These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Proposed laser turret naming changes

First post
Author
CCP Gnauton
C C P
C C P Alliance
#1 - 2012-03-19 10:35:00 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Navigator
Hi everyone,

For the next iteration of the naming revamp, we're taking a look at the much-maligned laser turret scheme and aiming to make across-the-board improvements that will increase the scheme's usability and intuitiveness. This is the first proposed step in that direction. It's in an essentially prototypical stage right now, so by all means rip this to shreds if need be. Nice comments and suggestions most welcome as well, in case you're feeling cuddly. Also, please note that as the meta level 1-4 scheme is currently undergoing revision and redesign, the examples below do not take meta changes into account and therefore are not final. They are only intended to serve as examples of the changes within the laser turret scheme itself. Without further ado:


SMALL BEAM LASERS:
Split into two subcategories:
Dual Light guns and Medium guns
Proposed Changes:
Dual Light becomes Dual Gatling
Medium becomes Light

Examples:
Dual Modulated Light Energy Beam I becomes Dual Gatling Modulated Energy Beam I
Medium Modulated Energy Beam I becomes Light Modulated Energy Beam I

Comments: One of the main goals with the new scheme is to bring every module name into line with the actual size class of the module in question. For this reason, Medium needed to get the axe here. In order for that to happen and still make sense, we needed a new name for the Dual Lights (since Dual Lights would obviously be a more powerful gun than a simple Light gun). Gatlings are known to laser users as the smallest (read: lowest damage/highest RoF) guns in a given subclass, so it made sense to rename the Dual Light to a Dual Gatling so it would sit naturally in the hierarchy. As with everything else here, if this is founded on some fallacy we're not aware of, by all means let us know. (And yes, the Dual Gatling is a more powerful gun than the regular pulse Gatling, so the two still have proper cross-category context.)


SMALL PULSE LASERS:
Split into three subcategories:
Gatling guns, Dual guns and Medium guns
Proposed Changes:
Medium becomes Light

Example:
Medium Modal Pulse Laser I becomes Light Modal Pulse Laser I

Comments: Fairly straightforward here, as far as we can tell. We thought about changing "Dual" to "Dual Light" here in order to make the Gatling-to-Light hierarchy more defined across the Small size class, but given the responses to past iterations of this project we're more inclined to err on the side of making as few changes as possible, to minimize player confusion in adapting to the new scheme. If you have compelling reasons why changing Dual to Dual Light would give benefits that would outweigh the player confusion caused by having the name hop the category from Beam to Pulse, please do sound off.


MEDIUM BEAM LASERS:
Split into three subcategories:
Quad Light guns, Focused Medium guns and Heavy guns
Proposed Changes:
Quad Light becomes Quad Gatling
Heavy becomes Solid-State Medium

Examples:
Quad Anode Light Particle Stream I becomes Quad Anode Gatling Particle Stream I
Heavy Modulated Energy Beam I becomes Solid-State Modulated Energy Beam

Comments: Gatling, once again, was pulled in here to serve as the lowest rung within a given size and class. Solid-State is one of the better suggestions we've been able to come up with to denote a high-damage laser while remaining lateral to the size issue, but the name is by no means final. If you have better suggestions that you wish us to consider, feel free to throw them into the thread. We can't guarantee anything, but we'll give everything its fair shake.


MEDIUM PULSE LASERS:
Split into two subcategories:
Focused guns and Heavy guns
Proposed Changes:
Heavy becomes Medium

Example:
Heavy Afocal Pulse Maser I becomes Medium Afocal Pulse Maser I

Comments: Again, fairly straightforward here, but if you see anything we've overlooked, you know what to do.


LARGE BEAM LASERS:
Split into three subcategories:
Dual Heavy guns, Mega guns and Tachyon guns
Proposed Changes:
Dual Heavy becomes Heavy

Example:
Dual Heavy Beam Laser II becomes Heavy Beam Laser II

Comments: Minimal, but we hope it nudges things into place while not attempting to fix anything that isn't broken.


