These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Fiction

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why are the Caldari seen as "honorable"?

Author
Evet Morrel
Doomheim
#21 - 2012-04-28 14:25:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Evet Morrel
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
YuuKnow wrote:

I guess the Caldari would consider themselves 'honorable' for attacking Nouvelle Rouvenor too then? That was basically a terrorist attack on a 500mil innocent civillians so that would put the honorable society that the Caldari claim similar to the honorable society terrorist groups claim (Im sure Al Queda claims a society that claims 'a strong sense of personal and collective honor and dignity' too). That or the proposed lore is all a farce.

yk


You're judging an entire culture and civilization based off the actions of a few extreme radicals and terrorists? Congratulations. You're an idiot.


Excuse me Katrina, you’re clearly not a stupid person but are we not debating generalities, call foul if you like, call racism if you must but isn’t this question framed in such a way as to make this inevitable and complaints specious. Perhaps you might address the underlying issue in an enlightened manner rather than engage in name calling.

The sabotaging of the dome at Nouvelle Rouvenor killed half a million innocent people, was that state sponsored terrorism or something else? How about Tovil-Toba killing three million innocent inhabitants in Hueromont when he ordered his carrier down, what was the justification there? I personally agree with Khergit Deserters lucid contribution, in large free markets where social relations are abstract and anonymous there’s little incentive to be honorable.

So, the perception that the caldari are honorable must to my mind be largely attributed to their deplorable fashion sense.
Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#22 - 2012-04-30 02:27:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Katrina Oniseki
Evet Morrel wrote:

Excuse me Katrina, you’re clearly not a stupid person but are we not debating generalities, call foul if you like, call racism if you must but isn’t this question framed in such a way as to make this inevitable and complaints specious. Perhaps you might address the underlying issue in an enlightened manner rather than engage in name calling.

The sabotaging of the dome at Nouvelle Rouvenor killed half a million innocent people, was that state sponsored terrorism or something else? How about Tovil-Toba killing three million innocent inhabitants in Hueromont when he ordered his carrier down, what was the justification there? I personally agree with Khergit Deserters lucid contribution, in large free markets where social relations are abstract and anonymous there’s little incentive to be honorable.

So, the perception that the caldari are honorable must to my mind be largely attributed to their deplorable fashion sense.


I'll address your concern about name-calling by simply saying EVE-O trolling is contagious. I caught the bug, and coughed on someone else. Besides, his statement was ridiculous, which brings me to your second point.

The sabotaging of the dome at Nouvelle Rouvenor was committed by the Templis Dragonaurs (unsure of spelling), a known anti-Gallente (by an extremely racist definition of the term) terrorist group. This group is outlawed at the highest level by the Caldari State.

Excluding underhanded dealings by corrupt officials (which would be pure speculation anyways, since there is no PF mention of it), the State did not sponsor that attack. In fact, the State did not even exist at that point in time. This can be taken into all sorts of conjecture and speculation, but it's quite clearly stated in PF that the attack on the underwater city of Nouvelle Rouvenor was comitted by terrorists who were and are to this day outlaws.

Tovil-Toba is a different fish altogether. What he did is in fact an example of the highest displays of honor ever seen in Caldari history. Ever. To the Caldari people, Tovil-Toba is a national hero. If you disagree with this viewpoint, I'm afraid nothing I can say will convince you they are honorable, because you are either unwilling or incapable of understanding their culture.

His justification for ordering his carrier into the atmosphere of Gallente Prime was a rather obvious 'kamikaze' example. While I hate to compare EVE to the real world, in this case it's pretty cut and dry. Tovil-Toba steered his failing warship into the most militarily and economically sensitive target of the entire Federation - the homeworld. It should be noted that you can't exactly aim something as big as a Chimera at a specific city. It broke up in the upper atmosphere and was then subject to dynamic forces which spread the wreckage across half the continent. It just so happened that one of the larger pieces airburst over the city, wiping out a major population center. Was this intentional? It might have been hoped that his sacrifice would have some major impact, but I would doubt his intention was to wipe out millions of innocent civilians. Even if it was, I suppose it could be considered a case of eye-for-an-eye, or revenge killing for the wanton orbital bombardment of Caldari Prime. Again, this would likely fit in with the Caldari mindset.

Whether you see Tovil-Toba's sacrifice as honorable or not is up to you, but the Caldari people by an overwhelming majority consider him their national hero. If you consider him otherwise, then I'm afraid you're simply subject to an ethnocentric opinion.

