These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Faction Warfare, Datacores and T2 production

Author
Uppsy Daisy
State War Academy
Caldari State
#1 - 2012-04-06 15:46:37 UTC
So I was thinking about the new factional warfare changes.

CCP intend on allowing Loyalty Points to upgrade systems, etc. So why would anyone join the losers? Why not just join the winners, and reap the rewards of the winning militia's better upgrades?

Then I realized that is why datacores are being moved to the militia stores. The loosing militia will get less pilots, the supply of that race's datacores will dry up, leading to a massive spike in the losing race's datacores and whole T2 economy. This will then encourage pilots to join that militia to supply the demand for those items.

For example, Amarr are geting roflstomped by Minmatar. Supply of Amarr Datacores dries up. Prices of T2 Heat Sinks and Lasers spike. People observe high prices and are incentivised to join Amarr.

Herping yourDerp
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#2 - 2012-04-06 16:13:55 UTC
my problem with that is this
i join amarr miltia and i killed what i have in minmitar standings.

thankfully, datacores can still be farmed from agents, just not as much.
Blueprint Seller
Bring Me Sunshine
#3 - 2012-04-06 16:25:12 UTC
Uppsy Daisy wrote:
So why would anyone join the losers?

To be fair, people join the losing side all the time in both FW and PvP in general.

Some do it because they want the challenge and the targets, some do it because they don't know any better, some do it because they are losers and that is where they belong.
Lt Angus
Goat Herders
#4 - 2012-04-06 16:27:25 UTC
and this is why I have 30,000 amarr data cores although still shoulda put it into zydrine with the rest of my money
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#5 - 2012-04-06 16:32:51 UTC
Lt Angus wrote:
and this is why I have 30,000 amarr data cores although still shoulda put it into zydrine with the rest of my money

...an interesting choice given that the minmatar are the underdog in that warzone.
Uppsy Daisy
State War Academy
Caldari State
#6 - 2012-04-06 16:59:13 UTC
As someone that has been in amarr fw (on other char) for 2-3 years, amarr are certainly not winning in minmatar vs amarr ATM.

The combination of SPDR and elects matari joining minmatar along with all the usual suspects makes them numerically superior in most times zones
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#7 - 2012-04-06 17:16:09 UTC
Uppsy Daisy wrote:
As someone that has been in amarr fw (on other char) for 2-3 years, amarr are certainly not winning in minmatar vs amarr ATM.

The combination of SPDR and elects matari joining minmatar along with all the usual suspects makes them numerically superior in most times zones

That's a gem.

I was going to retort and then I realised I can't actually make you look any worse.
Blueprint Seller
Bring Me Sunshine
#8 - 2012-04-06 18:34:14 UTC
Uppsy Daisy wrote:
amarr are certainly not winning in minmatar vs amarr ATM.

You cannot win in factional warfare.
Uppsy Daisy
State War Academy
Caldari State
#9 - 2012-04-06 21:57:29 UTC
Bad Bobby wrote:
Uppsy Daisy wrote:
As someone that has been in amarr fw (on other char) for 2-3 years, amarr are certainly not winning in minmatar vs amarr ATM.

The combination of SPDR and elects matari joining minmatar along with all the usual suspects makes them numerically superior in most times zones

That's a gem.

I was going to retort and then I realised I can't actually make you look any worse.


i.e. you mean you are not going to retort because you have nothing of value to add.

If you have, say it.

I am happy to respond to you.
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#10 - 2012-04-07 06:15:47 UTC
Uppsy Daisy wrote:
i.e. you mean you are not going to retort because you have nothing of value to add.

If you have, say it.

I am happy to respond to you.

If you must keep digging, sure.

As it stands Amarr (and Caldari) have a massive advantage when it comes to generating isk.

This inbalance has existed for a very long time, pretty much since FW was introduced, but it has been exacerbated by shifts in the market, the metagame and the game code. The simple fact is that Amarr/Caldari FW promotions are an extremely valuable reward to which Minmatar/Gallente have no equivalent. The value is mostly derived from the fact that Jita is the market hub of choice and the high sec near Jita is the POS anchoring area of choice, so Caldari standings (and Amarr standings by derivation) are significantly more valuable than Minmatar/Gallente.

If this situation persists after the upcomming changes, then you can expect Amarr to remain the more attractive side for carebearing (in the Amarr/Minmatar FW zone at least) and you can expect Amarr LP and Amarr LP derived datacores to be pushed down.

I haven't seen anything concrete from CCP to suggest they are going to remove the standings rewards from FW promotions. So until I hear otherwise, Amarr LP derived datacores are not the investment I would favour.
Uppsy Daisy
State War Academy
Caldari State
#11 - 2012-04-07 07:49:23 UTC
Ah! We merely misunderstood each other then.

