These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Missions & Complexes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Regarding AFK Complex Farming

First post First post
Author
MisterNick
The Sagan Clan
#401 - 2012-08-10 12:56:51 UTC
Bloody hell, i've never seen such a mass of self-pitying whingers. Whingers who it seems have no facility for rational thought either. You don't have to be a genius to know the difference between afk farming and afk hauling or missioning Roll

Sreegs, you're a more patient man than I o7

"Human beings make life so interesting. Do you know that in a universe so full of wonders, they have managed to invent boredom."

War Kitten
Panda McLegion
#402 - 2012-08-10 13:25:50 UTC
Damion Rayne wrote:
So any word from our resident Team Security guy? All the backlash to this very very poorly handled situation and we've got nothing from anyone other than Sreegs, who has been just as hostile to us as we have been in response to how badly his team is handling this situation. Come on CCP, you are better than this...I know, because I've worked with you guys..


What is there to respond to?

You ninnies got all butthurt about CCP declaring something very specific as off-limits and saying they're going to fix it.

People made slippery slope analogies, read things wrong, or just plain didn't read, and then started posting.

I give credit to CCP Sreegs for bothering to try and answer all you trolls over and over.

tl;dr: CCP makes the rules - its their game. Rules change. Play by them or go find another game.

I don't judge people by their race, religion, color, size, age, gender, or ethnicity. I judge them by their grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, clarity of expression, and logical consistency.

OutCast EG
Very Industrial Corp.
#403 - 2012-08-10 13:31:05 UTC
I have no idea what this "afk running" thing is about" but again, i see that what's right and what's wrong in player's actions is decided on single person's (Sreegs') judgment and good will. Which looks ********.
Give players at least some concrete framework on what they can and cannot do, what's considered bad, what can get you punished, so we're all on the same grounds. I thought this was obvious and logical.

Also, on the second thought, you might want to check your wording, so you don't sound like a pompous douche.
No offence, just tired of Sreegs' ever-patronizing tone towards his company's clients.
Thiama Pacht-Feng
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#404 - 2012-08-10 13:38:03 UTC
Hi So your Updat is indeed awesome, but I think it's not fair that her Trimxere (player name) use the boot found guilty even though this is the case. Pettie to be the Eula Quoted ^ ^ although he has not offered or made ​​geminer marco use so as I said great game but if you people for 14 days beginning no reason to block this is a very nice regressive
Zapson
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#405 - 2012-08-10 13:53:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Zapson
dexington wrote:
Zapson wrote:
The issue, what I think most think is, that "we" are angry, because you will ban "us" for using a mechanic which made it super easy for us to aquire rather large amounts (not really....).


If you find a way to make 30B a months by being afk 24/7 and think everything is perfectly fine, and you could not possibly be breaking any rules, you are pretty ******* stupid... or more likely, you know you are exploiting a bug.

Zapson wrote:
The other issue, what I think many of you have in mind, is that if this gets discussed more openly many people will abuse this to adjust bots to stand under the radar.


Everyone knows that CCP are looking a activity patterns, when detecting bots.



Give me actual numbers, or Sreegs should give out ACTUAL numbers how much they really made.
I know a lot of persons which make insane amounts of money and manipulate the market.
I do not think I broke any rules, because I never did "AFK COSMOS"-whatever. I am just an observer trying to be objective.

And they did not break any clear rules, just because some meta-philosophical interpretation of the EULA or Sreegs says that this is not okey, it did not actually break any rule.
Don't get me wrong. I do not like to see people making money out of nowhere, but they did it on a legitimate basis.
Please tell me you wouldn't did the same thing if you spotted something similiar.
You probably wouldn't have done it 24h but you would have used it for a good amount of time, which is basically "abusing" the same mechanism.
If doing something 24hours is abuse, doing it 8hours is abuse too.
Beating your wife gets not any near more legal if you only did it once a week rather than each day.

