These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Market orders... not rewarding the market bots....

Author
Aranakas
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#21 - 2012-04-10 20:58:18 UTC
Confirmed that the best way to fill out a sell order for tritanium is to undercut by 1 mil.

Aranakas CEO of Green Anarchy Green vs Green

Nura Taron
Doomheim
#22 - 2012-04-10 21:19:58 UTC
Spy 21 wrote:
I am guessing that is impossible.

I bought a ship in Rens just now off the market... the market bot order ended in xxx499.97 ISK and the next higher order was xxx500.00 ISK,,, So for the extra .03 ISK and not to reward the bot trader, I clicked on the even number offer and then clicked buy...

I got my ship at the even number amount except it was filled by the bot trader as the number of ships it had for sale went down by 1 and the other offer for a single ship remained.

Sorta makes me mad cause I really didn't want to subsidize that insane penny crap that goes on in market hubs... most by bots, some by real traders. As a former trader, I still have resentments lol...

CCP should allow me to pick who's order I buy from. I simply don't like the market bots that have proliferated in the market hubs.

Just bitching.

Have a nice day.

S

I always thought it was ******** that the sale always goes to the lowest price order no matter what order you click on. I agree we should be able to choose who we buy from.
Lady Spank
Get Out Nasty Face
#23 - 2012-04-10 21:23:47 UTC
You can't pick and choose as it would be used for RMT ISK laundering... not that that stops people doing it anyway in backwater stations.

(ಠ_ృ) ~ It Takes a Million Years to Become Diamonds So Lets Just Burn Like Coal Until the Sky's Black ~ (ಠ_ృ)

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#24 - 2012-04-10 21:23:55 UTC
Nura Taron wrote:
I always thought it was ******** that the sale always goes to the lowest price order no matter what order you click on. I agree we should be able to choose who we buy from.
The problem with that is that it would massively reduce the efficiency of the market, so you would no longer be able to pay (or charge) what stuff is actually worth.
Nura Taron
Doomheim
#25 - 2012-04-10 21:25:08 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Nura Taron wrote:
I always thought it was ******** that the sale always goes to the lowest price order no matter what order you click on. I agree we should be able to choose who we buy from.
The problem with that is that it would massively reduce the efficiency of the market, so you would no longer be able to pay (or charge) what stuff is actually worth.

How would getting the order I clicked on do any of that?
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#26 - 2012-04-10 21:34:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Nura Taron wrote:
How would getting the order I clicked on do any of that?
The way it works now, there is very little reason not to price your goods as low as possible because going higher just means someone else gets the sale. Likewise, offering less then something is worth is pointless since it just means someone else gets the goods.

Thus, there is always a downward pressure on sell orders and an upwards pressure on buy orders. The net effect is that both buy and sell orders will automatically tend towards that much-extolled equilibrium where everyone “agrees” that the “right” price is achieved.

If you remove the mechanic that dictates these upper and lower bounds on a meaningful order, they will no longer converge (at least not as automatically and certainly not as quickly as before). By being able to pick your order, there is no longer any reason for anyone to price their wares reasonably because there will always be some sucker who misreads the numbers, sorts the prices incorrectly, or who just likes to spend more money than is needed for no good reason. Remove the brokerage aspect, and suddenly, the upwards and downwards pressure towards the “right” price is, if not gone, then at least very weakened.
Hiram Alexander
State Reprisal
#27 - 2012-04-10 21:57:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Hiram Alexander
CCP I'm holding you personally responsible for how terrible the OP's post was.

Please do something ~this year~ to improve your tutorials... New or old, the number of people who don't understand how the market actually works is truly astounding.

People don't understand ~shopping~ !

--- seriously, can you fix that please...?


And just for the record, Market PvP is still PvP, while crying about losing is a bit embarassing... Blaming bots is worse.

I have a mouse wheel. Most people do... It increments prices by 0.01 isk... I trade in billions of units every day, so not using it would be ********.

As for being able to pick and choose who you buy from... How about if we picked and chose who we sold to...? There'd be an uproar from people crying about having to 'train' shopping alts, lol...

The Market's fine the way it is.
Nura Taron
Doomheim
#28 - 2012-04-10 21:58:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Nura Taron
Tippia wrote:
Nura Taron wrote:
How would getting the order I clicked on do any of that?
The way it works now, there is very little reason not to price your goods as low as possible because going higher just means someone else gets the sale. Likewise, offering less then something is worth is pointless since it just means someone else gets the goods.