When you said 'minmatar are the under dog in that warzone' you meant datacore wise. I thought you meant militarily.

Still, I am not sure that you are correct. Minmatar factional warfare mission s can be farmed in a stealth bomber. Amarr missions cannot. This leads to everyone running Minmatar not amarr missions.

For example every member of wolfs brigade has a Minmatar alt running few missions for the opposition.
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#12 - 2012-04-07 08:38:15 UTC
Uppsy Daisy wrote:
Ah! We merely misunderstood each other then.

Not really. I was just choosing not to redicule the rest of your post out of kindness.

Uppsy Daisy wrote:
When you said 'minmatar are the under dog in that warzone' you meant datacore wise. I thought you meant militarily.

There is no military underdog in factional warfare, because there is no victory to achieve. The concept of winning in factional warfare as it stands is as daft as the concept of winning at mining. You can have fun, you can make isk, you can score kills, you can smug over battle reports, you can participate, but you cannot win.

Uppsy Daisy wrote:
The combination of SPDR and elects matari joining minmatar along with all the usual suspects makes them numerically superior in most times zones

There is no superiority that comes from numbers alone, you must have figured that much out in the 2-3 years you have spent in factional warfare.

Uppsy Daisy wrote:
Still, I am not sure that you are correct. Minmatar factional warfare mission s can be farmed in a stealth bomber. Amarr missions cannot.

Firstly, you can farm Amarr missions in a stealth bomber. You shouldn't, because it's inefficient, but then so is farming minmatar missions in a stealth bomber.

Uppsy Daisy wrote:
This leads to everyone running Minmatar not amarr missions.

Just because a lot of people do something doesn't mean it's a good idea, or that it's the most profitable thing to do.

People with a good understanding of the game mechanics will always outperform those that don't have a clue. It's the way of eve.
Uppsy Daisy
State War Academy
Caldari State
#13 - 2012-04-07 19:09:17 UTC
I see.

So I can't say that America is militarily superior to anyone that they are not fighting a war with, because military superiority is defined in terms of whether there is a victory to achieve?

I think not.
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#14 - 2012-04-07 19:50:15 UTC
Uppsy Daisy wrote:
So I can't say that America is militarily superior to anyone that they are not fighting a war with, because military superiority is defined in terms of whether there is a victory to achieve?

I think not.

I don't know how you draw any kind of parallel between what I said and that drivel.

For one, the Amarr and the Minmatar factions are at war with eachother and will be so from now until the servers are switched off.

Secondly, all worthwhile analysis of military strength is based on achievable objectives. As it stands there are no objectives within factional warfare and nothing can be achieved beyond the entertainment and enrichment of the participants. It doesn't matter how many people are in either militia, it doesn't matter how many ships they have, how many capitals, supercapitals, FCs, moons, POSes, ibises, exotic dancers or forum posters they have it will not allow them to achieve objectives that they do not have.

Just the same as if the US Marine core hired two million chefs, it wouldn't aid them one bit unless their objective as a force was to make a decent omelette... and even then, having eaten military food, I'd say they'd be in trouble.

The point I was originally making, which shouldn't suprise you in the Market Discussions forum, was a market one. The value of LP depends on the amount of LP generated, the more there is the less it is worth. It doesn't matter how many people are in a militia, how many are carebears or how much time they spend carebearing, it only matters how many LP they generate and LP generation has more to do with technique and game knowledge that it does about numbers.

The fact is that there are a small cadre of people in a handfull of corps within the Amarr milita that are making isk at rates that you would not believe. They are pumping out wealth faster than they could incursioning, C6 wormholing or Titan ratting. For these people LP is but one product of their procedure and it is dumped into whatever shifts in volume with the minimum of fuss. What is more, these people are now stockpiling a portion of their LP in the expectation of expansion introduced content that gives them better isk/LP conversion. These people will, knowingly and without regard for others, crash the Amarr datacore price as soon as it shows the slightest sign of being viable.

Any talk about PvP within FW is a sideshow, at least within this forum, and if you want to engage me in a debate about the relative worth of the Amarr and Minmatar, given that I have considerable experience FCing both sides going back to when FW was introduced, I'd happily have that discussion in a more appropriate venue.
Uppsy Daisy
State War Academy
Caldari State
#15 - 2012-04-07 21:52:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Uppsy Daisy
Though I still disagree with your opinion on military strength, I can see your point.

And thank you for finally being straightforward about LP. If you are right, CCP should be taking this into account in their FW plans. I suspect they are not.

I am, perhaps naively, genuinely surprised about what you say about amarr FW corps and their ISK generating ability.

