These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Morality of punishing the end recipients of RMT isk
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Rory Orlenard
Eve Pilots Revolutionary Army
#1 - 2012-04-01 01:08:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Rory Orlenard
This is Eve, there is no no need of coddling end recipients of RMTing isk. The argument that a few innocents will be unfairly
punished doesn't have any merit here and it is a tool used by the guilty to escape punishment. The 'innocents" should have
done thier homework and if they didn't ...to bad, this is an open cesspool we play in and you better learn where the disinfectant is.

The guilty will employ any argument to escape punishment that sounds reasonable and if CCP and we the honest players fall
for these arguments out of concern for the innocent we are only harming ourselves.

Thats enough said..you get the point. If someone is guilty..screw them, if someone gets falsely accused with time and effort they
can clear thier name with existing procedures.

If a pvp alliance or corp take Isk from a "common knowledge" RMTing alliance or corp when that isk is tracked to it's source
using the argument "we didn't know it was dirty isk" should not be acceptable.

"Common Knowledge" means most people know of the topic under discussion. Claiming ignorance should not be a shield to protect
the dirty isk honestly gained. That encourages botters and RMTers. Dirty isk is dirty isk and if it is subject to removal and punishment
you discourage good honest players from "looking the other way" while they take isk from know botters.
Serene Repose
#2 - 2012-04-01 01:11:40 UTC
Such eloquence. Your use of your native tongue rivals that of a braying mule.

We must accommodate the idiocracy.
Rory Orlenard
Eve Pilots Revolutionary Army
#3 - 2012-04-01 01:16:09 UTC
Serene Repose wrote:
Such eloquence. Your use of your native tongue rivals that of a braying mule.



What part was eloguent ?
T' Elk
Strategically Bad
Goonswarm Federation
#4 - 2012-04-01 01:20:12 UTC
Rory Orlenard wrote:
Serene Repose wrote:
Such eloquence. Your use of your native tongue rivals that of a braying mule.



What part was eloguent ?

He was being sarcastic, bro.

~Badposter since FOOOOREEEEEVAAAAAR~ I come back after 2 years to THIS? ~Now 4 years apparently
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#5 - 2012-04-01 01:34:48 UTC
lol don't defend botting empires then
Zverofaust
Ascetic Virtues
#6 - 2012-04-01 01:43:08 UTC
I like that you put so much effort into this post, like how you typed it up in notepad and then pasted it here, I can tell by your ****** up line parsing.
Merin Ryskin
Peregrine Industries
#7 - 2012-04-01 01:50:27 UTC
New plan for EVE domination:

1) Post forum threads accusing major alliances of botting so that it becomes "common knowledge".
2) Get an alt into a major alliance.
3) Buy ISK and give it to the alliance.
4) Report to CCP and get everyone in the alliance banned.

For a mere 1 billion ISK I will not use this tactic against your alliance. Pay me within one week or all of your space will be mine and all of your accounts will be banned.