Thus, there is always a downward pressure on sell orders and an upwards pressure on buy orders. The net effect is that both buy and sell orders will automatically tend towards that much-extolled equilibrium where everyone “agrees” that the “right” price is achieved.

If you remove the mechanic that dictates these upper and lower bounds on a meaningful order, they will no longer converge (at least not as automatically and certainly not as quickly as before). By being able to pick your order, there is no longer any reason for anyone to price their wares reasonably because there will always be some sucker who misreads the numbers, sorts the prices incorrectly, or who just likes to spend more money than is needed for no good reason. Remove the brokerage aspect, and suddenly, the upwards and downwards pressure towards the “right” price is, if not gone, then at least very weakened.

Oh I see now. So like the way I can choose what to buy in real life and it made a can of soda cost $10,000. Wait, that didn't happen? Well then I guess people aren't going to suddenly stop caring what things cost just because they can choose who to buy from. What it does mean is that nontraders like me can buy the one that costs 5000 instead of the one that costs 4999.99 because that one is being sold by a friend or even just to spite the undercutter. I think what people are worried about is that they might actually have to do some work and move those items to a system with less competition instead of just undercutting by .01 once in a while to automagically force everyone to buy from them and never undocking from jita 4-4.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#29 - 2012-04-10 22:07:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Nura Taron wrote:
Oh I see now. So like the way I can choose what to buy in real life and it made a can of soda cost $10,000. Wait, that didn't happen?
That's because, at the back-end of the process, the sugar, and water, and chemicals (and even, to some extent, the collective work) that go into that can of soda are being bought and sold using exactly this kind of system…

…and then the manufacturers, logistics, retailers and sales points add various mark-ups to that base price, all of which basically comes down to branding — something that doesn't exist in EVE since all goods are fungible.

Quote:
Well then I guess people aren't going to suddenly stop caring what things cost just because they can choose who to buy from.
It's not about caring — it's about inherent mechanical pressure towards a common mean.
Markus Reese
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#30 - 2012-04-10 22:10:43 UTC
Kessiaan wrote:
I do some trading; I plug in whatever number my spreadsheet spits out. Just because it doesn't end in .00 doesn't mean its a bot by any means.


I think the main point is though, that if people select a market order, that should be the one they get to buy from however. If I only need one item, I might finish off that one person's one item buy order before the big order if I could. Just cause.

To quote Lfod Shi

The ratting itself is PvE. Getting away with it is PvP.

Nura Taron
Doomheim
#31 - 2012-04-10 22:10:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Nura Taron
Tippia wrote:
Nura Taron wrote:
Oh I see now. So like the way I can choose what to buy in real life and it made a can of soda cost $10,000. Wait, that didn't happen?
That's because, at the back-end of the process, the sugar, and water, and chemicals (and even, to some extent, the collective work) that go into that can of soda are being bought and sold using exactly this kind of system…

…and then the manufacturers, logistics, retailers and sales points add various mark-ups to that base price.

Quote:
Well then I guess people aren't going to suddenly stop caring what things cost just because they can choose who to buy from.
It's not about caring — it's about inherent mechanical pressure towards a common mean.

I buy my milk and cigarettes from CVS even though I buy my other groceries from Sweetbay. Why? CVS sells those things way cheaper. There would still be an inherent pressure towards lower prices; competition. If someone charges $7 for a pack of Marlboros almost nobody is going to buy from them until they lower the price.
Hiram Alexander
State Reprisal
#32 - 2012-04-10 22:20:31 UTC
Nura Taron wrote:

I buy my milk and cigarettes from CVS even though I buy my other groceries from Sweetbay. Why? CVS sells those things way cheaper. There would still be an inherent pressure towards lower prices; competition. If someone charges $7 for a pack of Marlboros almost nobody is going to buy from them until they lower the price.

I buy tons of stuff in Jita every single day, but today I also bought...

Mechanical parts in Uedama, Suroken and Kaimon... because they were ~much~ cheaper, and I had free time for travel. No-one said you can't shop around to 'choose' where you buy...
Rengerel en Distel
#33 - 2012-04-10 22:21:23 UTC
No idea why people hate the 0.01 isk game. You're always driving the price down, or up. When placing buy orders, the people that annoy me are the ones that drive up the price nearly to the sell price, or just some random number. If there is profit still in the item, people are just going to 0.01 you again, so all you're doing is reducing profit.

