These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Missions & Complexes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

lowsec anoms

Author
Daniel Plain
Doomheim
#1 - 2012-03-29 22:06:30 UTC
good evening everyone.
i am relatively inexperienced with exploration, so i have two short questions.
1. are sansha lowsec anomalies worth the hassle? i have found a lowsec nook that seems quiet and is full of those but i dn't want to waste time on them if they do not pay out at least a little.
2. i can fly minmatar assault frigs, minmatar and caldari BCs or amarr BSs. which of these options would perform best in this situation?

I should buy an Ishtar.

Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
#2 - 2012-03-29 22:49:34 UTC
You mean the cosmic anomalies that pop up on system scan?

It depends on how you define "worth the hassle". They can pay, but not nearly as much as in null. They can escalate (very rarely) and that's a good thing, though it will generally require a better ship. You of course have to calculate into your "hassle" the fact that anyone can warp to them and there are no gates, so the risk running them compared to gated complexes is significant.

Having said that, I've run a few, gotten some faction spawns, and never been interrupted. But at least for me it's very much a stopgap when I'm bored of scanning and don't feel like logging just yet.

As far as what kind of ship, just take something that will pile on damage. If you're comfortable using a BS in low, do that. Otherwise, I very much doubt a decent Harbinger would have any trouble with them -- it would just be a bit slower.
drdxie
#3 - 2012-03-29 23:00:02 UTC
its easier to use a drake, you can keep aligned incase someone warp in and just warp off, with the other bc's you need to "chase" down your targets. Its may be a bit slower but much safer..

Caldari Loving needed.. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1608277&#post1608277

Daniel Plain
Doomheim
#4 - 2012-03-29 23:20:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Daniel Plain
thank you for the replies
i really don't give a fuk about losing a drake once in a while, but it is less effective in amarr space, so i'd rather use a cane if the tank holds. if the expected payout is so small that you can offset it by losing a bc i probably won't even bother

I should buy an Ishtar.

OfBalance
Caldari State
#5 - 2012-03-30 03:04:34 UTC  |  Edited by: OfBalance
If your expectation is x million isk PER HOUR, you will be highly disappointed.
If your expectation is to get x module worth x billion isk, you will be highly disappointed.
If your expectation is gaining a low-risk method of increasing your bottom line on a regular basis, you will be disappointed.

If you have none of the above expectations, enjoy the act of exploration itself, and have an affinity for gambling with your time as well as your ships for the possibility of a decent payout well below the average earning of a mindless mission, incursion, anom, or sleeper robot... you might not be disappointed.

On a personal note, I like it, but if you follow the posting trend in this forum you'll see unrealistic expectations and failures to comprehend probability and statistics lead to many players absolutely hating it and/or shiptoasting about their impossibly poor luck.
Tarsus Zateki
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#6 - 2012-03-30 03:20:26 UTC
Lowsec exploration doesn't necessarily have a large profit margin. But if you really like exploration and you want to have a little bit more risk and excitement in your gaming, go for it, you'll have lots of fun.

My personal experience, or lack of luck, is that every encounter site in lowsec is a gas cloud What?

You asked me once, what was in Room 101. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world.

Kahega Amielden
Rifterlings
#7 - 2012-03-30 03:51:57 UTC
The guy is talking about cosmic anomalies.

Cosmic anomalies are not part of the exploration system. They are two separate topics.
OfBalance
Caldari State
#8 - 2012-03-30 04:37:56 UTC
Waste of a no-troll post. Ugh.
St Mio
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#9 - 2012-03-30 05:17:09 UTC
They're pretty terrible. If you honestly have nothing else to do in game, you may as well do them instead of docking up and ship spinning I guess?

I've done them (low-sec Blood anomalies) in a Tornado just to pass the time while chatting to friends in game, and the ISK is pretty terrible. You'll easily make more money running L4s in highsec. And the chance of faction spawn/escalation is somewhere along the lines of "pretend/expect it won't happen" and "expect Tags&Ammo" when it does.

If you want to do exploration, ignore anomalies.

To close with a terrible analogy (a delicious vice to have):
Anomalies are to exploration what a lottery ticket is to Vegas.
Mnemosyne Gloob
#10 - 2012-03-30 08:39:29 UTC
Tarsus Zateki wrote:
Lowsec exploration doesn't necessarily have a large profit margin. But if you really like exploration and you want to have a little bit more risk and excitement in your gaming, go for it, you'll have lots of fun.

