These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why does everyone hate the Drake?

Author
Mfume Apocal
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#41 - 2012-04-21 01:56:00 UTC
Lili Lu wrote:
Evidence: http://eve-kill.net/?a=top20 Look at the ships used on kills. Drake 273k, next ship Maelstrom 92k. That is a 3 to 1 ratio between the top ship and the 2nd most used ship. This ridiculous ratio has been there about every month for the last 2 or 3 years.


This is a pet peeve of mine: it is the highest because the CFC uses them extensively. The Maelstrom is #2 because the CFC uses them less than Drakes. If the CFC decided tomorrow to fly Laser Feroxes, they'd fly right up the EVE-Kill Top 20 rankings in short order.
Grimpak
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#42 - 2012-04-21 02:56:15 UTC
people hate drakes because of DRAEK.

[img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]

[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right

Lili Lu
#43 - 2012-04-21 03:04:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Lili Lu
Mfume Apocal wrote:
Lili Lu wrote:
Evidence: http://eve-kill.net/?a=top20 Look at the ships used on kills. Drake 273k, next ship Maelstrom 92k. That is a 3 to 1 ratio between the top ship and the 2nd most used ship. This ridiculous ratio has been there about every month for the last 2 or 3 years.


This is a pet peeve of mine: it is the highest because the CFC uses them extensively. The Maelstrom is #2 because the CFC uses them less than Drakes. If the CFC decided tomorrow to fly Laser Feroxes, they'd fly right up the EVE-Kill Top 20 rankings in short order.

No, it's not just the CFC use of Drakes. This pattern has been steady for years now, maybe not as pronbounced as 3 to 1 but drakes have remained top used over that time.

It's not just the recent CFC adoption of the drake over Maels as their main BSBlink. Evoke uses drakes. -A-/Stainwagon used drakes. ****, you guys are straying from the Moonin and using drakes and tengus now aren't you? Everyone has used drakes heavily.
Kalli Brixzat
#44 - 2012-04-21 05:01:57 UTC
Mfume Apocal wrote:
Lili Lu wrote:
Evidence: http://eve-kill.net/?a=top20 Look at the ships used on kills. Drake 273k, next ship Maelstrom 92k. That is a 3 to 1 ratio between the top ship and the 2nd most used ship. This ridiculous ratio has been there about every month for the last 2 or 3 years.


This is a pet peeve of mine: it is the highest because the CFC uses them extensively. The Maelstrom is #2 because the CFC uses them less than Drakes. If the CFC decided tomorrow to fly Laser Feroxes, they'd fly right up the EVE-Kill Top 20 rankings in short order.


I'm sure that plays into it, but it's not THE reason.

The real reason is because the Drake is probably the best bang for the buck in the game. Best combination of firepower, survivability and versatility for the cost. It is that by a country mile.

Corp FC's like Drakes because the cost of loss is low with solid performance.
Mfume Apocal
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#45 - 2012-04-21 06:49:55 UTC
Lili Lu wrote:
No, it's not just the CFC use of Drakes. This pattern has been steady for years now, maybe not as pronbounced as 3 to 1 but drakes have remained top used over that time.


When the CFC used only Maelstroms, Maelstroms were #1, with Abaddons (flown by their enemy) being #2 and once they adopted Welpcanes, Canes flipped between the 2 and 3 spots.

Quote:
It's not just the recent CFC adoption of the drake over Maels as their main BSBlink. Evoke uses drakes. -A-/Stainwagon used drakes.


And lost to actual BS. Repeatedly. Pointedly. For months on end. Like every other battlecruiser in the game.

Quote:
****, you guys are straying from the Moonin and using drakes and tengus now aren't you? Everyone has used drakes heavily.


Drake week happens every once in awhile in BL, has been that way since before I joined a year ago. We do it because it's a better learning platform than a Muninn for gang pvp. Meanwhile Tengus are a hard-counter (appropriately employed) against Alphafleet that we've been fighting.
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#46 - 2012-04-21 08:02:08 UTC
Draek will be way overpowered after buff.

It can do already:
- tank Concord
- tank sieged dread
- it survives one DD
Darthewok
Perkone
Caldari State
#47 - 2012-04-21 08:22:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Darthewok

  • Best in BC vs BC 1v1


  • Kiting, sig tanking, neuting doesn't counter Drake well


  • Punches above its weight in large groups for fleets


  • Punches above its weight in PVE


  • Relatively cheap as chips in replacement cost after insurance


These 5 factors combined make Drake a bit too good.
Just wait for it to get nerfed before the Hurricane OP cries start emerging.

