain in the backside and the reason a small percentage of the populace "interacts" with them is two-fold:
A. If we let every scrub recruit have access to the POS tower(s) we'd be robbed blind
B. The interface for managing a POS is so clunky and abnormal NO ONE wants to mess with them, leaving the fewest folks possible to manage the towers that are the industrial/research backbone of Eve and home away from home for WH dwellers. (has anyone at CCP tried to control the mods on a tower lately? it is easily the most dated UI in the game)

The last improvement was the fuel blocks... about 18Mo ago? it was a nice change, but hardly a major change, we just added a mfr. step and got 1 item where we used to have 8, kinda washes out.

Some thoughts... for the CSM, CCP, whoever...
I thought the idea of using the current station egg mechanic was horrible, esp in WH space, but it carries the seed of a really GOOD idea, which should involve minimal coding... create 3 new classes of stations, S/M/L and make them destructible, current stations would be XL and destruction issue left open. all the traits of stations, hangars, personal space, no shield bubble, no guns outside would all be in place (you get a ton of extra HP for the loss of offensive/defensive mods) <-- this needs more fleshing out but its too late to type more.

While a proper full revamp is the desired path, I understand why CCP thinks it would be a maximum effort for minimal gain, I cannot count the number of annoyed corpies who have had to hand over their BPO's to a director for research, or the number of problems caused when setting up a POS in WH space and you forget to restrict access to a certain hangar and all your best PVPer toys are laid out for anyone. The reasons for posting a "keep out" sign on the POS varies from research, to theft to simply being responsible for the logistics of fueling... we have to keep out most of our own folks for our/their own safety.
Fellblade
Old Comrades
#240 - 2013-01-17 09:55:16 UTC
The POS revamp should be something that they are aiming to do for the 'Instigators' and 'Enablers'. One of the first things that people need once they start organizing groups of players to do anything meaningful is start using POSes.

It seems paradoxical that they are saying that they want to do things for the 2000-or-so instigators in the game, but that they don't want to do POSes as the number of people managing them is small - I see a lot of overlap in those two groups.

But all of the above is not even taking into account that the people who currently do POS management is not the group of users that POS changes would affect. POS limitations affect every single player in wormhole space, making it a nightmare to recruit new players, and affect huge numbers of players using POSes in high, low and null to boot.

http://theexcession.blogspot.com - A Wormhole PvP blog.