These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Noob Questions: High Sec Miner ganking.

Author
Immortis Vexx
Onyx Moon Industries
#121 - 2012-04-26 23:57:51 UTC
Arkturus McFadden wrote:
Bugsy VanHalen wrote:


So what can CCP do to prevent such an escalation in ganking of the high sec population? Is there anything? Or is it simply up to the players that commit such acts to tone it down?



CCP has already taken steps to tone down the level of ganking. The problem is that the ganking community revolts and rages against this and only goes out and ganks more. I agree with Bugsy completely, griefing is a part of any game, its the internet for gods sake! If we continue to escalate the level of ganking CCP will be FORCED to drop the hammer. THIS CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO HAPPEN!! The minute CCP is forced to make a decision between open sandbox environment and safe high sec is the day that things have gone too far. The ganking community will have no one to blame but themselves. Law enforcement must step up their game to combat new threats.

Our system of law has a very similar progression. You start off with taking small freedoms, and giving up things that no one really cares about. Then in small steps you expand the scope of said law base and before you know it, you have SOPA.

Short answer: If you continue to escalate the level of ganking CCP WILL take action. We have seen this happen in other pvp centric games and the solution is NEVER awesome. Please, please don't force their hand in this.

Vexx
Henry Haphorn
Killer Yankee
#122 - 2012-04-27 00:15:02 UTC
Jacob Staffuer wrote:
Quote:
Cyber Bullying: "Cyberbullying" is when a child, preteen or teen(person) is tormented, threatened, harassed, humiliated, embarrassed or otherwise targeted by another child, preteen or teen using the Internet, interactive and digital technologies or mobile phones. It has to have a minor on both sides, or at least have been instigated by a minor against another minor. Once adults become involved, it is plain and simple cyber-harassment or cyberstalking. Adult cyber-harassment or cyberstalking is NEVER called cyberbullying.


I respect Noir, so it's sad to see such a moron counted amongst their ranks.

Here's the actual, legal definition of "cyberbullying":

Cyberbullying is the use of the Internet and related technologies to harm other people, in a deliberate, repeated, and hostile manner. It involves the use of information and communication technologies to support deliberate, repeated, and hostile behavior.

So people who "shitpoast", repeatedly gank miners, use locator agents, "make it personal", convo, post said convo's on forums, etc... are cyberbullying. Period.

Thx now stop being an idiot; you're making Noir look bad, and they're a respectable group.


That doesn't apply to Eve because the characters we each use to represent ourselves are just fictional characters and are property of CCP Games. Besides, any player that thinks they are being harassed can always go to CCP so that they can ban the griefer for harassment. Either that or they can always make an alt to hide in so that they can live out their typical Eve lives in peace. Eventually the griefers or gankers will get bored of waiting and move on to someone else.

Adapt or Die

Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#123 - 2012-04-27 07:42:59 UTC
Jacob Staffuer wrote:

Pretty much just a bunch of cyber bullies who have found a safe haven because this sort of thing is tolerated in EVE.


I'm sorry that you got killed in a spaceship game that revolves around killing.

It happens because to this day some people still load their Exhumers with faction & officer mods, which gives them a false sense of invincibility.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Lyric Lahnder
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#124 - 2012-04-27 13:29:27 UTC
http://www.stopcyberbullying.org/what_is_cyberbullying_exactly.html

Jacob this where I got the source for my definition just so you know.

I also would like to draw the distinction that you chose to call me stupid. In my initial and following posts I did not take the time to attack any one's character while making my point.

The fact that you called me stupid in a forum... Should I consider that cyber bullying?

I dont think so.

We will have to agree to disagree on the definition of cyberbullying Jacob. I do respect your opinion but as other posters have said, space stuffs and real stuff are too very different things. I think people need to see the difference between convincing your high school class mates that so and so is a whore, and trying to extract tears from a target corp. I have been in a corp that has been hard core griefed in the past and I had to deal with that. It was annoying and even insulting at times.

But guess what? Its the sandbox, and I knew that once I got into It I would have to take my lumps eventually. You take the good with the bad when you play this game. Its what makes eve a dynamic experience.

Bottom line is an attack in game does not constitue a personal attack in real life.

