These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

incoming tengu nerfs

Author
Akonnen
Birds of Prey Inc.
#61 - 2012-07-09 11:09:31 UTC
Removing fleet boosting capabilites of all T3 cruiser would be wise. Make command ships viable for the time it takes to train... might as well remove them completely if not.
Kaena Stark
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#62 - 2012-07-09 11:19:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Kaena Stark
Dio Chrysostom wrote:
CCP are bad people


lol yea i totally agree and stuff, can i have your things now?

Edit: as much as 100MN t3's annoy me it surely takes away from the whole "thinking outside the box" ethos of creative ship fittings to limit 100MN's to BS and so on. Maybe its just me but as soon as CCP starts taking away some of the sandbox aspects of Eve such as crazy ship fittings then its just a matter of time before the game becomes stale...
Lucious Shakiel
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#63 - 2012-07-09 11:30:23 UTC
Heavy Missiles are too powerful. They project damage faaar beyond why any medium turret can compare too, even when the turret is using T2 long range ammo, unless said turret boat uses a lot of mods to increase range. The range on those things needs to be brought in line, then a ship with a Heavy missile range bonus might be worth something.
Lilith Aurilien
State War Academy
Caldari State
#64 - 2012-07-09 11:57:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Lilith Aurilien
Amazing - 4 pages of crying, wooping, discussion and hyposthesis over what? Nothing...not one link to any source that even hints at any kind of nerf to the Tengu.

OP hasn't posted since making the topic - You all been trolled. Roll

Post a link to an official source stating the exact nature of these imaginary 'nerfs' or STFU and let this thread die...
Seishi Maru
doMAL S.A.
#65 - 2012-07-09 12:22:25 UTC
Lilith Aurilien wrote:
Amazing - 4 pages of crying, wooping, discussion and hyposthesis over what? Nothing...not one link to any source that even hints at any kind of nerf to the Tengu.

OP hasn't posted since making the topic - You all been trolled. Roll

Post a link to an official source stating the exact nature of these imaginary 'nerfs' or STFU and let this thread die...



Come on.. you must admit his trolling deserves a 8.5/10 Extremely well executed and with very little text. Based upon a latent fear of the community based on a common altough self denied perception that the tengu is overpowered :P
Tor Gungnir
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#66 - 2012-07-09 12:46:33 UTC
All-in-all, a well-executed trolling.

Space. It seems to go on and on forever. But then you get to the end and a gorilla starts throwing barrels at you.

Daniel Plain
Doomheim
#67 - 2012-07-09 13:17:29 UTC
Dio Chrysostom wrote:
I swear to god, between CCP and Blizzard player base will never trust another MMO company again. Why the F@@@ would you nerf the Tengu it is a PVE boat and your already nerfing the drakes tank. What the F%%% are you going to run sites in ? ? that can shoot farther than 5km ?


People !!! The only way we can punish CCP for their Greed and lack of intellect is by hurting their wallets. with all forms of PvP save for blob warfare nerfed. And the nerfing of the 2 most popular site running ships (Drake & Tengu) to the point of them being wothless for running sites. What do some players have left besides going to another MMO that has not sold out for profit yet.


I used to love Eve like family I held out after watching multiple friends quit over the years. I used to feel that no matter what I would never ever quit eve. But in the past 6 months CCP has ruined or announced they are ruining every single way I play the game. Now short of running sites here and there before they nerf the Tengu, all I do is log in and talk with friends who like me have been patched out of their way of life and cannot do antyhing besides talk anymore. How about you nerf something that really f's the ballance of the game up instead of make believe f's it up something like the new ASB.


I will take pleasure in CCPs demise along with actively participating in campaigns against CCP/Eve right after I let my 3 paying characters sub's run out even though I have been plexing them for months. I only wish I could take back money that I already payed to CCP in order to hasten their failure. Me and another scorned buddy of mine are going to start an anti-dust/ anti-CCP blog soon and promote it with vigor across the gaming world. Not that it will really be needed CCP will never be able to compete with GW2 when it comes out because unlike CCP GW has not spurned the hardcore PvP market (yet)


why would you necro a two month old topic with an incoherent wall of text? what's wrong with you?