The very problem is that CCP Sreegs always comes out and says PLAYERS ABUSED IT, WE WILL PUNISH THIS BEHAVIOUR.
I said it last time, when the Factional Warfrare thing was around.

Please CCP watch your words, people on the internet are sensitive and you should learn to address things in a much nicer way.
"There is problem with COSMOS which opened the possibility to made more money than we intended, we will fix(!) this issue"
and not "investigate it and ban all people".

We have much bigger problems than some few high sec carbears getting a bit too much money.
This is only another addition to the list of problems that the system might be broken, yet unfixed.
And I doubt they will do more about this, rather than simply striking through with bans instead of adjusting the algorithm or altering the gameplay of COSMOS.


http://memegenerator.net/instance/24746559
Danny theDog
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#406 - 2012-08-10 13:56:57 UTC
I agree with Dregol but i would like to just state the fact that CCP sreegs concentrating on those players making ISK afk and not actually playing the game wether it be right or wrong i dont care but allowing cloaky campers to stay cloaked 23/7 is ok? you let ppl cloaky camp a system that stops players actually playing the game like how YOU want US to play the game, and more to the point to the habitants of nullsec systems that players spend hours on gaining /fighting for sov over.

Theres a strategical advantage and more to the fact trolololol advanatge to cloaky campers but still if ther gonna doit atleast make them have to sit at thtere pc's to stay cloaked and stop camping a system 23/7

looking at it as a business you are stopping ppl from playing the game half arsed and yet allowing players stopping lots of other players from actually actively playing the game. <-doesn't make sense

(excuse the spelling im on drugs so it makes it ok...i think)

TROLL SHIELD ACTIVATE!!
daddi0
Brooklyn Tax Dodgers
#407 - 2012-08-10 14:01:18 UTC  |  Edited by: daddi0
Rayford Carpathia wrote:
Suqq, quit insulting people and name calling just because we don't agree with you. You see only what you want to see. You read only what you want to read. Post with your main or just go away. You've already rendered your arguments invalid by your contradictions and insults.



What he said. In some 20+ posts, Suqq, you haven't said anything directly related to the issue at hand, simply flamed other people's comments. Regardless of our opinions, some of us are trying to have a serious discussion about the direction of the game, so eIther get out from behind your 4 month old alt and act responsibly, or quit being a newbie troll and shut-up. To correct your misinformed carping, the Code of Conduct describes how you should BEHAVE, not how you can play, and there is nothing in either it or the EULA that describes or defines BOT-LIKE behavior. That is strictly an artifact of forum discussions like this one.

Contrary to many of the CCP positive/Player negative comments, Much of this discussion is not about whether this behavior is right or wrong, but how CCP is going about it, and what the ramifications of their actions are. AFK is an important fact of life in the game. Hardly anyone, even stupid listless ones, ever do absolutely nothing. Unless you're insanely paranoid or a complete couch potato, very few players sit around and watch while they do 22 jumps through hisec space. I certainly don't. I don't watch my laundry spin, or my chicken roast; I GO DO SOMETHING ELSE. If someone chooses to farm a complex manually because they can do it while at work, or some other reason, the question remains HOW CAN YOU TELL if they are AFK ot not?

The without an answer to this question this kind of decision is indeed a slipperly slope, as this behavoir is very similar to others in the game. The only distinction is some nebulous determination of how much/how fast that has yet to be revealed.

Edited this in:

Chainsaw Plankton wrote:


12/7 does seem to be an reasonable (Hell I'd probably buy 18/7 from some people) amount of time to play. but I will say I think that doing a small number of keystrokes and then not interacting for multiple hours is wrong.


