These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

I Want Your Big Things
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Nag'o
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#61 - 2012-04-04 18:02:35 UTC
XIRUSPHERE wrote:
Variable system security status : Allow various influential factors as well as random ones to cause system security to ebb and flow, especially in high security space sans the starter systems. It would be nice to see 0.8 systems and below end up as 0.4 and lower for limited amounts of time as sovereign navies are strained along with concord as various criminal and political elements work against the stability of lawful space.

I envision high security space becoming an ever changing landscape sculpted by both random and player influenced factors leading to unexpected change and portions of highsec being cut off and turned into islands of safety rather than a sea of security. The static nature of this space leads many to never leave and a taste of danger would prove challenging and could potentially be very rewarding.


+1
I was going to write this. Its something I tought about when I started playing EvE - security status being dynamic. It could work in a lot of ways. Maybe neighborhooding systems sec status could determine it somehow. Ratting, missioning, war deccing on corps installed in the system, pvp, number of stations, lore, faction warfare sov, security status of capsuleers in the system (inverselly proportional, the more pirates in the system the higher the sec status it gets) and so forth.. all this and more could help determine the security of the system that would change on a daily basis after downtime, based on an average of the system activity the day after.

Brain hackz0r. Execute schizophrenia virus. Hyper-phishing activated. Downloading reality.
Destination SkillQueue
Doomheim
#62 - 2012-04-04 18:07:58 UTC
Breast/ass jiggle physics on the avatars.
RogueMind
KnightHammer Industries
#63 - 2012-04-04 18:15:37 UTC
Missle Launchers on Ships - Nope thats coming
Faction Warfare Fixes - Nope thats coming
Titan Nerf - Oh baby finally
The ability to make your Avatar animated - *Ding Ding*
ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#64 - 2012-04-04 21:00:02 UTC
War Kitten wrote:
Dislike button for the forums.

Minimum intelligence test requirement for enabling the "New Topic" button on the forums.


A test to judge whether or not a new poster has got a sense of humour beyond dead baby jokes and trolling?

Dodixie > Hek
Lyrrashae
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#65 - 2012-04-05 01:22:28 UTC
ElQuirko wrote:
War Kitten wrote:
Dislike button for the forums.

Minimum intelligence test requirement for enabling the "New Topic" button on the forums.


A test to judge whether or not a new poster has got a sense of humour beyond dead baby jokes and trolling?


What's wrong with dead-baby jokes?

Ni.
masternerdguy
Doomheim
#66 - 2012-04-05 13:53:44 UTC
Make all of eve nullsec. Buff NAPs.

Things are only impossible until they are not.
Tariq Norn
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#67 - 2012-04-05 14:06:21 UTC
Capitals in high sec

Level 5's in high sec (we have incursions anyway).

+1 to the flip null and high sec suggestion....basically making the galactic core null sec, all the high trade lanes become plunder grounds for the yarr amongst us.

+1 to the advanced shuttle idea too