LARGE PULSE LASERS:
Split into two subcategories:
Dual Heavy guns and Mega guns
Proposed Changes:
Dual Heavy becomes Heavy

Example:
Dual Heavy Afocal Pulse Maser I becomes Heavy Afocal Pulse Maser I



That's the long and the short of it for now. It's entirely possible that we've committed some conceptual errors that need ironing out. Please tell us what you think works, what you think doesn't, and what needs to be taken out back of the shed and shot in the head. This early stage is your greatest chance to affect the way this will shake out in the long run, so please be frank and unsparing with your feedback.

Thanks!
JamesCLK
#2 - 2012-03-19 10:38:03 UTC  |  Edited by: JamesCLK
Just to get this clear right off the bat; this thread is for the community (us) to debate the actual names of the modules being brought up, right? Not the structure of the meta naming convention.
e.g we'd be discussing the merit of using "Light Energy Beam" over "Medium Energy Beam", not if "modulated" is a good name for a meta level.

/chews on the names.

Okay, so I'm going through these changes and a few things popped out at me (these notes are really haphazardly structured, sorry in advance):

Small Lasers:
Is there a particular reason you didn't settle for "Dual" over "Dual Gatling"? It would still be painfully obvious that a said gun is either pulse or beam regardless, not to mention that the dual beam doesn't visually fit the concept of "gatling" as opposed to the Gatling Pulse Laser.
Rec. "Dual Modulated Light Energy Beam" becomes "Dual Modulated Energy Beam" to match "Dual Modal Pulse Laser"

What you could do is maybe make the new "Light" category 'feel' bigger than the "Dual".
"Solid-State Light Energy Beam I" anyone?

On the pulse laser front:
Don't bother changing anything but the medium pulse laser; gatling and dual already make as much sense as they can in context.

Medium Lasers:
Again, no need to insert Gatling into the quad beam, the old Quad Light already does a good job of conveying that it is the smallest beam calibre of its size (it has Light in its name).
I support using Solid-State to replace Heavy, it feels scifi (despite the forthcoming age of SSDs) despite the... possible innuendo? P
Beams and Pulses aren't that different in the end, so my personal suggestion for the old "Heavy Pulse Laser" would be "Liquid-State Medium Pulse Laser".

Large Lasers:
Not much to comment about, it's pretty straight forward (read: people will rage if you touch their Tachyons Blink).


I may or may not have more ideas to add to this, but I'm actually expecting Nova Fox to chime in with his usual flurry of name ideas.

-- -.-- / -.-. .-.. --- -. . / .. ... / - --- --- / . -..- .--. . -. ... .. ...- . / - --- / ..- -. -.. --- -.-. -.- / ... - --- .--. / .--. .-.. . .- ... . / ... . -. -.. / .... . .-.. .--. / ... - --- .--.

CCP Gnauton
C C P
C C P Alliance
#3 - 2012-03-19 10:39:29 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Gnauton
Yes, the scheme itself; specifically whether it's clear and intuitive enough to minimize confusion to laser turret users. The names themselves (modulated et al) are of secondary import here, since we want to try to change only what we need to change so that the user pain of adjusting to new stuff is as minimal as possible.

That said, all comments on the one new name addition (Solid-State) are welcome.
ConranAntoni
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#4 - 2012-03-19 10:43:24 UTC
Hm, interesting proposal but I don't truly see the issue at hand, not trolling, just saying. I mean who purchasing under market tab their clearly in their alloted area and in hanger you can see the gun size etc fairly easily also.

Empyrean Warriors - Recruiting now.

seany1212
M Y S T
#5 - 2012-03-19 11:02:05 UTC
This is one of the more logical name changes and should have been changed over the whole shield module adjustment any day. Having small lasers named mediums has always seemed a bit squiff to me too, for once in a module name changing thread +1 Cool
impli
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#6 - 2012-03-19 11:06:59 UTC  |  Edited by: impli
Thats a good change.. in the beginning I was confused and put medium laser guns on my harbinger.. and wondered why there is an S in the gun icon... but that was years ago.. Roll

good change .. keep going.
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
#7 - 2012-03-19 11:29:17 UTC  |  Edited by: War Kitten
From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatling

"The Gatling gun's operation centered on a cyclic multi-barrel design which facilitated cooling and synchronized the firing/reloading sequence. Each barrel fired a single shot when it reached a certain point in the cycle, after which it ejected the spent cartridge, loaded a new round, and in the process, cooled down somewhat. This configuration allowed higher rates of fire to be achieved without the barrel overheating."



