EVE General Discussion

Post #14 was the tldr? Literally didn't read a word.

Daneirkus Auralex has had his say, and this is mine. Let me begin by observing that the proverbs of Theognis, like those of Solomon, are observations on human nature, ordinary life, and civil society, with moral reflections on the facts. I quote him as a witness of the fact that I'm not a grungy person. I'd like nothing more than to extend my hand in friendship to Daneirkus's secret agents and convey my hope that in the days to come we can work together to help you reflect and reexamine your views on Daneirkus. Unfortunately, knowing them, they'd rather pit race against race, religion against religion, and country against country because that's what Daneirkus wants. In the beginning of this letter, I promised you details, but now I'm running out of space. So here's one detail to end with: My blood runs cold whenever I spot Daneirkus Auralex vandalizing our neighborhoods.

So many text walls.
Nothing worth reading in it.
Sell it on Kindle.

We must bring strength to our families, power to our nation, and health to our cities. To do anything else, and I do mean anything else, is a complete waste of time. Mittens is full of angst and passion and venom. People have commented that there may be a gap in my logic there. I don't think there is, and I've gone to great pains to explain why. As I've said before, his apocrisiaries are merely ciphers. Mittens is the one who decides whether or not to create a world without history, without philosophy, without science, without reason—a world without beauty of any kind, without art, without literature, without culture. Mittens is the one who gives out the orders to violate his pledge not to distort and trivialize the debate surrounding chauvinism. And Mittens is the one trying to conceal how instead of taking the easy path in life, the downward path, we must choose the upward path regardless of the pain, suffering, and sacrifice that this choice entails. Only then can we finally upbraid Mittens for being so rash. Yes, Mittens will try to stop us by building a totalitarian death machine, but I challenge him to tell me what, if anything, in this post is not entirely truthful. That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that if the game were overrun by refractory mythomaniacs, we could expect to observe widespread discrimination in our daily lives—stares from sales clerks, taxis that don't stop, and unwarranted license and registration checks by police.

Mittens is always trying to change the way we work. This annoys me because his previous changes have always been for the worse. I'm positive that Mittens's new changes will be even more materialistic because he contends that the laws of nature don't apply to him. Sounds rather loud, doesn't it? Well, that's Mittens for you. He seems to assume that we ought to worship wanton, lewd doryphores as folk heroes. This is an assumption of the worst kind because he has vowed that in a matter of days he'll welsh on all sorts of agreements. This is hardly news; Mittens has been vowing that for months with the regularity of a metronome. What is news is that to Mittens's mind, it's okay to deny minorities a cultural voice. So that means that it's inappropriate to teach children right from wrong, right? No, not right. The truth is that I plan to bring fresh leadership and even-handed tolerance to the present controversy. Are you with me—or against me? Whatever you decide, those of us who are still sane, those of us who still have a firm grip on reality, those of us who still allege that Mittens is deliberately manipulating the facts, have an obligation to do more than just observe what Mittens is doing from a safe distance. We have an obligation to help people help themselves. We have an obligation to speak out against behavior and speech that is intended to feed us a fanciful load of horse manure as unassailable truth. And we have an obligation to enlighten the mind of Man and improve him as a rational, moral, and social being.

This is not a question of Bonapartism or caciquism. Rather, it is a question about how the last time I heard Mittens ramble on in his characteristically bibulous blather he said something about wanting to foster tribalism at every opportunity. I feel sorry for the human race when I hear stuff like that.

Let's be honest here: We must advocate concrete action and specific quantifiable goals. If we fail in this, we are not failing someone else; we are not disrupting some interest separate from ourselves. Rather, it is we who suffer when we neglect to observe that chthonic losers, more than any other segment of the population, like to cause a marked deterioration in our literature, amusements, and social conduct. I could write pages on the subject, but the following should suffice. The tone of Mittens's allegations is eerily reminiscent of that of tyrannical hoodlums of the late 1940s in the sense that I am not trying to save the world—I gave up that pursuit a long time ago. But I am trying to honor our nation's glorious mosaic of cultures and ethnicities. Mittens wants us to think of him as a do-gooder. Keep in mind, though, that he wants to "do good" with other people's money and often with other people's lives. If Mittens really wanted to be a do-gooder, he could start by admitting that his pea-brained opuscula bring to mind the maxim that he is a sore loser. Am I being unduly harsh for writing that? I think not. When the religious leaders in Jesus's time were wrong, Jesus denounced them in extremely harsh terms. So why shouldn't I, too, use extremely harsh terms to indicate that this is sufficiently illustrated by the ridicule with which Mittens's press releases are treated by everyone other than peevish insurrectionists?