CAVEAT RICHARDUS VOLVERE - YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0

Alice Saki
Nocturnal Romance
Cynosural Field Theory.
#48 - 2012-04-21 08:34:33 UTC
I like to Solo in this

Nanofiber Internal Structure II
Nanofiber Internal Structure II
Ballistic Control System II
Ballistic Control System II

Experimental 10MN MicroWarpdrive I
Large Shield Extender II
Invul II
Stasis Webifier II
Stasis Webifier II
Warp Disruptor II

Heavy Missile Launcher II, Trauma Fury Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Trauma Fury Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Trauma Fury Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Trauma Fury Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Trauma Fury Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Trauma Fury Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Trauma Fury Heavy Missile
Small EMP Smart Bomb II

Medium Core Defence Field Extender I
Medium Core Defence Field Extender I
Medium Core Defence Field Extender I

5x Warrior II
Or
5x ECM

Webs are not for tackle. they are for GTFO.

Smart Bomb for Drones.

FREEZE! Drop the LIKES AND WALK AWAY! - Currenly rebuilding gaming machine, I will Return.

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#49 - 2012-04-21 13:29:06 UTC
Lili Lu wrote:
Mfume Apocal wrote:
Lili Lu wrote:
Evidence: http://eve-kill.net/?a=top20 Look at the ships used on kills. Drake 273k, next ship Maelstrom 92k. That is a 3 to 1 ratio between the top ship and the 2nd most used ship. This ridiculous ratio has been there about every month for the last 2 or 3 years.


This is a pet peeve of mine: it is the highest because the CFC uses them extensively. The Maelstrom is #2 because the CFC uses them less than Drakes. If the CFC decided tomorrow to fly Laser Feroxes, they'd fly right up the EVE-Kill Top 20 rankings in short order.

No, it's not just the CFC use of Drakes. This pattern has been steady for years now, maybe not as pronbounced as 3 to 1 but drakes have remained top used over that time.

It's not just the recent CFC adoption of the drake over Maels as their main BSBlink. Evoke uses drakes. -A-/Stainwagon used drakes. ****, you guys are straying from the Moonin and using drakes and tengus now aren't you? Everyone has used drakes heavily.



However Drakes are much less heavily used than when they were the de facto fleet ship in the horrible post-Dominion lag days. There are plenty of viable non-Drake fleet options - probably more now than ever - but Drakes will continue to be popular for as long as they're cheap, easy to skill for and easy to fly. It's not like there are no viable counters to a Drake fleet either; Hellcats, alphafleet and sniper tier 3s all spring to mind.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Lili Lu
#50 - 2012-04-21 14:18:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Lili Lu
Mfume Apocal wrote:
When the CFC used only Maelstroms, Maelstroms were #1, with Abaddons (flown by their enemy) being #2 and once they adopted Welpcanes, Canes flipped between the 2 and 3 spots.

Sure Maelstroms were well represented in those stats. I don't think you are correct that they held dominance for any significant period of time. Drakes were and have been used by so many others even the blob of CFC couldn't reverse the Drake stats. If someone has access to an evekill set of last day of the month top-20 snapshots for the last 3 years please link it. I could be wrong, but I don't think so because I've been following that page and I don't remember any meaningful diminution in Drake top placement. I will conced that 3 to one drakes over second place has not been consistent. It has been a lesser ratio.

Mfume Apocal wrote:
And lost to actual BS. Repeatedly. Pointedly. For months on end. Like every other battlecruiser in the game.
Stainwagon and -A- drake fleets lost to BSs like that because frankly they saw PL involvement, increasing enemy numbers, and turtled up. I fought their drake fleets a lot in INIT. There did come a time when the political situation, and subcap and supercap fleet numbers, overwhelmed -A-/stainwagon (which is not to say that they were winning when they had the early number advantage). But then they found that at a certain fleet sized tipping point Drakes beat AHACs (whereas at lesser numbers AHACs>drakes) and the politics changed and they again had the numbers advantage. Point still stands that large Drake fleets are a cheap and viable fleet option that no other BC can perform in taking on opposing large fleets.

Mfume Apocal wrote:
Drake week happens every once in awhile in BL, has been that way since before I joined a year ago. We do it because it's a better learning platform than a Muninn for gang pvp. Meanwhile Tengus are a hard-counter (appropriately employed) against Alphafleet that we've been fighting.