My personal experience, or lack of luck, is that every encounter site in lowsec is a gas cloud What?


This made me chuckle.
Daniel Plain
Doomheim
#11 - 2012-03-30 09:57:53 UTC
OfBalance wrote:
If your expectation is x million isk PER HOUR, you will be highly disappointed.
If your expectation is to get x module worth x billion isk, you will be highly disappointed.
If your expectation is gaining a low-risk method of increasing your bottom line on a regular basis, you will be disappointed.

If you have none of the above expectations, enjoy the act of exploration itself, and have an affinity for gambling with your time as well as your ships for the possibility of a decent payout well below the average earning of a mindless mission, incursion, anom, or sleeper robot... you might not be disappointed.

On a personal note, I like it, but if you follow the posting trend in this forum you'll see unrealistic expectations and failures to comprehend probability and statistics lead to many players absolutely hating it and/or shiptoasting about their impossibly poor luck.

i understand RNG very well and i can deal with it. what i cannot understand is taking risks without an adequate reward. if risk is the only motivation, you might as well fit a badger with officer mods and try to get to serpentis prime and then back to jita.

I should buy an Ishtar.

Nuela
WoT Misfits
#12 - 2012-03-30 19:25:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Nuela
Daniel Plain wrote:
OfBalance wrote:
If your expectation is x million isk PER HOUR, you will be highly disappointed.
If your expectation is to get x module worth x billion isk, you will be highly disappointed.
If your expectation is gaining a low-risk method of increasing your bottom line on a regular basis, you will be disappointed.

If you have none of the above expectations, enjoy the act of exploration itself, and have an affinity for gambling with your time as well as your ships for the possibility of a decent payout well below the average earning of a mindless mission, incursion, anom, or sleeper robot... you might not be disappointed.

On a personal note, I like it, but if you follow the posting trend in this forum you'll see unrealistic expectations and failures to comprehend probability and statistics lead to many players absolutely hating it and/or shiptoasting about their impossibly poor luck.

i understand RNG very well and i can deal with it. what i cannot understand is taking risks without an adequate reward. if risk is the only motivation, you might as well fit a badger with officer mods and try to get to serpentis prime and then back to jita.


Here Here!

I tried exploration and I like it. However, it is risky and pays, on average, much less than lvl 4's.

When I do losec exploration, I know I am being a fool. It's nice as a change of pace but one still is a fool doing it. If you don't like the word 'fool', substitute "play very sub-optimally". The Risk/reward is just not worth it.

Hell, I even tried null sec exploration in relatively safe space...and THAT doesn't even pay as well as lvl 4's...but I haven't done it enough to say that conclusively...haven't done it nearly enough so could just be RNG screwing with me.
OfBalance
Caldari State
#13 - 2012-03-30 21:13:15 UTC
Daniel Plain wrote:
i understand RNG very well and i can deal with it. what i cannot understand is taking risks without an adequate reward.


It should be clear that we're talking about lower isk over any given period of time. What constitutes adequate? PLEX a month? Making x per week?

It's well known that the income sources of EVE, weighted against risk, are a little screwed up at present. Thus I doubt you're going to find the rewards to feel adequate.
Sir Livingston
Doomheim
#14 - 2012-03-31 01:29:16 UTC
There is no isk to be had through exploration.
Just leave the sites to me. I'll find use for them Blink

Sci-fi games as played by an earthbound human in the 21st century http://www.youtube.com/JonnyPew

Daniel Plain
Doomheim
#15 - 2012-03-31 04:18:17 UTC
OfBalance wrote:
It's well known that the income sources of EVE, weighted against risk, are a little screwed up at present. Thus I doubt you're going to find the rewards to feel adequate.


well then, back to the grind it is... just fyi i spent the last four hours shooting missiles at sleepers and came back with over 30 ribbons + blue loot. before that i spent about one hour running an escalation and ended up with ~10mil worth of faction trash. when-oh when will CCP fix the risk/reward issues?

I should buy an Ishtar.

OfBalance
Caldari State
#16 - 2012-03-31 04:56:44 UTC  |  Edited by: OfBalance
Daniel Plain wrote:

well then, back to the grind it is... just fyi i spent the last four hours shooting missiles at sleepers and came back with over 30 ribbons + blue loot. before that i spent about one hour running an escalation and ended up with ~10mil worth of faction trash. when-oh when will CCP fix the risk/reward issues?


vOv I think w-space payouts are alright, maybe on the surplus side, but wormholes are a special kind of risky. Far as lowsec exploration is concerned, there doesn't need to be a big tune-up. The act of exploring is pretty much 10x the amusement compared to "the grind," elsewhere and since the reward is loot there's no way to really bring it up too much without flooding the markets with the best faction/ds bling.

