These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Noob Questions: High Sec Miner ganking.

Author
Barbara Nichole
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#101 - 2012-04-24 19:22:53 UTC
Vaal Erit wrote:
Miners became targets for a number of reasons:
because ganking high isk cargo haulers is tough work, requires a bunch of people and knowledge of how much every item in eve costs
because miners are either bots or afk 95% of the time allowing you to setup very easily
T2 salvage, faction shield boosters and named mining upgrades means it can be profitable
They don't tank their ship at all.



False... you don't have to have indepth knowledge of every item.. a general knowledge suffices.
False... This is the often quoted mythology. the truer figures are closer to 35% for AFK mining in high sec. and botting is actually rarer than many think. The easy setup is a product of your next item and the fact that mining is a static, labor intensive passtime.
True... this can be true.. though fewer people have faction fits for high sec mining with out what they feel is a decent tank, T2 fittings are common .. of course, the hulk is an overpriced T2 ship.
True and False... this depends on where they are mining - the sec and how busy the system is, and how green they are. Saying that they never tank their ships is false. some even fleet boost as well as tank.

High sec miner ganking is a product of bordom.. and a little of the bully theory above. Who in their right mind would point to the love of carebear tears as non-bullying proof.. ? Isn't this exactly what school yard bullys are after?... oh that and the possible slight monetary or culinary compensation.

It's part of the game ... most learn to deal with it or unsub..

  - remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not  "afk" cloaking -

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG]

kiki mo
Suddenly Ninjas
Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
#102 - 2012-04-24 19:27:15 UTC
well said Malcanis.

I'd also add to your law in your signature something from RL

any promises or stated desires of politicians to 'save' the people or to protect them from something or somebody, by needing to pass new laws; is usually done to benefit the politicians themselves.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#103 - 2012-04-24 19:31:35 UTC
kiki mo wrote:
well said Malcanis.

I'd also add to your law in your signature something from RL

any promises or stated desires of politicians to 'save' the people or to protect them from something or somebody, by needing to pass new laws; is usually done to benefit the politicians themselves.


Indeed, or those paying the politicians.

Malcanis' law was originally inspired by the "won't somebody please think of the children" hysteria that falred up a few years ago, and still rumbles on, when any attempt to further reduce our civil liberties or privacy or access to information was justified as "protecting children from abusers/fighting child pornography". The nouns change; the principle is the same: an attempt to stampede the cattle into something they'll regret before they can work out what's actually happening.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Lyric Lahnder
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#104 - 2012-04-24 20:11:59 UTC
Cyber Bullying: "Cyberbullying" is when a child, preteen or teen(person) is tormented, threatened, harassed, humiliated, embarrassed or otherwise targeted by another child, preteen or teen using the Internet, interactive and digital technologies or mobile phones. It has to have a minor on both sides, or at least have been instigated by a minor against another minor. Once adults become involved, it is plain and simple cyber-harassment or cyberstalking. Adult cyber-harassment or cyberstalking is NEVER called cyberbullying.

So thats out of the way lets move on to cyber harassment or cyberstalking.

I dont know your real name hopefully you dont know mine.

Situation 1:
Ganking a miner is only determined by its tank, and your dps nothing else. Its like moving a piece in a game of checkers.
So I blow up your minning barge, and we go at it in local. Even if I post the chat logs on a forum, I still dont know your name and you dont know mine. Every one is anonymous.

Situation 2:
I post a naked picture of your mother in local, says she's a whore, and then I D you as who you are in real life in local.
THAT^ Is cyber harassment using the aforementioned definition. In that situation I didn't even have to undock to instigate, and If im not mistaken its a bannable offense if it pans out that really was a naked picture of your mum, and that really was your name.

Cyber bullying was a label applied by the gaming media after the mittani gate scandal to generate interest in there news sites. It cheapens the true definition of cyberbullying and the harm it can do, and besmirches our good name as a gaming community. Seriously If you want to back hello kitty online in hi sec thats great, but dont use this ill appropriated term to try and get your way, it wont work and it makes every one that plays eve, not just miners and gankers look bad.