And this is exactly WHY it is a slippery slope. First, the limits cannot be easily determined, and second this is EXACTLY the behavior pattern of PI. A few keystokes, and no interaction for hours (days even); I could remain online, AFK or not, without doing anything else, logout, or go do some other game activity. But in the first case, you cannot tell what I'm doing or what my intentions are.
Thiama Pacht-Feng
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#408 - 2012-08-10 14:05:55 UTC
So what my colleague, he writes, after 14 days As always when he makes Pettie Minert or umlogt or just afk and I know him as the really;)
dexington
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#409 - 2012-08-10 14:06:32 UTC
Zapson wrote:
Give me actual numbers, or Sreegs should give out ACTUAL numbers how much they really made.


Linkage

23 hours a day, 28 days a month is around 29B

I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous.

Zapson
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#410 - 2012-08-10 14:09:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Zapson
dexington wrote:
Zapson wrote:
Give me actual numbers, or Sreegs should give out ACTUAL numbers how much they really made.


Linkage

23 hours a day, 28 days a month is around 29B



...."with a fleet".

The size is not very specific and you can do pretty much the same or more money with a "fleet" of miners in less time.
dexington
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#411 - 2012-08-10 14:15:15 UTC
Zapson wrote:
dexington wrote:
Zapson wrote:
Give me actual numbers, or Sreegs should give out ACTUAL numbers how much they really made.


Linkage

23 hours a day, 28 days a month is around 29B



...."with a fleet".

The size is not very specific and you can do pretty much the same or more money with a "fleet" or miners in less time.


Not while being afk 23 hours a day.

I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous.

Zapson
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#412 - 2012-08-10 14:17:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Zapson
dexington wrote:
Zapson wrote:
dexington wrote:
Zapson wrote:
Give me actual numbers, or Sreegs should give out ACTUAL numbers how much they really made.


Linkage

23 hours a day, 28 days a month is around 29B



...."with a fleet".

The size is not very specific and you can do pretty much the same or more money with a "fleet" or miners in less time.


Not while being afk 23 hours a day.



The funny thing is you don't have to be afk that long to make the same amount of money with a fleet of miners.
Mining is semi-afk you come back every once and again.
If you do the same with COSMOS afking you would say it's legit?
GFL Kalor
Shadow Council
#413 - 2012-08-10 14:17:24 UTC
Damion Rayne wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
CARB0N FIBER wrote:
How do you know I'm AFK?

Are you hacking my web cam?

Is there a time limit on how long I can play?

What is this time limit?

Will this time limit be like other rules, where we don't know what it is till we are banned?


Since playing 23 hours a day is now a bannable offense will we be getting a dicounted rate?

So we pay for 720 hours of game time, in which we can play 690 hours. So how many of the 690 hours of the 720 hours we pay for can we play without getting banned?

Another thing, ALT's. Obviously if you have multiple accounts logged in one is AFK. So should you banned if you have multiple accounts?

I know you saying something like I'm not AFK, I have a screen and keyboard for every account. How do we know that?


This is a very old, old issue.

I have proof of people getting banned and sent a GM message stating they did not detect any botting software but their "too regular and prolonged gameplay" flagged them as bots.

This is why in the past I always asked CCP Sreegs for ways for players to defend and prove their innocence.

This is why I created multiple in game tickets about the same matter and all of them got a "players cannot defend themselves, they will be banned with no ability of recourse" reply.


Which in fact proves that this entire thing is being handled in an entirely incompetent manner. Let's just remember, big brother Sreegs is watching us and if we play for more than a few hours straight and we're not actively pushing buttons, it's best to just log off. Oh and that will eventually go to hauling, mining, salvaging, PI, day-trading, and mission running.



I wonder if this means my "Off Grid Booster" is a bot? Are you going to ban them as well????
Emperor Salazar
Remote Soviet Industries
Insidious Empire
#414 - 2012-08-10 14:19:27 UTC
This is now a thread dedicated to fielding ideas on how to nerf afk cloaking, as it is a serious problem in null sec and it needs to be addressed.
Brokers Clone
#415 - 2012-08-10 14:29:58 UTC


THIS looks like what Skreggs was talking about.