Yep, sounds exactly like layzors to me.

Solid-State must be a huge jump up from the rotating barrel of a gatling laser, taking things into 20th century electronics.


Some better lasery adjectives off the top of my head: Focused, precision, wide-beam, narrow-beam, low-divergence, Guassian, temporal, coherent, phased....

I don't judge people by their race, religion, color, size, age, gender, or ethnicity. I judge them by their grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, clarity of expression, and logical consistency.

JamesCLK
#8 - 2012-03-19 11:32:45 UTC
War Kitten wrote:
From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatling

"The Gatling gun's operation centered on a cyclic multi-barrel design which facilitated cooling and synchronized the firing/reloading sequence. Each barrel fired a single shot when it reached a certain point in the cycle, after which it ejected the spent cartridge, loaded a new round, and in the process, cooled down somewhat. This configuration allowed higher rates of fire to be achieved without the barrel overheating."



Yep, sounds exactly like layzors to me.

Solid-State must be a huge jump up from the rotating barrel of a gatling laser, taking things into 20th century electronics.


Myeap, and this right here is why I'm a bit on edge about slinging the term "Gatling" around when the only laser we have that actually looks like a gatling gun is the one that goes on frigates.

-- -.-- / -.-. .-.. --- -. . / .. ... / - --- --- / . -..- .--. . -. ... .. ...- . / - --- / ..- -. -.. --- -.-. -.- / ... - --- .--. / .--. .-.. . .- ... . / ... . -. -.. / .... . .-.. .--. / ... - --- .--.

Gripen
#9 - 2012-03-19 11:43:29 UTC
Rename the stuff as you like but please, scrap that Upgraded-Limited-Experimental-Prototype meta level name homogenization scheme.

Immersion/roleplay/gameworld complexity is one of the weakest points of EVE in my opinion. Don't nail last bits of it by removing original item names. For some type of players they have more importance than you seem to think.
Sirinda
Ekchuah's Shrine Comporium
#10 - 2012-03-19 11:48:40 UTC
I honestly stopped reading at gatling lasers.

Seriously, you'd be better off with one barrel and a huge coolant sleeve instead of several barrels rotating so the air can cool them faster. Oh wait.

Plus, you have no ammo feed that could possibly take advantage of a gatling-style laser weapon.

Don't even get me started on the single focusing crystal.


Call them something else, Rapid Fire Light Lasers, for all I care. Same goes for pulse lasers.

Or call them Small/Medium/Large/XLarge Light/Medium(Dual Light?)/Heavy Beam/Pulse Lasers.


Don't try to reinvent the wheel. Don't try naming a rifle with attached scope a "scoped long range precision rifle", because that's exactly what I think you're about to do. Just call it a scoped rifle. That is all
Sunji Togenada
Doomheim
#11 - 2012-03-19 11:58:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Sunji Togenada
CCP Gnauton wrote:


SMALL BEAM LASERS:
Split into two subcategories:
Dual Light guns and Medium guns
Proposed Changes:
Dual Light becomes Dual Gatling
Medium becomes Light

Examples:
Dual Modulated Light Energy Beam I becomes Dual Gatling Modulated Energy Beam I
Medium Modulated Energy Beam I becomes Light Modulated Energy Beam I



SMALL PULSE LASERS:
Split into three subcategories:
Gatling guns, Dual guns and Medium guns
Proposed Changes:
Medium becomes Light

MEDIUM BEAM LASERS:
Split into three subcategories:
Quad Light guns, Focused Medium guns and Heavy guns
Proposed Changes:
Quad Light becomes Quad Gatling





I'm not too sold on the use of gatling for more laser types, unless you intend on changing the 3d models you will have a whole line of "gatling" lasers where only one type (the current gatling pulse laser) actually has multiple spinning barrels.

