These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Ingame Griefing or Cyber Bullying ?

First post
Author
Deen Wispa
Sheriff.
Caldari Tactical Operations Command
#1 - 2012-03-27 05:04:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Deen Wispa
So given the recent Fanfest Alliance fiasco where Mittani encourages other people to harass said player, is this considered a form of cyber bullying? It's a very sensitive topic nowadays given how many kids are cyber bullied on social networks such as Facebook and then commit suicide because of it.

And so I wonder if this recent act is considered a form cyber bullying? Or is what he did referred to as "content" ? Aka ingame griefing...something considered acceptable for CCP.

And yes, I really hate trying to compare a serious issue like RL cyber bullying to this but to Mittens (or is it Alex?) credit, he's done a masterful job of blurring RL with ingame that many us don't know anymore. He truly has mastered the art of metagamming at a level that I've never seen before.

EDIT: I for one am fascinated with how CCP handles this because given the litigious nature of todays world and the sensitivity people have with cyber bullying (or how they interpet it), CCP will be setting a tone in one form or another with their actions moving forward.

High Five. Yeah! C'est La Eve .

Xython
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2012-03-27 05:07:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Xython
No, it's not Cyber Bulling. Don't be stupid.

There are plenty of idiot pubbies who think the only thing EVE is missing is less things that make EVE unique. These are the types who are getting themselves into frothy rants about "Mittani the Goon Figurehead" -- because we dared break the illusion of Highsec-as-safehaven.

If you don't like the sandbox, get the **** out and go play Earth and Beyond.
THE L0CK
Denying You Access
#3 - 2012-03-27 05:12:02 UTC
Do we have a internet lawyer in the house?

Do you smell what the Lock's cooking?

Liam Mirren
#4 - 2012-03-27 05:14:14 UTC
Xython wrote:
No, it's not Cyber Bulling. Don't be stupid.

There are plenty of idiot pubbies who think the only thing EVE is missing is less things that make EVE unique. These are the types who are getting themselves into frothy rants about "Mittani the Goon Figurehead" -- because we dared break the illusion of Highsec-as-safehaven.

If you don't like the sandbox, get the **** out and go play Earth and Beyond.


Sir, I happen to notice that you seem to be quite angry.

Excellence is not a skill, it's an attitude.

Xython
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2012-03-27 05:15:25 UTC
Liam Mirren wrote:
Xython wrote:
No, it's not Cyber Bulling. Don't be stupid.

There are plenty of idiot pubbies who think the only thing EVE is missing is less things that make EVE unique. These are the types who are getting themselves into frothy rants about "Mittani the Goon Figurehead" -- because we dared break the illusion of Highsec-as-safehaven.

If you don't like the sandbox, get the **** out and go play Earth and Beyond.


Sir, I happen to notice that you seem to be quite angry.


Not at all, I'm delighted that all this User Generated Content was created by a single off the cuff drunken comment by Mittani.

I'm going to ask him to kill a puppy next year, maybe we can get some protest songs going.
Liam Mirren
#6 - 2012-03-27 05:18:24 UTC
Yup, you're mad.

Excellence is not a skill, it's an attitude.

Sri Nova
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#7 - 2012-03-27 06:38:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Sri Nova
The game eve and its in game culture magnifies a natural tendency to attack the in game stereotypes.

However this is not really just an issue with eve, as it is present in all multi-player gaming .

The current game culture that we have at this time is to badger those who do not fit the accepted gaming stereotype of that genre .

Most of the time this badgering is socially acceptable, as it is mere ribbing and poking fun at each other and our flaws. All in the spirit of fun and to achieve a greater sense of camaraderie . (i.e. i suck or you suck lol)

however this can be taken to extremes and cause alienation which in turns produces a vicious circle and ends up creating outcasts and socially unacceptable classes which are used to create stereotypes . (see the blizzcon "anti-gay" fiasco)

in eve classes have been established care bears , pirates, and pvp'ers every player is classified by the games culture in to one of the 3 classes. All 3 generally disdain one another and see each others play style as detrimental to the game .

