These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Neut nerf and its impending impact....
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Herman Klaus
Touched By Klaus
#1 - 2012-03-27 23:28:05 UTC
So with the neut nerf confirmed, are we gonna see a drop in prices for neut bonuses ship and neuts themselves?
Adunh Slavy
#2 - 2012-03-27 23:56:15 UTC
Did they say what the change was, seemed kind of vauge or perhaps I wasn't paying attention closely enough.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt
corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
#3 - 2012-03-28 00:17:39 UTC
Is this the talk of cap batteries being able to reflect nos/neuts or something?

If so, then no, no impact. No one fits cap batteries.

This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

fofofo
Liberty Eternal
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2012-03-28 00:46:17 UTC
Herman Klaus wrote:
So with the neut nerf confirmed, are we gonna see a drop in prices for neut bonuses ship and neuts themselves?


Why the relentless neut talk Herman? Has your alt gone and bought too many of them?
Jan VanRijkdom
House VanRijkdom Trading Conglomerate
#5 - 2012-03-28 05:03:24 UTC
Whyyyy would neuts be nerfed? No need.

.
Uppsy Daisy
State War Academy
Caldari State
#6 - 2012-03-28 07:45:43 UTC
Medium neuts might drop, their prices are way above their reprocessing value.

Large neuts reprocess into a reasonable amount of high end minerals, and given the current rise in high end minerals across the board, I think they will go up not down.
Herman Klaus
Touched By Klaus
#7 - 2012-03-28 07:54:38 UTC
Liberty Eternal wrote:
Herman Klaus wrote:
So with the neut nerf confirmed, are we gonna see a drop in prices for neut bonuses ship and neuts themselves?


Why the relentless neut talk Herman? Has your alt gone and bought too many of them?


I wad playing around with the Meta modules a month or two back. Not now though.

Im more interested in the potential for ship prices to drop.
Adunh Slavy
#8 - 2012-03-28 14:47:00 UTC
corestwo wrote:
Is this the talk of cap batteries being able to reflect nos/neuts or something?

If so, then no, no impact. No one fits cap batteries.



Ah yeah that was it, that cap bats could act as a "reverse" on a neut. If someone zapped you and you had a cap, the neuter would neut them selves. Thus nueting nuet nueters.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt
Kneebone
K-H Light Industries
#9 - 2012-03-28 16:39:41 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:
corestwo wrote:
Is this the talk of cap batteries being able to reflect nos/neuts or something?

If so, then no, no impact. No one fits cap batteries.



Ah yeah that was it, that cap bats could act as a "reverse" on a neut. If someone zapped you and you had a cap, the neuter would neut them selves. Thus nueting nuet nueters.


Stupid change, better that the Cap Battery gives untouchable cap, but then you could argue ECM needs a module that allows for a minimum of targets. The reflect should be blocked on ships like the PIlgrim and Curse since that is what they do.
Gingerlord
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2012-03-28 17:55:39 UTC
Kneebone wrote:
Adunh Slavy wrote:
corestwo wrote:
Is this the talk of cap batteries being able to reflect nos/neuts or something?

If so, then no, no impact. No one fits cap batteries.



Ah yeah that was it, that cap bats could act as a "reverse" on a neut. If someone zapped you and you had a cap, the neuter would neut them selves. Thus nueting nuet nueters.


Stupid change, better that the Cap Battery gives untouchable cap, but then you could argue ECM needs a module that allows for a minimum of targets. The reflect should be blocked on ships like the PIlgrim and Curse since that is what they do.


I totally agree here. There is a similar thread in one of the other channels. The 'neut' ships like Curse, Pilgrim, Bhaal etc shouldn't suffer from this change.
Abyss Azizora
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#11 - 2012-03-29 01:26:22 UTC
Oh boy, this is going to make flying an archon so much more fun, should also lower the outrageous prices for the bahl. It's a much needed change. May actually see people use cap batteries since... well... ever.
Gizan
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#12 - 2012-03-29 02:08:07 UTC
this "nerf" if good for armor incursion ships, the anchor's could use a cap battery so they dont get neuted out by the rats, there for can start using active hardeners instead of passive ones because its "un-neutable" cap
Scrapyard Bob
EVE University
Ivy League
#13 - 2012-03-29 23:01:23 UTC
Kneebone wrote:

Stupid change, better that the Cap Battery gives untouchable cap, but then you could argue ECM needs a module that allows for a minimum of targets. The reflect should be blocked on ships like the PIlgrim and Curse since that is what they do.


It's not a 100% chance - so just because you fit a cap battery, doesn't make you immune to neuts.