Also, for the record, my posting on this forum is not In Character. I am always Out Of Character in EVE Fiction forums.

EDIT: Oh, and I enjoyed reading your interview story. Have you posted any others lately?

Katrina Oniseki

Evet Morrel
Doomheim
#23 - 2012-04-30 12:34:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Evet Morrel
Ties between the establishment and this group are likely closer than your statement suggests. It’s useful to have agent provocateurs that you can disavow as terrorists, modern history is rife with examples particularly at the end of the colonialist era when an emerging state needs to ‘manage’ how it is seen by the international community. Although, I’ll avoid giving specifics, which might get very political very quickly.

My glib statement about Caldari fashion, is not entirely facetious. Societies that have little regard for the individual tend to be highly normative, affirming how things should or ought to be, and how they must be valued. Psychologist Silvan Tomkins researched the various ways affect promulgates this interpersonally through society. Affect such as disgust, embarrassment and shame. These can be transmitted through immediate facial reactions that people have to a stimulus, typically well before they could process any real response to the stimulus.

Like the Vogon, my personal brain care specialist is always saying “zee channeling of aggressive impulses into acts of senseless vitriol, I shink zis is perfectly normal behaviour for a capsuleer.” I also must own the troll within.

Anyway thanks for the compliment, you’re quite right I’ve been posting in character, oops. I had written a final bit of the ‘interview’, happily I have just the right amount of time to write a paragraph on my commute - and usually can read and then steal something from the paper at the same time. It still needs an edit though. I want it to end with the Galentee interrogators blowing Evet’s head off. I thought that’d be a crowd pleaser, she is so damn ernest isn’t she!

My fear is that, my new genre: Porno Political Polemic, or Sado-Satirical Slash while wildly fun to write, combining, as it does, my two great loves was not actually that fun to read. As some writer said , I forget who, if you’re really enjoying yourself your readers probably aren’t.

Thanks again so much, if you like my stories I have rewritten Crew, and harshly edited it. I now think it’s much better, I’m an endless tinkerer I’m afraid.
‘Crew’ unfinished

However, I’m still proud of these two though, the first I wrote to interest my first corp in 2009 ...
‘Embarcation’
‘Recruitement’
Morwen Lagann
Tyrathlion Interstellar
#24 - 2012-04-30 15:31:10 UTC
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
The sabotaging of the dome at Nouvelle Rouvenor was committed by the Templis Dragonaurs (unsure of spelling), a known anti-Gallente (by an extremely racist definition of the term) terrorist group. This group is outlawed at the highest level by the Caldari State.


I always found this amusing, given that Tibus Heth is (or at least, was at one point) a member of the Templis Dragonaurs, according to some parts of the Empyrean Age novel. His affiliation was never proved publicly lore-wise though. :(

(I'll look for the excerpt when I get home - if I can find my copy of the novel, that is. It's probably buried under other books in a box that hasn't been opened since I graduated last spring. xD)

Morwen Lagann

CEO, Tyrathlion Interstellar

Coordinator, Arataka Research Consortium

Owner, The Golden Masque

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#25 - 2012-05-01 19:03:23 UTC
Morwen Lagann wrote:
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
The sabotaging of the dome at Nouvelle Rouvenor was committed by the Templis Dragonaurs (unsure of spelling), a known anti-Gallente (by an extremely racist definition of the term) terrorist group. This group is outlawed at the highest level by the Caldari State.


I always found this amusing, given that Tibus Heth is (or at least, was at one point) a member of the Templis Dragonaurs, according to some parts of the Empyrean Age novel. His affiliation was never proved publicly lore-wise though. :(

(I'll look for the excerpt when I get home - if I can find my copy of the novel, that is. It's probably buried under other books in a box that hasn't been opened since I graduated last spring. xD)


It's always bothered me that we can't call out Tibus Heth as a racist terrorist IC because of that. I can hope though. :(

Katrina Oniseki

Wyke Mossari
Staner Industries
#26 - 2012-05-01 19:35:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Wyke Mossari
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
Morwen Lagann wrote:
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
The sabotaging of the dome at Nouvelle Rouvenor was committed by the Templis Dragonaurs (unsure of spelling), a known anti-Gallente (by an extremely racist definition of the term) terrorist group. This group is outlawed at the highest level by the Caldari State.