So it becomes accepted in the games cultural , that to bash one another is acceptable.

This creates prejudice and intolerance and you can see it on a day to day basis in many multi player games. Even though it is still based on good natured ribbing, it has become much uglier and more pointed , the purpose being to get a reaction from the (victim) .

In eve this reaction is referred to as "tears" and many methods have been devised to create tears amongst the classes of players.


"Mittens" while inebriated forgot he was not in game, and was participating in the games culture of provoking tears from a player belonging to one of the games "lesser" classes . (as seen from his eyes)

The perception was probably more akin to a chat channel or in game chat where one would rally the "troops" and go trounce the target .

What makes this difficult is that Mittens was at a event that was all about eve and its mechanics, so it could be argued that he actually was playing eve.

So we are left with a dilemma . Is our attitudes in game unacceptable these days ?

Have we crossed the line and become intolerant bigots who are insensitive to others who do not share our views?

I think for the majority, this is not really an issue as on a day to day to basis in the real world we mostly treat each other with respect and compassion .

I think this was an isolated event with aggravating circumstances and its not a form of cyber bullying . Just a enthusiastic player showing a total lack of self control and getting carried away by the event they were attending.

At best it can used as an example as how we all could be a bit more thoughtful in how we act, around and towards others in game and in real life.
Revolution Rising
Last-Light Holdings
#8 - 2012-03-27 06:44:09 UTC
Deen Wispa wrote:
So given the recent Fanfest Alliance fiasco where Mittani encourages other people to harass said player, is this considered a form of cyber bullying? It's a very sensitive topic nowadays given how many kids are cyber bullied on social networks such as Facebook and then commit suicide because of it.

And so I wonder if this recent act is considered a form cyber bullying? Or is what he did referred to as "content" ? Aka ingame griefing...something considered acceptable for CCP.

And yes, I really hate trying to compare a serious issue like RL cyber bullying to this but to Mittens (or is it Alex?) credit, he's done a masterful job of blurring RL with ingame that many us don't know anymore. He truly has mastered the art of metagamming at a level that I've never seen before.

EDIT: I for one am fascinated with how CCP handles this because given the litigious nature of todays world and the sensitivity people have with cyber bullying (or how they interpet it), CCP will be setting a tone in one form or another with their actions moving forward.


This is exactly my point, the difference between a lot of these guys and "the rest of us" is they consider the game an avenue where they can inflict their predatory behaviour on others, instead of just playing the game.

This wasn't some drunken mistake, he premediated this because the powerpoint was done up WAY before he got drunk.

Every person has to accept a certain amount of mosh pit in life, but there are some things you don't do to people - any people.

Some things shouldn't be done to anyone - at all - ever.

It's not just "oops" it was sick behaviour we all know he's capable of and he finally overstepped himself. This isn't "ingame griefing" this was psychological malice directed at someone already vulnerable.

That is what predators do, they look for the weak to prey on. He saw someone vulnerable so to him - they were fair game.

.

Thabiso
Merchants of the Golden Goose
#9 - 2012-03-27 06:51:15 UTC
What mittens did was bullying, plain and simple - while people might think that "oh it's part of the game"; it's not and should not be allowed. Back in the days of playing CS; there was a very strict line (if somewhat fine) between friendly banter and downright bullying - do the latter and you would be instant banned from our game servers.

These days cyber bullying has caused kids to commit suicide and as far as I know in one case lead to a trial in United Kingdom over said subject.

I truly hope that CCP will get off their asses and deal with this according to their eula; if only to indemnify themselves in case of the guy/kid actually caries out the suicide.
YUMAD BRO
ZZ Cow
#10 - 2012-03-27 06:54:34 UTC
OMG STFU YOU FKN TARD...



OH YA AND REMEMBER....ITS DOWN THE HIGHWAY, NOT ACROSS THE ROAD :P
Red Templar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#11 - 2012-03-27 06:54:37 UTC
Should we consider hundreds of threads on this forum about Mittens and his misconduct as cyber bullying and harassment?