With the increase in shiptoasting, the Report timer needs to be shortened.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#34 - 2012-04-10 22:21:24 UTC
Nura Taron wrote:
I buy my milk and cigarettes from CVS even though I buy my other groceries from Sweetbay.
…and again, the EVE market is a commodity brokerage market, not a supermarket — the two can't really be compared since they operate on completely different principles and with completely different goals.

The fundamental design decision remains: they've gone for the former because it makes for a much more efficient market that tends towards the equilibrium price for any good that much quicker. Would there be competition without it? Yes, but it would be much less efficient.
Nub Sauce
State War Academy
Caldari State
#35 - 2012-04-10 22:34:13 UTC
0.01 isking makes sense for low end minerals. However, it's absurdly stupid when something is already priced a million or more. 1,000,000 and 999,999.99 are effictively the same price even if not exactly the same. There should really be some sort of minimum % of the per item listed price that an order can be adjusted. 0.05% or so should do it. Then we'd see some REAL upward or downward pressure.

Richard Hammond II
Doomheim
#36 - 2012-04-10 22:34:54 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Rath Kelbore wrote:
I'm confused.

If there are two sell orders for the same item and one is at 100 and the other is at 150 and I buy the order at 150, The person listed at 100 gets 150 isk ?

Yes.


Yeah that doesnt make sense to me either

Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#37 - 2012-04-10 22:42:10 UTC
Richard Hammond II wrote:
Yeah that doesnt make sense to me either
That's because you're thinking supermarket rather than brokerage firm. It makes perfect sense if you change your point of comparison. Blink
Nura Taron
Doomheim
#38 - 2012-04-10 22:53:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Nura Taron
Hiram Alexander wrote:
Nura Taron wrote:

I buy my milk and cigarettes from CVS even though I buy my other groceries from Sweetbay. Why? CVS sells those things way cheaper. There would still be an inherent pressure towards lower prices; competition. If someone charges $7 for a pack of Marlboros almost nobody is going to buy from them until they lower the price.

I buy tons of stuff in Jita every single day, but today I also bought...

Mechanical parts in Uedama, Suroken and Kaimon... because they were ~much~ cheaper, and I had free time for travel. No-one said you can't shop around to 'choose' where you buy...

You're right, nobody said that. Why are you bringing it up?

Tippia wrote:
Richard Hammond II wrote:
Yeah that doesnt make sense to me either
That's because you're thinking supermarket rather than brokerage firm. It makes perfect sense if you change your point of comparison. Blink

No it still doesn't make any sense. People are thinking supermarket because that's what it's like.
Ghoest
#39 - 2012-04-10 22:57:17 UTC
The easy way to stop the bot advantage is basically give everyone a bot that works on a 15 min cycle.

It would also give us a more efficient market.

Wherever You Went - Here You Are

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#40 - 2012-04-10 23:04:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Nura Taron wrote:
You're right, nobody said that. Why are you bringing it up?
Because it's the parallel to what you're looking for: a way to pick and choose your source. You did bring it up, but your continual assumption that you're dealing with a supermarket means you're not quite grasping either of the differences and parallels.

Quote:
No it still doesn't make any sense. Also, people are comparing it to a supermarket because that's exactly what it's like.
No, it's nothing like a supermarket. You're not buying anything by picking up item X from the shelf and paying for it at the exit — you're placing buy (and sell) orders with a brokerage house, and they go out and find sell (and buy) orders that match your wishes. There is no picking one shelf over another, only a selection of a desired price point and trade volumes. The brokers are doing all the actual picking and buying and selling, and they simply deliver the results of these exchanges to you. They don't particularly care where stuff is coming from because their only goal is to fulfil your buy order and get the commission. There's a reason why you're paying brokerage fees, rather than VAT, on those market orders…

People are comparing it with a supermarket because that's all they know of, not because it's what they're dealing with, and it's this mismatch between familiarity and reality that is causing things not to work the way they expect them to work. What they're dealing with is that brokerage model, where all trading is indirect and through proxies and where you as the customer have no control over the source or destination beyond the reach and range of the trade floor.

Again, as soon as you stop thinking of it as a supermarket (which it isn't) and start to think of it as, say, something more like a stock market (which it is), it makes perfect sense.