Ganking miners in hi sec is not bullying of any kind in reality. If you never respond you both loose a ship and they get no tears.

Noir. and Noir Academy are recruiting apply at www.noirmercs.com I Noir Academy: 60 days old must be able to fly at least one tech II frigate. I Noir. Recruits: 4:1 k/d ratio and can fly tech II cruisers.

Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
#105 - 2012-04-24 21:15:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Bugsy VanHalen
Arkturus McFadden wrote:
Hey folks, just a quick question about the origins of this popular "trend" of sort


Where did this originate from? Did it begin with killing mining bots and eventually spiraled down to killing any and all (if the opportunity arose) miners in high se

Also, why is this done? for amusement? From what I understand of EVE, don't miners make mineral prices go down? Which then leads to more PVP because we all can get ship

Thanks for the replies.

Basically they are players who want to be PVPers but every time they go looking for PVP they get their butts kicked. So rather than putting the effort into learning to be competitive they go kill players they know they can not loose against, namely miners and haulers. then to make them selves feel better about totally failing at PVP they act all macho and say they do it for the tiers.

Really there is no point to it. It takes no skill, you can not learn to PVP by killing players who can not shoot back, and there is rarely any reward in it. But some asshats just don't get it. For some reason it makes them feel l33t when they kill carebears. How is killing a defenseless carebear something to be proud of? It is like the difference between shooting an animal in a cage or actually going out and hunting where the animal actually has a chance at survival. The ganker would have you believe that shooting the animal in the cage is the same as shooting an animal in the wild, after all they are still shooting the same animal. They seem to miss the fact that the point of hunting that makes it fun is the challenge of the hunt not just the act of pulling the trigger.
Severe Pain
Paladin Order
#106 - 2012-04-25 05:10:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Severe Pain
Bugsy VanHale wrote:


Basically they are players who want to be PVPers but every time they go looking for PVP they get their butts kicked. So rather than putting the effort into learning to be competitive they go kill players they know they can not loose against, namely miners and haulers. then to make them selves feel better about totally failing at PVP they act all macho and say they do it for the tiers

Really there is no point to it. It takes no skill, you can not learn to PVP by killing players who can not shoot back, and there is rarely any reward in it. But some asshats just don't get it. For some reason it makes them feel l33t when they kill carebears. How is killing a defenseless carebear something to be proud of? It is like the difference between shooting an animal in a cage or actually going out and hunting where the animal actually has a chance at survival. The ganker would have you believe that shooting the animal in the cage is the same as shooting an animal in the wild, after all they are still shooting the same animal. They seem to miss the fact that the point of hunting that makes it fun is the challenge of the hunt not just the act of pulling the trigger.


Interesting point of view. Im sure that you know alot of gankers and their habbits so your statement must be 100% true? My point of view is abit different, because I kinda know few of these miner-gankers and I know their backgrounds in EVE. All of the guys who I know have played EVE for years and years. They have been PVPing in different forms almost from day one. They know their s*it and don't feel a need to prove their skills. They do it for fun.

Iam sure that you can find less challenging and more boring ways to PVP than ganking.

Animals usually don't have a choice. Miners in other hand have alot of choices but they choose to let them unused.
Buck Futz
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#107 - 2012-04-25 12:51:00 UTC
Severe Pain wrote:

Interesting point of view. Im sure that you know alot of gankers and their habbits so your statement must be 100% true? My point of view is abit different, because I kinda know few of these miner-gankers and I know their backgrounds in EVE. All of the guys who I know have played EVE for years and years. They have been PVPing in different forms almost from day one. They know their s*it and don't feel a need to prove their skills. They do it for fun.

Iam sure that you can find less challenging and more boring ways to PVP than ganking.

Animals usually don't have a choice. Miners in other hand have alot of choices but they choose to let them unused.


