These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Highsec Agression

Author
Lana Torrin
Friends of Tristan
#1 - 2012-04-03 01:30:19 UTC
With the recent patch notes and the proposed changes to the criminal flagging and wardec mechanics I was wondering, why don't you just turn off highsec aggression already? Clearly it is no longer in CCPs interest to have people fighting in highsec without consent, so why not just take it away from us completely now and save us the 2 or 3 years of it getting slowly pushed aside. You'll probably only drop a few subscriptions now anyway as you have pretty much banned most of PL and Goons for RMTing ahead of their proposed jita camp.

Why draw out the death of highsec PvP CCP, just put a bullet between its eyes and never look back.
Jita Alt666
#2 - 2012-04-03 01:32:40 UTC
I have a very different reading of the wardec mechanics than you. I am looking forward to running a merc corp for profit in high sec.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#3 - 2012-04-03 01:35:39 UTC
Lana Torrin wrote:
With the recent patch notes and the proposed changes to the criminal flagging and wardec mechanics I was wondering, why don't you just turn off highsec aggression already? Clearly it is no longer in CCPs interest to have people fighting in highsec without consent, so why not just take it away from us completely now and save us the 2 or 3 years of it getting slowly pushed aside. You'll probably only drop a few subscriptions now anyway as you have pretty much banned most of PL and Goons for RMTing ahead of their proposed jita camp.

Why draw out the death of highsec PvP CCP, just put a bullet between its eyes and never look back.

I applaud you for taking this to the logical conclusion rather than having to iterate repeatedly before converging to the solution.

Listen to this person, they have thought though this.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Zircon Dasher
#4 - 2012-04-03 01:38:17 UTC
Lana Torrin wrote:
Clearly it is no longer in CCPs interest to have people fighting in highsec without consent


Shocked The new patch keeps people in highsec from logging in???

Nerfing High-sec is never the answer. It is the question. The answer is 'YES'.

masternerdguy
Doomheim
#5 - 2012-04-03 01:41:41 UTC
Jita Alt666 wrote:
I have a very different reading of the wardec mechanics than you. I am looking forward to running a merc corp for profit in high sec.


Lulz.

CCP is basically removing all meaningful hi sec pvp.

Can you hear the woosh? It's the sound of WoW in space approaching the server.

Things are only impossible until they are not.

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#6 - 2012-04-03 01:44:49 UTC
masternerdguy wrote:
Jita Alt666 wrote:
I have a very different reading of the wardec mechanics than you. I am looking forward to running a merc corp for profit in high sec.

Lulz.

CCP is basically removing all meaningful hi sec pvp.

Can you hear the woosh? It's the sound of WoW in space approaching the server.

Did they change the whole decshield yet, actually? It's still possible and not an exploit, right?

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
#7 - 2012-04-03 01:46:58 UTC
Suspect flagging = OH ****, everyone can shoot me. If more than one person can attack me **** that, that's not fair and highsec is full of carebears.
Adunh Slavy
#8 - 2012-04-03 01:49:30 UTC
Aww, poor gankbears. Soon the law abiding citizenry will be able to take more matters into their own hands instead of having to rely on spaghetti code. All your protections and silly aggro loops holes from Concord are going away gankbears, boo hoo.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#9 - 2012-04-03 01:53:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:
Suspect flagging = OH ****, everyone can shoot me. If more than one person can attack me **** that, that's not fair and highsec is full of carebears.


This is how it should be, break the rules followed by the majority, get your arse whupped by the majority. The days of popping a 200 million ISK mining vessel or a PVE fitted missioning ship for minimal personal risk and the loss of a gank fitted ship are coming to an end. PVP is the game but the biggest whiners about the changes are the "PVPers" who might actually have to do some proper PVP instead of picking on miners and mission runners whose ships are not suitable or fitted for that purpose.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#10 - 2012-04-03 01:59:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Vimsy Vortis
The wardec changes aren't totally awful.

The aggression flagging thing on the other hand is going to completely ruin all non-war related highsec PVP.
Rengerel en Distel
#11 - 2012-04-03 02:02:17 UTC
Yeah, it's gonna suck when you actually lose your ship when you suicide gank.
Next they'll make it so 1v1 duels don't allow people to have 5 neutral RRs on their side too!

With the increase in shiptoasting, the Report timer needs to be shortened.

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#12 - 2012-04-03 02:03:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Vimsy Vortis
Why are people talking about ganking? None of the aggression flagging stuff greyscale talked about was even related to ganking with the exception of some offhand mention of death rays.
Skydell
Bad Girl Posse
#13 - 2012-04-03 02:05:26 UTC
Griefer kills carebear
Alt steals loot
Other grifer kills alt
Other griefer steals Alts loot
Other griefer kills second alt.
There is no loot left

Gate griefing becomes a dog eat dog system and the griefers are eating crow.

So how does it feel to be the victim?
Adunh Slavy
#14 - 2012-04-03 02:06:20 UTC
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
Why are people talking about ganking? None of the aggression flagging stuff greyscale talked about was even related to ganking.



Has more to do with the attitude I think than the specifics. You are right though, ganks bears can still gank. Just won't be able to get away with as much.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#15 - 2012-04-03 02:07:25 UTC
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
Why are people talking about ganking? None of the aggression flagging stuff greyscale talked about was even related to ganking.

Ganking is fighting without one parties consent last I checked. Since the op thinks CCP is interested in removing non-consensual highsec PvP, how is it not related?
Zircon Dasher
#16 - 2012-04-03 02:10:02 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Ganking is fighting without one parties consent last I checked.


When was the last time you were ganked without being logged on and/or undocked?

Pretty sure those things count as consent.

Nerfing High-sec is never the answer. It is the question. The answer is 'YES'.

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#17 - 2012-04-03 02:18:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Vimsy Vortis
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
Why are people talking about ganking? None of the aggression flagging stuff greyscale talked about was even related to ganking.



Has more to do with the attitude I think than the specifics. You are right though, ganks bears can still gank. Just won't be able to get away with as much.

Did you miss the part about tags for sec status and farming alts for sec status or did I completely overlook something? Because it seems to me that there are going to be more ways to recover sec status for ganking and no additional penalties.

And at the same time several the proposed changes will have a hugely deleterious effect on several types of highsec PVP gameplay to the exclusive benefit of NPC corp jet can miners and missioners who get really mad at ninjas but aren't in a corp and don't have a PVP ship.

As someone who actually does PVP in highsec outside of wars and ganking the crimewatch changes look awful. Like worse than dominion sov awful.
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#18 - 2012-04-03 02:20:27 UTC
"Highsec Dominion"

If that's what this is, oh lord you highsec dwellers are in for a treat.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2012-04-03 02:30:19 UTC
Zircon Dasher wrote:
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Ganking is fighting without one parties consent last I checked.


When was the last time you were ganked without being logged on and/or undocked?

Pretty sure those things count as consent.

Going to have to disagree. Placing oneself in a situation where something is possible and explicitly consenting to it happening are not mutually inclusive. Either way "Death of highsec PvP," would include this kind of activity.
Black Dranzer
#20 - 2012-04-03 02:33:38 UTC
Suicide gankers complain about their ganks having to be suicidal, story at 11.

Although I must ask, does that no-warping thing only apply to suicide ganking? Or are you also unable to warp if you enter highsec from lowsec with a gcc?
123Next pageLast page