I always found this amusing, given that Tibus Heth is (or at least, was at one point) a member of the Templis Dragonaurs, according to some parts of the Empyrean Age novel. His affiliation was never proved publicly lore-wise though. :(

(I'll look for the excerpt when I get home - if I can find my copy of the novel, that is. It's probably buried under other books in a box that hasn't been opened since I graduated last spring. xD)


It's always bothered me that we can't call out Tibus Heth as a racist terrorist IC because of that. I can hope though. :(


I agree, we see a lot of scandal in backgrounds of many key figures, Roden's Serpentis connection is another.

These kind of details could easily be introduce into IC lore by ISD through investigative journalist's "press releases". A sort of official ISD version of Muck Raker. Scandalous news stories and allegations with little hard evidence but that characters can choose to believe as true or just regard as scurrilous slurs.

e.g.

Dichard Rawkins alleges Jamyl is a posses by demons.
Dragonaurs : The Terrorists that Hijacked the State.
The Past Presidents Club : An exposure of Presidential corruption.
Horatius Caul
Kitzless
#27 - 2012-05-02 09:57:34 UTC
Astrid Stjerna
Sebiestor Tribe
#28 - 2012-05-08 12:25:31 UTC
YuuKnow wrote:
Why are the Caldari seen as a honorable? Isn't the entire faction governed my mega corporations? When has being a pawn of a megacorporation ever been "honorable?"

That's like Wal-mart employees claiming they are honorable for working at Walmart. Or even worse, Exxon would claim its employees are "noble". Doesn't fit.

Caldari as cut-throat, ruthlessly competatitive capitalist... yes. But noble and honorable.... no. That would better fit with the Minmatar.


According to PF, everything in Caldari society is about the corporation. Corporations are big on contracts: you sign the papers and you are legally bound to honor the terms. Break a contract, and you could get fired (which means that you're essentially unemployable, and you're probably going to starve to death).

Given the above consequinces, it's pretty clear that a Caldari will not give his word (ie, sign a verbal contract) unless he is absolutely certain he can hold up his end of the deal. It also means that once a Caldari gives his word, it'll be a cold day in hell before you can convince him to break it.

So, noble? Perhaps not so much in the world of cutthroat corporate competition. But honorable? Heck, yeah.

I can't get rid of my darn signature!  Oh, wait....

Evet Morrel
Doomheim
#29 - 2012-05-08 18:37:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Evet Morrel
Ok I’ll put aside oblique finger pointing at leadership, but will point out that it 'is' described as:

“Caldari partisans [who] sabotaged the glass dome of the Gallente-inhabited underwater city Nouvelle Rouvenor”
The_Early_Days_Chronicle

“characters can choose to believe [it] as true or just regard as scurrilous slurs”

I guess they can choose to, most capsuleers do just that. It’s an entirely understandable disposition considering the medium. It’s an aesthetic choice. Truth is beauty, and beauty truth, and if it’s not beautiful how can it be true. The good must end happily and the bad unhappily that’s the definition of fiction Blink!

Anyway I probably wouldn't have written any of that but then I read Astrid Stjerna’s bit, incorrect without being wrong. For Astrid to link reputation with honour is exactly right in my view.

However, because the point of a contract is to make obligations legally enforceable - so that you can take action backed by the state if and when an agreement breaks down - it provides for the parties having no honour. For example in Japan, I think Japan was mentioned as particularly honorable above anyway in Japan, a contract symbolises the formation of a working relationship, there it's not legally binding.

There is of course a morality expressed in the concept but it's utterly skeptical. A contract like its cousin doesn’t provide flexibility, nor does it make allowance for what may be the morally right thing to do, force majeure is its human face. In short the contract is what you have instead of honor and honour is what you have if you are immoral. This is why certain religious denominations refuse to make promises or give guarantees believing it to be unethical or immoral.
Duvida
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2012-05-12 18:15:35 UTC
The past does have an effect on judgements for the present and future, but I would wonder if Tibus Heth's move to seize Caldari Prime and hold it doesn't serve a secondary purpose of keeping the Gallente attentive and close to the Caldari in case of problems with Amarr. One never knows when the next Reclaiming might be, and it may be that the Minmatar nation forms a much less desirable target now that there are ... alternatives.
YuuKnow
The Scope
#31 - 2012-05-12 20:07:20 UTC  |  Edited by: YuuKnow
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
YuuKnow wrote:

I guess the Caldari would consider themselves 'honorable' for attacking Nouvelle Rouvenor too then? That was basically a terrorist attack on a 500mil innocent civillians so that would put the honorable society that the Caldari claim similar to the honorable society terrorist groups claim (Im sure Al Queda claims a society that claims 'a strong sense of personal and collective honor and dignity' too). That or the proposed lore is all a farce.

yk


You're judging an entire culture and civilization based off the actions of a few extreme radicals and terrorists? Congratulations. You're an idiot.