Again though my point stands. Would you guys put together a fleet of any other tier 1 or 2 BCs to fight the CFC? No. Canes are probably the second best option and their shield tank is simply too flimsy for large fleet battles. Tier 3 BC fleets are not a slugging it out option. They are great for mobile periphery killing if you are in a coalition of alliances on the field and someone else is providing the BS (or Drake, heh) tanking main meatshield fleet. On their own tier 3s are not going to save system sov and tech towers
Lili Lu
#51 - 2012-04-21 14:42:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Lili Lu
Malcanis wrote:
However Drakes are much less heavily used than when they were the de facto fleet ship in the horrible post-Dominion lag days. There are plenty of viable non-Drake fleet options - probably more now than ever - but Drakes will continue to be popular for as long as they're cheap, easy to skill for and easy to fly. It's not like there are no viable counters to a Drake fleet either; Hellcats, alphafleet and sniper tier 3s all spring to mind.

Mfume is correct CFC use of Maels has had a significant impact on their placement in the evekill stats, but then same for canes and drakes. Regardless Drakes still proliferate for the reasons that even you agree, "as long as they're cheap, easy to skill for and easy to fly." But those quoted reasons alone are not enough to explain why they and no other tier 1 or 2 BCs enjoy being used as a main fleet type. It is the oversized tank and the ability to project their full damage (even if that is not spectacular it is sufficient) at 70km.

As for counters, sure if you know the opposition is in Drakes again then don't bring pulse geddons because unless you get some lucky warpins and adept tackle you will just lose, so instead bring something to try to outrange (tier 3 snipe) or out(or tbh equally)tank (abaddon) or alpha (massed artillery).

Again though Malc, the problem is that Drakes alone of all tier 1 and 2 BCs are sitting as a main battle ship among Battleships. It's a friggin BC but it has the utility of a BS.

It is good to see that Rokhs are now being used alongside Maels. I would love cruises get some kind of buff that wouldn't make them pve on easy mode but would make them viable for fleet actions. If we could have mixed Raven and Tempest (a ship I have always thought should be reworked to have a shield focus) fleets, and maybe reworked Hyperion. Or if we could on the armor side have cruises make phoons viable in a mixed armor tanking BS fleet. There was a time when snipe BSs ruled when we did not have monoculture fleets. That was great.

But unfortunately we have a situation now where fleets are either Maels, Abaddons, Tengus or Drakes, with Drakes winning out frankly because they are much easier on the wallet to produce, fit, and lose.

Btw, it saddens me immensealy to see INIT using Drakes all the time now Sad

Edit- also back to the OP's title for this thread, the truth of the situation is that everyone does not hate the drake. It is rather as was joked about earlier in this thread, that everyone is in window licking love with the drake. Werd P
Verity Sovereign
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#52 - 2012-04-21 17:12:34 UTC
Its a love-hate relationship.

I love its versatility, you can pretty much use it for anything, when I got a 2nd account alt, its the first thing I trained for.
If you want an all purpose ship, the Drake is that ship.

Its hated because no other ship comes close to its versatility - where is the balance?

About the only thing the drake can't do is tackle well, and mining/industrial tasks (Most BS's can be fit to mine decently, but nobody is going to go from a drake to a BS for mining.....)
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#53 - 2012-04-21 17:50:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Malcanis
Lili Lu wrote:


Btw, it saddens me immensealy to see INIT using Drakes all the time now Sad



Why? If they're so "overpowered", then surely it makes sense to use them, right?

But actually we always seem to be running tier 3 fleets when i log in, not Drakes.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Kengutsi Akira
Doomheim
#54 - 2012-04-21 18:00:22 UTC
Talok Ren wrote:
I was looking to upgrade from my Cormorant to start doing some lvl 2 missions and was told that the Drake would be a good ship to get, so I trained all the necessary skills, found a seemingly decent loadout and started saving the ISK for it. Then I started seeing a lot of players hating on it and making general fun of others who pilot them with no real reason given. Can anyone inform me as to why this is, or Is this more of a PVP/balance issue?

I am really wanting a decent missile boat, is there a better ship for level 2 missions or should I just dismiss the negativity towards the ship since I'm mainly doing PVE missions?