Just want to say I'm a big fan of your work. Keep it up!
Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
#108 - 2012-04-25 13:51:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Bugsy VanHalen
Severe Pain wrote:
Bugsy VanHalen wrote:


Basically they are players who want to be PVPers but every time they go looking for PVP they get their butts kicked. So rather than putting the effort into learning to be competitive they go kill players they know they can not loose against, namely miners and haulers. then to make them selves feel better about totally failing at PVP they act all macho and say they do it for the tiers

Really there is no point to it. It takes no skill, you can not learn to PVP by killing players who can not shoot back, and there is rarely any reward in it. But some asshats just don't get it. For some reason it makes them feel l33t when they kill carebears. How is killing a defenseless carebear something to be proud of? It is like the difference between shooting an animal in a cage or actually going out and hunting where the animal actually has a chance at survival. The ganker would have you believe that shooting the animal in the cage is the same as shooting an animal in the wild, after all they are still shooting the same animal. They seem to miss the fact that the point of hunting that makes it fun is the challenge of the hunt not just the act of pulling the trigger.


Interesting point of view. Im sure that you know alot of gankers and their habbits so your statement must be 100% true? My point of view is abit different, because I kinda know few of these miner-gankers and I know their backgrounds in EVE. All of the guys who I know have played EVE for years and years. They have been PVPing in different forms almost from day one. They know their s*it and don't feel a need to prove their skills. They do it for fun.

Iam sure that you can find less challenging and more boring ways to PVP than ganking.

Animals usually don't have a choice. Miners in other hand have alot of choices but they choose to let them unused.


I have nothing against actual PVPers who occasionally go out ganking. Ganking keeps my profits up by weeding out the less adept miners. My beef is with the gankers who have no PVP skills and the only way they get kills is by ganking. Ganking does not make you a PVPer. This does not mean that all players who participate in ganking are gankers, i.e. fail PVPers, but the ones that can not get kills outside of ganking are not PVPers but just common gankers.

I guess if you do not understand what my view of what constitutes a ganker is, than you may have difficulty understanding my point of view. It was not the PVPers who occasionally gank that I was speaking of, but the players who think ganking is the same as PVP. The only less callenging more boring form of PVP I can think of is blobbing which I also hate. But the gankers I speak of would also be afraid of blobbing as there is still a chance they could die if they got primaried, also blobbing is not a form of grieving while ganking although not always grieving, can be, and often is, used for grieving.
Severe Pain
Paladin Order
#109 - 2012-04-25 14:50:31 UTC
Bugsy VanHalen wrote:

I have nothing against actual PVPers who occasionally go out ganking. Ganking keeps my profits up by weeding out the less adept miners. My beef is with the gankers who have no PVP skills and the only way they get kills is by ganking. Ganking does not make you a PVPer. This does not mean that all players who participate in ganking are gankers, i.e. fail PVPers, but the ones that can not get kills outside of ganking are not PVPers but just common gankers.

I guess if you do not understand what my view of what constitutes a ganker is, than you may have difficulty understanding my point of view. It was not the PVPers who occasionally gank that I was speaking of, but the players who think ganking is the same as PVP. The only less callenging more boring form of PVP I can think of is blobbing which I also hate. But the gankers I speak of would also be afraid of blobbing as there is still a chance they could die if they got primaried, also blobbing is not a form of grieving while ganking although not always grieving, can be, and often is, used for grieving.



I don't know if someone already has written the "code of PVP" book where the "real PVPer" concept has been explained thoroughly with rules and settings, but PVP to me is Player VS. Player. And because of that, I would call ganking as one part of PVPing family :) It might not be most ethnic or honorable way to do it, but it is still part of the family.

Seems like we just know abit different stereotypes of the gankers and have different point of views about them. Nothing wrong with that of course.

I have got ganked twice in last 7 years. Can't say that I was totally happy about it, but can't blame the gankers for it either :) With current set of rules of EVE, you will always take a risk of losing ship when you undock from the station. Everyone should accept this fact, if they want to keep playing playing this game and enjoy it.
Lyric Lahnder
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#110 - 2012-04-25 15:10:20 UTC
Bugsy, I think the Idea that people who cant pvp gank, is an overgenarlization that stems from the idea that if I dont harm you in eve and you harm me for no reason you must be bad.