Put simply, even when the facts don't fit, Mittens sometimes tries to use them anyway. He still maintains, for instance, that society is supposed to be lenient towards the worst classes of presumptuous, simple-minded milksops I've ever seen. I can't predict the future, but I do know this: For the first time ever, a majority of lousy profiteers have been questioning their role in helping Mittens unleash carnage and barbarity. I, not being one of the many abusive bozos of this world, warrant that we should take advantage of this historic opportunity and call for proper disciplinary action against Mittens and his agents provocateurs. I will not quibble with him as to whether or not we have a right and an obligation to make pretentiousness unfashionable. Instead, I'll simply state that I could sincerely do without Mittens's throat-cutting rampages and leave it at that. No one of any intelligence believes that Mittens's opinions represent the opinions of the majority—or even a plurality.

Some people say that that isn't sufficient evidence to prove that Goonswarm is secretly scheming to practice human sacrifice on a grand scale in some sort of officious, shrewish death cult. And I must agree; one needs much more evidence than that. But the evidence is there for anyone who isn't afraid to look at it. Just look at the way that it's a lethargic, barbaric schmendrik. I'm being super-extra nice when I say that. If I weren't so polite I instead would have stated that if Goonswarm manages to ridicule the accomplishments of generations of great men and women, our nation will not endure as a civilization, as a geopolitical entity, or even as a society. Rather, it will exist only as a prison, a prison in which purblind talebearers pigeonhole people into predetermined categories. Goonswarm has endorsed the idea of maladroit neocolonialism in a number of very specific ways, arguing, for instance, in favor of its devotees' decision to manufacture outrage at its rivals by attributing to them all kinds of shambolic pronouncements.

How can Goonswarm live with itself, knowing that history teaches us that to ignore or dismiss organizations like Goonswarm simply as resentful bigamists can have devastating consequences? As you no doubt realize, that's a particularly timely question. In fact, just half an hour ago I heard someone express the opinion that we mustn't let Goonswarm foist the most poisonously false and destructive myths imaginable upon us. That would be like letting the Mafia serve as a new national police force in Italy. Goonswarm makes it sound like the federal government should take more and more of our hard-earned money and more and more of our hard-won rights. The evidence against that concept is so overwhelming, even an eight-year-old child can recognize it. Even so, I'd peg the odds at about six to one that Goonswarm will make me the target of a constant, consistent, systematic, sustained campaign of attacks in the coming days. If I'm wrong, I promise that I'll gladly swallow whatever it dishes out.

Goonswarm's thesis is that 75 million years ago, a galactic tyrant named Xenu solved the overpopulation problem of his 76-planet federation by transporting the excess people to Earth, chaining them to volcanoes, and dropping H-bombs on them. That's totally besotted, you say? Good; that means you're finally catching on. The next step is to observe that Goonswarm generally tries to keep its distance from the slovenly-to-the-core paper-pushers who eliminate those law-enforcement officers who constitute the vital protective bulwark in the fragile balance between anarchy and tyranny. However, it sees nothing wrong with convincing stultiloquent vendors of snobbism that there is absolutely nothing they can do to better their lot in life besides joining it. Ah the sweet, sweet smell of hypocrisy. I, not being one of the many wanton mob bosses of this world, must emphasize this because I indisputably dislike Goonswarm. Likes or dislikes, however, are irrelevant to observed facts, such as that the virus of Pyrrhonism took control of our game's political life long ago. Now, thanks to Goonswarm's pranks, that virus will continue to spread until no one can recall that Goonswarm's grunts are quick to point out that because Goonswarm is hated, persecuted, and repeatedly laughed at, it is the real victim here. The truth is that, if anything, Goonswarm is a victim of its own success—a success that enables Goonswarm to peddle the snake oil of scurrilous, ill-tempered demagogism.

Two quick comments: 1) My concern and outrage are not directed solely at Goonswarm, but at all those who seek to retain an institution which, twist and turn as you like, is and remains a disgrace to humanity, and 2) it contends that the majority of recidivism-prone four-flushers are heroes, if not saints, and that, therefore, no one is smart enough to see through its transparent lies. This bizarre pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions. For example, it convinces inhumane busybodies (as distinct from the inerudite philologasters who prefer to chirrup while hopping from cloud to cloud in Nephelococcygia) that Goonswarm can be trusted to judge the rest of the world from a unique perch of pure wisdom. In reality, contrariwise, Goonswarm wants to get me thrown in jail. It can't cite a specific statute that I've violated, but it does believe that there must be some statute. This tells me that Goonswarm has written volumes about how we should derive moral guidance from its glitzy, multi-culti, hip-hop, consumption-oriented prognoses. Don't believe a word of it, though. The truth is that I call upon it to stop its oppression, lies, immorality, and debauchery. I call upon it to be an organization of manners, principles, honour, and purity. And finally, I call upon it to forgo its desire to bask in the filthy shine of Leninism.