Gotta hand it to him, He really attempted to cloud the issue....MMMyeah

OK, I see this as going a weeee bit too far. And I see CCP deciding to nip it off
however, I still say:

1. Tell the CSM you are gonna make a change to player capabilities Re:COSMOS
2. Fix it
3. No banning needed. Just a footnote, buried in a patch log

(But of course, CCP Skreggs would not get a chance to... ummm... Shine)


(Of course, you have to admit, he WAS pretty cool about replying to all of our Kvetching)
dexington
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#416 - 2012-08-10 14:33:49 UTC
Zapson wrote:
The funny thing is you don't have to be afk that long the make the same amount of money with a fleet of miners.
Mining is semi-afk you come back every once and again.
If you do the same with COSMOS afking you would say it's legit?


You just don't get it, they did not discover a new profession. Someone found a way to afk grind isk, and decided to exploited the best he could, when what he should have done was inform ccp of the problem. I really don't care if people cheat and exploit, i can do **** all about it. It is just ******** to try and make CCP the bad guys for enforcing a rule everyone knows exist, exploit a bug and you risk perma ban. And it was pretty obvious this was not working as intended, why else would it be the only place in the game it was possible.

If you can't see what effect it would have on the economy of eve if everyone did this, then you clearly do not understand eve.

I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous.

Satyra Eventide
The Council
#417 - 2012-08-10 14:39:26 UTC
put like, a 3 hour timer on drones, just like you did with probes?
no, seriously. ban bots and bad people, but if you didn't make the game the way you wanted, then fix it.
Achaiah7
Perkone
Caldari State
#418 - 2012-08-10 14:53:21 UTC
Protip: next time you post something that's going to affect a huge population of EVE be explicit about what you mean. There are all kinds of AFK activities that are OK .... why not state exactly that you're targeting one plex that keeps respawning over and over so people can abuse it. *facepalm*
Zapson
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#419 - 2012-08-10 14:59:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Zapson
dexington wrote:
Zapson wrote:
The funny thing is you don't have to be afk that long the make the same amount of money with a fleet of miners.
Mining is semi-afk you come back every once and again.
If you do the same with COSMOS afking you would say it's legit?


You just don't get it, they did not discover a new profession. Someone found a way to afk grind isk, and decided to exploited the best he could, when what he should have done was inform ccp of the problem. I really don't care if people cheat and exploit, i can do **** all about it. It is just ******** to try and make CCP the bad guys for enforcing a rule everyone knows exist, exploit a bug and you risk perma ban. And it was pretty obvious this was not working as intended, why else would it be the only place in the game it was possible.

If you can't see what effect it would have on the economy of eve if everyone did this, then you clearly do not understand eve.


There are not enough sites to exploit it on a very high level.
Many mining OPS have a larger influence on the market than this, especially since this "exploit" was only done by a few people.

It's hard-limited by the amount of COSMOS sites, with the right rats and bounty.


I am not blind, but the "if everyone does this"-argument is a very bad one, since if really everyone would do this, everyone would get the exact same amount of money out of it.^^
And as I said before, there are hard-limits on doing this.
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
#420 - 2012-08-10 15:10:12 UTC  |  Edited by: War Kitten
For all you "Sreegs is a lone wolf dictator" fans, let me re-quote one of his replies:

CCP Sreegs wrote:
The system is doing precisely what it's supposed to do. The GMs are aware and were a part of this decision. Human people have reviewed each of the instances where this has already occurred. This instance fit within those rules because... IT ISN'T SUPPOSED TO BE HAPPENING IT IS NOT NORMAL AND IT IS EVEN SPELLED OUT IN THE EULA AS NOT ACCEPTABLE.



One person communicating the rules and warnings to you is not one person making the decision.

Get a clue people.

I don't judge people by their race, religion, color, size, age, gender, or ethnicity. I judge them by their grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, clarity of expression, and logical consistency.