Noir. and Noir Academy are recruiting apply at www.noirmercs.com I Noir Academy: 60 days old must be able to fly at least one tech II frigate. I Noir. Recruits: 4:1 k/d ratio and can fly tech II cruisers.

Jebediah MacAhab Dallocort
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#125 - 2012-04-27 13:52:39 UTC
For the love of DIETY, stop throwing around Cyberbullying when used in a group context; The word doesn't mean squat in a game where, right out of the gate, you're told that the game allows piracy/scams/etc. It only becomes that when they single you out (like if I were to follow a single person around, ganking them everywhere they went). If it's between groups, it's called politics and you move on with your life.

Also, if you're really getting stressed out, press the X button. It's a video game.

How to Improve Quality Assurance at CCP

Professional Programmer, DBA, Game Developer and Systems Analyst

Ispia Jaydrath
Reib Autonomous Industries
#126 - 2012-04-27 14:22:49 UTC
Arkturus McFadden wrote:
I see people in local killing miners quite a bit when I'm traveling through high sec doing my daily tasks. It just seems extremely counterproductive to kill people that help us.


The problem here is that you think miners are people.
Arkturus McFadden
Anukar
#127 - 2012-04-27 20:09:06 UTC
Ispia Jaydrath wrote:
Arkturus McFadden wrote:
I see people in local killing miners quite a bit when I'm traveling through high sec doing my daily tasks. It just seems extremely counterproductive to kill people that help us.


The problem here is that you think miners are people.


Yet another problem I see.. is that you don't see them as people. Sure there are bots, but countless players that mine do it actively alongside other people.
Daemon Ceed
Ice Fire Warriors
#128 - 2012-04-28 00:03:35 UTC
Arkturus McFadden wrote:
Ispia Jaydrath wrote:
Arkturus McFadden wrote:
I see people in local killing miners quite a bit when I'm traveling through high sec doing my daily tasks. It just seems extremely counterproductive to kill people that help us.


The problem here is that you think miners are people.


Yet another problem I see.. is that you don't see them as people. Sure there are bots, but countless players that mine do it actively alongside other people.


There is no problem here. They aren't people. They are like Gingers. Mindless, soulless, flesh that shoot high powered lasers at defenseless rocks. Think about the environment, you bastard!
Arkturus McFadden
Anukar
#129 - 2012-04-28 00:20:49 UTC
lol, good post there. Smile
Ispia Jaydrath
Reib Autonomous Industries
#130 - 2012-04-28 01:15:50 UTC
Arkturus McFadden wrote:
Ispia Jaydrath wrote:
Arkturus McFadden wrote:
I see people in local killing miners quite a bit when I'm traveling through high sec doing my daily tasks. It just seems extremely counterproductive to kill people that help us.


The problem here is that you think miners are people.


Yet another problem I see.. is that you don't see them as people. Sure there are bots, but countless players that mine do it actively alongside other people.


I wasn't talking about the bots.

Miners are like medieval serfs. They may be the basis of the economy, but they get no respect, barely make enough money to live, and sometimes the upper classes kill them just because it's fun.

The difference is that serfs were born to it. Miners choose to be that way.
Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#131 - 2012-04-28 12:53:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Katran Luftschreck
Arkturus McFadden wrote:
Where did this originate from?


A bunch of ubervirgins got banned from 4CHAN for being too socially repulsive, so they all migrated over to EvE and formed their own alliance of greatly overrated, obnoxious, narcissistic, stupid, worthless, arrogant, rotund malcontents.


Henry Haphorn wrote:
This is what Adam Smith, the father of modern economics and author of the book "The Wealth of Nations", once referred to as the "invisible hand" theory of free market economics that has been witnessed several times already in real life. What the theory states is that the self-interests of those in a free market economy will ensure that the market will stabilize itself over time. The balance will not come quick, but it will be balanced eventually.


A very interesting theory, and a sound one if but for one fatal flaw - it assumes that people, including and most especially the gankers, have more brains than Mother Nature gave to a jellyfish.

I think we both know better.

Sure, there may indeed be some portion of the ganker demographic that runs their own mining/industry alts, and are doing what they do simply to leverage themselves into an economically advantageous position by eliminating the competition. This is a valid strategy, and in a sense I can respect that. It's just good business.