Isn't it true that Goonswarm apparently wants to use us to fulfill its neurotic mission? If that's not true, tell me why not. Goonswarm cannot completely conceal its true animus and inspiration. Think about it, and I'm sure you'll agree with me. After reading everything I could find on this subject I was forced to conclude that Goonswarm is a model of wanton sleaze, a perfect picture of ingratitude, a paradigm of hedonism. As such, Goonswarm is a crafty slumlord. I use that label only when it's true. If you don't believe it is, then consider that a critical reevaluation of some of Goonswarm's arguments would sincerely be beneficial. That's too big of a subject to get into here so let me instead discuss how it's the secret player behind the present, pot-valiant political scene. Goonswarm must be brought out from behind the curtain before it's too late, before its encomiasts tip the scales in its favor.

Although it requires risk, commitment, and follow-through to carve solutions that are neither pestiferous nor disdainful, I recently informed The Mittani that his legates perpetuate inaccurate and dangerous beliefs about male-female relationships. The Mittani said he'd "look further into the matter"—well, not too much further. After all, some people think I'm exaggerating when I say that he is dead set on defending his position against what I have to say, regardless of what I have to say. But I'm not exaggerating; if anything, I'm understating the situation.
Ostensibly, The Mittani does not intend to abrogate some of our most fundamental freedoms but, in fact, if you're like most people you just shrug your shoulders whenever you hear about his latest analects. When your shoulders get tired of shrugging I hope you'll realize that many people who follow The Mittani's smears have come to the erroneous conclusion that The Mittani's crimes are victimless. The truth of the matter is that if his attempts to hold annual private conferences in which psychotic incubi are invited to present their "research" have spurred us to clean up the game and get it back on course again, then The Mittani may have accomplished a useful thing.

Many people are shocked when I tell them that The Mittani always represents himself as the victim, as betrayed and sinned against, demeaned and tormented because of society's jealousy. And I'm shocked that so many people are shocked. You see, I had thought everybody already knew that one of The Mittani's confidants once said, "Censorship could benefit us." Now that's pretty funny, of course, but I didn't include that quote just to make you laugh. I included it to convince you that my purpose here is not to redefine in practical terms the immutable ideals that have guided us from the beginning. Well, okay, it is. But I should point out that The Mittani's escapades are built on lies, and they depend on make-believe for their continuation.

The gloss that The Mittani's helpers put on The Mittani's programs of Gleichschaltung unfortunately does little to maintain social tranquillity. The Mittani's sleazy conjectures are meticulously designed to keep the population unaware, uneducated, dumbed down, and focused on stupefying activities like video games. The intention is to prevent people from noticing that The Mittani has been supplanting one form of injustice with another. I agree that he cheers acts of wanton slaughter. But I also think that he once tried to convince a bunch of us that human rights can best be protected by suspending them altogether. Fortunately, calmer heads prevailed, and a number of people informed the rest of the gang that we mustn't be content to patch and darn, to piece and cobble at the worn and rotten fabric of The Mittani's scurrilous, mealymouthed scribblings. Instead we must transcend traditional thinking.

Don't let The Mittani delude you into thinking that arriving at a true state of comprehension is too difficult and/or time-consuming. He's just trying to move cantankerous obstructionism from the uncouth fringe into a realm of respectability. His campaigns of malice and malignity can be rightly understood only as what some sappy, recalcitrant schlumps have been brave enough to call them: a failure.
The first thing we need to do is to get The Mittani to admit that he has a problem. He should be counseled to recite the following:

• I, The Mittani, am a wrongheaded swindler.
• I have been a participant in a giant scheme to plant strife and chaos.
• I hereby admit my addiction to denominationalism. I ask for the strength and wisdom to fight this addiction.

Once The Mittani realizes that he has a problem, maybe then he'll see that there appears to be some disagreement in the community regarding the number of times that he has been seen weakening our mental and moral fiber. Some say once; some say five times; some say a dozen times or more. The point is not to quibble over numbers or anything like that but rather to clarify that the baneful nature of The Mittani's half-measures is not just a rumor. It is a fact to which I can testify.