It sounds kind of silly to me in the first place. A gatling laser? Quad gatling lasers? That's just fallout silly.

The small lasers in general are kind of a mess and I echo the other suggestions in the thread for renaming them, something that makes it very clear at first glance that the dual lasers are weaker than the light lasers.

Call them "split light beam laser" instead of "dual light beam laser"? Or something to make the high-end light lasers sound more beefy?



CCP Gnauton wrote:


MEDIUM PULSE LASERS:
Split into two subcategories:
Focused guns and Heavy guns
Proposed Changes:
Heavy becomes Medium

Example:
Heavy Afocal Pulse Maser I becomes Medium Afocal Pulse Maser I

Comments: Again, fairly straightforward here, but if you see anything we've overlooked, you know what to do.


As I understand the changes to heavy pulse lasers you've now got "Focused Medium Pulse Laser" and "Medium Pulse Laser".

A player glancing at that is going to get confused. A "focused" medium pulse laser sounds a lot cooler and harder-hitting than its plain old boring medium pulse laser cousin, but as we know the focused pulse laser is the weaker, faster gun.


CCP Gnauton wrote:



LARGE BEAM LASERS:
Split into three subcategories:
Dual Heavy guns, Mega guns and Tachyon guns
Proposed Changes:
Dual Heavy becomes Heavy

Example:
Dual Heavy Beam Laser II becomes Heavy Beam Laser II

Comments: Minimal, but we hope it nudges things into place while not attempting to fix anything that isn't broken.


LARGE PULSE LASERS:
Split into two subcategories:
Dual Heavy guns and Mega guns
Proposed Changes:
Dual Heavy becomes Heavy

Example:
Dual Heavy Afocal Pulse Maser I becomes Heavy Afocal Pulse Maser I




These do feel like fixing what isn't broken. I would hope a player reading just the names would assume that a MEGA LASER kicks more ass than a dual heavy laser, and with this change the obviously twin-barreled lasers (take a look at the 3d models) are just described as drab "heavy lasers". If you're going to do that, why wouldn't you go back and eliminate the "dual laser" names for the light turrets as well?

Perhaps you should borrow from the naming schemes of the other turret types and change "dual heavy" to "dual medium" pulse/beam lasers.
Acac Sunflyier
The Ascended Academy
#12 - 2012-03-19 12:13:56 UTC
Yeah I do think they need to be renamed and organized better. I look at lasers and then say to myself, "Maybe later!" It's honestly something that holds me back from getting into amarr. The minmitar and gallente have very easy to understand weapons. The bigger the number in front of the mm, the bigger the hit. Why does the small market group have medium guns listed under it for lasers? Can't you fix that? Especially since there is a medium laser section of the market.
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
#13 - 2012-03-19 12:32:43 UTC
Acac Sunflyier wrote:
Yeah I do think they need to be renamed and organized better. I look at lasers and then say to myself, "Maybe later!" It's honestly something that holds me back from getting into amarr. The minmitar and gallente have very easy to understand weapons. The bigger the number in front of the mm, the bigger the hit. Why does the small market group have medium guns listed under it for lasers? Can't you fix that? Especially since there is a medium laser section of the market.


This has simplicity written all over it...

Give lasers a megawatt, gigawatt, something-awatt power rating that increases logically.

Simple. Elegant. Effective.

/thread

I don't judge people by their race, religion, color, size, age, gender, or ethnicity. I judge them by their grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, clarity of expression, and logical consistency.