As I said before, many of the big amarr FW corps even have alts in the Minmatar milita due to the ability to easily solo the missions in a stealth bomber. Why would they do this if amarr was the ISk generating machine you claim?

Perhaps you are just so amazingly clever that you have it all figured out and they do not.

Did you FC both sides as Bad Bobby?
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#16 - 2012-04-08 05:10:08 UTC
Uppsy Daisy wrote:
If you are right, CCP should be taking this into account in their FW plans. I suspect they are not.

We'll see. Either way it'll be interesting and provided you've chosen the right side of the coin, you'll make a nice profit.

Uppsy Daisy wrote:
I am, perhaps naively, genuinely surprised about what you say about amarr FW corps and their ISK generating ability.

As I said before, many of the big amarr FW corps even have alts in the Minmatar milita due to the ability to easily solo the missions in a stealth bomber. Why would they do this if amarr was the ISk generating machine you claim?

Perhaps you are just so amazingly clever that you have it all figured out and they do not.

I'm not particularly clever, but I can tie my own shoes.

I just make it my business within EVE to learn things and figure stuff out. Like they say, knowledge is power. Doing the same thing as everyone else has never been the path to riches in EVE. I prefer to find something a little unauthadox, something that only a few others may have figured out and scale it as far as it will go. Then, when the time is right, I try to make an extremely profitable exit.

The miltias, it's sad to say, are not entities that select for the resourceful or knowledgeable. Given the limited nature of it as a game feature (thanks CCP) it's not exactly the first choice for someone who wants to push the boundaries.

Quote:
Did you FC both sides as Bad Bobby?

No. I've hardly done anything worthwhile with BB. He's just an alt that made a name for himself on the forums.

You'll have to take my word on it, or not, it's not like convincing you of this is on my agenda. I'm just here for the profit.
Uppsy Daisy
State War Academy
Caldari State
#17 - 2012-04-08 08:13:20 UTC
Quote:
No. I've hardly done anything worthwhile with BB. He's just an alt that made a name for himself on the forums.

You'll have to take my word on it, or not, it's not like convincing you of this is on my agenda. I'm just here for the profit.


I don't have to take your word for it, because it took about 2 minutes to find out.

So very secretive... its like you think everyones out to get you or somethingBig smile

DeliaPrescot
Balintol
#18 - 2012-04-08 08:36:43 UTC
Bad Booby is absolute correct, i spoke to 2 corp mates farming Amarr LP with their alts. It's kinda funny how much profit a Navy Geddon can yield. Anyway, knowing that i bought out Amarr and Jita several times at about 205m to 220m stockpiled it and sold some with a nice profit in Jita again. With Abaddons about 230m and rising and Geddons itself getting expansive, Navy Geddons won't be that cheap ever again. In other words Navy Geddons won't be below Abaddons in price as both ships have neraly the same perfomance.

I told my mates to stockpile LP like crazy because CCP has dropped some note that they will nerf the easy LP farming in FW and if that happens FW LP's will be much more worth. In the end it all depends on how many will do FW LP farming as BB said.
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#19 - 2012-04-08 08:43:24 UTC
Uppsy Daisy wrote:
Quote:
No. I've hardly done anything worthwhile with BB. He's just an alt that made a name for himself on the forums.

You'll have to take my word on it, or not, it's not like convincing you of this is on my agenda. I'm just here for the profit.


I don't have to take your word for it, because it took about 2 minutes to find out.

So very secretive... its like you think everyones out to get you or somethingBig smile

Big smile

The names of my alts and mains are widely known, it's not a secret at all. It was more the fact that I'm not an awesome FC and saying stuff like "Hey, don't you know who I am? I am Joe Public the elite FC of the Amarr militia." is like saying I am chief nappy changer by appointment to the royal court of King Rudolph III of WungaWungaLand. I did FC, I did it a lot and I was successful, but I'm now semi-retired and enjoying the fact that more talented people take that burden from me.

I enjoyed the times I spent in the Amarr milita, particularly the early days when we were up against Outbreak (now our brosefs ohsevenohseven) and great fun was had by all, but it's not something I am going to boast about. I only mentioned it in relevance to my experience there, just like your many years of loyal service.

I think of FW as a good place to get exposure to PvP, enabling you to learn the basics fast, but I feel that staying there long term teaches you mostly bad habits and trains you to be low-effort, unresourceful and narrowly skilled. It's a very insular and paranoid social group too, which I don't think promotes a balanced outlook on EVE.
Uppsy Daisy
State War Academy
Caldari State
#20 - 2012-04-08 09:13:15 UTC
May Bad Bobby and all his alts, from this time forth be known as 'chief nappy changer by appointment to the royal court of King Rudolph III of WungaWungaLand'.

I think this thread has reached its end-of-life....it was fun (for me at least)