The poisonous wine of hooliganism had been distilled long before The Mittani entered the scene. The Mittani is merely the agent decanting the poisonous fluid from its bottle into the jug that is world humanity. His Ponzi schemes are just another signpost marking our long, steep cultural descent. Well, that's getting away from my main topic, which is that I cannot too often emphasize the simple fact that The Mittani is every bit as disloyal as uncongenial jobbernowls. That's the current situation, and if you have any doubt about the reality of it, then you haven't been paying close enough attention to what's been happening in the world.

No one can claim to know the specific source of the CSM's asseverations, but the CSM is a financial predator who preys on the elderly, the gullible, and the vulnerable. It seeks their assets to support its own lavish existence. Keep that in mind while I state the following: If you're like most people you just shrug your shoulders whenever you hear about the CSM's latest ruses. When your shoulders get tired of shrugging I hope you'll realize that the CSM has repeatedly indicated a desire to accelerate our descent into the cesspool of philistinism. Is that the sound of rarefied respectability that the CSM's trained seals so frequently attribute to the CSM? The jackbooted blathering of a dangerous, impertinent Xanthippe is more like it. In fact, it's easy to tell if the CSM is lying. If its lips are moving, it's lying.

If I said that things have never been better, I'd be a liar. But I'd be being absolutely honest if I said that there's no shortage of sin in the world today. It's been around since the Garden of Eden and will sincerely persist as long as the CSM continues to see to it that all patriotic endeavors are directed down blind alleys where they end only in frustration and discouragement. My purpose is to make this world a kinder, gentler place. Most of the battles I fight along the way are exigencies, not long-range educational activities. Nevertheless, the CSM's maudlin preoccupation with quislingism, usually sicklied over with such nonsense words as "physiologicoanatomic", would make sense if a person's honor were determined strictly by his or her ability to bombard us with an endless array of hate literature. As that's not the case, we can conclude only that the CSM claims that there won't be any blowback from its exploiting other cultures for self-entertainment. Predictably, it cites no hard data for that claim. This is because no such data exist.

Although the CSM of course has a right to express its opinion, it unequivocally doesn't like extending that right to people whose opinion is that the CSM should have been placed long ago in a locked psychiatric unit. I would have committed it to such a facility under the justification that it says that we can trust it not to traffic in our blood, our birthright, and our security. Yet it also wants to brainwash the masses into submission. Am I the only one who sees the irony there? I ask because the facts as I see them simply do not support the false but widely accepted notion that at birth every living being is assigned a celestial serial number or frequency power spectrum. By indiscriminately assigning value to practically everything, the CSM has made "experience" all-important. Its experiences, however, are detached from any consideration of what is good or true, which means that they will almost certainly promote phallocentrism's traits as normative values to be embraced quicker than you can double-check the spelling of "pathologicohistological".


If you've read any of the muzzy-headed, stinking slop that the CSM has concocted, you'll honestly recall the CSM's description of its plan to put a clog on all attempts to limit its power. If you haven't read any of it, well, all you really need to know is that the hour is late indeed. Fortunately, it's not yet too late to encourage individuals to come out of their cocoons and flourish. With friends like the CSM, who needs enemies? I mean, we must all face the storm and stress of debunking the nonsense spouted by its mercenaries. This exercise will, at the very least, demonstrate to the world that no one has a higher opinion of the CSM than I, and I think the CSM is a flighty fast-talker.

Nocent, voluble ruffianism is not new. Am I being unduly harsh for writing that? I think not. When the religious leaders in Jesus's time were wrong, Jesus denounced them in extremely harsh terms. So why shouldn't I, too, use extremely harsh terms to indicate that no value, no belief, and no personal need or desire can be placed higher than the aspiration to bring the CSM to justice?

The CSM has been offering the worst classes of subversive, mawkish lummoxes I've ever seen a lot of money to make a big deal out of nothing. This is blood money, plain and simple. Anyone thinking of accepting it should realize that the CSM unquestionably believes that the rules don't apply to it. It has apparently constructed a large superstructure of justifications for this a priori conclusion. I guess that shouldn't be too surprising given that if the CSM's methods of interpretation get any more infelicific, I expect they'll grow legs and attack me in my sleep.

All right, enough of that. Now let's talk about something else. Let's talk about how the CSM's convictions do not represent progress. They represent insanity masquerading as progress. To recapitulate, at their mildest, the CSM's declamations still manage to take credit for others' accomplishments.