Sturmwolke
#14 - 2012-03-19 13:26:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Sturmwolke
SMALL BEAM LASERS
Beam lasers SHOULD NOT hold the "Gatling" term (it's pulse lasers specific), please don't screw around trying to homogenize everything with the term "Gatling".
The original term is fine. See:

Dual Light Beam Laser I
Dual Modulated Light Energy Beam I

Light Beam Laser I
Light Modulated Energy Beam I


SMALL PULSE LASERS
Simple continuity from the beam version. "Gatling Light" inserted for improved clarity.
See:

Gatling Light Pulse Laser I
Gatling Modulated Light Pulse Energy Beam I

Dual Light Pulse Laser I
Dual Modulated Light Pulse Energy Beam I

Light Pulse Laser I
Light Modulated Pulse Energy Beam I


MEDIUM BEAM LASERS
Again, remove the term "Gatling" from the beam laser family. The quad laser is probably the most confounding due to its name. It just needs a small and simple touch. "Solid-state" is an ungraceful name, some better alternates are "Positron/Antiproton" (the reasoning for this is to aim for a loose association with the next level tachyon beams), but I'm in more favor just sticking in "Medium". There may be some initial confusion (with the current Medium Beam), however in the long run, it should work out fine. See:

Quad Medium Beam Laser I
Quad Modulated Medium Energy Beam I

Focused Medium Beam Laser I
Focused Modulated Medium Energy Beam I

Medium Beam Laser I
Medium Modulated Medium Energy Beam I

Edit: Striked the extraneous "Medium"


MEDIUM PULSE LASERS
Simple continuity from the beam version.

Focused Medium Pulse Laser I
Focused Modulated Medium Pulse Energy Beam I

Medium Pulse Laser I
Medium Modulated Pulse Energy Beam I


LARGE BEAM LASERS
There's nothing wrong with the current scheme. It should be preserved. When you omit "Dual", you screw the actual turret art.
"Heavy" inserted for improved clarity. See:

Dual Heavy Beam Laser I
Dual Modulated Heavy Energy Beam I

Mega Beam Laser I
Mega Modulated Heavy Energy Beam I

Tachyon Beam Laser I
Tachyon Modulated Heavy Beam Laser I


LARGE PULSE LASERS
Simple continuity from the beam version.

Dual Heavy Pulse Laser I
Dual Modulated Heavy Pulse Energy Beam I

Mega Pulse Laser I
Mega Modulated Heavy Pulse Energy Beam I
Ciar Meara
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#15 - 2012-03-19 13:42:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Ciar Meara
War Kitten wrote:


Give lasers a megawatt, gigawatt, something-awatt power rating that increases logically.

Simple. Elegant. Effective.

/thread


This, and the Gatling comment everybody has, Quad gatling just sounds silly, megawat, gigawat, hell even ectowat sounds A+

- [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow]

Jacob Holland
Weyland-Vulcan Industries
#16 - 2012-03-19 13:49:05 UTC
The turret models show twin beams on dual and so on so gatling should be avoided for all but the existing gatling IMHO...

Gatling
Dual Light
Light Tachyon

Quad Light (shouldn’t cause more confusion than Dual 150mm Railgun for example)
Medium
Medium Tachyon

Dual Medium (shouldn’t cause more confusion than Dual 250mm Railgun for example)
Mega
Tachyon

As suggested earlier light could be replaced with kilowatt, medium with megawatt, and mega (to be added as a prefix for Tachy’s too) with gigawatt - the Capital turrets are already duals and so continue an apparent progression but could be adjusted to Terawatt to avoid confusion.
John Maynard Keynes
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#17 - 2012-03-19 14:27:37 UTC  |  Edited by: John Maynard Keynes
CCP Gnauton wrote:

Stuff

It is still too complicated. When i try to find out what a certain name actually means I always look at the meta level and fittig prereqs.


Make simpler and less opaque.