There are no moral's in eve. Most of the people who gank Ill bet do it for the kicks and because they think its funny not that they cant or wouldn't get fun from shooting some one who can shoot back, just like people who would **** around on Battlefield 3 with C4 and team kill. They get the same kicks from warping into a belt and out of the blue wasting a miner.

The problem with this idea is that even if your idea is true it says if your not an accomplished pvper you shouldnt gank, and also if you are you shouldnt gank because your out killing other pvper's. This essentially means no one should have a reason to gank miners. Im saying they dont need to have a reason to do it or a reason not to do something else instead of ganking.

A person isn't wrong because they ganked you or someone else. Its like you said, you know how to avoid it. Others shouldn't post tears they should live and learn. Getting ganked once should make a miner stronger on knowing how to avoid it next time.

"Pain with out tuition is wasted."

Noir. and Noir Academy are recruiting apply at www.noirmercs.com I Noir Academy: 60 days old must be able to fly at least one tech II frigate. I Noir. Recruits: 4:1 k/d ratio and can fly tech II cruisers.

Henry Haphorn
Killer Yankee
#111 - 2012-04-25 15:44:50 UTC
Dear OP

You are thinking that the increase in mineral prices is a bad thing. It's not, at least for the people who mine for those minerals who later sell them and at least to a certain level.

The overabundance of minerals in the market is what undermined the profit potential of being a miner because lower mineral prices meant you had to mine more to earn the same amount of ISK. Rumor has it that tritanium use to sell for nearly 10 ISK/unit back in 2004 or 2005. The price dropped later on to a miserable 3 ISK/unit and it finally back up to at least 5 ISK/unit as of today.

Because of the drop in price, there was the loss in profit potential for miners. When mining couldn't bring you much ISK as it use to you, you would no doubt be tempted to do missions instead. Bot users who operated 23/7 and the introduction of drone alloys and meta0 drops from NPC wrecks ruined the mining profession as mission runners and drone farmers would harvest minerals from the NPC ships they destroyed.

Even if minerals were to rise up out of control to let's say 500 ISK/unit for tritanium (just throwing out a number) it will only be temporary and will settle down as players from other professions stop what they were doing and begin helping the miners meet the demand.

This is what Adam Smith, the father of modern economics and author of the book "The Wealth of Nations", once referred to as the "invisible hand" theory of free market economics that has been witnessed several times already in real life. What the theory states is that the self-interests of those in a free market economy will ensure that the market will stabilize itself over time. The balance will not come quick, but it will be balanced eventually.

Eve Online's economy is based on the free market model of Early America when federal regulations were extremely limited in terms of commerce. Therefore, the Adam Smith's theory would apply here.

This is also one more reason why gankers do what they do. They want the prices to go up. After all, an unknown number of them are industrialists as well who mine for a living and want prices to go up some more.

Adapt or Die

Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
#112 - 2012-04-25 16:07:34 UTC
Its seems I am still not being clear on my position

I do not have a problem with ganking in general. There is and should be a certain amount of risk every time you undock your ship

My issue with gankers, in the context I described above is not so much the actual act of ganking but the impact excessive ganking, to the point of greiving has on MMO's. For example a level 80 character camping a pivotal quest point or spawn point repeatedly killing a character 20 or more levels below them until they log off, out of frustration.

