These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Most dysfunctional and broken ship
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#41 - 2012-04-16 06:37:16 UTC
Temu TheGreat wrote:
????? Please show me a good fit for a paladin that does not struggle with power grid issues... kthnx


[Paladin, Tach Paladin]

Tachyon Beam Laser II, Imperial Navy Multifrequency L
Tachyon Beam Laser II, Imperial Navy Multifrequency L
Tachyon Beam Laser II, Imperial Navy Multifrequency L
Tachyon Beam Laser II, Imperial Navy Multifrequency L
Small Tractor Beam I
Small Tractor Beam I
Salvager II

Federation Navy Stasis Webifier
Tracking Computer II, Tracking Speed
Cap Recharger II
Cap Recharger II

Large Armor Repairer II
Armor EM Hardener II
Armor EM Hardener II
Armor Thermic Hardener II
Heat Sink II
Heat Sink II
Heat Sink II

Large Ancillary Current Router I
Large Energy Collision Accelerator I
Hathrul
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#42 - 2012-04-16 11:39:09 UTC
phoenix. citadel torps are total ****. citadel cruise missiles.....noone ever used them afaik.
X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#43 - 2012-04-16 15:07:02 UTC  |  Edited by: X Gallentius
Verity Sovereign wrote:


As for the navy issue exequror, I'd rather see it be like a halfway decent logi - but in its current role I will point out that it is significantly faster than a Thorax, its ROF bonus means its 4 turrets are 5.33 "effective turrets" before the 5% damage per level is factored in (but the thorax has this, so they cancel out), and it has the same low and med slot distribution
I'm guessing the lower number of highs makes the fitting about the same
So you get 6.67% more turret DPS, and 78 m/s more speed (45.8% faster) for the loss of about 200 armor, 200 shield, and 200 hull H
I checked on this because I thought I had compared the Thorax to the ENI a long time ago and I remember the only difference between the two was speed and number of drones. Structure/Armor/Shield EHP were the same. Now Evelopedia shows they are different by quite a bit.

Thorax/ENI/Rupture
Sig Radius:140/108/130
Scan Res: 259/322/282
Inertia Mod: .585/.46/0.54

Did CCP do a stealth change to the stats of the Tier 1 Faction Cruisers, or am I just remembering incorrectly?
Tanya Powers
Doomheim
#44 - 2012-04-16 15:45:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Tanya Powers
Alara IonStorm wrote:
Stabber
Omen
Tier 1 Cruisers
Tier 1 Faction Cruisers
Tier 1 Combat Frigs
Ferox / Moa using Rails.
Prephecy / Omen / Punisher using Lasers
Bellicose
Celestis
Breacher
Vigil
Maulus

I know some of these ships can be good in certain situations but they all could use some work.


This and I'd add some out of my head, not exhaustive, there are far more than the ones above and below.


+Eos

+Sin

+T1/T2 EF/EAF

+Exequror and all T1 fake logi ships

+Mackinaw and hulk for being such fail design (n°1 fail imho) and the T2 skif fake version whatsoever

+T1 mining barges and industrials
Previous page123