Because it can do anything pretty much. PPl hate versatility in this game

"Is it fair that CCP can get away with..." :: checks ownership on the box ::

Yes

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#55 - 2012-04-21 18:00:37 UTC
Lili Lu wrote:


Again though Malc, the problem is that Drakes alone of all tier 1 and 2 BCs are sitting as a main battle ship among Battleships. It's a friggin BC but it has the utility of a BS.


A drake has significantly less tank than a fleet BS, and less damage too. That said, why is it a problem that Drakes are viable, if somewhat underpowered, fleet ships?

Arty canes can do the snipe alpha thing in a way that Drakes just can't, AC canes can be fit to do 900 DPS which no Drake can.

I'm sorry, I'm just not seeing a problem here. Drakes aren't uncounterable, they don't obselete battleships, they don't obselete other tier 2 battlecruisers - all of which can do things well that the drake can't, although the Harby could use some optimal love and the Myrm needs 100 Mbit bandwidth - they're popular because they allow new players to get involved in the big fleet action that many of them no doubt joined the game hoping to see after watching CCP's lovely trailers. Should we be telling them NO FLEET FOR YOU FOR TWO YEARS based on some abstract notion of racial fairness?


Come to think of it, Goons have a Hurricane based fleet doctrine too, IIRC.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Lili Lu
#56 - 2012-04-21 18:09:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Lili Lu
Malcanis wrote:
Lili Lu wrote:


Btw, it saddens me immensealy to see INIT using Drakes all the time now Sad



Why? If they're so "overpowered", then surely it makes sense to use them, right?

But actually we always seem to be running tier 3 fleets when i log in, not Drakes.

But I said sadens for the historical juxtaposition with the former -A- v INIT contests.

I also said saddens, not confuses. Of course why not use a ship that is a cheap but overpowered alternative. Can't blame anyone for doing what CCP has left too easy for too long. But I can still criticize the situation for all alliances in general, and summon my best Worf voice to proclaim that it lacks honor. P

edit - come on Malc your examples all lack full fleet viability. 900 dps hurricanes? where's the tank? where's the range? Yeah welp canes are a go to fleet for internet sov is serious business battles? and of course canes are always sitting in first place in the top 20 by huge margins?

See we agree, you agree, that for Harbingers and Myrms to have a reason to be flown in similar numbers they would need buffs. Buffs that I agree would give them something, but still not make them fleet worthy like Drakes.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#57 - 2012-04-21 18:12:35 UTC
"Stop using a screwdriver to put those screws into that board! A TRUE WARRIOR uses only a hammer or an axe!!!!"

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#58 - 2012-04-21 18:14:59 UTC
Also they're not overpowered you big sexyvoiced crybaby.

Let's imagine the following scenario:

80 Hellcats + 20 Guardians + 20 assorted support engage 120 Drakes + 30 Scimis + 20 assorted support

I won't ask who wins, because the Drakes are going to get their **** pushed in, I'll just ask for your estimate of how long it will take for the Drake FC to ask for a cyno for the supercaps?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Lili Lu
#59 - 2012-04-21 18:31:19 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Also they're not overpowered you big sexyvoiced crybaby.

Let's imagine the following scenario:

80 Hellcats + 20 Guardians + 20 assorted support engage 120 Drakes + 30 Scimis + 20 assorted support

I won't ask who wins, because the Drakes are going to get their **** pushed in, I'll just ask for your estimate of how long it will take for the Drake FC to ask for a cyno for the supercaps?

Have to admit I lack your recent experience with such a hypothetical encounter. ******* work and less eve time. I'm reduced to crying here on the forums.Cry

However, talkabout sexy. 30 scimis looks pretty sexy to me. Can those drakes have ecm drones. I would think 20 ecm'd guardians won't hold up the baddons very long. But I suppose I should take your word for it as my recent experience is lacking.

Regardless, the issue is not can Drakes be beat. It is where are the Harbinger and Myrm fleets? Why is there one tech I BC sitting among BSs and Tech III ships for comprising the backbone of a fleet? Why is a Drake the easiest and fastest entry to level 4s for characters starting out, while other races have to train BS? Why is the Drake a pve and pvp powerhouse while none of the others are?
Darthewok
Perkone
Caldari State
#60 - 2012-04-21 19:17:53 UTC
Anyway, this discussion is going to be irrelevant. Drake will be changed.

The real question is when is the change going to occur.
And after the change, how will this affect the popularity of Drake in PVE, PVP and fleet tactics?

CAVEAT RICHARDUS VOLVERE - YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0