I should buy an Ishtar.

Zyress
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#68 - 2012-07-09 18:48:45 UTC
Mfume Apocal wrote:
Cerb isn't bad.


The king of irrelevant range
Lin-Young Borovskova
Doomheim
#69 - 2012-07-09 19:13:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Lin-Young Borovskova
Cedo Nulli wrote:
Im guessing tengu to the ground and loki to be boosted to high heavens !

Afterall minmatars have race-right to be the best and they have been totally underpowered compared lolcaldari in this aspect.



Loki is already the second best T3 and on pair with Tengu if you put aside Command subs.
Tengu does not need nerf of any kind except that stupid command ship but hey, it's not like Booster Lokis were unknown right?
Nerf that command sub on all T3's is a very nice thing but then Tengu or Loki don't need any sort of nerf, on the other let's see what's bad on those T3's:

-Legion: awful HAM sub, Laser sub would like another hard point but maybe needs to trade a low for this (less tank moar gank)

Don't know much about this ship but these two points seem to come back again and again by people using them very often.

-Tengu: Can't fir a rack of Blasters with hybrid sub so rails don't even try or you'll commit hara kiri. Ham's Tengu don't like it X

-Proteus: Probably the worst drone boat of all, command sub is ridiculous but I will not complain here and actually would like all T3 command subs just go down the toilets.
Can't fit a decent rack of Rails and fit decent active tank without making far too much sacrifice at the point it becomes pointless, hell even without active tank fit rails on Proteus is pointless (all med Rails are total crap and med blasters still need some work)

-Loki: sacrifices far too much stuff to fit a decent rack of 720's but at least it can (Proteus don't), good DPS with AC excellent shield or armor tanked ship, can permanently run a large shield booster cap stable and still have a decent dps.

Actually I can't find those ships overpowered, they all have very strong points for something but some subs are weak and are not in need of nerfs, be it the pimped Tengu every one and his mother hates for stupid reasons, the battleship gank dps Proteus, the uber Tengu hunter armor tank double faction web Loki or the almost unbreakable Legion Brick.

I don't like the command subs anyway and think those T3 ships shouldn't be touched in any 0.000000001% before Cruiser/Battlecruiser rebalance, then see if they need nerfs or buffs, they need more buffs than nerfs right now, after cruiser/Battlecruiser rebalance it will be worst, but yes Command subs are OP on Tengu and Loki.

Just an opinion, any way until this rebalance stuff really comes up thousands if not millions will be born and others die.

Soon (TM by CCP) means in a couple years.

Instead of crying "nrf mumma nerf" fit those ships all T2 stuff and then come again say they're overpowered, they're not. Command sub needs to go away YES, give them a better logistic role YES, nerf them when those have the heaviest drawback just by undocking with before cap ships it's just plain silly and bad for the game.

brb

Tarak Addaney
Doomheim
#70 - 2012-07-09 19:34:13 UTC
Voith wrote:
Ines Tegator wrote:
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Would anyone care to link a source for this alleged tengu nerf?


There is no source cause there is no nerf. What there IS, is a discussion of ship balance from fanfest, where they state that t3 is ideally more versatile but roughly equal in power to navy faction ships, and t2 ships are more powerful at any given task but specialized. It's a discussion, that's all. Look up the fanfest feeds.

Why is it that "not surpassing T2" ships only applies to the Legion and Proteus?

Loki's and Tengu's Designers had no problem obsoleting their T2s. (Whose drone subsystem is actually inferior to T1 Vexor/Arb)

I really can't imagine how much you were dropped on your head as a child to be able to spout this line.



Caldari t2 cruisers are crap compared to everyone elses
Onictus
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#71 - 2012-07-11 07:45:05 UTC
Tarak Addaney wrote:
Voith wrote:
Ines Tegator wrote:
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Would anyone care to link a source for this alleged tengu nerf?


There is no source cause there is no nerf. What there IS, is a discussion of ship balance from fanfest, where they state that t3 is ideally more versatile but roughly equal in power to navy faction ships, and t2 ships are more powerful at any given task but specialized. It's a discussion, that's all. Look up the fanfest feeds.