This type of behavior ruins the enjoyment of the game for so many players that they start leaving the game. As the population drops the gankers have a harder and harder time finding targets and genereally become more and more agressive. Then they go on the forum crying about lack of PVP content when it is there own fault there is nobody left to kill. I have seen this happen in almost every other MMO I have played

In EVE this involves killing new players and carebears repeatedly until they quit. This is grieving. This is not good for the game as a whole, and eventually results in the games population decline and eventual death

Any MMO that can not sustain an influx of new players at least equal to the egress of players leaving, will experience population decline. Population decline is death for an MMO. The more the population declines the more noticeable it gets. The more noticeable it gets the more players leave, the more players leave the faster that decline becomes. It becomes a vicious cycle as an MMO without a decent population is not fun to play. far to many games have died within their first couple years due to this

The high death penalty in EVE combined with the fact that the longer you play gaining higher SP and more valuable equipment the more expensive that death penalty becomes is one of the main diferences in EVE. I believe this is the most important factor that has sustained EVE for almost 10 years. In my opinion the level of ganking currently experienced in EVE is well within acceptable limits, and is actually healthy for the game. But I also know from experience that if the ganking gets out of hand it could ruin the game

The removal of insurance payouts for those killed by CONCORD was a good move even though it's impact was slightly softened by the addition of the tier 3 BC's that can use large guns. No more insurrance but cheaper ships with the same BS level alfa. Like I said, in my opinion the ganking in EVE currently is at an acceptable healthy level, but if ganking was made easier it could quickly reach a level that could be harmful to the game

The recent and coming changes with regard to CONCORD responses to illegal activity in high sec should help keep this under control. However I have lost count of the number of threads I have read recently either asking for reduced penalties for ganking, or content to be added to force carebears into low sec. I believe such things could lead to an increase in ganking to a point where it becomes detrimental to the game. A resonable level of ganking is a healthy needed element of the game, but excessive ganking can quickly contribute to its downfall.
Arkturus McFadden
Anukar
#113 - 2012-04-25 17:50:20 UTC
Bugsy VanHalen wrote:


So what can CCP do to prevent such an escalation in ganking of the high sec population? Is there anything? Or is it simply up to the players that commit such acts to tone it down?
Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
#114 - 2012-04-25 17:58:25 UTC
Arkturus McFadden wrote:
Bugsy VanHalen wrote:


So what can CCP do to prevent such an escalation in ganking of the high sec population? Is there anything? Or is it simply up to the players that commit such acts to tone it down?


I think CCP has taken steps to ensure there is minimal returns and maximum costs involved in the typical ganking. However not to the point of removing it from game. As I said in my last post I believe some ganking is actually healthy for an MMO. I just fear it getting out of hand. In my opinion CCP is doing a good job in this respect. Ganking still happens, but not in a game breaking volume as many other PVP oriented MMO's have experienced before their decline and death.
Jacob Staffuer
Doomheim
#115 - 2012-04-26 18:29:07 UTC
No matter how old, well established, professional, or respected a griefer may be in real life...

No matter what twisted, convoluted, illogical justifications they come up with...

Deep down inside the core of every griefer...

Is this.
Jacob Staffuer
Doomheim
#116 - 2012-04-26 18:34:16 UTC
Quote:
Cyber Bullying: "Cyberbullying" is when a child, preteen or teen(person) is tormented, threatened, harassed, humiliated, embarrassed or otherwise targeted by another child, preteen or teen using the Internet, interactive and digital technologies or mobile phones. It has to have a minor on both sides, or at least have been instigated by a minor against another minor. Once adults become involved, it is plain and simple cyber-harassment or cyberstalking. Adult cyber-harassment or cyberstalking is NEVER called cyberbullying.


I respect Noir, so it's sad to see such a moron counted amongst their ranks.

Here's the actual, legal definition of "cyberbullying":

Cyberbullying is the use of the Internet and related technologies to harm other people, in a deliberate, repeated, and hostile manner. It involves the use of information and communication technologies to support deliberate, repeated, and hostile behavior.

So people who "shitpoast", repeatedly gank miners, use locator agents, "make it personal", convo, post said convo's on forums, etc... are cyberbullying. Period.

Thx now stop being an idiot; you're making Noir look bad, and they're a respectable group.
Buck Futz
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#117 - 2012-04-26 20:23:07 UTC
Jacob Staffuer wrote:
Quote:
Cyber Bullying: "Cyberbullying" is when a child, preteen or teen(person) is tormented, threatened, harassed, humiliated, embarrassed or otherwise targeted by another child, preteen or teen using the Internet, interactive and digital technologies or mobile phones. It has to have a minor on both sides, or at least have been instigated by a minor against another minor. Once adults become involved, it is plain and simple cyber-harassment or cyberstalking. Adult cyber-harassment or cyberstalking is NEVER called cyberbullying.