Then there is the demographic of pew-pew basement dwellers who got picked on in high school for being too fat/acne ridden/smelly/short/whatever who now find their only two pleasures in life comes from 1) Feeling like Real Big Men from ganking people who can't even shoot back and 2) Furry "erotic art." They don't care about the economy, they don't care about supply and demand, nor do they care about anything except finally having found an alternate reality where they get to be the schoolyard bully instead.

Care to guess the ratio between the two?

And it is no surprise that older players with millions of skill points invested in their combat skills feel that it's "just not fair" that they can't go waltzing into 1.0 max security space and blow up newbies with complete impunity. "Where is my sandbox?" they cry. It is hilarious the arguments that these people will make, all in the name of "balance," to slant game mechanics entirely in their own favor.

Meanwhile...

It's like this, people: There are already lots of places on the map where you can go pew-pew each other to your Twinkie filled heart's content. It's called low-sec. If that's not good enough for you then there is null-sec. If that isn't good enough for you, there is wormhole space. Take a look at the map and count the number of blue & green dots compared to the number of orange and red dots. You already own more than 75% of the entire galaxy to be your own personal PvP playground.

But oh no, that's not good enough, you want hi-sec too! Why? Oh don't bother, we already know why. The other PvPers out there in the red zones are simply too much for you. You can't hack in the real PvP world so you want to head over into hi-sec and thump on some newbies and unarmed mining ships to help your flaccid e-peen to feel big again. And when we tell you to get lost you cry "Carebare." Sorry, but the real carebare is obvious: Yourselves. You want CCP to make it easier for you. You don't want the real fight out in hard-core death space where all the real monsters of PvP live. You want nice, safe, easy PvP against people you know that you can beat... the kind of people who stay in hi-sec specifically to avoid exactly these kinds of nitwits.

Yes, hi-sec "carebares" don't want to get PvPed against their will, especially when flying unarmed ships. That's why they're in hi-sec and not in low/null-sec. This is the choice they make. But it's not the choice you want, because then you can't go clubbing seals to get your chest-thumping horah on. Instead you might have to (gasp!) actually go into those dangerous places yourself and get mauled by your own kind. Fair fight? A real challenge? Noooooo, CCP protect us! We can't fight real opponents, take away hi-sec so we can go beat up on people who can't fight back! Waaaah! No, no, these aren't tears, they're welts of testosterone pouring from my eyes because I'm such a He-Man! What, CCP is going to start arming mining ships?! I'm unsubbing!

Why CCP would cater to people like this is beyond me, because their only purpose is to drive away their other customers. With that in mind, they'd be better off putting up a solid wall of CONCORD between hi-sec and null-sec. Then the miners won't be complaining about gankers and the gankers could actually learn how to do real PvP for a change. It's just good business sense, and I can respect that.

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

Hench Tenet
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#132 - 2012-04-29 03:39:42 UTC
Arkturus McFadden wrote:
I just find it hard to believe thats the only real answer to all of this..

I don't know, I want to get into PVP in EVE.. but killing those that make it possible for me to afford ships just seems extremely illogical and game breaking..

I mean, by all means kill the bots.. but active players that like mining?

More replies would be great, maybe from actual gankers? I really want to understand why this is done.


I am not a suicide ganker by any means, but I have ganked a lot of miners. It's not my forte, however. Anyway, your assertion that miners make ships available isn't true; most T2 ships are comprised mostly of moon materials and high-end minerals. If mining becomes rare in highsec and it affects prices, market wizardry means that more mining will be done in nullsec.

Which, coincidentally, was one of the main motivations for small gang PvP, mining in nullsec (and the defence of)
Eryn Velasquez
#133 - 2012-04-29 06:39:57 UTC
Hench Tenet wrote:

I am not a suicide ganker by any means, but I have ganked a lot of miners. It's not my forte, however. Anyway, your assertion that miners make ships available isn't true; most T2 ships are comprised mostly of moon materials and high-end minerals. If mining becomes rare in highsec and it affects prices, market wizardry means that more mining will be done in nullsec.


So the gankers are all little pets of those, which try to monopolize these materials, espacially moon-goo?

_“A man's freedom consists in his being able to do whatever he wills, but that he should not, by any human power, be forced to do what is against his will.” ― Jean-Jacques Rousseau _