Why is it that "not surpassing T2" ships only applies to the Legion and Proteus?

Loki's and Tengu's Designers had no problem obsoleting their T2s. (Whose drone subsystem is actually inferior to T1 Vexor/Arb)

I really can't imagine how much you were dropped on your head as a child to be able to spout this line.



Caldari t2 cruisers are crap compared to everyone elses


The amarr T2 line up is pretty Craptastic.....excluding the recons.

Just like caldari, if you think the falcon and room are Crap I have news for you.
Maeltstome
Ten Thousand Days
#72 - 2012-07-11 08:25:43 UTC
Onictus wrote:
Tarak Addaney wrote:
Voith wrote:
Ines Tegator wrote:
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Would anyone care to link a source for this alleged tengu nerf?


There is no source cause there is no nerf. What there IS, is a discussion of ship balance from fanfest, where they state that t3 is ideally more versatile but roughly equal in power to navy faction ships, and t2 ships are more powerful at any given task but specialized. It's a discussion, that's all. Look up the fanfest feeds.

Why is it that "not surpassing T2" ships only applies to the Legion and Proteus?

Loki's and Tengu's Designers had no problem obsoleting their T2s. (Whose drone subsystem is actually inferior to T1 Vexor/Arb)

I really can't imagine how much you were dropped on your head as a child to be able to spout this line.



Caldari t2 cruisers are crap compared to everyone elses


The amarr T2 line up is pretty Craptastic.....excluding the recons.

Just like caldari, if you think the falcon and room are Crap I have news for you.


Zealot: Excellent
Curse: Always primary due to how deadly it is
Pilgrim: Unparalleled for solo roaming in hostile space/k-space
Sacrilege: underused but definitely a strong HAC.
Guardian: Do i need to explain?

Sweeping statements like the one you just made are what create false perceptions and lead to pointless 'balancing' of ships that don't need balanced.
Mfume Apocal
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#73 - 2012-07-11 08:27:53 UTC
Onictus wrote:
The amarr T2 line up is pretty Craptastic.....excluding the recons.

Just like caldari, if you think the falcon and room are Crap I have news for you.


Counterpoints: Zealot. Devoter. Guardian. Damnation. Absolution. Heretic. Sentinel. Purifier. Vengeance. Retribution.

Amarr have a very strong T2 lineup, maybe not if all you want is "SOLO BRAWLMAN LONEWOLF PVP" but certainly not "craptastic" by any stretch.
Lin-Young Borovskova
Doomheim
#74 - 2012-07-11 18:00:26 UTC
Akonnen wrote:
Removing fleet boosting capabilites of all T3 cruiser would be wise. Make command ships viable for the time it takes to train... might as well remove them completely if not.



T3's already don't have bomber sub or interdictor sub, so I will not miss that Command sub in any terms, versatility yes, pick spec ships role no. Command ships are in need of love and some like EOS in need of total revamp, and it's not Tengus or Lokis that made it bad, it has always been.

People tend to compare Tengu with Cerberus witch only proves how horribly they know that ship. All HACs are in deep need of huge buffs, except maybe Zealot that is still an awesome ship, but this becomes then irrelevant for discussions about how much Tengu is op or not.
Also a lot of people forget Cerberus is a missile spewer at 150km with not much of a problem, the problem of Cerbeus is exactly the same all other HAC's have, fittings, bonuses. Once this is balanced, I hope properly, there will be no more false threads about this.

brb

Lin-Young Borovskova
Doomheim
#75 - 2012-07-11 18:04:34 UTC
Onictus wrote:
Tarak Addaney wrote:
Voith wrote:
Ines Tegator wrote:
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Would anyone care to link a source for this alleged tengu nerf?


There is no source cause there is no nerf. What there IS, is a discussion of ship balance from fanfest, where they state that t3 is ideally more versatile but roughly equal in power to navy faction ships, and t2 ships are more powerful at any given task but specialized. It's a discussion, that's all. Look up the fanfest feeds.