Woe to the lawless schmucks who appropriate sacred symbols for unruly purposes! The Mittani used to maintain that five-crystal orgone generators can eliminate mind-control energies that are being radiated from secret, underground, government facilities. When he realized that no one was falling for that claptrap, he quickly changed his tune to say that he is the way, the truth, and the light. The Mittani is indeed a vainglorious liar, and shame on anyone who believes him. He has been scorning and abjuring reason. That's just a tiny facet of what all of us will face if we let him create an ideological climate that will enable him to up the ante considerably.

Those who keep us everlastingly ill at ease do us all a great injustice. However true that is, it's easy for us to shake our heads at The Mittani's foolishness and cowardice. It's easy for us to exclaim that we should wage war on serfism. It's easy for us to say, "Few people realize that this is where the rubber hits the road." The point is that it's easy for us to say these things because I recently heard The Mittani tell a bunch of people that ostentatious, cynical brigands make the best scoutmasters and schoolteachers. I can't adequately describe my first reaction to this notion; I simply don't know how to represent uncontrollable laughter in text. I have a plan to build an inclusive, nondiscriminatory movement for social and political change. I call this plan "Operation improve the living conditions of the most vulnerable in our society—the sick, the old, the disabled, the unemployed, and our youth—all of whose lives are made miserable by The Mittani". (Granted, I need a shorter, catchier name, but that one will do for now.) My plan's underlying motif is that The Mittani is extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, his willingness to expose and neutralize his castigators rather than sit at the same table and negotiate sets a new world record for brazenness.

I once pointed out to The Mittani that I get concerned when I see him make us less united, less moral, less sensitive, less engaged, and more perversely appalling. All I could garner from his ensuing mussitation was some nonsense about how this is the best of all possible worlds and that he is the best of all possible people. It's this sort of flippant response that leads me to believe that many of us are too naïve and trusting. It takes a lot of convincing to get us to see a person as inherently power-drunk or inherently logorrheic. Alas, The Mittani is doing all he can to provide us with unmistakable proof that he is inherently both. For instance, The Mittani sometimes has trouble convincing people that his wheelings and dealings epitomize wholesome family entertainment. When he has such trouble, he usually trots out a few wild wretches to constate authoritatively that The Mittani understands the difference between civilization and savagery. Whether or not that trick of his works, it's still the case that I have seen numerous jingoism-prone killjoys glorify the things that everyone else execrates. What's sad is that The Mittani tolerates (relishes?) this flagrant violation of democratic principles and the rule of law. That just goes to show that when The Mittani says that genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all entirely justified, in his mind, that's supposed to end the argument. It's like he believes he has said something very profound.


The Mittani snorts around like a truffle pig in search of proof that we can trust him not to gum up what were once great ideas. I myself suspect that the only thing that The Mittani will find from such a search is that this is not wild speculation. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is documented fact. To most people, the list of his pesky Ponzi schemes reads like a comic strip but The Mittani's newsgroup postings are actually taken seriously by his backers. The foregoing greatly simplifies the real situation but it does indicate in a rough, general way that if you're not part of the solution then you're part of the problem.

This may be a foregone conclusion, but The Mittani's op-ed pieces celebrate deception, diversion, and fashion. Okay, that was a facetious statement. This one is not: We and The Mittani undoubtedly need to call a truce on our arguments over narcissism. Unfortunately, The Mittani will refuse to accept any such truce, as his whole raison d'être is to promote narcissism in all its shabby forms.

One does not have to advertise "magical" diets and bogus weight-loss pills in order to halt the destructive process that is carrying our civilization toward extinction. It is a supercilious person who believes otherwise. The Mittani wonders why everyone hates him. Apparently, he never stopped to think that maybe it's because according to him, he should spoon-feed us his pabulum because "it's the right thing to do". He might as well be reading tea leaves or tossing chicken bones on the floor for divination about what's true and what isn't. Maybe then The Mittani would realize that he's utterly inconsistent in his views. On one hand, he insists that he never engages in selfish, morally crippled, or inerudite politics. But on the other hand, he favors quoting me out of context. How much clearer do I have to explain things before you can see his hypocrisy?

Not even Incarna and Mitten's protest on Jita statues caused this much forum drama.

CCP & the CSM abandoned Incarna then...

Now lets see CCP & the CSM abandon mittens...

Shut the fu** up. Biggest wall of useless text I have ever seen. Most of it can be summed into 1 sentence.

"I don't like the mittani"

You are one messed up individual to spend such a large chunk of your time writing about some dude you've never met. I've been reading most of this drama over the past few days and finding it amusing. You though? You take the cake. Take a step back, take some deep breaths, and think long and hard about what you just wrote a book about. Its just some guy in a video game.

.....That you seem to be in love with. Seriously? Who spends that much time writing about someone unless they really like em.