Ofc these dumb threads lack in the department of bullying, but they are pretty good at harassing my faith in humanity. I mean come on! People cannot be so dumb. Can they? Straight

[b]For Love. For Peace. For Honor.

For None of the Above.

For Pony![/b]

Terminal Insanity
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#12 - 2012-03-27 06:54:55 UTC
This just in.

Eveonline is a cyberbullying simulator. Its main features are literally the killing, thieving, and backstabbing.

WOW is back in the direction you came from.

"War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP

Markus Reese
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#13 - 2012-03-27 06:58:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Markus Reese
Sri Nova wrote:
Lots of good stuff.


I personally feel the line was crossed when it came from playing the pirate to direct harassment of a player because of who they were/what they said. Eve is a game, but it is also a business. Carebear tears are part of eve, however continued following in a grief environment does nothing productive, a player who is unable in any way to enjoy playing, wont.

Following somebody in lowsec and hunting them, well that is lowsec, it is hunted regions. Driving an alliance out of null, well null is a war zone. But highsec players need that line. They help pay the bills, and going by the highsec player counts, they pay alot of ccp bills.

As nullsec, we also need the highsec players. All those jump freighter logistic runs, pos ice, etc. I am willing to bet alot of that is not done by alliances. Hundreds of battlecruisers blown up in a fight, I know it wasn't our industrial division that made mine. So yeah, grief and freighter gank, 99% of the time, player might get mad, we all do at stuff. They won't quit, or even care next day. Keep following the player, drive them out, and do that continually. Suddenly who is doing manufacture for your pvp? Now eve has a bad rep, few new players joining, and pvp slows down because now nobody is making the bread and butter of pvp anymore.

To the OP of the thread. That is bullying. Griefing is indescriminate and game mechanic. In the end, the player will be upset, but hopefully learns and better enjoys eve because of that. Myself, when a player has gotten mad over a grief, I say straight up why, and do this to avoid. Bullying is when you lol and then go out of your way to ruin the game experience, it acomplishes nothing.

To quote Lfod Shi

The ratting itself is PvE. Getting away with it is PvP.

Death Killer21
Lowlife.
Snuffed Out
#14 - 2012-03-27 07:03:56 UTC
Deen Wispa wrote:
So given the recent Fanfest Alliance fiasco where Mittani encourages other people to harass said player, is this considered a form of cyber bullying? It's a very sensitive topic nowadays given how many kids are cyber bullied on social networks such as Facebook and then commit suicide because of it.

And so I wonder if this recent act is considered a form cyber bullying? Or is what he did referred to as "content" ? Aka ingame griefing...something considered acceptable for CCP.

And yes, I really hate trying to compare a serious issue like RL cyber bullying to this but to Mittens (or is it Alex?) credit, he's done a masterful job of blurring RL with ingame that many us don't know anymore. He truly has mastered the art of metagamming at a level that I've never seen before.

EDIT: I for one am fascinated with how CCP handles this because given the litigious nature of todays world and the sensitivity people have with cyber bullying (or how they interpet it), CCP will be setting a tone in one form or another with their actions moving forward.


Yes it is and he should be banned for it

Death killer21

Caldari and amarr Mission service.  Contact me for more info

Largo Usagi
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#15 - 2012-03-27 07:06:44 UTC
**** the year i started playing eve i got poped in lowsec as a newbie scrub and harassed over and over by the same group of people about how ****** at the game I was. So was that cyber bullying 6 years ago? I argue no but some one else would look at all of the banter I got in my newbie days and say yes.

This is a sandbox game, where hate and greed form and control situations and in many cases some ones entertainment is at the expense of others. Every time some one is celebrating a titan kill there is some one else upset or mad about its loss. The person in loss isn't having a good time but the people destroying his stuff where.