Why is it that "not surpassing T2" ships only applies to the Legion and Proteus?

Loki's and Tengu's Designers had no problem obsoleting their T2s. (Whose drone subsystem is actually inferior to T1 Vexor/Arb)

I really can't imagine how much you were dropped on your head as a child to be able to spout this line.



Caldari t2 cruisers are crap compared to everyone elses


The amarr T2 line up is pretty Craptastic.....excluding the recons.

Just like caldari, if you think the falcon and room are Crap I have news for you.



Lol dude, Amarr are just fantastic, more spec than some other races because dmg selection (vs Calamari or Matarr), but they're definitively good and have an excellent representation from small pvp to large fleets.
in fact, I think Amarr is probably the most balanced pvp race, they have very strong points and also very strong drawbacks but some how they have a very decent line up not being top dogs but sure not underdogs.

brb

Suqq Madiq
#76 - 2012-07-11 19:05:26 UTC
God's Apples wrote:
I've killed plenty of buffer and active (not just t2 fit) tengus solo with my nano cane.


The ZERO Tengu kills on your Killboard seems to indicate you may be talking out of your ass. You should get that looked at.
Mechael
Tribal Liberation Distribution and Retail
#77 - 2012-07-11 23:47:10 UTC
Hopefully they bring them in line with other cruisers (lower just about all of the stats/bonuses) so that they don't obsolete any of them. And then all that needs to happen is make warfare links only work when on grid.

Whether or not you win the game matters not.  It's if you bought it.

Voith
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#78 - 2012-07-12 05:06:41 UTC
Tarak Addaney wrote:
Voith wrote:
Ines Tegator wrote:
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Would anyone care to link a source for this alleged tengu nerf?


There is no source cause there is no nerf. What there IS, is a discussion of ship balance from fanfest, where they state that t3 is ideally more versatile but roughly equal in power to navy faction ships, and t2 ships are more powerful at any given task but specialized. It's a discussion, that's all. Look up the fanfest feeds.

Why is it that "not surpassing T2" ships only applies to the Legion and Proteus?

Loki's and Tengu's Designers had no problem obsoleting their T2s. (Whose drone subsystem is actually inferior to T1 Vexor/Arb)

I really can't imagine how much you were dropped on your head as a child to be able to spout this line.



Caldari t2 cruisers are crap compared to everyone elses

:downs:

Rooks and Falcons are horrible ships!!!!11111oneeleven

Zealot is a great all around ship, and Amarr Recons and Logi hold their own. Sacrilege is crap, the Drake out classes it.

The core point remains completely unchallenged and unassailable after 4 months: The design philosophy behind T3 was used to limit Amarr/Gallente, and was ignored to allow Caldari/Minmatar to succeed.

But this is standard for Eve and has been for years. It is easier to design two great ships and crap out two poor ones than to design 4 good ones.
Rel'k Bloodlor
Federation Front Line Report
Federation Front Line
#79 - 2012-07-12 05:07:36 UTC
I just want to see the T3's bonuses brought below there T2 counter parts. The big one here is the command bonuses BUT they all should be lower than T2's. T2's get between 3-6 bonuses some static role some buy skill level, all focused at a single goal.
On the other hand you have T3' which aside from there over heat bonuses get 5-9 other things and some exclusive to the hull(like the over heat) BUT there really needs to be more subsystems, drones for amarr missiles for minnie and the missing Ewar for not caldari just to name a few.
At the end of the day what makes a T3 great should be the choices and versatility not out doing one thing, that's what T2 is for. Right now that's not what were seeing, T3's have replaced all races command ships, some races HAC's, Some races Ewar ships, and some races sneaky sneaky Recons.
Now i love what they have done for small gang work BUT stepping on other ships toes to do it kinda sucks, all and all tho its rather moot in this necro thread as they will be "balancing" T1 cruisers and hopefully there T2 counter parts and with that perhaps the T3 will be the one in need of buffs.



And as always remember when in dought ask for a nerf to armor caps, Dark Lord knows they need them.

I wanted to paint my space ship red, but I couldn't find enough goats.