All I would like to see is isk faucet income like bounties and incursions brought down a peg and from the way Soundwave was talking a universal bounty nerf was high on his list of things to do. Honestly, I hope exploration is never -the- thing to do for isk. It feels good for me to take the legion for a spin in some bumfuck lowsec region and just enjoy the treasure hunt without empire levels of competition.
Daniel Plain
Doomheim
#17 - 2012-03-31 16:44:52 UTC
OfBalance wrote:

All I would like to see is isk faucet income like bounties and incursions brought down a peg and from the way Soundwave was talking a universal bounty nerf was high on his list of things to do. Honestly, I hope exploration is never -the- thing to do for isk. It feels good for me to take the legion for a spin in some bumfuck lowsec region and just enjoy the treasure hunt without empire levels of competition.


personally, i'd even go a step further and argue that now is the time to remove lvl4s and incursions from highsec. it would fix not only inflation but also the woes of miners. right now, i could probably get more minerals/hour by chain salvaging in a mission hub than i would by sitting in a perfect hulk in 0.5.
I agree that exploration should not be the #1 cash cow but it should at least play in the same league as other activities, not be outclassed by a factor of 10.

I should buy an Ishtar.

OfBalance
Caldari State
#18 - 2012-03-31 18:21:18 UTC
Daniel Plain wrote:
OfBalance wrote:

All I would like to see is isk faucet income like bounties and incursions brought down a peg and from the way Soundwave was talking a universal bounty nerf was high on his list of things to do. Honestly, I hope exploration is never -the- thing to do for isk. It feels good for me to take the legion for a spin in some bumfuck lowsec region and just enjoy the treasure hunt without empire levels of competition.


personally, i'd even go a step further and argue that now is the time to remove lvl4s and incursions from highsec. it would fix not only inflation but also the woes of miners. right now, i could probably get more minerals/hour by chain salvaging in a mission hub than i would by sitting in a perfect hulk in 0.5.
I agree that exploration should not be the #1 cash cow but it should at least play in the same league as other activities, not be outclassed by a factor of 10.


I'd like to see that next step too, but the reality is that change isn't forthcoming or at least not any time soon. Factor of being outpaced earning-wise really depends on where you are exploring and the competition, which is why I don't come out in favor of buffs to its income or drops. Like incursions there is a kind of soft cap to how crowded an area can get before everyone's profits except the ~elite~ sink to low levels. The only difference being, it takes a lot less players in a much larger area to saturate exploring.

You also have to consider, any modules you sell on the marketplace are going to be selling at a price adjusted for demand and inflation over time. If all the isk-faucets get nerfed today, in a few weeks time the average price for mods goes down, the average earning of the module seller (such as mr. explorer) goes down too. His average income is more or less neutral (some exceptions, but i'll not gore this argument with detail). This pretty much ensures that it will never be a truly competitive income source without a good roll of the rng, but it also makes it impossible (without the advent of some new modules that make drops worthless) for exploration to hit mining levels of absolute failure.

tl;dr: Exploration is well suited to being a slightly-below "average" income source, but that is a strength and a weakness. So long as the gameplay is good compared to other pve activities, I think it should be left alone.
Mnemosyne Gloob
#19 - 2012-03-31 23:24:09 UTC
As someone in the Exploration chat likes to say "Welcome to Gamblers Anonymous".

Daniel Plain wrote:
i spent about one hour running an escalation and ended up with ~10mil worth of faction trash.


Now if i say i spent 30 minutes of running a site and went away with 3 B, surely that must mean the 'payout' is severely overpowered, no!? Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.
Daniel Plain
Doomheim
#20 - 2012-04-01 13:44:38 UTC
Mnemosyne Gloob wrote:
As someone in the Exploration chat likes to say "Welcome to Gamblers Anonymous".

Daniel Plain wrote:
i spent about one hour running an escalation and ended up with ~10mil worth of faction trash.


Now if i say i spent 30 minutes of running a site and went away with 3 B, surely that must mean the 'payout' is severely overpowered, no!? Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.


which hisec site has the chance of getting you 3bil? and even if there is one, i'd argue that on average, your income is closer to 10mil/hr than 3bil/hr or even 50mil/hr if you are in hisec.

I should buy an Ishtar.

12Next page