At an event like fanfest the people introduce themselves as their online alter ego's and I use alter ego because I highly doubt many of you enact the same behavior in game and out of game.

So here is a case,
Next time I get jumped I should claim that if the pilot blows up my ship I think I might kill myself. Now is that player on the other side of the world now responsible for what I may do, If he mails his corp and his friends a chat log showing, look at this care bear and how he tried to save his tengu, is he now at fault for any of my actions.

If anything is to be changed that won't ruin this game is a simple disclaimer in the eula stating that this is a stressful game and that you should refrain from playing if mentally unstable. Its a game that breeds distrust and power vacuums, back stabbing and cut throat politics and if you aren't in a mental capacity to handle that environment you shouldn't be playing eve online or engaging in any community that has that potential.
Chokichi Ozuwara
Perkone
Caldari State
#16 - 2012-03-27 07:11:54 UTC
Liam Mirren wrote:
Sir, I happen to notice that you seem to be quite angry.

He really is quite angry. Dude should probably logoff for 12 hours and get some perspective.

Tears will be shed and pants will need to be changed all round.

orphenshadow
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2012-03-27 07:14:08 UTC
If i call you a dumb ****, and leave it at that.

Its not bullying, its just an insult.

If i do it every day over and over again.

Then it becomes bullying.
Markus Reese
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#18 - 2012-03-27 07:20:39 UTC
Largo Usagi wrote:
**** the year i started playing eve i got poped in lowsec as a newbie scrub and harassed over and over by the same group of people about how ****** at the game I was. So was that cyber bullying 6 years ago? I argue no but some one else would look at all of the banter I got in my newbie days and say yes.

This is a sandbox game, where hate and greed form and control situations and in many cases some ones entertainment is at the expense of others. Every time some one is celebrating a titan kill there is some one else upset or mad about its loss. The person in loss isn't having a good time but the people destroying his stuff where.

At an event like fanfest the people introduce themselves as their online alter ego's and I use alter ego because I highly doubt many of you enact the same behavior in game and out of game.

So here is a case,
Next time I get jumped I should claim that if the pilot blows up my ship I think I might kill myself. Now is that player on the other side of the world now responsible for what I may do, If he mails his corp and his friends a chat log showing, look at this care bear and how he tried to save his tengu, is he now at fault for any of my actions.

If anything is to be changed that won't ruin this game is a simple disclaimer in the eula stating that this is a stressful game and that you should refrain from playing if mentally unstable. Its a game that breeds distrust and power vacuums, back stabbing and cut throat politics and if you aren't in a mental capacity to handle that environment you shouldn't be playing eve online or engaging in any community that has that potential.


Similar story for me, the noob popped, always then stuck in a war cause our noob corp was being followed.

As for the being jumped, well the reply is exactly what eve is, don't go to lowsec, don't haul 1000 plexes in an ibis on autopilot or goons are attempting to control ice market, don't like it, dont mine it.

Now if you quit your corp, joined a new corp, move from lonetrek to khanid and entire gameplay has become nothing but spin ship because a person is a rookie, that is a bit different.

To quote Lfod Shi

The ratting itself is PvE. Getting away with it is PvP.

Ciar Meara
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#19 - 2012-03-27 07:24:32 UTC
THE L0CK wrote:
Do we have a internet lawyer in the house?


We do but you probably won't like his answer.

- [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow]

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
#20 - 2012-03-27 07:31:35 UTC
wrote:
"Cyberbullying" is when a child, preteen or teen is tormented, threatened, harassed, humiliated, embarrassed or otherwise targeted by another child, preteen or teen using the Internet, interactive and digital technologies or mobile phones. It has to have a minor on both sides, or at least have been instigated by a minor against another minor. Once adults become involved, it is plain and simple cyber-harassment or cyberstalking. Adult cyber-harassment or cyberstalking is NEVER called cyberbullying.

http://www.stopcyberbullying.org/what_is_cyberbullying_exactly.html

[b]Don't worry about posting with your main!  Post with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."[/b]

123Next pageLast page