Touchy, touchy. lol.P

Doesn't matter if its an extremist or not. An 'honorable' society would never have been able to produce such a terrorist offshoot (attacking civillians in cold blood). The analogy would be a extremist wing of Britain deciding to conduct a nuclear attack on Argentina's civillians.... In that light, perhaps it would be more fitting to say that the Caldari faction is more of an offshoot of Middle Eastern culture and Middle East concepts of honor, rather than anything else.

Honor is in the eyes of the beholder. Nothing honorable to the rest of us looking in.
Tifin'a Ach'ing
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#32 - 2012-05-23 19:22:05 UTC
IMO

The ideal of Caldari honor is reflected in the sentiment of, State before Self.

Tif

YuuKnow
The Scope
#33 - 2012-05-24 00:34:26 UTC
Tifin'a Ach'ing wrote:
IMO

The ideal of Caldari honor is reflected in the sentiment of, State before Self.

Tif



That's more of a communist than a capitalist attitude. Wouldn't "Corp before self" be more inline with the canon?

yk
Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#34 - 2012-05-24 03:14:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Katrina Oniseki
YuuKnow wrote:
Tifin'a Ach'ing wrote:
IMO

The ideal of Caldari honor is reflected in the sentiment of, State before Self.

Tif



That's more of a communist than a capitalist attitude. Wouldn't "Corp before self" be more inline with the canon?

yk


I don't think that word means what you think it means.

Wikipedia - Communism wrote:
Communism (from Latin communis - common, universal) is a revolutionary socialist movement to create a classless, moneyless, and stateless social order structured upon common ownership of the means of production, as well as a social, political and economic ideology that aims at the establishment of this social order.

Wikipedia - Capitalism wrote:
Capitalism is generally considered to be an economic system that is based on private ownership of the means of production and the creation of goods or services for profit or income by individuals or corporations.

Katrina Oniseki

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#35 - 2012-05-24 03:20:57 UTC
YuuKnow wrote:
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
YuuKnow wrote:

I guess the Caldari would consider themselves 'honorable' for attacking Nouvelle Rouvenor too then? That was basically a terrorist attack on a 500mil innocent civillians so that would put the honorable society that the Caldari claim similar to the honorable society terrorist groups claim (Im sure Al Queda claims a society that claims 'a strong sense of personal and collective honor and dignity' too). That or the proposed lore is all a farce.

yk


You're judging an entire culture and civilization based off the actions of a few extreme radicals and terrorists? Congratulations. You're an idiot.


Touchy, touchy. lol.P

Doesn't matter if its an extremist or not. An 'honorable' society would never have been able to produce such a terrorist offshoot (attacking civillians in cold blood). The analogy would be a extremist wing of Britain deciding to conduct a nuclear attack on Argentina's civillians.... In that light, perhaps it would be more fitting to say that the Caldari faction is more of an offshoot of Middle Eastern culture and Middle East concepts of honor, rather than anything else.

Honor is in the eyes of the beholder. Nothing honorable to the rest of us looking in.


You had it right there at the end. Honor is in the eyes of the beholder. The concept of that doesn't mean honor is judged by outsiders. It means it's judged differently by who's looking at it.

At any rate, extremists exist in every type of society except a utopian one.

Before I bother to debate this further, I'd like you to again define what you consider 'honorable' to be, and then explain to me why your concept of it is the only correct concept of it.

Katrina Oniseki

Mijano
Hakaari Inc.
#36 - 2012-05-24 11:00:08 UTC
It's quite simple really. There is a universal acceptable way to judge honor. Were the Romans honorable? Yes - why? Because whatever happened; whatever classes fought against each other politically in Forum Romanum, they were Romans; from the head count to the aristocrats; from the greedy to the poor - they were Romans.