Implement an unanimous structure for all guns!
[size]["calibre"][meta][type][category]

Proposal for lasers (you can do it with all guns):

Small light (for meta--> Basic, Limited, Standard and Improved) pulse/beam laser I
Small heavy (for meta--> Basic, Limited, Standard and Improved) pulse/beam laser I
Small mega (for meta--> Basic, Limited, Standard and Improved) pulse llaser I

Medium light (for meta--> Basic, Limited, Standard and Improved) pulse/beam laser I
Medium Heavy (for meta--> Basic, Limited, Standard and Improved) pulse/beam laser I
Medium Mega (for meta--> Basic, Limited, Standard and Improved) beam laser I

Large light (for meta--> Basic, Limited, Standard and Improved) pulse/beam laser I
Large heavy (for meta--> Basic, Limited, Standard and Improved) pulse/beam laser I
Larger mega (for meta--> Basic, Limited, Standard and Improved) beam laser I


This system is by far easier to understand and is transferable to other guns as well.

"Large mega limited beam laser" becomes "Large mega limited artillery gun"
And i don't have to ask myself what meta lvl scout stands for and what the name for meta 3 for other guns is.

P.S: I think it will be easy for everyone to adjust to this system, it is pretty intuitive. It is always the same structure [size]["calibre"][meta][Type][category]
Bienator II
madmen of the skies
#18 - 2012-03-19 14:48:04 UTC
THANK YOU!

how to fix eve: 1) remove ECM 2) rename dampeners to ECM 3) add new anti-drone ewar for caldari 4) give offgrid boosters ongrid combat value

Lyron-Baktos
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2012-03-19 14:57:17 UTC
as I'm now training for Amaar, the guns on their ships are confusing so I'm glad this change is coming
JamesCLK
#20 - 2012-03-19 16:16:14 UTC  |  Edited by: JamesCLK
TL;DR: Before we start coming up with names, the naming structure needs to be fixed.

    Rather than stumble around with just the information in the first post, I looked at the evelopedia entry for small beam turrets - here are five names for (essentially) the same small beam turret:
  • Dual Light Beam Laser I
  • Dual Afrocal Light Maser I
  • Dual Annode Light Particle Stream I
  • Dual Modal Light Laser I
  • Dual Modulated Light Energy Beam I

  • Can you spot the problems? Here are a few I noted:
  • 3 of them don't even have the words "Beam" and/or "Laser" in the name.
  • None of them share any similarities beyond "Dual" and "Light"
  • You must memorise each and every one of the names to make any sense of which is better or even what type they are. I'm willing to bet that more than one person -- and other than myself -- initially fit beams thinking they were pulses due to the name, or vice versa (don't get me started on the dual pulse that uses both beam and pulse in the same name).


First things first: All laser turret names -- regardless of meta or tech -- should contain calibre, size, and type.
This means that your "Dual Annode Light Particle Stream I" needs to contain the following words:
"Dual", "Light", "Beam" and "Laser".
Anything beyond that is flavour and is debatable, but at the very least unify these meta names into some kind of coherant structure.

"[Calibre][Meta][Size][Type][Tech]" would fit with the current system IMO.
Hence, "Dual Annode Light Particle Stream I" would be renamed to "Dual Annode Light Beam Laser I".

What one would call individual components boils down to name flavour, but the key here is creating a unified and easy to pick up structure that you can name all energy turrets under. And that last part is important; projectile turret names could have a different structure to lasers, could have a different structure to hybrids, could have a different structure to propulsion modules - idealy flavoured by primary developer (racial) influence.

Four parameters with arguably interchangable orders allows for up to 24 different naming structures - some of them won't make much sense ("Pulse Laser Annode Light Dual I" for instance), but others aren't as big a stretch to fit the current names into. Changing the words within these structures is 100% flavour- however the most important part is that all pulse lasers have "pulse laser" in the name; all beam lasers have "beam laser" in the name.

I hope this didn't come across as anything short of constructive - I apreciate the decision to start this thread and get our opinions on the matter.
I'll have another post in the making about my own suggestions as for what the calibres could be named, later.

-- -.-- / -.-. .-.. --- -. . / .. ... / - --- --- / . -..- .--. . -. ... .. ...- . / - --- / ..- -. -.. --- -.-. -.- / ... - --- .--. / .--. .-.. . .- ... . / ... . -. -.. / .... . .-.. .--. / ... - --- .--.

123Next pageLast page