I respect Noir, so it's sad to see such a moron counted amongst their ranks.

Here's the actual, legal definition of "cyberbullying":

Cyberbullying is the use of the Internet and related technologies to harm other people, in a deliberate, repeated, and hostile manner. It involves the use of information and communication technologies to support deliberate, repeated, and hostile behavior.

So people who "shitpoast", repeatedly gank miners, use locator agents, "make it personal", convo, post said convo's on forums, etc... are cyberbullying. Period.

Thx now stop being an idiot; you're making Noir look bad, and they're a respectable group.


Threats of violence against a person, living on 23 Elm Street, Apache Junction, AZ. "cyberbulling"

Threats or acts of Violence against a person's anonymous space pixels or 'in game char' = EVE.

Don't try to conflate the two - it only makes you look stupid(er).
Eryn Velasquez
#118 - 2012-04-26 20:47:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Eryn Velasquez
Buck Futz wrote:

Threats of violence against a person, living on 23 Elm Street, Apache Junction, AZ. "cyberbulling"

Threats or acts of Violence against a person's anonymous space pixels or 'in game char' = EVE.

Don't try to conflate the two - it only makes you look stupid(er).


Don't think that this simple schizophrenic view is the right way to look at this. Because behind the ingame avatar there is a real person, who invested time, effort and money.
Of course this is a game, and one can loose, and also win sometimes. But if one is constantly harrassed by the same guy or group, possibly with the goal to drive this person out of the game - that for me is clearly bullying and/or griefing.

_“A man's freedom consists in his being able to do whatever he wills, but that he should not, by any human power, be forced to do what is against his will.” ― Jean-Jacques Rousseau _

Zemst
DARK ROOM
#119 - 2012-04-26 22:36:35 UTC
hey folks!

as many guys said before, the sandbox-system makes it free for everyone to do whatever he/she likes.

i think most players who do suicide ganking really give a crap about the other players they kill. if the victim is filling the local chat with foul language, calling his killer the full repertoire of nasty words, the ganker will be highly amused (maybe he will quote the "best of" in his bio). so every victim which is posting strong language against the aggressor encourages the outlaws even more.

furthermore, as long as suicide ganking is as easy and cheap as it is now, there will always be players doing it ... for fun ... to fight boredom ... to show off with a fat counter on the killboard ... or for the emo-rage-comments mentioned before.
killing a 300M hulk with cargo-rigs and MLUs with a decent fitted destroyer, lets say for 10 to 15M is an easy job an can bring some profit if you have a proper loot and salvage. if the miner fits some tech 2 rigs or even faction stuff on his hulk he will get his ship killed for sure, just to be a trophy on the killboard or for the chance to collect some faction hardners or something like that.

i don't think that there will be any game changes according to that in the near future, because the "emo-rage-quitting-carebears" are surely fewer than the gankbears (funny new word, me likey) who leave the game because of boredom or the lack of miner tears
Corina Jarr
en Welle Shipping Inc.
#120 - 2012-04-26 23:28:06 UTC
Why do I gank?

I like explosions. Sometimes it is nice to lose a ship once in a while while making those explosions. However whenever I fly into low sec with a cheap ship, people don't engage (maybe I haven't found the right low yet, suggestions would be nice).

I also like to see what the heaviest thing I can gank solo for the least amount of isk.

Oh and the third reason, though this isn't necessary, is I like to kill bots.


Now if you check a KB you'll find I am very bad at this. But its fun none the less.



Do I worry that the other person will feel bad? Not really. If they don't like getting blown up, there are measures that can be taken that will make it nearly impossible to be ganked. And if they think they should be able to mine in peace afk, they should find another game. Or keep doing what they are doing... but stop whining about it.