Was Sparta honorable? Some would say that it was. Worshiping Sparta even has a Latin name, if I recall it correct, and lives yet today being born in democratic Athens. On one hand, Sparta discarded tiny-winy, imsy-wimsy babies that were puny, weak, or in another way undesirable for the Spartan way of life, but on the other hand, Sparta was the greatest military nation this world saw before modern warfare became a way of life. In Sparta the social classes were extreme enough to cut close to the Romans (but not too close). Albeit that Spartan men were equal to one another, from senator and king to the lowest soldier, they had different kind of citizens whom were not of Spartan decent. A group of these were routinely harassed and once or twice every century they were mass murdered, lest the Spartans risked being outnumbered by these under-bred slaves. So, were Spartans honorable? What do you think a Spartan would do if he stood with 299 men between 300'000 Persians and Greece? He would fight. Why? Because he is a Spartan. It's what they did - anything else would've been dishonorable. Efial’tes is supposed to have lead the Persian troops behind Spartan lines. Was he honorable? Come on! He almost ended a slave-murdering, military-fascist society. He must've been honorable! No? Huh, I guess we must take a look at how our culture views honor.

The same principles work in Caldari society. To them, honor is Spartan discipline; it's patriotism; it's the good for the many; it's fighting for the independence they paid for with dearest blood. That is honor - why? Because they are the Caldari.
N'maro Makari
Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries Ltd.
Arataka Research Consortium
#37 - 2012-05-24 15:46:05 UTC  |  Edited by: N'maro Makari
To be frank, it seems to me you saw the word "hyper-capitalism" and then went off on one drawing crude conclusions from just one word.

Also, why on earth make a unilateral statement of "the Caldari are not honourable" then go all "well, depends who you ask" ? Logic needs working on.

**Vherokior **

Hail Goddess
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#38 - 2012-05-25 12:45:57 UTC
Honor is subjective. Different for person to person and cultures. Caldari are "a-political and a-moral". They're closer to what a pure logical vulcan society would look like.
Evet Morrel
Doomheim
#39 - 2012-05-25 17:30:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Evet Morrel
Mijano wrote:
It's quite simple really.


Oh ok, that’s reassuring.

Mijano wrote:
There is a universal acceptable way to judge honor. (sic)


For clarity’s sake, are you saying that honour is an ethical universal? An ethical principle that holds for all? Or simply a single perspective from which to judge the honour of its adherents (i.e. those that follow the honour system)? … or perhaps you’re asserting rationality, always welcome here, such that we can examine the ‘honour’ system to determine if it’s internally consistent, that it doesn’t lead to contradictions. Whichever of these you meant I feel that you want to escape a kind of cultural obscurantism, or full stop, that says “you’ll never understand us”, well that’s cool.

I tend towards pluralism myself, requiring multiple explanations to account for it. But it’s we, the subject, who name the event recasting the system in a new light. It’s through this process that we become the subject. When some dude says a guy is dishonorable, what and to whom is he signaling? To the other guy, to his fellows or to himself?

Mijano wrote:
Were the Romans honorable? Yes - why? Because whatever happened; whatever classes fought against each other politically in Forum Romanum, they were Romans; from the head count to the aristocrats; from the greedy to the poor - they were Romans.


What does it all boil down to? Well I don’t think it’s just ethnocentricity. It has something to do with identity. It certainly "places an individual socially and determines his right to precedence." In that sense it’s a value system. It values agency by its history.

So is this what it all adds up to? Surely there must be more to it than personal integrity, otherwise any consistent behaviour would be honourable which leads to a logical contradiction. As others have pointed out honour is socially determined, as we all are. Honour is a concern for material circumstance and status, and you can see this if you consider the synonym nobility. It is normative. It’s the way the social asserts order, and also how it communicates to us whom to shun and whom to love. It is usually a feature of political systems that have a weak, or no, rule of law.


Katrina Oniseki wrote:
What [Tovil-Toba] did is in fact an example of the highest displays of honor ever seen in Caldari history … If you disagree with this viewpoint, I'm afraid nothing I can say will convince you they are honorable, because you are either unwilling or incapable of understanding their culture.


What nothing, I contest that its not the differences in moral judgment across different peoples and cultures that make it difficult for outsiders to understand the ‘honour’ due Tovil-Toba. For instance, if the Gallente believed they could somehow avoid risking the lives of their own citizens by a reliance on drone technology to win then Tovil-Toba effectively disillusion them. But that isn’t the end of it. It’s propaganda, it seeks to justify the instigation of a cartel that acted to kill innocents because a number of corporations found the Gallente government’s interfering restrictive.
Nogginz
State War Academy
Caldari State
#40 - 2012-05-25 20:06:35 UTC
no idea why, but i see them akin to the Imperial Guard in 40k....just saying