These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

New Dev Blog: Alliance Panel at Fanfest 2012: The Conclusion

First post First post
Author
Steamgrind Meatroller
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#141 - 2012-03-28 23:00:28 UTC
Marlona Sky wrote:
Alex thought he was untouchable. He stepped over the line and the proper punishment has been issued. He should be grateful he was not perma-banned. Just keep in mind he is not the victim of anything but his own ego.

Thank you CCP for doing the right thing.


I wish you'd do the right thing now. I think you know what I'm saying. DO THE RIGHT THING.
Oliver Duncan
B0rthole
Spacetime Manifold
#142 - 2012-03-28 23:00:32 UTC
The alliance panel is not governed by the TOS of the Eve Client. You let them drink on stage, you let them get out of hand, and now you kick out Dear Leader for actions that you did nothing to stop. Way to disenfranchise 20% of your most active players. CCCP is at it again.
J3ssica Alba
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#143 - 2012-03-28 23:00:32 UTC
Every action has a consequence. Maybe he should have thought about the 10058 people he represented before putting his foot in his mouth rather than after.

Also, I must say for a group of people dedicated to extracting tears, they are doing a great job of shedding them themselves. Big smile
This is my signature. There are many others like it, but this one is mine.  Without me, my signature is useless. Without my signature, I am useless
Kosh Seere
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#144 - 2012-03-28 23:00:33 UTC
V'raak wrote:
~10058~
Burn Jita

Skill yourself!

Nylith Empyreal
Blood Marauders
#145 - 2012-03-28 23:00:33 UTC
Major Spag wrote:
Nylith Empyreal wrote:
Major Spag wrote:
Avila Cracko wrote:
Good job CCP.
EULA/ToS violations are serious business.
And one lawyer need to know what a contract is.

Mittani is survived this without serious consequence (It could be worse) so be happy and do not attack CCP for the right right (and light) verdict.



Fun Fact: Real Life comments are not reflective of any EULA/TOS agreement. Sorry, but if I say racial slurs in real life, that does not mean I am banned from all of the online games I play.


Fun fact, the fucks ccp give about your what is and is not on the TOS/EULA just left building.


Fun Fact: You need to stop posting before you seriously injure yourself.


This would be the part where we start saying umad, but because we both know this profession I will save you the time and repeated posts. But you are a insignificant number amongst the masses of EVE's entirity. So by all means quit, I bet after the year is over they will have MORE subs.

Who's the more foolish the fool or the fool who replies to him?

DelightSucker
Epeen Moving company
#146 - 2012-03-28 23:00:35 UTC
This is The Mittanis own fault not ccp, blame him for this issue.
Skye Aurorae
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#147 - 2012-03-28 23:00:57 UTC
Subscription cancelled

http://imgur.com/soaxM,HMZgg#1

http://imgur.com/soaxM,HMZgg#0

Skye Aurora is a 7 year old Girl Who Wants to be on the CSM! Unfortunately, the Lawyers say you have to be 21 - oh well.

Midge Mo'yb
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#148 - 2012-03-28 23:01:04 UTC
so does saying vulgar things on mumble now constitute a 30 day ban?
Dirk Action
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#149 - 2012-03-28 23:01:06 UTC
BROTHERS IN ALLAH: MOHAMMED'S GLORIOUS PROPHET the_mittani HAS PLACED A FATWA ON jita. GOD WILLING, WE WILL DIE IN GLORIOUS JIHAD. ALLAHU AKBAR.
School Nickname Worldmonkey
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#150 - 2012-03-28 23:01:10 UTC
MeBiatch wrote:
School Nickname Worldmonkey wrote:
CCP, you literally better give me my assfucking vote back. I'm Irish and can legitimately live with the illusion of democracy where my elected representative makes no decisions, but deposing the people's King of Space goes too far.

I propose that you give all those who voted for Mittani their votes back, which will now become STV votes.



why not every player voted... only 15% of the player base voted remember...

and you voted for a person who broke eula/tos... thats not ccps fault... you voted for a idiot... thats your fault... not mine...

two step is now the logical chioce... and the next person inline who did not get voted in should now be the 14th csm... plain and simple...

your brosefs....

deal wit it!


DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY DEMOCRACY.

This argument literally works IRL, why not try it here.

For a better argument, Riverini, will literally be on the CSM.
db T
Perkone
Caldari State
#151 - 2012-03-28 23:01:13 UTC
Sounds like 10 058 people should have voted for a better candidate.
Andski
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#152 - 2012-03-28 23:01:17 UTC
Li Malak wrote:
Bull-*******-****.

I am schocked and disgusted by CCP's decision to ban The Mittani from serving on CSM 7. The Mittani received over 10,000 votes; more than the next two highest vote-getters COMBINED. To throw him off of the CSM 7 is a travesty. CCP's actions harken back to the days of teh t20 scandle, and the unjust destruction of those who spoke up on the issue. CCP and all CCP employees should feel a deep personal shame over today's actions.

~10,058~


Moaning about this is useless. Unsubscribe and they'll listen.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Koby Botick
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#153 - 2012-03-28 23:01:21 UTC
Does the EULA give refund in case of provider voting fraud?
Sara Sue
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#154 - 2012-03-28 23:01:30 UTC
CCP disregarding the voices of 10058 Players and loosing one of the best csm members all over some drunken ramblings.
CCP really likes to screw over its player base by removing one of their voices from the csm.
Magnus Orin
SUNDERING
Goonswarm Federation
#155 - 2012-03-28 23:01:45 UTC
Jita will burn.
MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#156 - 2012-03-28 23:02:08 UTC  |  Edited by: MeBiatch
Lenrir Andven wrote:
MeBiatch wrote:
School Nickname Worldmonkey wrote:
CCP, you literally better give me my assfucking vote back. I'm Irish and can legitimately live with the illusion of democracy where my elected representative makes no decisions, but deposing the people's King of Space goes too far.

I propose that you give all those who voted for Mittani their votes back, which will now become STV votes.



why not every player voted... only 15% of the player base voted remember...

and you voted for a person who broke eula/tos... thats not ccps fault... you voted for a idiot... thats your fault... not mine...

two step is now the logical chioce... and the next person inline who did not get voted in should now be the 14th csm... plain and simple...

your brosefs....

deal wit it!


Yet that isn't how a electoral system works.

Cripes, can't believe how many pubbies have little to no brain cells to comprehend how an election works.


care the cite the president in internet spaceship democracy that supports a re election clause when a csm breaks eula?

as i remember when akcnabobited broke tos there was no reelection....

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.

Nalha Saldana
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#157 - 2012-03-28 23:02:09 UTC
Reelection if anything!
bestposteringoonfleet
Perkone
Caldari State
#158 - 2012-03-28 23:02:23 UTC
db T wrote:
Sounds like 10 058 people should have voted for a better candidate.


dislike

CCP PLEASE DO NOT BAN ME!!!!!!
Leykan
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#159 - 2012-03-28 23:02:44 UTC
Yuki 0nna wrote:
Slow in coming, but well done.

A strong firewall against further damage if this story has legs.



So apparently ignoring 10,000 votes without recourse is a "firewall"?

:golfclap:
Ni Cho
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#160 - 2012-03-28 23:02:54 UTC
So.

Yea.

Instead of going for a middle of the road approach, CCP decide to go hard to port.